Economic Study for Watts Branch Stream Restoration N. E

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Restore Lawyer Creek Habitat: Targeting Steelhead and Chinook Salmon.
Advertisements

Stream Corridors Christine Hall Natural Resources Conservation Service North Jersey RC&D Slides 1-12.
Title Text for Slide “ The region’s environmental and economic health will improve when we fully implement the Blueprint. The cleanup plan was designed.
District of Columbia Stormwater Fees October 27, 2008 Apartment and Office Building Association of Metropolitan Washington Brendan Shane DDOE Office of.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) Project Implementation.
Proposed Stormwater Regulations Public Forum Richland County Government September 2009.
2010 Squak Valley Park Restoration Project City of Issaquah.
Watershed Forestry Initiative Ellen Kohler Attorney & Policy Specialist Funded in part by Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Urban.
Green Infrastructure Planning for working landscapes, natural resources and other open spaces.
Amy Sheldon Watershed Coordinator February 3, 2004.
Point Source POLLUTION: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES
Nonpoint Source Pollution Reductions – Estimating a Tradable Commodity Allen R. Dedrick Associate Deputy Administrator Natural Resources & Sustainable.
Landscape Ecology, Urban Forestry & Wetlands.  Woody vegetation in populated places  25% of forest canopy in US.
Ground Water and Ecosystems Restoration Division Assessing the Effectiveness of Restoration Technologies Elise Striz and Joe Williams.
Economics of Riparian Restoration on Western Washington Farms June 29, 2004 American Water Resource Association Olympic Valley, CA Carolyn J. Henri, PhD.
West Virginia University Natural Stream Restoration Program An Interdisciplinary Program Focusing on Research, Education, and Professional Services in.
Bureau of Reclamation Overview Christopher Cutler Deputy Chief Boulder Canyon Operations Office.
Most Common Conservation Practices Forestry Illinois.
Title Text for Slide “ The region’s environmental and economic health will improve when we fully implement the Blueprint. The cleanup plan was designed.
Presented by Insert your name, title, and district Lower Hudson Coalition of Conservation Districts Volunteer Streamwalk Program Developed by the Westchester.
COMPREHENSIVE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT : Promoting Wise Uses of Floodplains CA Department of Water Resources/ CIFMCG Workshop July 2006.
Ian McBride Earth and Physical Science Department Western Oregon University Monmouth, Oregon
Golf Course Water Resources Best Management Practices TOOLBOX  Project Overview  Your Role in the Project April 2009.
Loudoun Watershed Watch “ Restoring Loudoun Streams” LCSA Water Forum Presented by: Darrell Schwalm Loudoun Watershed Watch Loudoun Wildlife Conservancy.
Clackamas River Basin Council Lower Columbia River Conservation and Recovery Plan Implementer’s Perspective August 19, 2013.
Habitat Restoration Division Coastal Program Partner For Wildlife Program Schoolyard Habitats Chesapeake Bay Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Estimating the Employment Impacts of Corps of Engineers Activities Associated with the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Dr. Wen-Huei Chang
Stormwater 101 Ohio Lake Erie Commission Best Local Land Use Practices Kirby Date, AICP.
Drafting the New Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes – Decision/Actions From Management Board Meetings June 13 and 18, 2013.
U.S. Department of the Interior Chesapeake Bay Watershed Land Cover Data Series 1984, 1992, 2001, and 2006 U.S. Geological SurveyThe Chesapeake Bay Program.
Improving Lives, Communities and the Environment Through Natural Resources Conservation.
Lessons Learned from BMP evaluation studies in the nontidal streams and river in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman University of Maryland Center.
Western Lake Erie Basin Partnership Presented by: Name, Title Your Organization DATE YOU PRESENTED The Meeting you presented at.
THE ADMINISTRATION OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT Wildlife Management Unit 1 Part 2.
Becky Houdek - Assistant Planner Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Minnehaha Creek Reach 14 Feasibility Study Insert photo.
Mission Statements of Some Federal Land Management Agencies U.S. Forest Service The mission of the U.S. Forest Service is to sustain the health, diversity.
Coos Watershed Association Watershed Restoration Projects.
Salmon-Safe: Peer-reviewed standards for the management of urban parks and natural areas Carrie Foss WSU Puyallup.
Lessons Learned from BMP evaluation studies in the nontidal streams and river in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman University of Maryland Center.
Central & Southern Florida Project George Horne Deputy Executive Director Operations & Maintenance Resource Area.
The Young Hoosiers Conservation Corps SYEP Best Practices- Green Jobs Indiana.
Opportunities for Collaboration on Water- Quality Issues in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, Office of Water Quality.
Agency Questionnaire Results Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture Conservation Strategy Work Group Information gathered September/October 2005.
Oregon Natural Treatment Systems for Wastewater Natural Treatment Systems – A Water Quality Match for Oregon’s Cities and Towns June, 2014 Oregon Department.
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources By Joan Schumaker Chadde, Western U.P. Center for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education. All photos by Chadde,
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
James M. Poling Brownfields Administrator Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control Brownfields 2011 Sustainable Communities Start Here.
The Chesapeake Bay: How is it Doing? An Overview of The Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Effects of Stream Restoration: A Comparative Study of Pine Run in Felton, Pennsylvania Luke Mummert, Department of Biological Sciences, York College of.
Pasadena Water and Power Authorization to Enter into MOUs with LACFCD and ASF to Implement Proposition 84 Grant Presented by Natalie Ouwersloot, Engineer.
Source: Stream Corridor Restoration Manual WATERSHED MANAGEMENT.
GOOSE CREEK WATERSHED LEVEL I STUDY SCOPING MEETING
GREEN STREETS | GREEN JOBS | GREEN TOWNS INITIATIVE
The Oregon Watershed Council Model, USA
Our Mission Protect water quality and quantity for present and future
Using TIF to Support Primary Employers
Griffith Park Fire Draft Recovery Plan May 30, 2007
Integrating Wetlands and Watershed Management: Lessons from the U.S.
Summit County – Canyons Employee Housing
The Gila River Restoration at Apache Grove
Henrico County Stream Assessment / Watershed Management Program
Restoration practices: one size does not fit all
Creating and Managing Watershed Stewardship Programs Session 5
Los Angeles Greater IRWM:
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources
River Flow into Chesapeake Bay
Nebraska Water Infrastructure Funding and Financing Programs
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources
Stream Management Implementation Program Schoharie Watershed Advisory Committee Meeting October 24th, 2018.
Watershed Restoration, Chesapeake Bay
Presentation transcript:

Economic Study for Watts Branch Stream Restoration N. E Economic Study for Watts Branch Stream Restoration N.E. District of Columbia Mark A. Secrist U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 177 Admiral Cochrane Drive Annapolis, Maryland 21401 www.fws.gov/chesapeakebay New Pic

Project Background 2001 USFWS Coastal Program and DC Department of Health entered into agreement to implement stream and riparian habitat restoration project First Tasks Watershed assessment of Watts Branch, Hickey Run, and Oxon Run Selected Watts Branch as first restoration project Implementation started December 2010 and completed in May 2012

Project Description Located in NE Washington D.C. 1.8 miles of stream and riparian restoration 3.3 square mile drainage area Poor in-stream habitat 1,500 tons of bank and bed erosion annually Located on DC parkland

Project Partners D.C. Department of the Environment (DDOE) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) D.C. Department of the Environment (DDOE) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) National Park Service Environmental Protection Agency National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Washington Water and Sewer Authority (WASA)

Project Design A natural channel design methodology Watershed based assessment and design A natural channel design methodology Improve bedform diversity thru in-stream structures Floodplain connection and creation Reduce lateral erosion with bioengineering Increase riparian buffer width with native grasses, trees, and shrubs Invasive species removal Floodplain creation on right bank Instream structures in photos – they increase riffle and pool habitat - decrease stress on banks and reduce erosive forces Since photo, native plants have been planted on floodplain and adjacent slope

Project Photos

Project Benefits Improved bed form diversity from 90% riffle run to 60% riffle and 40% pool Significant reduction of bed and bank erosion Increased floodplain storage Reestablished riparian corridor Improved water quality – sediment reduction, DO, temperature reductions Improved habitat for American eel, alewife, and American shad

Economic Study Watts Branch Stream Restoration is one project in set of cases in 2011 Economic Impacts of the Department of the Interior’s Programs and Activities Report. Restoring a Stream, Restoring a Community-Urban watershed restoration fosters community improvement by Catherine Cullinane Thomas and Elizabeth Myrick USGS Fort Collins Science Center

Economic Study Background & Methods Three measures of economic impacts (2011 dollars): Employment - Includes full time, part time, and temporary jobs Labor income - Employee wages and salaries, payroll benefits and income of sole proprietors Value added – Contribution that the expenditures make to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Geographic Limits “Local” Area included in study Reasonable Commuting Distance – 60 miles Counties that were less than 60 miles from project site

Economic Study Results Construction took approximately 18 months to complete Due to urban nature of project, much of the money was spent in the “local economy” Direct Impacts Created 26 jobs $1.5 million in local labor income (salary, wages, and benefits) $1.5 million in local value added (contributions of expenditures to GDP) Indirect Impacts Supported an additional 19 jobs $1.1 million in labor income $1.9 million value added Total Impacts Restoration supported 45 jobs $2.6 million in local labor income $3.4 million in value added

Additional Benefits DC Parks and People – Green Corps Training A total of 173 people in 12 cohorts have now completed the full adult job training and readiness program, and thousands of youth have now connected with the youth component of the Corps They are working in urban forestry, landscaping, park revitalization, urban agriculture, green infrastructure, and a wide range of other trades. Photo Credit – DC Parks and People

Additional Benefits Sanitary sewer upgrades Increased aesthetic values Improved recreational areas Improved water quality The Economic Value of the Riparian Buffers in the Delaware River Basin - August 2018 Estimated value $10,000 per acre Watts Branch Project Created approximately 12 acres

Thanks! Conclusions Economics of restoration projects maybe complex Economic value of project can be much more than the actual construction costs Benefits are long term Thanks!

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Chesapeake Bay Field Office 177 Admiral Cochrane Drive Annapolis, Maryland 21401 www.fws.gov/chesapeakebay Mark A. Secrist mark_secrist@fws.gov