Visual map of the EEF Sutton Trust toolkit

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improving Education: A triumph of hope over experience
Advertisements

Practice and research in education: How can we make both better, and better aligned? Robert ResearchED 2013, Dulwich College, 7 Sept 2013.
Effect Size Robert ResearchED 2013, Dulwich College, 7 Sept 2013.
USING EVIDENCE TO INFORM YOUR LEADERSHIP APPROACH AND SUPPORT SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT ROB CARPENTER 26 TH SEPTEMBER 2013
Dorset Leadership Conference, 2013 Using evidence to inform your leadership approach and support school improvement James Richardson 5 th November 2013.
The Pupil Premium Grant (PPG) & The Sutton Trust Analysis of best practice usage Virtual School for Looked After Children.
Exploring Research-Led Approaches to Increasing Pupil Learning Steve Higgins School of Education, Durham University Addressing.
Pupil premium toolkit: what works best at raising school achievement? Dr Lee Elliot Major, Director of Research and Policy, Sutton Trust, and EEF trustee.
Spending the Pupil Premium: Strategies to Improve Learning
Research-Led Approaches to Increasing Pupil Learning BOWDEN ROOM.
Effective use of the Pupil Premium to close the attainment gap James Richardson Senior Analyst, Education Endowment Foundation 27 th June 2014
1 Research and Development From CEM CEM conference: Improving Pupil Assessment London 7th June 2011.
1 The Pupil Premium How to Spend it Wisely Robert Coe Director of the Centre for Evaluation & Monitoring (CEM) and Professor of Education, Durham University.
Embedding employability skills in teaching maths Janice Richards MEI Tricia Hartley Campaign for Learning Jamie Allen Ravens Wood School.
Southend-on-Sea Pupil Premium Network March 2015.
Using evidence to raise the attainment of children facing disadvantage James Richardson Senior Analyst, Education Endowment Foundation 1 st April 2014.
How can evidence contribute to closing the attainment gap? James Richardson & Jonathan Sharples Education Endowment Foundation 16 th March 2015
GROVE WOOD PRIMARY SCHOOL PUPIL PREMIUM – OUR STORY.
The Aspirer Teaching Alliance in conjunction with Cheshire East LA.
Narrowing the gap and the effective use of the Pupil and Service Premium with SEN young people Glyn Wright Autumn Term 2013.
What makes schools improve Primary headteachers February / March 2014.
SEND Reforms 2014 Linda Calverley: Head of SEND Services Paul Silvester: Deputy Headteacher North Ridge School Route 2000 Friday 14 th March 2014.
Using research to get the best value from the Pupil Premium Steve Higgins, School of Education, Durham National.
Research evidence and effective use of the Pupil Premium Professor Steve Higgins, School of Education, Durham
Closing the gap Evidence-based use of the pupil premium Robert Coe Closing the Gap in North Yorkshire, Harrogate, 27 June
Pupil Premium Grant: Report for Governors July 2014 PPG statement: Rationale and Principles: Luke’s CE Primary school acknowledges that the PPG is provided.
Planning high quality, evidence based provision to meet the needs and achieve the outcomes How do you know what works?
Welcome & Introduction.  The largest educational research unit in a UK university (75 staff)  1.1 million assessments are taken each year  More than.
The Pupil Premium: Using Evidence to Narrow the Gap Robbie Coleman 7 th July 2014
Research-Led Approaches to Increasing Pupil Learning Robert Coe Capita Conference: Implementing the Pupil Premium Newcastle, 8 July 2013.
ResearchED Time for a reality check? Robert Coe ResearchED Research Leads Network Day, 13 December 2014.
Using Evidence to Narrow the Gaps. What is the Education Endowment Foundation? In 2011 the Education Endowment Foundation was set up by Sutton Trust as.
Strategies for S&C Intervention. Ofsted “The creation of a culture of high expectation and aspirations and scholastic excellence in which the.
1 ADES Conference Educational Outcomes and the London Challenge Frankie Sulke 19 November 2015.
Evidence-based use of the pupil premium Robert Coe Durham Leadership Conference, 26 June
The Coseley School A Co-operative Trust Closing the Gap Strategies – 2015/16 Believe, Achieve, Excel Closing the Gap Strategies – 2015/16 Believe, Achieve,
Joe Murray Consulting Working effectively with teaching assistants Annual Secondary Mathematics Conference National STEM Centre, University.
Dylan Wiliam Why and How Assessment for Learning Works
Pupil Premium Plus Designated Teacher for LAC Training February 2015.
A Quick Guide to Pupil Premium Spending. Interesting Data Based on 2013 data the gap between FSM and non FSM students gets wider as students get older.
Provision for Looked after Children at St Cuthbert’s.
The power of feedback: insights from research Dr Lee Elliot Major Director of Research, Sutton Trust, Chair of evaluation advisory group, Education Endowment.
Planning high quality, evidence based provision to meet the needs and achieve the outcomes How do you know what works?
VISIBLE LEARNING VISIBLE LEARNING St Mary’s RC High School.
Planning Key Stage 3 National Literacy Trust
The Pupil Premium Action Plan- making it work for Tidcombe
Feedback and learning Professor Steve Higgins,
Effective Primary Teaching Practice 2016: THE IMPORTANCE OF RECEPTION
Reporting of end of Key Stage assessments
Raising standards, improving lives
Dissemination and scale-up is the key to the EEF’s impact.
Thinking with Technology Course Module 4
How are more effective schools supporting disadvantaged pupils to achieve? Shona Macleod NFER November 2016.
Pupil Premium Grant: Report for Governors for 2014/2015
Making Research Stick By John, Tom and Joanne.
OFSTED and the role of Teaching Assistants
Using data and evidence to improve performance
Metacognition and Self-regulation.
Evidence in Action: Using Research to Narrow the Gap Eleanor Stringer
Assessment in Transition: SOLO Taxonomy
Swaledale Alliance Pupil Premium Research 13th October 2017
For Improving Outcomes
Homework.
Professional evidence
TA Toolkit Teacher Session
Virtual School for Looked After Children
Outcomes for pupils were variable over time
The EEF approach Sir Kevan Collins 25th March 2019.
School Review – Monitoring visit from Ofsted
Presentation transcript:

Visual map of the EEF Sutton Trust toolkit 26/11/2018

The Sutton Trust-EEF Toolkit The Sutton Trust-EEF Teaching and Learning Toolkit is designed to provide a summary of current evidence in a useable form for an audience that includes teachers and school leaders. It reviews the evidence in terms of the amount of progress that can be expected by carrying out an intervention and compares it to the cost of the intervention. It also provides an indication of the strength of the supporting evidence. 26/11/2018

The Sutton Trust-EEF Toolkit in short it tells you… what works what it costs how well we know this 26/11/2018

What is new is that this information has been put on a Visual Map 26/11/2018

Visual map of the EEF Sutton Trust toolkit Average impact/ months of additional progress Up to £80 per pupil Up to £170 per pupil Up to £700 per pupil Up to £1200 per pupil Over £1200 per pupil Cost Key The size of the bubble indicates strength of evidence base: a larger bubble = stronger evidence No systematic analysis At least one meta-analysis/ review At least two meta-analyses/ reviews At least three meta-analyses/ reviews Data taken from http://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/toolkit 26/11/2018

Visual map of the EEF Sutton Trust toolkit Average impact/ months of additional progress Up to £80 per pupil Up to £170 per pupil Up to £700 per pupil Up to £1200 per pupil Over £1200 per pupil Cost Key The size of the bubble indicates strength of evidence base: a larger bubble = stronger evidence No systematic analysis At least one meta-analysis/ review At least two meta-analyses/ reviews At least three meta-analyses/ reviews More effective Cheaper Data taken from http://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/toolkit 26/11/2018

What does kind of intervention does each dot represent? 26/11/2018

Visual map of the EEF Sutton Trust toolkit Average impact/ months of additional progress Up to £80 per pupil Up to £170 per pupil Up to £700 per pupil Up to £1200 per pupil Over £1200 per pupil Cost Key The size of the bubble indicates strength of evidence base: a larger bubble = stronger evidence No systematic analysis At least one meta-analysis/ review At least two meta-analyses/ reviews At least three meta-analyses/ reviews Metacognition & Self regulation (outer bubble) Feedback (inner bubble) Early years intervention Peer tutoring Collaborative learning (inner bubble) One to one tuition Homework secondary (outer bubble) Social & emotional learning Behavioural intervention (outer bubble) Small group tuition (inner bubble) Phonics  Digital technology Parental involvement (outer bubble) Reducing class size Summer schools (inner bubble) Individualised instruction Sports participation Learning styles Extended school time Arts participation After school programmes Homework primary Mentoring Block scheduling (outer bubble) Performance pay Teaching assistants Physical environment Aspiration interventions School uniform (inner bubble) Data taken from http://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/toolkit Ability grouping 26/11/2018

Now we know what the interventions are, where do we start? 26/11/2018

Visual map of the EEF Sutton Trust toolkit Average impact/ months of additional progress Up to £80 per pupil Up to £170 per pupil Up to £700 per pupil Up to £1200 per pupil Over £1200 per pupil Cost Key The size of the bubble indicates strength of evidence base: a larger bubble = stronger evidence No systematic analysis At least one meta-analysis/ review At least two meta-analyses/ reviews At least three meta-analyses/ reviews These are the lowest cost, highest impact strategies. Start by considering intervention in these areas. Key The size of the bubble indicates strength of evidence base: a larger bubble = stronger evidence No systematic analysis At least one meta-analysis/ review At least two meta-analyses/ reviews At least three meta-analyses/ reviews Metacognition & Self regulation (outer bubble) Feedback (inner bubble) Peer tutoring Collaborative learning (inner bubble) Homework secondary (outer bubble) Social & emotional learning Phonics Data taken from http://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/toolkit 26/11/2018

Visual map of the EEF Sutton Trust toolkit Metacognition & Self regulation (outer bubble) Feedback (inner bubble) Please click on any label to link to the toolkit Peer tutoring Collaborative learning (inner bubble) Homework secondary (outer bubble) Social & emotional learning Phonics Data taken from http://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/toolkit 26/11/2018

Visual map of the EEF Sutton Trust toolkit Average impact/ months of additional progress Up to £80 per pupil Up to £170 per pupil Up to £700 per pupil Up to £1200 per pupil Over £1200 per pupil Cost Key The size of the bubble indicates strength of evidence base: a larger bubble = stronger evidence No systematic analysis At least one meta-analysis/ review At least two meta-analyses/ reviews At least three meta-analyses/ reviews Key The size of the bubble indicates strength of evidence base: a larger bubble = stronger evidence No systematic analysis At least one meta-analysis/ review At least two meta-analyses/ reviews At least three meta-analyses/ reviews These strategies are much more expensive, but they have strong positive effects, so consider these next. These strategies are an effective way to deploy pupil premium funding. Early years intervention One to one tuition Behavioural intervention (outer bubble) Small group tuition (inner bubble)  Digital technology Parental involvement (outer bubble) Reducing class size Summer schools (inner bubble) Data taken from http://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/toolkit 26/11/2018

Visual map of the EEF Sutton Trust toolkit Early years intervention One to one tuition Behavioural intervention (outer bubble) Small group tuition (inner bubble)  Digital technology Parental involvement (outer bubble) Summer schools (inner bubble) Reducing class size Data taken from http://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/toolkit 26/11/2018

Visual map of the EEF Sutton Trust toolkit Average impact/ months of additional progress Up to £80 per pupil Up to £170 per pupil Up to £700 per pupil Up to £1200 per pupil Over £1200 per pupil Cost Key The size of the bubble indicates strength of evidence base: a larger bubble = stronger evidence No systematic analysis At least one meta-analysis/ review At least two meta-analyses/ reviews At least three meta-analyses/ reviews Key The size of the bubble indicates strength of evidence base: a larger bubble = stronger evidence No systematic analysis At least one meta-analysis/ review At least two meta-analyses/ reviews At least three meta-analyses/ reviews Although these are lower impact, they still have a positive impact and are relatively low cost. Consider these next. Individualised instruction Learning styles Arts participation Homework primary Data taken from http://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/toolkit 26/11/2018

Visual map of the EEF Sutton Trust toolkit Individualised instruction Arts participation Learning styles Homework primary Data taken from http://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/toolkit 26/11/2018

Visual map of the EEF Sutton Trust toolkit Average impact/ months of additional progress Up to £80 per pupil Up to £170 per pupil Up to £700 per pupil Up to £1200 per pupil Over £1200 per pupil Cost These interventions have a lower impact and are costlier. These may be a use for pupil premium, especially if better value interventions are already in place. Consider carefully whether they are worth implementing. Key The size of the bubble indicates strength of evidence base: a larger bubble = stronger evidence No systematic analysis At least one meta-analysis/ review At least two meta-analyses/ reviews At least three meta-analyses/ reviews Key The size of the bubble indicates strength of evidence base: a larger bubble = stronger evidence No systematic analysis At least one meta-analysis/ review At least two meta-analyses/ reviews At least three meta-analyses/ reviews Sports participation Extended school time After school programmes Mentoring Data taken from http://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/toolkit 26/11/2018

Visual map of the EEF Sutton Trust toolkit Sports participation  After school programmes Extended school time  Mentoring Data taken from http://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/toolkit 26/11/2018

Visual map of the EEF Sutton Trust toolkit Average impact/ months of additional progress Up to £80 per pupil Up to £170 per pupil Up to £700 per pupil Up to £1200 per pupil Over £1200 per pupil Cost Key The size of the bubble indicates strength of evidence base: a larger bubble = stronger evidence No systematic analysis At least one meta-analysis/ review At least two meta-analyses/ reviews At least three meta-analyses/ reviews Key The size of the bubble indicates strength of evidence base: a larger bubble = stronger evidence No systematic analysis At least one meta-analysis/ review At least two meta-analyses/ reviews At least three meta-analyses/ reviews These have no positive impact based on the current evidence. Bear in mind that the evidence base is generally weaker here. If you are spending a lot of time and/or resources implementing these then consider whether this represents best value for money. Block scheduling (outer bubble) Performance pay Teaching assistants Physical environment Aspiration interventions School uniform (inner bubble) Data taken from http://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/toolkit Ability grouping 26/11/2018

Visual map of the EEF Sutton Trust toolkit Block scheduling (outer bubble)  Performance pay Teaching assistants School uniform  (inner bubble) Aspiration interventions Physical environment Ability grouping Data taken from http://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/toolkit 26/11/2018

Visual map of the EEF toolkit - Summary Average impact/ months of additional progress Up to £80 per pupil Up to £170 per pupil Up to £700 per pupil Up to £1200 per pupil Over £1200 per pupil Cost Key The size of the bubble indicates strength of evidence base: a larger bubble = stronger evidence No systematic analysis At least one meta-analysis/ review At least two meta-analyses/ reviews At least three meta-analyses/ reviews 1 In summary - consider interventions in the following order of priority… Metacognition & Self regulation (outer bubble) Feedback (inner bubble) Early years intervention 2 Peer tutoring Collaborative learning (inner bubble) One to one tuition Homework secondary (outer bubble) Social & emotional learning Behavioural intervention (outer bubble) Small group tuition (inner bubble) Phonics  Digital technology Parental involvement (outer bubble) Reducing class size 3 Summer schools (inner bubble) 4 Individualised instruction Sports participation Learning styles Extended school time Arts participation After school programmes Homework primary Mentoring Block scheduling (outer bubble) 5 Performance pay Teaching assistants Physical environment Aspiration interventions School uniform (inner bubble) Data taken from http://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/toolkit Ability grouping 26/11/2018

Words of caution Remember the larger the bubble, the stronger the evidence at this time – pay more attention to large bubbles than small ones. The evidence base is being increased all of the time so our understanding of ‘what works’ can and will change. There may be reasons (other than progress) for making a decision, for example in the case of school uniform there may be other reasons to have/introduce a uniform. 26/11/2018