Indicator 13, Secondary Transition IEP Record Reviews

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
TRANSITION SUMMER INSTITUTE 2014 INDICATOR 13 BASIC REQUIREMENTS.
B13 Secondary Transition Updates
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
Transition 101 I-13 Compliance: Transition Activities for Before, During and After the IEP Meeting.
Continuous Improvement Monitoring System (CIMS) Indicator B13 Secondary Transition January 2015.
This document was developed by the National Post-School Outcomes Center, Eugene, Oregon, (funded by Cooperative Agreement Number H326U090001) with the.
Transition and Indicator 13 Writing Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) That Meet the Legal Mandate A Webinar Series Presented by The California Community.
Teaching and Learning Special Education Secondary Programs Transition Services.
Pre-test Please come in and complete your pre-test.
Section 3: Secondary Transition Considerations Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS July 13,
INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx October 18, 2011 DESK AUDIT.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Part B Indicator 13 FFY 09 SPP/APR Writing Suggestions Western Regional Resource Center APR Clinic 2010 November 1-3 San Francisco, California.
What Is TRANSITION & Transition PLANNING?
State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report Indicator 13 Effective Transition Susan Beck, Ghaski Browning and Karen Ruddle Office of Special Programs.
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Physical Fitness Test (PFT) Program Update 2013 Assessment.
A Review of the Special Education Integrated Monitoring Process BIE Special Education Academy September 12-15, 2011 Tampa, Florida.
What does Indicator #13 say? Virginia Department of Education  “Percent of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable.
Transition Plans A results-oriented process that focuses on improving the academic and functional achievement of the child with a disability to facilitate.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Letter of Explanation Copy of Data Disproportionality Initial Eligibility 60-day Timeline Early Childhood Transition Secondary Transition Corrected and.
2010 B13 Data Collection March 24, 2010 Craig Wiles Public Sector Consultants Chuck Saur MI-TOP.
B 13 Secondary Transition Preparing for the 2015 IEP Review and Data Collection.
How to write great transition IEPs and meet compliance for Indicator 13!
INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx March 22, 2011 DESK AUDIT.
1 State Performance Plan (SPP) Indicator # Measurement 1Graduation 2Dropout 3Statewide Assessments 4Suspension and Expulsion 5Least Restrictive Environment.
Getting to Know Indicator 13 MITS Summit 2010 Bonnie Boaz, Coordinator.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education California Department of.
Improving Secondary Transition Services: Meeting the Requirements of Indicator 13 National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Improving Special Education Services November 2010 Sacramento, CA SPP/APR Update.
ALIGNING TRANSITION REQUIREMENTS IN THE IEP PAM HUMPHREY, TRANSITION CONSULTANT.
Categorical Findings of Noncompliance March 24, 2011 Guidance & Intensive Technical Assistance Related to Correction of Noncompliance for SY
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
IEP Team. Develops the IEP including the transition component for a single student.
Improving Secondary Transition Services: Meeting the Requirements of Indicator 13 National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
THE APR AND SPP--LINKING SPECIAL EDUCATION DATA TO ACCOUNTABILITY FOR EDUCATION RESULTS Building a Brighter Tomorrow through Positive and Progressive Leadership.
January 21, 2014 Welcome! The January COP call will begin in a few moments. –Event password: 5COPcall –Event number: 666– To hear the presentation.
Post-Secondary Transition
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
WDE Division of Individual Learning
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Welcome! The B-13 CAP Webinar will begin in a few moments.
Special Education Division Data Identified Noncompliance (DINC) Overview Presented by the Assessment, Evaluation, and Support Unit.
Transition IEPs: Lessons Learned From Across the State
Alignment and Articulation Roadmap / Visual
Mission Possible: Planning a Successful Life for Students with Intellectual Disabilities TAC it up! VCU T/TAC May 2010.
Using the Transition Planning Form (28M/9)
Ohio Longitudinal Transition Study (OLTS)
Standards-based Individualized Education Program: Module Eight: Additional Components Specific to Secondary IEPs SBIEP Module Eight: Additional Components.
SPR&I Regional Training
California State Performance Plan
Maryland Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity #8
2nd Annual Special Education Symposium
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Post-Secondary Transition
2/23/2019 Special Education End-of-Year FINAL STEPS Report Review/Complete Snapshot.
IEP and the IPS Crosswalk
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Transition Outcomes Project Report Out Meeting
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
SECN – Transition Role Group Meeting
Ohio Longitudinal Transition Study (OLTS)
The Transition Planning Process
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Data Use to Improve Programming
Presentation transcript:

Indicator 13, Secondary Transition IEP Record Reviews 2018-2019

Agenda  Overview  What’s New  Process Levels of Support Reporting

Purpose of IEP Record Reviews To improve academic achievement, career and college readiness and post school outcomes for students with disabilities To identify trends and areas of strength in IEP development and implementation To make data informed decisions about professional development and technical assistance needs in IEP development, implementation and transition planning To gather statewide data on Indicator 13 for the Colorado State Performance Plan submitted to OSEP

Overview AUs will review 3% of all IEPs min 10, max 50 20% of the total IEP review count for Transition IEPs min 5, max 10 Samples pulled from 2017 December Count Separate column in the DMS.

Overview Double the sample size – provides flexibility for AUs in file selection Review IEPs dated between July 1, 2018 – June 1, 2019 Full record reviews Any individual corrections needed for I 13 compliance must be done, documented and uploaded to the DMS by June 1, 2019 AU target for I 13 compliance - 100% Data collection window closes and the DMS files will be locked June 1,2019 CDE provides tiered Levels of Support

What’s New The DMS Transition Age column will include students who were age 15 as of July 1, 2018 OSEP will allow us to include these students in our SPP Align with Colorado ECEA 4.03(7)(b)(i) Decrease burden to AUs in having transition age youth in 2 different columns May decrease number of students in your sample who have left school Reviewing transition plans of younger students may improve in-school and post-school student outcomes

What’s New Standard Record Review includes an additional question to verify compliance with IDEA and ECEA language: (not part of I13 compliance calculation) The notice of meeting must indicate that a purpose of the meeting will be the consideration of the postsecondary goals and transition services.

Compliance Components for Indicator 13 Appropriate measurable postsecondary goals (PSGs)in education/training, career/employment, and, as needed, independent living skills PSGs are updated annually Each PSG is based on age-appropriate transition assessment Courses of Study are multi-year, specific, individualized and linked to PSGs Transition Services that will reasonably enable the student to meet his or her PSGs Annual Goals directly and genuinely link to PSGs or Transition Services Documentation of Student Invitation to the IEP Written parental consent to invite an outside agency prior to the documented agency invitation (n/a is okay)

Calculating % Compliance Indicator 13 is an “all or nothing” indicator, meaning that a Transition IEP is considered compliant only if ALL required components are evident in the document. Calculation: % Compliant = (Number of youth age 15 and above with IEPs that contain each of the required components for secondary transition/sample size) * 100. Example: Required file reviews = 5 Compliant IEPs = 4 % Compliant: 4/5 = 0.8 x 100 = 80%

Process Transition Tracker Download, complete, and upload back when your reviews are completed – due by June 1, 2019 Includes a tab with raw data for your transition sample

Process Transition Tracker (this is your friend!) Identifies required number of reviews Prepopulated with the DMS Record Number, SASID, First Name, Last Name, DOB and Review By date Columns for AUs to complete: the IEP date, case manager, compliant/noncompliant, and reason not reviewed Use to verify your compliance results (no surprises) Required Required

How many files do I have to review? Process How many files do I have to review? CDE has uploaded a document to the DMS Compliance tab that spells this out for each age category.

Process Sign in to the DMS Compliance Tab Go to the Attachment Section Download Transition Tracker Select IEPs to review (July 1, 2018 – June 1, 2019 dates) Upload selected IEPs to the DMS* Complete full record review in the DMS by June 1, 2019 Corrections of any non-compliant sections must be completed and documentation uploaded by June 1, 2019 On the Transition Tracker, fill in IEP date and compliance outcome (compliant or non-compliant) for reviewed files Upload completed Transition Tracker to the Attachment section in the DMS Compliance tab by June 1, 2019 * Note: Instructions for uploading IEPs for Enrich and non-Enrich users can be found on the Directors’ Corner of the CDE website. http://www.cde.state.co.us/cdesped/dircorner 10

Levels of Support (Year 1 is 2017-2018) Years 2015-16 and 2016-17 were recalibration years. The baseline year for levels of support is 2017-2018. *Directors can find their trend data used to determine their AU’s level of support in the DMS on the Summary Tab, 2017-2018 Indicator 13 Results.

Levels of Support Universal Support Indicator 13 Compliance and Quality Tips Indicator 13 Webinar on August 27, 2018 will provide training on the record review process. Checklist of steps to follow in completing the review and certification of data submission process Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Guidance Documents Secondary Transition Assessment Module Secondary Transition Leadership Institute – professional learning and team planning Written communication, “Indicator 13 Overview and What’s New” available on the Secondary Transition website http://www.cde.state.co.us/cdesped/transition

All elements of Universal Support plus: Levels of Support Targeted Support All elements of Universal Support plus: Side-by-side IEP record reviews done by CDE team in partnership with the AU team either in person or virtually by February, 2019. Important Note: For those AUs participating in the Colorado Continuous Improvement Process visits, side-by-side record reviews will be a requirement.

All elements of Universal and Targeted Support plus: Levels of Support Intensive Support All elements of Universal and Targeted Support plus: CDE will provide required individualized professional development in the area(s) of Secondary Transition based on the AUs identified need. CDE will follow-up with a second check of IEPs written after the professional development.

Indicator 13 Reporting 2018-2019 Indicator 13 Compliance Results Spring 2020 AU Compliance Matrix and Determinations Currently in revision by ESSU

Indicator 13 Reporting Data submission window closes and DMS files will be locked June 1, 2019 By August 2019, CDE will upload a letter to the DMS Compliance tab indicating the AUs 2018-2019 final Indicator 13 compliance percentage. The 2018-2019 Indicator 13 compliance percentage will be used for AU Determinations released in Spring 2020. The CDE will use this data collection period for reporting state-wide Indicator 13 compliance to OSEP for the 2018 State Performance Plan. 19

Questions?? 20

Howell_g@cde.state.co.us 303-866-6885 Contact Information Questions? Contact your Regional Senior Consultant, Secondary Transition Gloria Howell Howell_g@cde.state.co.us 303-866-6885 or Gail Lott Lott_g@cde.state.co.us 303-866-6721 Find your regional transition specialist using this link: http://www.cde.state.co.us/cdesped/transition_regionalspecialist 21