Scorecard Future File Data

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LACCD Strategic Plan Internal Scan A. Enrollment Trends and Student Characteristics.
Advertisements

California Community Colleges Student Success 2014 Scorecard 2014 Scorecard College of the Desert Board of Trustee Presentation Dec. 19, 2014.
Student Success Pilot Project Overview Student Success Pilot Project ITS Workgroup March 8, 2010.
Scorecard: How to Improve your CDCP Outcomes Rate Association for Community and Continuing Education 2014 Annual Conference Beverly Heasley Mt. San Antonio.
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges 2010 Report: Moreno Valley College Calculation presented by presented by David Torres, Dean Institutional.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
 Student Success: What Is It, and How Can We Measure It? Kim Harrell, Folsom Lake College Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College David Morse, ASCCC Executive.
1 Foothill College Basic Skills College Hour Rob Johnstone, Ph.D. 10/8/03.
Summary of Emerging Trends in Higher Education Spring 2011.
November 13, 2013 Contra Costa Community College District Board Review Achievement Gap Report & College Scorecards.
Student Success Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges September 2011.
De Anza Equity for All, Spring 2006 Equity for All Institutional Responsibility for Student Success Project.
ARCC Accountability Report for the Community Colleges Focus on Quality.
Defining a Career Skills Building Student Cohort & Outcome.
The Student Success Scorecard Dr. Matt Wetstein Interim Vice President of Instruction April 16,
Board of Trustees Presentation 2014 Student Success Scorecard Report and District Strategic Plan Metrics Presented by Mallory Newell August 25,
Accountability Reporting for Community Colleges (ARCC) 2007 Report for Cerritos College Bill Farmer and Nathan Durdella.
Cuesta College ARCC Data Report to the San Luis Obispo Community College District Board of Trustees May 5, 2010.
2014 Student Success Scorecard PaRC Presentation May 7, 2014 E. Kuo FH IR&P *Formerly known as the Accountability Reporting for Community Colleges (ARCC)
Student Success Scorecard PaRC Presentation April 17, 2013 FOOTHILL COLLEGE E. Kuo FH IR&P *Formerly known as the Accountability Reporting for Community.
REMEDIATION IN COLORADO. COLORADO GEAR UP SUCCESS.
Student Achievement Coding as of September Data principles Keep all calculations as transparent as possible. Colleges can replicate all points.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
Student Success Scorecard De Anza College 2015 Mallory Newell Office of Research and Planning.
 California community colleges serve over 2.9 million students each year  70 to 80% of students enrolled in California community colleges need developmental.
2010 ARCC Overview Michael Orkin, Ph.D. Associate Vice Chancellor of Academic Affairs Peralta Community College District.
Pierce College Students: Who They Are & How They’re Doing Carol Kozeracki Student Success Mini-Conference February 9, 2007.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability for community colleges, by community colleges.
Mallory Newell Office of Institutional Research and Planning
Student Pathways as defined exclusively by Units Earned Units Earned in Following Spring Term Units Earned in Next Fall Term Units Earned in First Fall.
1 A ccountability R eporting for the C ommunity C olleges (ARCC) 2008 Presentation to Peralta Community College Board of Trustees Merritt College Office.
The Voluntary Framework of Accountability
SLOCCCD Board of Trustees Meeting November 2, 2016
Student Success Scorecard: 2016 Report
Student Success Scorecard and Institution-Set Standards 2014
Student Success Scorecard 2017
Student Success Scorecard Spring 2017
Student Success Scorecard Spring 2016
SLOCCCD Board of Trustees October 1, 2014
January 23, 2017 Academic Senate Meeting
2016 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
Contra Costa Community College District
Educational Master Plan
Indicators Four areas of institutional effectiveness
2017 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
Board of Trustees Review
SOCCCD Board of Trustees’ Meeting
Student Success Scorecard & Other Institutional Effectiveness Metrics
Dr. Brian Lofman, Dean April 18, 2017 Student Success Scorecard 2017:
IFs and Nested IFs =IF(R3<60,”F”,”P”)
Dr. Brian Lofman, Dean April 18, 2017 Student Success Scorecard 2017:
Student Success Data.
Institution-Set Standards for Improvement
2008 ARCC Report Findings February 2, 2009
2009 ARCC Report Findings October 5, 2009
Presentation to the Mt. San Jacinto College Board of Trustees
Student Success Metrics
Career Technical Education (CTE) Completion Rates
Institution-Set Standards for Improvement
Governance Institute for Student Success (GISS) Wed
Resources Pertaining to Student and Faculty Diversity
Guided Pathways Metrics for Accountability
Student Success Scorecard
Dr. Bridget Herrin Associate Dean, Research & Planning
SLOCCCD Board of Trustees October 7, 2014
Disproportionate Impact Study
IPEDS Outcome Measures and the VFA
2010 ARCC Report Findings May 3, 2010
Presented to the Strategic Planning Committee
Fall 2018 & Winter 2019 AB 705 Results.
Presentation transcript:

Scorecard Future File Data Institutional Research and Planning, 5/23/2018

Current Scorecard Data Scorecard Metric: Cohorts of degree, certificate, transfer-seeking first-time students. The 2012-2013 cohort will be our “Degree/Transfer Completion” cohort next year (Scorecard will be replaced after this year) Students achieve Degree/Transfer Completion if they: Earn an AA/AS or certificate, transfer to a four-year university, or achieve transfer-prepared (90 UC/CSU transferable units) within six years. Current Scorecard Data 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 Future Scorecard Data

Future Cohorts The four most recent cohorts ranged between 3,479 and 3,157 students This analysis of the future file from the Scorecard includes rates of degree/transfer completion matched to our own data to determine: percent of students who are still enrolled, highest level of English and Math completed, and rates of completion by ethnicity. 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 3,416 3,401 3,479 3,157

2018 Scorecard Data 5-Year Trends

Basic Skills Completion Rates

Transfer-Level Course Completion

Scorecard Future File Analysis

Completion of Degree/Transfer Vs. Non Completion

Currently Enrolled Student who DID NOT Achieve Completion 2012-2013 5% Original Cohort 2013-2014 10% 19% of last four cohorts are still enrolled 2014-2015 19% 2015-2016 45%

English Course Completion 2015-2016 Cohort

2015-2016 Scorecard Cohort: Highest English Course Completed 3,157 2015-16 Cohort 745 24% Completed 2,412 76% Not Completed 977 41% Not enrolled 1,435 59% Currently enrolled 40%

2015-2016 Scorecard Cohort: Highest English Course Completed 3,157 2015-16 Cohort 745 24% Completed 2,412 76% Not Completed 977 41% Not enrolled 1,435 59% Currently enrolled 133 Non-pass grades in EWRT1A 100 Non-pass grades in EWRT211 38 grades from ENGL courses at Foothill

Math Course Completion 2015-2016 Cohort

2015-2016 Scorecard Cohort: Highest Math Course Completed 3,157 2015-16 Cohort 745 24% Completed 2,412 76% Not Completed 977 41% Not enrolled 1,435 59% Currently enrolled 40%

2015-2016 Scorecard Cohort: Highest Math Course Completed 3,157 2015-16 Cohort 745 24% Completed 2,412 76% Not Completed 977 41% Not enrolled 1,435 59% Currently enrolled 225 Non-pass grades in Math10 178 Non-pass grades in Math114

Achievement of Degree/Transfer Completion by Cohort and Ethnicity

2015-2016 Cohort: Completion and Non Completion by Ethnicity

2014-2015 Cohort: Completion and Non Completion by Ethnicity

2013-2014 Cohort: Completion and Non Completion by Ethnicity

2012-2013 Cohort: Completion and Non Completion by Ethnicity

Summary

Future Cohorts: 2015-2016 Cohort The majority of students who did not achieve degree/transfer completion are still enrolled (59%) The majority of students have either completed transfer level Math (60%) or transfer level English courses (60%). Why one and not the other? Currently enrolled students who did not pass transfer-level courses struggled with EWRT1A and EWRT211 in English, and struggled with Math10, Math114, and Math41 in math

Questions/Comments