SESSION 4 Annual Catch Estimates Introduction/Objectives – WCPFC Obligations Seventh Tuna Data Workshop (TDW-7) 15-19 April 2013 SPC, Noumea, New Caledonia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Are pelagic fisheries managed well? A stock assessment scientists perspective Mark Maunder and Shelton Harley Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission
Advertisements

Data reporting Compliance workshop: Collection and reporting of Fisheries data to IOTC Mauritius, March 2014.
Report of Chinese Observer Program in the Tropical Eastern Pacific Ocean in 2006 Xiao-jie Dai, Liu-xiong Xu and Li-ming Song Shanghai Fisheries University,
Historical and recent estimates of the body-size and abundance of pelagic species taken by longline Peter Ward RAM Myers Dalhousie University EB WP-7.
1 II-Main scientific and management results expected from the tagging programme 1) Stock structure and migrations 2) Tuna growth 3) Natural mortality as.
Third Tuna Data Workshop (TDW-3) June 2009, Auckland, New Zealand Oceanic Fisheries Programme (OFP) Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC) SESSION.
SESSION 5.5 Developments with Transhippment Data Collection Sixth Tuna Data Workshop (TDW-6) April 2013 SPC, Noumea, New Caledonia.
SESSION 4 VMS Logsheet Reconciliation A tool for Annual Catch Estimates Eighth Tuna Data Workshop (TDW-8) April 2014 SPC, Noumea, New Caledonia.
Fifth Tuna Data Workshop (TDW-5) April 2011, Noumea, New Caledonia Oceanic Fisheries Programme (OFP) Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC) Session.
Abundance Trends and Fisheries for Highly Migratory Species
Indian Ocean: tropical tuna catches increasing rapidly over the last two decades Patudo Listao Albacore.
Improving South Pacific Tuna Longline Policy and Management
TDW-11: 24-28th April 2017, Noumea, New Caledonia
Compliance in reporting
SESSION 5.1 Update on the status of Artisanal tuna fisheries data collection Seventh Tuna Data Workshop (TDW-7) April 2013 SPC, Noumea, New Caledonia.
TDW-11: 24-28th April 2017, Noumea, New Caledonia
WCPFC CMM Reporting Obligations & Compliance Monitoring Scheme
Tuna Data Workshop 24 – 28 April 2017 SPC, Noumea
Day 1 Session 1 Overview of tuna fisheries and stock assessment in the WCPO
TDW10: April 2016, Noumea, New Caledonia
Ensuring you are CMS compliant!
Update on the Implementation of PS Spill Sampling
SESSION 11 Observer Data Auditing
SESSION 4 Annual Catch Estimates
Developing a Pacific COMMUNITY Marine Specimen Bank
SESSION 5.4 Consequences for scientific data collection/management as a result of recent WCPFC decisions Sixth Tuna Data Workshop (TDW-6) April 2012.
WCPFC Ecosystem & by-catch Conservation and Management Measures
Update on the status of Artisanal Tuna Fisheries Data Collection
SESSION 10.1 Latest developments with TUFMAN
SESSION 5.5 Developments with Transhippment Data Collection
TDW-11: 24-28th April 2017, Noumea, New Caledonia
SESSION 6.3 Update on the status of Artisanal tuna fisheries data collection Sixth Tuna Data Workshop (TDW-6) April 2012 SPC, Noumea, New Caledonia.
Update on issues related to Observer Data Management
SESSION 4 Annual Catch Estimates Introduction/Objectives – WCPFC Obligations Sixth Tuna Data Workshop (TDW-6) April 2012 SPC, Noumea, New Caledonia.
SESSION 4 How to prepare your TUFMAN data to obtain Annual Catch Estimates Seventh Tuna Data Workshop (TDW-7) April 2013 SPC, Noumea, New Caledonia.
TDW10: April 2016, Noumea, New Caledonia
Legally Enforceable Data Collection
20-24 April 2015, Noumea, New Caledonia
SESSION 5.2 An update on Information Management System (IMS) initiatives Seventh Tuna Data Workshop (TDW-7) April 2013 SPC, Noumea, New Caledonia.
TDW-11: 24-28th April 2017, Noumea, New Caledonia
Review of Recommendations from TDW-4
Legally Enforceable Data Collection
TDW10: April 2016, Noumea, New Caledonia
Day 1, Session 4 Fisheries data collection for stock assessment
SESSION 4 How to prepare your TUFMAN data to obtain Annual Catch Estimates Sixth Tuna Data Workshop (TDW-6) April 2012 SPC, Noumea, New Caledonia.
Regional artisanal data collection
STAGIS Shark TAGging Information System
OBSERVER DATA VIEWER Reference Guide
SESSION 10.2 Observer Database Systems Debriefing System
Tuna Data Workshop 23 – 27 April 2018 SPC, Noumea
TUFMAN – Current Status and Future work
Regional and National Tuna Data processing strategy in the future
The use of Data in Fisheries Management
20-24 April 2015, Noumea, New Caledonia
Fifth Tuna Data Workshop (TDW-5)
WCPFC CMM Reporting Obligations & Compliance Monitoring Scheme
Improving South Pacific Tuna Longline Policy and Management
TUFMAN – Developments and future plans
Regional artisanal data collection
Electronic Reporting and Electronic Monitoring
Compliance in reporting
SESSION 10.2 Observer Database Systems Master Observer Trip List
TDW-11: 24-28th April 2017, Noumea, New Caledonia
TDW10: April 2016, Noumea, New Caledonia
First Observer Tuna Data Workshop (OTDW-1) 3-7 March 2014 SPC, Noumea, New Caledonia     Session 6.5 Suggested Scenarios in the TUBS Reporting System.
TDW-12: 23-27th April 2018, Noumea, New Caledonia
OBSERVER DATA MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES AND BEST PRACTICE (Agenda Item 4)
SESSION 9.1a TUFMAN Common Problems With Data
TDW-13: 8-12th April 2019, Noumea, New Caledonia
Ensuring you are CMS compliant!
Presentation transcript:

SESSION 4 Annual Catch Estimates Introduction/Objectives – WCPFC Obligations Seventh Tuna Data Workshop (TDW-7) 15-19 April 2013 SPC, Noumea, New Caledonia

Presentation Outline Introduction and Objectives Why collect data ? What are Annual Catch Estimates ? Why are Annual Catch estimates important ? WCPFC Annual Catch estimates submission Reference to Guidelines Key criteria to follow Areas covered Species covered Indication of how estimates determined A note about “Coverage “ Status of Annual catch estimates submissions WCPFC submissions of other data Your work on producing annual catch estimates …

Long-distance (>1,000 nmi) movements of tagged skipjack. Why collect data ? Tuna don’t recognise man-made boundaries – they are “highly migratory” species - so stock assessment and management must be done on a regional, and sometimes ocean-wide, basis Long-distance (>1,000 nmi) movements of tagged skipjack.

Data obligations to the WCPFC In order to conduct the scientific work necessary to ensure the conservation and management of the target tuna species throughout their stock boundaries … (essentially the entire Convention Area and beyond) … WCPFC member countries agreed that a set of fishery data must be provided on an annual basis to conduct the regional stock assessments, which would provide advice to the WCPFC member countries to manage their stocks …..

What are Annual Catch Estimates ? “…are simply the total catches by species for a fishing fleet covering a calendar year “ Catch => metric tons Total number of active vessels in the fleet => required (as per slide)

Why are Annual Catch Estimates important ? Summary of actual catch at a concise level Indication of all data collected in the tuna fishery Indication of the evolution of National fisheries Provides easy comparisons between years, fleets, gears, fisheries, etc. Can be used for economic purpose (value of catch) Used to give an indication of coverage of other data collected -- Used to “raise” other types of data used in stock assessments (logsheet and landings data) (as per slide)

Annual Catch Estimates – WCPFC guidelines The WCPFC guidelines for “Scientific Data to be provided to the Commission” specify exactly what is required. (http://www.wcpfc.int/doc/data-01/scientific-data-be-provided-commission-revised-wcpfc4-wcpfc6) (as per slide)

Annual catch by GEAR and SPECIES No. of ACTIVE Vessels Calendar Year Annual Catch Estimates – WCPFC Data Provision WCPFC Requirements: Annual catch by GEAR and SPECIES No. of ACTIVE Vessels Calendar Year The area is the WCPFC CONVENTION AREA Prepared for the NATIONAL FLEET The deadline is 30th APRIL each year More details: http://www.wcpfc.int/doc/data-01/scientific-data-be-provided-commission-revised-wcpfc4-wcpfc6 (as per slide)

Annual catch estimates provided for the WCPFC Convention Area

Annual catch estimates must be provided for the other areas in some cases. For example, ALB and SWO stocks are separated by the equator

Annual catch estimates The main requirement is for the provision of total annual catch in metric tons by GEAR and SPECIES for your national fleet activities in the WCPFC Statistical Area. Species catches for each gear type are … LONGLINE : Bigeye, Albacore, Yellowfin, Pacific Bluefin and Skipjack tuna; Striped marlin, blue marlin, black marlin and swordfish; Blue shark, Silky shark, Oceanic Whitetip shark, Thresher sharks, Mako sharks and Hammerhead sharks PURSE SEINE : Skipjack, Yellowfin, Bigeye, Albacore and Pacific Bluefin tuna POLE-AND-LINE: Skipjack, Yellowfin , Bigeye, Albacore and Pacific Bluefin tuna TROLL: Skipjack, Yellowfin , Bigeye, Albacore and Pacific Bluefin tuna OTHER GEARS: Skipjack, Yellowfin , Bigeye, Albacore and Pacific Bluefin tuna

Annual catch estimates What types of data were used Need to provide an indication of how annual catch estimates were determined... What types of data were used Coverage rates of each type of data used Statistical methods used - if relevant Conversion factors used – if relevant (e.g. what is used to convert the processed weight of longline-caught fish to whole weight) For your estimates, this could be covered as follows … Logsheet and unloadings data raised using VMS Trip data Coverage of logsheet data was 82% determined from VMS trip data TUFMAN was used to raise logsheet-reported catch by weight based on unloadings data

Importance of “coverage” and annual catch estimates In general terms, “coverage” is defined as - “The extent or degree to which something is observed, analyzed, and reported” With certain tuna fishery data collection, we strive to achieve 100% coverage which provides the most accurate reflection of the fishery (as per slide)

Coverage Why is Coverage important ? “Coverage” provides an indication of the reliability of the different types of data collected and the degree that it represents actual fishing activity [Lower coverage usually means more “bias”] “Coverage” is a key component in estimating annual catches, and the level of coverage will determine the accuracy of the annual catch estimate … (as per slide)

Provision of 2011 Annual Catch Estimates to the WCPFC http://www.wcpfc.int/statprov (as per slide)

WCPFC Submissions – other data A note about the provision of AGGREGATE and OPERATIONAL LOGSHEET data to the WCPFC SPC Member countries who provide logsheets to SPC on a regular basis automatically satisfy the requirement for the submission of AGGREGATE and operational LOGSHEET data to the WCPFC (as per slide)

WCPFC Submissions – other data (as per slide) Provision of 2012 Aggregate data to the WCPFC Since Pacific Island member countries regularly provide SPC with logsheet data, their WCPFC aggregate data submission is AUTOMATIC – it is generated by SPC on your behalf

In any event, we are here to help you this week ! Annual catch estimates – what you need to do .. The work needs to be completed by the end of the week Use your template from last year (see next slides) If appropriate, use your TUFMAN data to determine annual catch estimates with the VMS recon tool (refer to the next presentation) Don’t forget to consider revising the estimates from years prior to 2012 - if appropriate ! Special attention this year to SHARK CATCH Estimates and DISCARDS estimates !! In any event, we are here to help you this week ! Congratulations to those who have already submitted their 2012 estimates (as per slide)

(as per slide)

(as per slide)

Annual catch estimates – SHARK SPECIES ... SPC has produced estimates of SHARK SPECIES for your fleets from OBSERVER DATA … we will provide these estimates to you to incorporate into your ANNUAL CATCHES estimates provision … (as per slide) NOTES Shark species catch estimates have been determined by raising the nominal observed catch by the coverage rate (observed target tuna catch to annual catch estimates of target tuna). Observer data with coverage rates > 0.8% have only be considered. There are currently no observer data are available (for this year) to estimate shark species catches.  As an interim measure, shark species composition data obtained from observers for this fleet in adjacent years have been used to produce very provisional estimates of shark species catch. For recent years, processed observer data may become available and will therefore contribute to a more reliable estimate in the future. The observer data coverage rate is considered too low (< 0.8%) to produce estimates of shark species catches for this year.  As an interim measure, shark species composition data obtained from observers for this fleet in adjacent years have been used to produce very provisional estimates of shark species catch. For recent years, processed observer data may become available and will therefore contribute to a more reliable estimate in the future.