Session Co-Chairs: Neal Seitz – Vice Chair, SG 13; Chair, WP 4/13

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ITU-T 1 EU Commission Open Workshop – Identifying policy and regulatory issues of Next Generation Networks, Brussels 22 June 2005 Some comments on ITU-T.
Advertisements

International Telecommunication Union Workshop on End-to-End Quality of Service.What is it? How do we get it? Geneva, 1-3 October 2003 ITU-T Recs. Y.1541.
Q5/13: Network Interworking Including, IP Multiservices Networks
ITU-T Workshop on IP/Optical Chitose, 9-11 July 2002 Session Network Performance N eal Seitz, Chair SG 13/WP 4 IP Performance Specifications: Progress.
Study Group 13 Futures Session Working Party 4 Network Performance and Resource Management July 25, 2003 Most Active Questions Q4/13 -- Broadband and IP.
Document IPW-111 TIPHON Perspective on VoIP Numbering John Horrocks (DTI) Tiphon WG4 Chair.
AIMS Workshop Heidelberg, 9-11 March /20 A Telecom and IP Project from ETSI Gerald Meyer
 3G is the third generation of tele standards and technology for mobile networking, superseding 2.5G. It is based on the International Telecommunication.
Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Training and Development.
6. Next Generation Networks A. Transition to NGN B
December 5, 2003FG3 Report FOCUS GROUP 3 Interoperability Report to NRIC VI Council December 5, 2003 Cliff Naughton (Boeing)
GSC /04/2003 SOURCE:TSACC TITLE:End to end Quality of Service AGENDA ITEM: DECISIONX DISCUSSION INFORMATION End to End Quality of Service.
What is SIGTRAN?. SIGTRAN Signaling Transport (SIGTRAN) is an Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) standard for transporting Public-Switched Telephone.
25/11/2015 ITU-T NGN - Progress and Plans Brian Moore Lucent Technologies Chairman of ITU-T Study Group 13 1GSC-9, Seoul SOURCE:ITU-T TITLE:ITU-T NGN -
Internet Protocol TeleVision
CSE5803 Advanced Internet Protocols and Applications (14) Introduction Developed in recent years, for low cost phone calls (long distance in particular).
Multimedia Access Platforms Glen Freundlich Avaya, Inc.
International Telecommunication Union Workshop on End-to-End Quality of Service.What is it? How do we get it? Geneva, 1-3 October 2003 ITU-T QoS Workshop.
Services – a perspective on building applications Richard Swale ETSI TIPHON Wg1 chair VoIP Technologist BTexaCT ITU Workshop on IP Networking and Mediacom.
Bearer Control for VoIP and VoMPLS Control Plane Francois Le Faucheur Bruce Thompson Cisco Systems, Inc. Angela Chiu AT&T March 30, 2000.
Data and Computer Communications Chapter 2 – Protocol Architecture, TCP/IP, and Internet-Based Applications.
Paul E. Jones Cisco Systems, Inc.
VoIP ALLPPT.com _ Free PowerPoint Templates, Diagrams and Charts.
CJK test-bed study based on MPM
Instructor Materials Chapter 6: Quality of Service
Chapter 9 Optimizing Network Performance
Review of new Question descriptions under ITU-T SG11
IP Telephony (VoIP).
Quality of Service (QoS) fundamentals
SIX MONTHS INDUSTRIAL TRAINING REPORT
ASYNCHRONOUS TRANSFER MODE(ATM) Sangram Sekhar Choudhuri
Network Model for Evaluating Multimedia Transmission Performance Over Internet Protocol PN Will become TIA/EIA-921 Jack Douglass, Spirent Chair.
Network Model for Evaluating Multimedia Transmission Performance Over Internet Protocol PN Will become TIA/EIA-921 Jack Douglass, Spirent Chair.
Internet, Part 2 1) Session Initiating Protocol (SIP)
1st Draft for Defining IoT (1)
VOICE AND VIDEO OVER IP VOIP, RTP, RSVP.
IP Networking and MediaCom 2004
QOS Requirements for Real-Time Services over IP
Introduction to Networking
Proposal for the CJK NGN Test-bed Activity
Chapter 25 Multimedia TCP/IP Protocol Suite
High Intelligent Network (Smart Pipe)
Presented by Fabio Bigi Workshop Coordinator
IP Performance Specifications - Progress and Next Steps
Implement Inter-VLAN Routing
Internet, Part 2 1) Session Initiating Protocol (SIP)
Achieving, Monitoring and Maintaining A High Quality of Experience
E-business & E-commerce
Gary Thom President, Delta Information Systems, Inc.
VoIP—Voice over Internet Protocol
Targets for the SG 13 Caracas Meeting
An ITU-T Study Group 16 Project
Transmission Quality of Service (QoS) in IPCablecom
IP and NGN Projects in ITU-T Jean-Yves Cochennec France Telecom SG13 Vice Chair Workshop on Satellites in IP and Multimedia - Geneva, 9-11 December 2002.
Alain Le Roux Geneva, 14 November 2002
Session 6 Home Network Quality of Service
Implement Inter-VLAN Routing
Standardize QoS signaling protocols using Y.1541
Good Morning 1/17/2019.
High Interest Subject: NGN – End-to-End QoS
TDR Multimedia Communications
Satellite Based IP Broadband – Business Opportunities
Jean-Yves Monfort ITU-T SG 12 Chairman France Telecom, R&D Division
Quality of Service Fundamentals
Implement Inter-VLAN Routing
High Interest Subject: Internet Protocol Over Wireless
Session 4: MULTIMEDIA issues
ITU-T Study Group 16 Multimedia services, systems
QoS based pricing in IP Networks
TDR authentication requirements
Presentation transcript:

Joint Session ACHIEVING MULTIMEDIA QOS OVER HYBRID IP/PSTN INFRASTRUCTURES Session Co-Chairs: Neal Seitz – Vice Chair, SG 13; Chair, WP 4/13 (Network Performance and Resource Management) Federico Tosco – Vice Chair, SG 16; Chair, WP 2/16 (Multimedia Platform and Interworking)

INDUSTRY GOALS Define QOS requirements for real-time services (e.g., signal delay, fidelity, service availability) Implement real-time QOS mechanisms in networks (e.g., traffic control, resource allocation) Implement QOS signalling among network providers (e.g., H.248/MEGACO, BICC)

PANELISTS AND TOPICS Helmut Schink (TIPHON) – VoIP QOS requirements Les Cottrell (SLAC) – ESnet user QOS measurements Chuck Dvorak (SG 12) – ITU-T QOS responsibilities Susumu Yoneda (SG 13) – IP traffic / congestion control Mike Buckley (SG 16) – Multimedia QOS signalling Tom Taylor (IETF) – Media gateway control standards Greg Ratta (SG 11) – BICC signalling standards

SESSION PLAN (Coffee break) 30 m. Objectives and discussion questions ….… 10 m. Panelist overview presentations ...…….… 70 m. (Coffee break) 30 m. Question-driven discussion period …..….. 60 m. Summary of views / action items ..……… 10 m. ______________ 180 m.

FOR THIS SESSION, “QOS” INCLUDES: “Customer-perceived” QOS (voice, video, data, control) • Subjective measures (summarize human judgment) • Objective measures (mimic perception and judgment) “Terminal-to-terminal” and “Network” QOS • Speed, accuracy, dependability of defined functions (e.g., IP packet transfer delay, IP packet loss ratio) • Service Availability (data transfer and call control) Distinguished from “QOS mechanisms” that enable “QOS” to be provided by networks and terminals.

Terminal-to-Terminal QOS MULTIMEDIA QOS ELEMENTS Multimedia Terminal Network QOS Terminal-to-Terminal QOS  Speed, Accuracy, Dependability  Service Availability MULTIMEDIA QOS ELEMENTS  Voice  Video  Data  Call Control Customer-Perceived QOS  Subjective Measures  Objective Measures Control Network Bearer

QOS COMMITMENT MODELS Best effort (traditional Internet) One size fits all (traditional PSTN) Selectable network behavior (e.g., Diffserv) Selectable performance values (ATMF) Selectable QOS Classes (ITU-T SG 13) Goal: Enable QOS allocation and/or concatenation in a multiple technology, multiple service provider environment.

QOS MECHANISMS Admission control / traffic management Priorities (e.g. for queuing resources) Resource reservation Traffic segregation (transport and routing) Protection switching / rerouting Can be implemented per packet type, per source or destination, per aggregate, or per “connection.”

SOME DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 1. What QOS levels will be required to support interactive multimedia communications and other real-time IP network services? 2. Can a limited set of QOS classes be defined to cover the wide range of services that will be supported by future IP networks? 3. How will QOS classes be supported by IP network traffic handling or resource reservation mechanisms? 4. How will control of QOS mechanisms be coordinated in a multi-technology, multi-provider environment?

FURTHER DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 5. How will QOS differentiation be verified, among networks and on an end-to-end basis? 6. Will it be possible to make quantitative QOS commitments (e.g., assured MOS levels) to customers of multi-provider connections? 7. By what processes will the industry converge on a workable scheme for supporting end-to-end QOS? Additional questions are encouraged …

SESSION OBJECTIVES • Promote cooperation and a common vision among ITU-T, IETF, and regional standards groups addressing multimedia QOS needs in a hybrid IP/PSTN environment. • Identify specific goals for cooperative action in the development of IP/PSTN QOS standards. • Identify “volunteers” to spearhead such action.