Systems Vaccinology Immunity

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Workshop on the immunological basis of vaccine efficacy Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute December 14, 2009 Ira M. Longini, Jr. Center for Statistical.
Advertisements

Maintaining Cell Identity through Global Control of Genomic Organization Gioacchino Natoli Immunity Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010) DOI: /j.immuni
The Transcription Factor Foxo1 Controls Central-Memory CD8+ T Cell Responses to Infection Myoungjoo V. Kim, Weiming Ouyang, Will Liao, Michael Q. Zhang,
Vaccines for the elderly
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
HIV-1 Latency by Transition
Anergic B Cells Caught in the Act
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Protein Networks in Alzheimer’s Disease
Costimulatory and Coinhibitory Receptor Pathways in Infectious Disease
Joseph C. Mudd, Jason M. Brenchley  Immunity 
How Many Subsets of Innate Lymphoid Cells Do We Need?
Rapid, Flow Cytometric Assay for NK Alloreactivity Reveals Exceptions to Rules Governing Alloreactivity  Dianne De Santis, Bree A. Foley, Elisabeth John,
The Architects of B and T Cell Immune Responses
Initial T Cell Receptor Transgenic Cell Precursor Frequency Dictates Critical Aspects of the CD8+ T Cell Response to Infection  Vladimir P. Badovinac,
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
The Lymphopenic Mouse in Immunology: From Patron to Pariah
2008: A MyD88 O, DC  Bali Pulendran, Weiping Cao  Immunity 
Pericycle Current Biology
Front-Line Memory T Cells Think Outside the T-box… Mostly
Chronic Infections Capture Little Attention of the Masses
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Redefining Clinical Trials: The Age of Personalized Medicine
T Helper 17 Cells Get the NOD
Benjamin Wooden, Nicolas Goossens, Yujin Hoshida, Scott L. Friedman 
Wing Y. Chang, William L. Stanford  Cell Stem Cell 
Widespread Immunological Functions of Mast Cells: Fact or Fiction?
PU.1 Takes Control of the Dendritic Cell Lineage
Coordinating the Human Looks
Thymic Selection: To Thine Own Self Be True
IgM Memory Cells: First Responders in Malaria
Angela L. Rasmussen, Michael G. Katze  Cell Host & Microbe 
Reverse Vaccinology: Developing Vaccines in the Era of Genomics
Juleen R. Zierath, Harriet Wallberg-Henriksson  Cell Metabolism 
Interleukin-17 Kick-Starts T Helper 1 Cell Differentiation
HIV-1 Vaccines: Let’s Get Physical
Chronic Infections Capture Little Attention of the Masses
Expression Diversity Adds Richness to T Cell Populations
Eukaryotic Transcription Activation: Right on Target
Etiology of Type 1 Diabetes
Systems Biology Strikes Gold
Keeping in Touch to Differentiate
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
ILC1 Populations Join the Border Patrol
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Blood Tfh Cells Come with Colors
Will There Be a Vaccine to Protect Against the Hepatitis C Virus?
Pericycle Current Biology
Immune and Nervous Systems: More Than Just a Superficial Similarity?
The TCR Takes Some Immune Responsibility
Vaccines for the elderly
ILC-poiesis: Making Tissue ILCs from Blood
Costimulatory and Coinhibitory Receptor Pathways in Infectious Disease
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Th17: An Effector CD4 T Cell Lineage with Regulatory T Cell Ties
Mast Cell Deficiency, A Game of Kit and Mouse
Mechanism of Action of Conventional and Targeted Anticancer Therapies: Reinstating Immunosurveillance  Laurence Zitvogel, Lorenzo Galluzzi, Mark J. Smyth,
Volume 40, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Trained Immunity: A Memory for Innate Host Defense
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Keeping STATs on Memory CD8+ T Cells
Ewing's sarcoma: General insights from a rare model
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
From Vaccines to Memory and Back
Paradigm for the cycle of precision vaccinology.
The Technology and Biology of Single-Cell RNA Sequencing
CTLA4Ig: Bridging the Basic Immunology with Clinical Application
Presentation transcript:

Systems Vaccinology Immunity Bali Pulendran, Shuzhao Li, Helder I. Nakaya  Immunity  Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 516-529 (October 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.10.006 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Using Systems Biology to Predict the Immunogenicity of the YF-17D Vaccine Schematic representation of the systems biology approach used to predict the T and B cell responses of YF-17D vaccinees (Querec et al., 2009). Healthy humans vaccinated with YF-17D are bled at the indicated time points and the innate and adaptive responses studied. Innate signatures obtained with microarrays are found to correlate with the later adaptive immune responses. The predictive power of such signatures is tested in an independent trial (trial 2). Immunity 2010 33, 516-529DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2010.10.006) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Construction of a Generic Vaccine Chip (Top) Systems biology approaches allow the identification of predictive gene signatures of immunogenicity for many vaccines. Vaccines with similar correlates of protection may or may not share the same gene markers. The identification of predictive signatures of many vaccines would enable the development of a vaccine chip. (Bottom) This chip would consist of perhaps a few hundred genes, subsets of which would predict a particular type of innate or adaptive immune response (e.g., magnitude of effector CD8+ T cell response, frequency of polyfunctional T cells, balance of T helper 1 (Th1), Th2, and Th17 cells, high-affinity antibody titers, and so on). This would allow the rapid evaluation of vaccinees for the strength, type, duration, and quality of protective immune responses stimulated by the vaccine. Thus, the vaccine chip is a device that could be used to predict immunogenicity and protective capacity of virtually any vaccine in the future. Immunity 2010 33, 516-529DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2010.10.006) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Integrating Systems Biology Approaches into Clinical Trials (Top) For vaccines for which correlates or protection are known (Table 1), systems approaches can be used to identify early signatures of protection in a phase 1 trial. The key genes from these signatures can be incorporated into a vaccine chip or ELISA kit, which can then be used to identify nonresponders or suboptimal responders, particularly in special populations such as immunocompromised patients, the elderly, and infants. (Bottom) For new and emerging vaccines, for which correlates of protection are unknown, signatures that predict various aspects of immunogenicity (e.g., CD8+ T cell responses or neutralizing antibody responses) can be assessed in phase I trials. Such signatures can then be incorporated into a vaccine chip or ELISA kit that can then be used in phase II and III trials to determine their capacity to predict protection. Alternatively, a retrospective nested case-control study could be done in a phase II and III trial to identify signatures of protection. Immunity 2010 33, 516-529DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2010.10.006) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 A Framework for Systems Vaccinology Systems biology approaches applied to clinical trials can lead to the generation of new hypotheses that can be tested and ultimately lead to developing better vaccines. For example, immune responses to vaccination in clinical trials can be profiled in exquisite depth with technologies such as microarrays, deep sequencing, and proteomics. The high-throughput data generated can be mined using bioinformatics tools and used to create hypotheses about the biological mechanisms underlying vaccine-induced immunity. Such hypotheses can then be tested with animal models or in vitro human systems. The insights gained from experimentation can then guide the design and development of new vaccines. Such a framework seeks to bridge the so-called gaps between clinical trials and discovery-based science, between human immunology and mouse immunology, and between translational and basic science and offers a seamless continuum of scientific discovery and vaccine invention. Immunity 2010 33, 516-529DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2010.10.006) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Box 1 Prediction and Classification Based on Gene Expression Signatures Immunity 2010 33, 516-529DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2010.10.006) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions