Physiologic outcome measures for urinary incontinence

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pelvic Floor Anatomy and Female Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction
Advertisements

Prolapse and Incontinence
8th Edition APGO Objectives for Medical Students
Relaxation of Pelvic Supports (Pelvic Organ Prolapse)
Staging for Cervical Cancer Can be done under anaesthesia WHO recommends downstaging Aim is to obtain adequate Histological specimen for conformation (
Female Pelvic Organ Prolapse
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
The Reproductive System
Diagnosis and Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
THE VAGINAL PESSARY Bernie Brenner Gynaecologist Clinical Director – Pelvic Floor Clinic Milford Auckland Presentation modified.
Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) Herniation of the pelvic organs to or beyond the vaginal walls Annual cost of ambulatory care from 2005 to 2006 was almost.
Imaging of the pelvic floor: Ultrasound and MRI
Total Uterine Prolapse
Evaluation of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Definition and Classification
MRI IN Pelvic Floor Disorders
A one day update in Gynaecology The National Association for Premenstrual Syndrome 19th June 2015 Ring pessary management including the use of silicone.
REPRODUCTIVE VISCERA FEMALE. Uterus Ligamentous structures: Ligamentous structures: Broad ligament: Mesometrium. Uterus to  lateral walls and pelvic.
Genital prolapse What is genital prolapse?
UOG Journal Club: April 2014 Comparison of vaginal mesh repair with sacrospinous vaginal colpopexy in the management of vaginal vault prolapse after hysterectomy.
« Rectocoele » Mesh?.
A: Example of complete vaginal prolapse (eversion) using POPQ classification. This occurs after a hysterectomy; therefore, there is no point D. Points.
Total hysterectomy and anterior vaginal wall suspension for concurrent uterine and bladder prolapses: Long-term anatomical results of additional vault.
Correct position of the incontinence ring
Peter Rehder, Christian Gozzi  European Urology 
Vaginal Motion and Bladder and Rectal Volumes During Pelvic Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy After Hysterectomy  Anuja Jhingran, M.D., Mohammad Salehpour,
POP Q.
Geriatric Gynecology.
What Impacts the All Cause Risk of Reoperation after Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair? A Comparison of Mesh and Native Tissue Approaches in 110,329 Women 
PELVIC FLOOR AND FUNCTIONAL ANATOMY
Urinary and fecal incontinence in nursing homes
Nutrition in End-Stage Liver Disease: Principles and Practice
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Nerve-Sparing Open Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy
Pathophysiology of adult urinary incontinence
Volume 126, Pages S164-S168 (January 2004)
Arianna Lesma, Aldo Bocciardi, Francesco Montorsi, Patrizio Rigatti 
Volume 126, Pages S152-S158 (January 2004)
Recent Advances in Assessing Anorectal Structure and Functions
The Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders and the Rome III Process
Volume 73, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Incontinence severity and QOL scales for fecal incontinence
Short-Bowel Syndrome Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Phenotypic Variation in Functional Disorders of Defecation
Volume 143, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Recent Advances in Assessing Anorectal Structure and Functions
Covering the Cover Gastroenterology
D. Batlle, P. Ramadugu, M.J. Soler  Kidney International 
Volume 126, Pages S172-S174 (January 2004)
Barry Marshall 2005 Nobel Laureate in Medicine and Physiology
Parturition Care Planning
Volume 126, Pages S90-S98 (January 2004)
Volume 150, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Figure 7 Operative excision of a urethral diverticulum with a Martius fat pad interposition Figure 7 | Operative excision of a urethral diverticulum with.
Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan, David Lieberman  Gastroenterology 
Colorectal cancer at a young age
Volume 150, Issue 7, Pages (June 2016)
Covering the Cover Gastroenterology
The Dawning of a New Editorial Board for Gastroenterology
Behavioral management of fecal incontinence in adults
Medical management of fecal incontinence
Volume 156, Issue 4, Pages (March 2019)
Volume 147, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014)
Changing of the Guards: 2011–2016 Gastroenterology Team
Michelle Maria Pietzak  Gastroenterology 
Choosing outcome variables: global assessment and diaries
Volume 143, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
Presentation transcript:

Physiologic outcome measures for urinary incontinence Ingrid Nygaard  Gastroenterology  Volume 126, Pages S99-S105 (January 2004) DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.009

Figure 1 POP-Q. Pelvic organ support is assessed during Valsalva efforts. Measurements are described relative to the hymeneal ring; points above the hymen, except total vaginal length (TVL), are recorded as negative values, and those beyond the hymen are recorded as positive values. The points include the following: 2 anterior points (Aa, that point 3 cm above the urethral meatus on the anterior vaginal wall in the midline [corresponding to the approximate location of the “urethrovesical crease”]; Ba, the most dependent portion of the anterior vaginal wall above Aa), 3 apical points (C, the leading edge of the cervix or vaginal cuff [or hysterectomy scar]; D, the posterior fornix in women with intact uteri [this point is not recorded in women without a cervix]; TVL, total vaginal length [distance from cervix or vaginal cuff, measured without Valsalva]), 2 posterior points (Ap, that point 3 cm above the hymen in the midline on the posterior vaginal wall; Bp, the most dependent portion of the posterior vaginal wall above Ap), and 2 points outside the vagina (gh, the distance from the middle of the urethral meatus to the posterior hymen in the midline; pb, the distance from the superior aspect of the perineal body to the midanal opening). Adapted with permission from Bump et al.44 Gastroenterology 2004 126, S99-S105DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.009)

Figure 2 The current staging system, used to describe the severity of prolapse, is based on the POP-Q measurement system and includes 5 stages as follows: stage 0, no prolapse; stage I, the most distal prolapse does not descend past 2 cm above the hymeneal ring; stage II, the most distal prolapse is between 1 cm above and 1 cm below the hymeneal ring; stage III, the most distal prolapse is at least 2 cm below the hymeneal ring but not as far out as stage IV; stage IV, complete vault eversion and the most distal prolapse protrudes at least as far out as TVL −2 cm.44 This figure shows examples of stages III and IV. Gastroenterology 2004 126, S99-S105DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.009)