by Qinghua Zhou, Haimin Li, Hanzeng Li, Akihisa Nakagawa, Jason L. J

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
by Samantha C. Lewis, Lauren F. Uchiyama, and Jodi Nunnari
Advertisements

Organismal Development Part 3
Organismal Development Part 3
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (November 2013)
Development of a hamster superovulation program and adverse effects of gonadotropins on microfilament formation during oocyte development  Seung T. Lee,
Sperm mitochondrial DNA depletion in men with asthenospermia
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 14, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Submitochondrial localization of mitofilin using quantitative immunoelectron microscopy. Submitochondrial localization of mitofilin using quantitative.
Volume 25, Issue 24, Pages (December 2015)
Timothy E. O’Sullivan, Lexus R. Johnson, Helen H. Kang, Joseph C. Sun 
Volume 15, Issue 24, Pages (December 2005)
Melissa Hernandez-Fleming, Ethan W. Rohrbach, Greg J. Bashaw 
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Opposing Dopaminergic and GABAergic Neurons Control the Duration and Persistence of Copulation in Drosophila  Michael A. Crickmore, Leslie B. Vosshall 
Volume 25, Issue 16, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Zhang-Yi Liang, Mark Andrew Hallen, Sharyn Anne Endow  Current Biology 
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Andrew R. Bassett, Charlotte Tibbit, Chris P. Ponting, Ji-Long Liu 
By genetic screen By candidate-based RNAi screen By educational guess
Anchor Cell Invasion into the Vulval Epithelium in C. elegans
Volume 26, Issue 24, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Sebastian Leidel, Pierre Gönczy  Developmental Cell 
Global Transcriptional Repression in C
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (July 2017)
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages (October 2016)
Steven Z. DeLuca, Patrick H. O'Farrell  Developmental Cell 
LFA-1 is present in cytosolic clusters similar to those containing RhoB and tubulin in migrating T lymphocytes, and reducing RhoB abundance impairs the.
Kang Shen, Richard D Fetter, Cornelia I Bargmann  Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Synucleins Have Multiple Effects on Presynaptic Architecture
Volume 22, Issue 14, Pages (July 2012)
Intra-spindle Microtubule Assembly Regulates Clustering of Microtubule-Organizing Centers during Early Mouse Development  Sadanori Watanabe, Go Shioi,
Xin Xie, Tomas Venit, Nizar Drou, Piergiorgio Percipalle
Coupled Caspase and N-End Rule Ligase Activities Allow Recognition and Degradation of Pluripotency Factor LIN-28 during Non-Apoptotic Development  Benjamin.
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Drosophila Maelstrom Ensures Proper Germline Stem Cell Lineage Differentiation by Repressing microRNA-7  Jun Wei Pek, Ai Khim Lim, Toshie Kai  Developmental.
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Franziska Aurich, Christian Dahmann  Cell Reports 
Fig. 3 CSF1 is expressed in human melanoma.
CK2 is required for early cell divisions in C. elegans embryos
Volume 22, Issue 14, Pages (July 2012)
Differential secretion profiles of C. elegans TTR models.
Tapetal mitochondria in wild-type (WT), drp3b, and elm1 mutants.
Notch-Dependent Induction of Left/Right Asymmetry in C
Fig. 1. Representative images of the four cell lines using fluorescence microscopy. Representative images of the four cell lines using fluorescence microscopy.
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages e3 (March 2018)
Fig. 2. abu/pqn genes are expressed in the pharyngeal cuticle
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Protection of Germline Gene Expression by the C
Fig. 5. The bulk of Cep135 localizes distantly from Sas-6 and STIL
Volume 15, Issue 18, Pages (September 2005)
Ibm1 and edm2 mutants generate more stomatal divisions in the leaf epidermis. ibm1 and edm2 mutants generate more stomatal divisions in the leaf epidermis.
Modeling of Mitochondrial Donut Formation
Fig. 7. Analysis of dFMRP kinetics in dFMRP granules by FRAP
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 11, Pages (January 2019)
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages (March 2017)
Organismal Development Part 3
Matching Mitochondrial DNA Haplotypes for Circumventing Tissue-Specific Segregation Bias  Jianxin Pan, Li Wang, Charles Lu, Yanming Zhu, Zhunyuan Min,
Presentation transcript:

Mitochondrial endonuclease G mediates breakdown of paternal mitochondria upon fertilization by Qinghua Zhou, Haimin Li, Hanzeng Li, Akihisa Nakagawa, Jason L. J. Lin, Eui-Seung Lee, Brian L. Harry, Riley Robert Skeen-Gaar, Yuji Suehiro, Donna William, Shohei Mitani, Hanna S. Yuan, Byung-Ho Kang, and Ding Xue Science Volume 353(6297):394-399 July 22, 2016 Published by AAAS

Fig. 1 Loss of cps-6 delays internal breakdown of paternal mitochondria after fertilization. Loss of cps-6 delays internal breakdown of paternal mitochondria after fertilization. (A to D, F to J) Tomographic slice images and corresponding 3D models of a mitochondrion in an N2 (A) or cps-6(tm3222) (F) spermatozoon or a paternal mitochondrion in an N2 embryo [(B) to (D)] or a cps-6(tm3222) embryo [(G) to (J)] at the indicated stages. 3D models of autophagosomes (AuPh) and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) are shown. Mitochondrial membranes, cristae, and aggregates are colored red, green, and blue, respectively. Dark aggregates and autophagosome membranes are indicated with blue and yellow arrowheads, respectively. Scale bars, 300 nm. (E) Histogram showing three classes of paternal mitochondria in embryos of different stages from the indicated N2 cross (n = 45) or cps-6(tm3222) cross (n = 56). Qinghua Zhou et al. Science 2016;353:394-399 Published by AAAS

Fig. 2 CPS-6 relocates from the intermembrane space of paternal mitochondria to the matrix after fertilization to promote PME. CPS-6 relocates from the intermembrane space of paternal mitochondria to the matrix after fertilization to promote PME. (A) Diagram of C. elegans mtDNA, the uaDf5 deletion, primers used in the nested PCR assays, and sizes of PCR products in N2 and uaDf5/+ animals. (B and C) Hermaphrodites and MTR-stained males were mated as indicated. Males also carried smIs42, an integrated Psur-5sur-5::gfp transgene used to track cross progeny (see fig. S2A). A single unfertilized oocyte and a single cross-fertilized embryo or larva (MTR- or GFP-positive) at the indicated stage was analyzed by PCR. uaDf5/+ and N2 hermaphrodites were controls. (D) Quantification of MTR-stained paternal mitochondrial clusters in 64-cell embryos from the indicated crosses with MTR-stained males. Data are means ± SEM; n = 20 per cross. **P < 0.0001 (unpaired Student t test); n.s., not significant. (E and F) Five cross-fertilized embryos (E) or transgenic embryos (F) at approximately 100-cell stage from the indicated crosses were analyzed by PCR. (G to J) Representative immuno-EM images of mitochondria in N2 spermatozoa and paternal mitochondria in zygotes from the indicated cross. CPS-6–specific and PD-E2–specific immunogold particles are marked with arrowheads. Scale bars, 300 nm. (K) Histogram of the distances of 15-nm immunogold particles from the mitochondrial membrane, illustrating CPS-6’s movement after fertilization. Numbers of immunogold particles scored are shown in parentheses. ***P < 0.0001 (Mann-Whitney U test). cps-6(tm3222) was used in all figures. Qinghua Zhou et al. Science 2016;353:394-399 Published by AAAS

Fig. 3 Depolarization of paternal mitochondria after fertilization and autophagosome formation on paternal mitochondria. Depolarization of paternal mitochondria after fertilization and autophagosome formation on paternal mitochondria. (A and B) Differential interference contrast (DIC) and fluorescence images of zygotes from the indicated crosses. TMRE had equal access to maternal and paternal mitochondria in the zygote (B). Scale bars, 10 μm. (C to F) Zygotes from the indicated crosses with MTR-stained males were labeled with an antibody to LGG-1. Images were acquired with a Nikon SIM microscope. Dashed rectangles highlight the areas enlarged and shown below [(D) and (F)]. Scale bars, 2 μm [(C) and (E)], 0.5 μm [(D) and (F)]. Qinghua Zhou et al. Science 2016;353:394-399 Published by AAAS

Fig. 4 Delayed removal of paternal mitochondria increases embryonic lethality and cell division durations. Delayed removal of paternal mitochondria increases embryonic lethality and cell division durations. (A to D) The embryonic lethality rate [(A) and (D)] and durations of cell divisions in the MS lineage (B) and P lineage (C) were scored in self-fertilized embryos (1 to 3) or cross-fertilized embryos from crosses (4 to 7) of the indicated genotypes. All males carried smIs42 and were stained with MTR to assist identification of zygotes [(B) and (C)]. Data are means ± SEM; n > 1000 embryos per cross at 25°C [(A) and (D)] and n = 3 embryos per cross at 20°C [(B) and (C)]. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001 (unpaired Student t test). Qinghua Zhou et al. Science 2016;353:394-399 Published by AAAS