(A) Status quo of NE watersheds, dams, and historic habitat extent for major sea-run fish species (scenario NE1). (A) Status quo of NE watersheds, dams,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Action Effectiveness Monitoring in the Upper Columbia (Chapter 4) Karl M. Polivka, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service.

Advertisements

Fish and Wildlife Losses and Hydroelectric System Responsibility January 2004.

Washington Department

Marylands Approach to Success Stories Presented to the Region III States Meeting May 12, 2009 Presented by Jim George.

Connectivity: fish migration & passage Native fish  most migratory species close to coast  most that penetrate far inland are good climbers (e.g. longfin.

Capacity Building for RCDs The Santa Cruz Countywide Partners in Restoration (PIR) Permit Coordination Program Prepared for the California Association.

Cedar River Instream Flow Management Balancing Certainty and Flexibility.

Anadromous Fish Run Site Selection Tool An Example Application: Identifying Restoration Projects for Community-Based Efforts.

Hoover Dam – Colorado River. Reasons for Dams Flood Control 39,000 dams worldwide higher than 15 m (ICOLD, 1988)

Watershed Management in MA The Deerfield River Watershed Action Plan Kate Crawford, River Corridor Management, October 10, 2005

Exploring Scenarios. What I have learned from presentations The default option is habitat loss Two kinds of restoration actions –Direct action: making.

Climate Change Adaptation : Case Studies U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service May 14, 2008.

Oregon’s Likely Future Climate Predicted Rainfall Changes in Oregon PNW rainfall will be about the same or a little higher Source: Climate Impacts Group,

Columbia River salmon : Who (or what) will save them? John Williams Klarälven meeting in Karlstad 9 May 2011.

OPTIMAL STRATEGIES FOR ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION UNDER CLIMATE CHANGE Koel Ghosh, James S. Shortle, and Carl Hershner * Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology,

Hancock Springs A natural lab for studying the roles of physical habitat, nutrient availability, and non-native species to inform river restoration John.

1 A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board Usha Varanasi, Ph.D. Science Director Philip Roni, Ph.D. Research Fishery Biologist Northwest Fisheries.

Ecological rationale for determining buffer width Forest Ecosystem Management and Assessment Team (FEMAT) Report.

Modeling physical environmental impacts on survival: the SHIRAZ model Ecosystem based management FISH 507.

Northwest Power and Conservation Council Sep 12-13, Science Policy Exchange - Thursday Sessions - Sponsored by Northwest Power and Conservation Council.

Differential Estimates of “Survival” for PIT Tagged Fish – Evidence and Causes Jason Vogel Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.

18-Nov-15 / 1 Strategic planning for hydropower in the Danube Sergiy Moroz WWF European Hydropower Summit, Bucharest 28 February 2012 Water and energy.

Assessing Diadromous Fish Restoration in the Kennebec and Androscoggin Rivers Claire Enterline 1, Gail Wippelhauser 1, Nate Gray 1, Paul Christman 1, Karen.

Critical problems for migratory fish in the North Sea region from a Danish perspective By Kim Aarestrup, Anders Koed & Niels Jepsen Technical University.

1 September 13, 2007 North-of-the-Delta Offstream Storage ACWA Regions 9 and 10 Carlsbad Water Summit North-of-the-Delta Offstream Storage ACWA Regions.

Chesapeake Fish Passage Prioritization Project: Overview MARY ANDREWS NOAA JULIE DEVERS USFWS ERIK MARTIN THE NATURE CONSERVANCY CHESAPEAKE BAY FISH PASSAGE.

Habitat GIT Meeting October 14, 2015 Harvell Dam Removal Project – first blockage on the Appomattox River, Petersburg, VA provide access to 127 miles of.

Ecosystem Management Chapter 5. Shifting management n Fisheries management is shifting from commodity production of single resource to management of whole.

Current Problems in the Management of Marine Fisheries by J. R. Beddington, D. J. Agnew, and C. W. Clark Science Volume 316(5832): June 22, 2007.

Dr. Patrick Doran, The Nature Conservancy in Michigan. Climate Change: Challenges to Biodiversity Conservation. Chris Hoving, Michigan Department of Natural.

Landscape Conservation Cooperative (LCC) Supported Assessment Tools Gulf of Mexico Alliance Tools Café June 2016 Southeast Aquatic Connectivity Assessment.

Biological Opinions and ESA Consultations Ritchie Graves NMFS-NWR Hydropower Division Portland, Oregon February 19, 2013.

Chris Harvey NOAA Fisheries NWFSC, Seattle OVERVIEW: THE 2014 STATE OF THE CALIFORNIA CURRENT REPORT FROM THE CCIEA TEAM.

Columbia River estuary – overview of physical features and habitats

ISSUES RELATED TO THE FEDERAL RENEWABLE GOAL

NEAFWA Aquatic Connectivity

Is California's Energy System Resilient to Climate Change

A Fishery Management Index:

Hydrogen solubility isotherms and solute susceptibility.

Schematic representation of possible effects of different factors on systemic resilience. Schematic representation of possible effects of different factors.

The evolution of WCI for biological specificity makes organisms more evolvable. The evolution of WCI for biological specificity makes organisms more evolvable.

Ten-criteria analysis, quantities reported as values normalized to maxima (counter clockwise from right) B, dam breach safety score; C, dam removal cost;

(A) Box and whisker diagram for median lag times (difference between date of death and seizure date) of ivory specimens analyzed in this study; the number.

Conformational changes of the ion-permeation pathway.

WCI evolve as organisms become more complex.

TEM images of the crural feathers sampled in Eoconfuciusornis STM (A and B, sample 111) compared with that of a black feather from G. gallus (C and.

Long-term up-regulation of proliferative markers and down-regulation of cell migration factors along with increased intestinal metaplasia after 56Fe radiation.

Behavioral sequence. Behavioral sequence. Behaviors were quantified during five 5-min assessments. Anxiety-related behaviors were quantified in the light/dark.

Relationship between species’ traits and relative occupancy change for (A) habitat specialization, (B) diet specialization (carnivores, omnivores, insectivores,

More Than Smart Framework Focus on Lifecycle Process Changes to Achieve Objectives

Using ArcGIS Pro to Evaluate the Impacts of In-Stream Barriers on Fish Habitats Case study: Bonneville cutthroat trout (BCT) habitats in the Bear River.

DG Environment, Nature Protection Unit (D3)

Hydrology and Physiography of Wetland Habitats

Жирэмслэлт ба тархины харвалт

Hydropower and the WFD: constraint or opportunity?

Bivariate density representation of the joint posterior distributions for the number of demes and the germination rate (b). Bivariate density representation.

Overpotential requirements resulting from high-energy catalytic intermediates. Overpotential requirements resulting from high-energy catalytic intermediates.

In vivo BrdUrd incorporation kinetics of KTSL−/lo and KTSL− cells.

Oligosaccharide profile of VexL reaction products.

Dependence of DesII steady-state parameters V (●) and (○) on pH.

(A) Communication fluxes PS(T|r′) conditional to the rank r′ for dataset D3. (A) Communication fluxes PS(T|r′) conditional to the rank r′ for dataset D3.

J. Todd Petty, Richard Herd, Paul Ziemkiewicz,

Rotational and vibrational energy distributions of surface scattered molecules. Rotational and vibrational energy distributions of surface scattered molecules.

The saturation scan database for Ubv.2.1 (A) and Ubv.21.4 (B).

Mediation model of study 4.

Heterozygosity, Tajima’s D, and FST values plotted against the putative selective sweep signatures (horizontal color blocks) along chromosomal arms 2R.

Correlation between Ti→jS(r) and Ti→jM(r) for pair of locations (gray dots) separated by a distance of (A) r=1 km, (B) r=5 km, (C) r=20 km, (D) r=50 km,

Mapping positions of QTL across five traits

Potential Process and Decisions for Conn. River Watershed Pilot

Fig. 4 Current (baseline) spawning habitat suitability for Atlantic cod and Polar cod in the Seas of Norden. Current (baseline) spawning habitat suitability.

Presentation transcript:

(A) Status quo of NE watersheds, dams, and historic habitat extent for major sea-run fish species (scenario NE1). (A) Status quo of NE watersheds, dams, and historic habitat extent for major sea-run fish species (scenario NE1). Migration connectivity varies by dam location and survival through fish passage facilities. Dam removal scenarios (B) NE2, (C) NE3, (D) NE4. (E) NE-scale PPF comparing absolute potential hydropower (in gigawatts) and biomass capacities (in kilotons per year, kt⋅a−1) for NE region and individual watersheds. Points along the PPFs denote efficient scenarios. C, cost of dam removal; F, sea-run biomass; P, hydropower capacity. Dashed box: watershed-scale PPFs, detailed in F, where symbols represent the scenarios described in E. (G) Costs of dam removal and hydropower loss for a hypothetical scenario: 50% of historic sea-run biomass is restored, coordinated strategically over NE region and separately over all NE subwatersheds (W). Samuel G. Roy et al. PNAS 2018;115:47:12069-12074 ©2018 by National Academy of Sciences