ERV Design Chris Heidelberger Dynamics & Control

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beatrice Venturi1 Economic Faculty STABILITY AND DINAMICAL SYSTEMS prof. Beatrice Venturi.
Advertisements

Section 2: The Planetary Boundary Layer
Space Engineering I – Part I
Comparative Assessment of Human Missions to Mars Damon F. Landau Ph. D. Preliminary Exam September 13, 2005.
1. 2 STRUCTURAL CONTROL INTERACTION FOR A LSS ATTITUDE CONTROL SYSTEM USING THRUSTERS AND REACTION WHEELS 1. INTRODUCTION Problems related to LSS: Most.
Orbital Operations – 2 Rendezvous & Proximity Operations
Prince William Composite Squadron Col M. T. McNeely Presentation for AGI Users Conference CIVIL AIR PATROL PRESENTS The CAP-STK Aerospace Education Program.
ATMOSPHERIC REENTRY TRAJECTORY MODELING AND SIMULATION: APPLICATION TO REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE MISSION (Progress Seminar Presentation - 2) K. Sivan (Roll.
Rocket Aerodynamics and Stability
Maribor, December 10, Stability of relative equilibria in spinning tops 9th Christmas Symposium dedicated to Prof. Siegfried Großmann CAMTP, University.
Attitude Determination and Control
AAE450 Spring 2009 LEO Atmospheric Drag Analysis and Lunar Orbit Circularization [Andrew Damon] [Mission Ops] February 19,
AAE450 Spring 2009 Lunar Capture Altitude Mass to LLO for Arbitrary Time to Rotate Lander During Descent Camera/Dust Removal [Kara Akgulian] [Mission Ops]
AAE 450 Spring 2008 Adam Waite January 24, 2008 Dynamics and Control Thrust Vector Control Analysis for an Air Launched Rocket.
Spacecraft Propulsion Dr Andrew Ketsdever Lesson 13 MAE 5595.
AAE 450 Spring 2008 Jeffrey Stuart January 17, 2008 Dynamics and Control Initial Inertia Matrix and Launch Scenario Considerations.
AAE 666 Final Presentation Spacecraft Attitude Control Justin Smith Chieh-Min Ooi April 30, 2005.
February 24, Final Presentation AAE Final Presentation Backstepping Based Flight Control Asif Hossain.
GN/MAE1551 Orbital Mechanics Overview 3 MAE 155 G. Nacouzi.
AAE450 Senior Spacecraft Design Atul Kumar Presentation Week 3: February 1 st, 2007 Aerodynamics Team Re-Entry vehicle analysis - Lifting body 1.
AAE450 Senior Spacecraft Design Chris Bush Week 5: February 15 th, 2007 D&C Group High Thrust Trajectories ET, dE, aM.
28 October st Space Glasgow Research Conference, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Autonomous Robotics Team Autonomous Robotics Lab: Cooperative Control of a Three-Robot Formation Texas A&M University, College Station, TX Fall Presentations.
The flight dynamics standpoint Alejandro Blazquez (CNES)‏ LSWT Venice, 30/03-01/04/2009.
Gyroscopic attitude control systems
1 Project Name Solar Sail Project Proposal February 7, 2007 Megan Williams (Team Lead) Eric Blake Jon Braam Raymond Haremza Michael Hiti Kory Jenkins Daniel.
Understand the factors and requirements associated with a spacecraft launch Understand the dynamics of Gravity Assist and the basic principles of placing.
AUTOMATIC CONTROL THEORY II Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
Mark Beckman - Flight DynamicsMB-1 Lunar Flight Dynamics Mark Beckman July 12, 2012.
A Framework for Distributed Model Predictive Control
Ryan Mayes Duarte Ho Jason Laing Bryan Giglio. Requirements  Overall: Launch 10,000 mt of cargo (including crew vehicle) per year Work with a $5M fixed.
rd Global Trajectory Optimisation Competition Workshop Aula Magna del Lingotto, Turin (Italy), June 27, 2008 © 2008 DEIMOS Space, S.L. –
Spacecraft Trajectories You Can Get There from Here! John F Santarius Lecture 9 Resources from Space NEEP 533/ Geology 533 / Astronomy 533 / EMA 601 University.
Main characteristics: systematic global search algorithm of quasi-ballistic trajectories; Gravity assist (GA) and Aerogravity assist (AGA) manoeuvres;
FAST LOW THRUST TRAJECTORIES FOR THE EXPLORATION OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM
Mars Today 1 An immediate and inexpensive program for manned Mars visitation.
S ystems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology Automated Solution of Realistic Near-Optimal Aircraft Trajectories Using Computational Optimal.
Formation Flight, Dynamics Josep Masdemont UPC 10/19/00JMS- 1 Formation Flight, Dynamics Josep Masdemont, UPC.
UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIED Lesson 2 Basic Orbital Mechanics A537 SPACE ORIENTATION A537 SPACE ORIENTATION.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Low Thrust Spiral Transfer Maneuvers and Analysis [Andrew Damon] [Mission Ops] February 5,
AAE450 Spring 2009 Brian Erson Attitude Control Systems Trans Lunar Phase Alternative Design Comparison [Brian Erson] [Attitude] 1.
University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 6008 Interplanetary Mission Design Spring 2015 Kate Davis Real Life 1.
1 Weekly Summary Weekly Summary Formation Flight AEM4332 Spring Semester March 7,2007 Masao SHIMADA.
SPACE TRAVEL. NOT A CONSTANT SPEED Lift off Need most speed Atmosphere Creates friction ;drag Gravity of objects Sling-shot.
A&AE 450 – Senior Design Jeremy Davis Group A – Aerodynamics Preliminary Design Analysis January 23, 2001.
SPECS 2004 Dynamics and Control Control modes: (1) Orbit insertion (2) Acquisition (3) On-station Determined by: mission requirements, mission geometry,
Recommendation to Cease NASA Crew Return Vehicle Development April 29, 2004 Amanda KellyBlake HajovskyAnthony Pittman Engineering Technical Communications.
 Other than minimizing the fence for a garden, there are more interesting optimization problems…  When designing a building, the cost of building materials.
1 The PISCES Project Don J. Pearson JSC/DM Flight Design & Dynamics Division May 2002
AAE450 Senior Spacecraft Design Goppert, 1 James Goppert Week 8: March 8 th, 2007 Aerodynamics: Reentry Optimization Dynamics and Control: Communication.
AAE 450 Spring 2008 Adam Waite 3/27/08 Dynamics and Control Control Theory and Steering Law Modifications.
AAE 450 – Spacecraft Design 1 Solar Power & Docking Options Eric Gustafson 1/18/2005 Power group & docking sub-committee Solar power and autonomous docking.
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 ACS Dave Auslander, Dave Pankow, Han Chen, Yao-Ting Mao, UC Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
Dynamics & Controls PDR 2
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 6
Development and Principles of Rocketry
Three-Body Trajectory Model and Spiral Transfer Matching
Why chose Atmospheric Re-Entry
Inertial Measurement Units
التسعير الفصل الرابع عشر.
Dynamics and Control Attitude dynamics Communications Pointing
RIT Space Exploration Group (SPEX)
Purdue Aeroelasticity
Jeff Stuart 1/31/2008 Dynamics and Control Simplified Rigid Body Equations of Motion AAE 450 Spring 2008.
AAE 450: Aero-thermodynamics
Kevin Dahya Critical Design Review 3/6/01
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 22
Daniel Chua 18 January 2008 Trajectory Simulation Simulation Assumptions – Flat Earth and Constant Thrust AAE 450 Spring 2008.
Team A Propulsion 1/16/01.
Dynamics & Controls PDR 2
Presentation transcript:

ERV Design Chris Heidelberger Dynamics & Control 01-23-01 AAE 450 ERV Design Chris Heidelberger Dynamics & Control 01-23-01

Design Considerations Launch trajectory Planetary transfer trajectory Attitude control Capture options

Launch Trajectories Earth launch trajectory is determined by launch vehicle, system and site. Using slightly modified, existing launch schemes, the launch trajectory is constrained to previously designed missions. Mars launch trajectory will be a function of g-loading, local terrain and final conditions.

Mars Launch Trajectory Assumptions -Flat Mars -No aero drag -Constant gravity field Final V at LMO=5.6 km/s ODEBVP optimization routine in Matlab (written by Prof Williams) Need GOOD initial guesses before routine can converge on solution.

Attitude Control Vehicle Shape -Outbound -Return Control Means -Thrusters -Rate Gyros Control Algorithms

Vehicle Shape Outbound Mission Cylindrical Spin stabilized Min. Comm. req. No human factors Even heating Structurally easier Return Mission Cylindrical, spin stabilized vs 3-axis stabilized

Return Mission Spin stabilized Control System Attitude Dynamics Structures Constrains Shape Human Factors Interior Design Pointing for Comm. 3-axis stabilized Human factors Comm. Req. More functional Lifting body Minimum 6 nonlinear, coupled equations (7) Complicated control

Three Axis Stabilization 2 Stable orientations - not very intuitive Unstable orientations - more “natural” - heating issues Can be stabilized with thrusters and gyros, similar to Shuttle Drawn by Chris Heidelberger

Control Methods Existing systems -well tested and proven -off the shelf technology and price Outbound -small thrusters to spinup, station keeping Return -more complicated

Control Method: Return Mixture of thrusters and moment gyros Thrusters for station keeping, fast maneuverability and gyro desaturation Moment gyroscopes for more efficient, precise attitude control Proven technology based on ISS systems

Applicable Skills Previous Experience - 440, 490e, 507, 508, 532, 564 -Three summers working ISS GN&C at Boeing Currently taking AAE666