Figure 1 The genomic nephrology workflow: genetic diagnosis and clinical application Figure 1 |The genomic nephrology workflow: genetic diagnosis and clinical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Patient Decisions for Disclosure of Secondary Findings Identified from Clinical Diagnostic Exome Sequencing Gonzalez K 1, Shahmirzadi L 1, Palmaer E 1,
Advertisements

Role of clinical genetics in medicine. Who provides this service Varies depending on structure and funding of service but is in reality provided by many.
The Future of Cancer Care The Future of Cancer Care Stephen C. Schimpff Executive Vice President, UMMC Interim Director, University of Maryland Greenebaum.
Understanding Genetic Testing
Lecture I: Genomic Pathology: An Introduction Richard L. Haspel, MD, PhD Mark S. Boguski, MD, PhD 1 TRIG Curriculum: Lecture 1 March 2012.
INTERPRETING GENETIC MUTATIONAL DATA FOR CLINICAL ONCOLOGY Ben Ho Park, M.D., Ph.D. Associate Professor of Oncology Johns Hopkins University May 2014.
European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation Challenges in Personalised Medicine.
Hereditary Cancer Predisposition: Updates in Genetic Testing
Interpreting exomes and genomes: a beginner’s guide
Olga Jarinova, PhD, FCCMG
National Healthcare Science Week 2017
Monogenic Disorders Genetic Counselling
THE ROLE OF NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
Christopher J. Klein, MD, Tatiana M. Foroud, PhD 
Development of a next-generation sequencing gene panel for neurogenetic disorders J E Martindale, R Crookes, L Crooks, N J Beauchamp, A Dalton Sheffield.
Nat. Rev. Neurol. doi: /nrneurol
Figure 1 Framework for variant interpretation of phaeochromocytomas and/or paragangliomas (PPGLs) susceptibility genes into five classes based on the likelihood.
Nat. Rev. Nephrol. doi: /nrneph
Figure 5 A layered approach to the follow-up of patients with acute kidney disease (AKD) Figure 5 | A layered approach to the follow-up of patients with.
Figure 4 Interplay between acute kidney injury (AKI),
Figure 6 Effects of adiponectin on podocyte function
Content and Labeling of Tests Marketed as Clinical “Whole-Exome Sequencing” Perspectives from a cancer genetics clinician and clinical lab director Allen.
Figure 6 Differences in glycaemic control with the study drug
Figure 6 Approach to drug management in patients with acute kidney disease (AKD) Figure 6 | Approach to drug management in patients with acute kidney disease.
Christopher J. Klein, MD, Tatiana M. Foroud, PhD 
Figure 3 Risk-adapted and response-adapted
Nat. Rev. Nephrol. doi: /nrneph
Figure 3 Semantic model of the active surveillance (AS) timeline
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Genomic Medicine Centre Overview
Lorraine Hartles West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory
Figure 6 The bioavailability of phosphate differs according to the protein source Figure 6 | The bioavailability of phosphate differs according to the.
Figure 7 The efficacy of phosphate-binder therapy
Genomic Medicine Centre Overview
Figure 5 Risk factor control in the intensive treatment group
Figure 2 The network of chronic diseases and their mutual influences
Figure 1 The burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD)
Figure 3 Societal costs for the care of patients with chronic kidney disease in the UK Figure 3 | Societal costs for the care of patients with chronic.
Figure 2 Podocyte dysfunction is a common feature of renal injury
Figure 1 Acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
100,000 Genomes Project & Mainstreaming Genomic Medicine
Figure 2 Endocrine dysfunction in mitochondrial disease and their associated gene defects Figure 2 | Endocrine dysfunction in mitochondrial disease and.
Figure 1 Translocations involved in multiple myeloma
Nat. Rev. Nephrol. doi: /nrneph
Nat. Rev. Nephrol. doi: /nrneph
Figure Revised Niemann-Pick disease type C (NP-C) diagnostic algorithm for the use of biomarkers and genetic testing Revised Niemann-Pick disease type.
The Genetic Basis for Cancer Treatment Decisions
Nat. Rev. Nephrol. doi: /nrneph
Clinical Genomics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Figure 3 Serum phosphate level is associated with
Nat. Rev. Nephrol. doi: /nrneph
100,000 Genomes Project & mainstreaming genomic medicine
Variant Triaging and ESMO Guidelines
Coverage and Reimbursement to Genetic Testing
Figure 2 Sources of data to characterize the ADPKD clinical phenotype
Nat. Rev. Nephrol. doi: /nrneph
Genomic Technologies and the New Era of Genomic Medicine
Genomic Medicine Centre Overview
Figure 3 Preventive strategies for CSA-AKI
Figure 5 Schematic overview of a clinical decision-support
Figure 4 The relationship between the time-dependent changes in the expression of immunoglobulin, mast cell, acute kidney injury (AKI), and fibrillar collagen.
Integration of Genomic Medicine into Pathology Residency Training
Figure 4 Radiogenomics analysis can reveal relationships
Lynda Anne Szczech, Ira L. Lazar  Kidney International 
The Drosophila pipeline for modeling human disease.
Importance of Early Diagnosis and Management in SMA
Nat. Rev. Nephrol. doi: /nrneph
Speakers: Lissa Poincenot & Dr. Nancy Newman June 28, 2019
Figure 1 Relationships between genetic variants, quantitative traits and diseases Figure 1 | Relationships between genetic variants, quantitative traits.
Presentation transcript:

Figure 1 The genomic nephrology workflow: genetic diagnosis and clinical application Figure 1 |The genomic nephrology workflow: genetic diagnosis and clinical application. The first step in obtaining a genetic diagnosis for a patient with kidney disease is to characterize their disease phenotype by summarizing their clinical history and other relevant data (for example, findings from biochemical, imaging, and histopathological studies). This phenotype is then used to guide the choice of genetic testing modality. Among patients with genetically heterogeneous disease aetiologies, clinically ambiguous phenotypes, or null results obtained using targeted forms of genetic testing such as Sanger sequencing or targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels, increasingly broad sequencing approaches can be applied, including Mendeliome panels, which can detect variants in all known disease-causing genes; whole-exome sequencing (WES), which can detect variants in all coding regions; and whole-genome sequencing (WGS), which can detect variants in all coding and non-coding regions. Clinical sequence interpretation should be performed according to consensus guidelines66,67,182. This process involves identifying genes that are relevant to the phenotype of the patient, prioritizing variants on the basis of prior reports in disease cases as well as compatibility with the prevalence and genetic pathogenesis of the associated disease, and assessing the concordance between the genetic findings and the clinical phenotype. If deemed diagnostic, these primary findings, together with secondary findings if the patient has opted to receive them, can be returned and used to inform prognosis and guide personalized care, including targeted work‑up and surveillance, choice of therapy, referral for clinical trials and family counselling. Groopman, E. E. et al. (2018) Genomic medicine for kidney disease Nat. Rev. Nephrol. doi:10.1038/nrneph.2017.167