Professional Development Modules: English Learner Tool Kit Chapter One - Communication with EL Parents [presenter] [date]

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jonathan Gibson & Kulwadee Axtell Nevada Department of Education.
Advertisements

Civil Rights and English Learners Melanie Manares Kansas State Department of Education.
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network.
Legal Obligations of the Juvenile Justice System for Limited English Proficient Youth Sam Jammal Legislative Staff Attorney MALDEF.
Civil Rights Act Office for Civil Rights (OCR). What Laws Does OCR Enforce? “No person shall on the ground of race, color or national origin, be denied.
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network 1.
Lau vs. Nichols Group 1.
 Federal Laws Related to English Learners. Video – How Not to Register EL Students.
New Title III Guidance U.S. Department of Education and U.S. Department of Justice Jointly Released: January 7, 2015 Office of Program Administration.
Title III: Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient and Immigrant Students Serving English Language Learners – It’s the Law VAFEPA: October.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
The English as a Second Language Program
1 Office for Civil Rights U.S. Department of Education This presentation provides general information and does not represent a complete recitation of.
U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights (OCR) Title VI, Section 504, Title II – Special Education and Limited English Proficient Students.
Section III: Legislation & Supreme Court Rulings in Support of ELLs
State Laws, Recommendations, & NCLB How research becomes policies Janice Kroeger, Ph.D. Associate Professor, TLC, ECED.
Questions and Responses: New Joint Title III Guidance U.S. Department of Education and U.S. Department of Justice Jointly Released: January 7, 2015 Office.
A Project Sponsored by the McCormick Foundation LINC Consortium Meeting August 9, 2011.
Serving English Language Learners with ESEA Title III, Part A Funds.
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network.
Meeting the Educational Needs of Diverse Learners DeAngela Milligan and Sarah Bardack.
Meeting and Exceeding Language and Communication Mandates Todd Blickenstaff Hablamos Juntos Gisela Prieto Caliente Communications June 2-3, 2003 Cultural.
ESOL Program (English for Speakers of Other Languages) in Greenwood District Questions and Answers Updated July 2015.
Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
From Lau to Unz: An Anatomy of the Debate over Bilingual Education. Kenji Hakuta Stanford University University of La Verne.
ESL LEGISTLATION ELS Language Centers Daiva Berzinskas Contact Information:
Civil Rights Presented by: Angie Martin October 5, 2011 Office of the Governor Criminal Justice Division.
English Language Learners and the Law Gema Sieh Highland Rim.
Laws Governing ESL Programs in the US Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI prohibits discrimination on the grounds of race, color,
Joint Guidance from USED and DOJ on LEP Students Released: January 7, 2015 Stacy Freeman, Title III Specialist Shyla Vesitis, Title I/III Specialist Office.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title.
2013.  Familiarize staff with parent involvement requirements  Learn process to involve parents in the development of activities and policies  Learn.
Title III: 101 Jacqueline A. Iribarren Ph.D. Title III, ESL & Bilingual Ed. Consultant October 20, 2011.
Time line of ESL Legislation Jena Tabor- ESL Teacher Flintville Elementary School
Title III and ESOL. Chapter 7: Serving Students with Special Needs IDEA Section 504 ESOL Chapter 8 – Student Discipline, Suspension, and Expulsion Student.
KRISTI CRUZ ANN WENNERSTROM WASHINGTON STATE COALITION FOR LANGUAGE ACCESS LANGUAGE ACCESS 101.
Agenda Review Public Comments Election of Chair NDE ELL Program Professionals: Jane Splean – Program Supervisor Kulwadee Axtell Jonathan Gibson Blakely.
ELL 101 Stephanie Johnson, LPSD38 ELL Coordinator.
Federal Title III Monitoring Visit Educational Equity Charlene Lui, Paul Ross, Cheryl Pietz, Nathan Moore, Sara Moore.
Changes for a New Title III Melanie Manares, Title III Coordinator Beth O’Connell, Title III Specialist Office of English Language Acquisition and Academic.
Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act
ESSA Federal Program Director Training January 13, 2017
Welcome Limited English Proficiency Panelists Disclaimer
Introduction to Title VI: Providing Services to LEP Persons
An Overview of Education Law and Language Access Requirements
Title III Fiscal Requirements and ESSA changes
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
TERY J. MEDINA, ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR THE SOUTHEASTERN EQUITY CENTER 800 E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 400 Fort Lauderdale, FL Telephone:
ElS - Rights lead to success
Limited English Proficiency (LEP)
Professional Development Modules: English Learner Tool Kit Chapter Nine - Evaluation of EL Programs [presenter] [date]
Professional Development Modules: English Learner Tool Kit Chapter 6 - English Learners With Disabilities [presenter] [date]
Professional Development Modules: English Learner Tool Kit Chapter One - Identifying All English Learners [presenter] [date]
Professional Development Modules: English Learner Tool Kit Chapter Two - Language Assistance Programs [presenter] [date]
Professional Development Modules: English Learner Tool Kit Chapter 3 - Staffing and Supports [presenter] [date]
Professional Development Modules: English Learner Tool Kit Chapter Seven - ELs Who Opt Out of Programs [presenter] [date]
GaDOE ESOL Unit 2017 Webinar Series - Part VI EL Parent Communication
Education 330 Teaching English Language Learners: Issues in Policy, Leadership, and Instruction Spring, 2013.
January 14, 2016 Stacy Freeman, Title III Specialist
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
Introduction to English learners and Related Federal and State Rules
Education 330 Teaching English Language Learners: Issues in Policy, Leadership, and Instruction Spring, 2014.
Professional Development Modules: English Learner Tool Kit Chapter Eight - Monitoring and Exiting EL Programs [presenter] [date]
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Nivia Gallardo-Ayala Corona Norco Unified School District
ENGLISH TO SPEAKERS OF OTHER LANGUAGES (ESOL)
SC ESOL Handbook and WIDA site
Presentation transcript:

Professional Development Modules: English Learner Tool Kit Chapter One - Communication with EL Parents [presenter] [date]

Purpose The Professional Development Modules: English Learner Tool Kit is a series of presentations intended to provide guidance to help local educational leaders meet their legal obligations to English learners (EL) and enhance existing EL practices to meet the needs of all EL students, parents, and families. This professional development power point module is one of a ten-part series designed to introduce viewers to the English Learner Tool Kit, which provides an overview of legal obligations that schools/districts must address in supporting the educational needs of English learners (ELs). This series frames federal and civil rights requirements with related Illinois statute requirements for statewide implementation.   The Professional Development Modules: English Learner Tool Kit are a facilitator’s guide and a resource tool. These PD Modules can also be used as a teacher support with suggestions and references to encourage inclusionary practices to ensure equity and access for English learners. The key objectives of the Professional Development Modules: English Learner Tool Kit include: Expand knowledge on legal obligations to meet the needs of English learners Implement inclusionary practices for equity and access for all English learners Provide a resource and tool for professional learning Serve as a companion and supplemental resource to legal guidance (“Dear Colleague Letter, OCR 2015” from US Department of Education) Integrate Illinois-specific requirements for English learners Each of the 10 self-paced PD Modules will include links to additional resources that can be downloaded. Facilitators can download the EL toolkit at: https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oela/english-learner-toolkit/index.html

English Learner Tool Kit Topics Identifying All ELs ELs Who Opt Out of Programs Language Assistance Programs Monitoring and Exiting EL Programs Staffing and Supports Meaningful Access Evaluation of EL Programs Inclusive Environment ELs with Disabilities Communication with EL Parents This list is an overview of the ten topics that will be covered within the ten Professional Development Modules: English Learner Tool Kit. These happen to be the most commonly overlooked (or violated) areas across the country.   This module focuses on Chapter 10: Ensuring Meaningful Communication with Limited English Proficient Parents.

Significant Legal History Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, 1964 Prohibits discrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin by recipients of federal financial assistance. The Title VI regulatory requirements have been legally interpreted to prohibit denial of equal access to education because of a language minority student's limited proficiency in English. This is a significant legal obligation. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act lays the foundation for prohibiting all aspects of discrimination and it has been legally interpreted to protect English learners (formerly labeled as Limited English Proficient - LEP, but changed to EL with passage of ESSA to eliminate deficit-labeling language).

Significant Legal History Lau v. Nichols Court Case, 1974 Case dealt with San Francisco school system’s failure to provide English language instruction to 1,800 students of Chinese ancestry. U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that a lack of supplemental instruction for English learners denies them a meaningful opportunity to participate in educational programs, which violates the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Lau v. Nichols Probably the most important legal event for bilingual education was the Lau v. Nichols case, which was brought against the San Francisco Unified School District by the parents of nearly 1,800 Chinese students. It began as a discrimination case in 1970 when a poverty lawyer decided to represent a Chinese student who was failing in school because he could not understand the lessons and was given no special assistance. The school district countered that its policies were not discriminatory because it offered the same instruction to all students regardless of national origin. The lack of English proficiency was not the district’s fault. Lower courts ruled in favor of the San Francisco schools, but in 1974 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of the plaintiffs. In his opinion, Justice William O. Douglas stated simply that “there is no equality of treatment merely by providing students with the same facilities, textbooks, teachers, and curriculum; for students who do not understand English are effectively foreclosed from any meaningful education.” The Court cited Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, noting that the students in question fall into the protected category established therein. (More information on Lau v. Nichols can be found at: https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/ell/lau.html)

Significant Legal History Equal Educational Opportunities Act (EEOA), 1974 Prohibits states from denying equal educational opportunity to an individual on account of his or her race, color, sex, or national origin. The statute specifically prohibits states from denying equal educational opportunity by the failure of an educational agency to take appropriate action to overcome language barriers that impede equal participation by its students in its instructional programs. EEOA takes Title VI to a very specific level focused in education and mandates that education institutions cannot deny equal educational opportunity to its students.

” “There is no equality of treatment merely by providing students with the same facilities, textbooks, teachers, and curriculum; for students who do not understand English are effectively foreclosed from any meaningful education.” —Justice William Douglas Bottom line implication for ELs from Title VI Civil Rights, EEOA, plus Lau v. Nichols: All districts in the country must provide ELs meaningful access to educational content and programs in a language that they understand. Typically, this requirement is met through native language support or bilingual programs. Subsequently, another significant case law is known as Castañeda v. Pickard. This case resulted in defining a useful three-prong test for bilingual program implementation criteria: Must be based on sound educational theory, Effective implementation with appropriate resources, and Demonstrate successful outcomes.

Legal Obligations U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights (OCR) and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) share enforcement authority. Issued joint guidance in 2015 to help states, districts, and schools meet legal obligations to ELs. Guidance identifies 10 common civil rights issues for English learners. Important things to note include: OCR and DOJ share authority for enforcing Title VI in the education context. DOJ is responsible for enforcing the EEOA. The U.S. Department of Education (ED) also administers Title III, Part A of the English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement, and Academic Achievement Act (https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/pg40.html). The guidance applies to: State education agencies, Local education agencies, and Any “school district” that is a recipient of federal financial assistance from ED, including public school districts, charter schools, and alternative schools.

Ensuring Meaningful Communication with Limited English Proficient Parents

ENGLISH LEARNER TOOLKIT Chapter 10: Ensuring Meaningful Communication with Limited English Proficient Parents KEY POINTS SEAs and LEAs have an obligation to communicate meaningfully with limited English proficient (LEP) parents and to notify LEP parents adequately of information about any program, service, or activity called to the attention of non-LEP parents. LEAs must have a process to identify LEP parents and provide them with free and effective language assistance, such as translated materials or an appropriate and competent interpreter. Appropriate and competent translators or interpreters should have proficiency in target languages; ease of written and oral expression; knowledge of specialized terms or concepts; as well as be trained on their role, the ethics of interpreting and translating, and the need for confidentiality. Chapter 10 on “Ensuring Meaningful Communication with Limited English Proficient Parents” summarizes legal requirements for meaningful parent communication and includes useful practices with examples and research citations. Facilitators can download the toolkit at: https://ncela.ed.gov/files/english_learner_toolkit/OELA_2017_ELsToolkit_508C.pdf

ENGLISH LEARNER TOOLKIT Chapter 10: Ensuring Meaningful Communication with Limited English Proficient Parents KEY POINTS SEAs and LEAs must communicate meaningfully with limited English proficient (LEP) parents and notify them about any activity called to the attention of non-LEP parents. LEAs must have a process to identify LEP parents and provide them with free and effective language assistance, such as translated materials or an appropriate and competent interpreter. Some of the most commonly misunderstood legal requirements include: must provide communication in the language that parents understand, must identify LEP parents, and must provide free language assistance with translated materials or appropriate interpreters. For example, it is not appropriate to use a child interpreter who may be exposed to confidential information or others who are not qualified to translate technical language.

ENGLISH LEARNER TOOLKIT Chapter 10: Ensuring Meaningful Communication with Limited English Proficient Parents KEY POINTS CON’T. Translators/interpreters should have: Proficiency in target languages Ease of written and oral expression Knowledge of specialized concepts Training on their role, the ethics of interpreting/translating, and confidentiality Translators and interpreters should have training to support these basic skills to ensure effectiveness. Understanding the Special Education identification and placement process or assessment and grading processes are examples of specialized concepts.

Pause and Reflect What is our process for determining family language needs? Are our school events scheduled with interpreters present at times that facilitate LEP family participation? How do we inform LEP parents about the availability of free language assistance services? What is our process for acquiring qualified and trained interpreters and translators? The questions on this slide can be used to help educational leaders and staff reflect on their EL programs and services to ensure meaningful communication with parents and families of EL students. In the EL Toolkit, Page 2 of Chapter 10 also allows you to complete checklists on meaningful family engagement as you pause and reflect: https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oela/english-learner-toolkit/chap10.pdf

Pause and Reflect How do we honor and reflect on the diversity of families, including their languages and cultures? How do our funding streams facilitate family and community engagement? What family, school, and community partnerships exist? What learning and leadership opportunities are available for parents of ELs? The questions on this slide can be used to help educational leaders and staff reflect on their EL programs and services to ensure meaningful communication with parents and families of EL students. In the EL Toolkit, Page 2 of Chapter 10 also allows you to complete checklists on meaningful family engagement as you pause and reflect: https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oela/english-learner-toolkit/chap10.pdf

Additional Resources to consider From the EL Toolkit

Tools for Ensuring Meaningful Communication with Limited English Proficient Families Tool 1 Establishing Family-School Partnerships This resource provides a framework for family engagement activities that help schools and families partner for improved student outcomes. The three tools presented in the EL toolkit are examples for helping schools and districts communicate meaningfully with limited English proficient parents. The tools are available in Chapter 10: https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oela/english-learner-toolkit/chap10.pdf. Tool 1: The Dual Capacity-Building Framework for Family-School Partnerships was formulated using research on effective family engagement and home-school partnership strategies and practices, adult learning and motivation, and leadership development.

Tools for Ensuring Meaningful Communication with Limited English Proficient Families Tool #2 Tapping into the Strengths of Families and Communities This resource provides educators with practices and tools to support establishing and maintaining strong community and parental engagement in schools. The three tools presented in the EL toolkit are examples for helping schools and districts communicate meaningfully with limited English proficient parents. The tools are available in Chapter 10: https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oela/english-learner-toolkit/chap10.pdf. Tool 2: The Regional Educational Laboratory Pacific (REL Pacific) developed a toolkit that focuses on practices and tools that provide an integrated approach for engaging families and the community with the schools.

Tools for Ensuring Meaningful Communication with Limited English Proficient Families Tool #3 Interpretation and Translation Resources This tool contains multiple resources for interpretation and translation. The three tools presented in the EL toolkit are examples for helping schools and districts communicate meaningfully with limited English proficient parents. The tools are available in Chapter 10: https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oela/english-learner-toolkit/chap10.pdf. Tool 3: Interpretation and translation resources. This tool offers a sampling of resources for interpretation and translation from the U.S. Department of Justice’s LEP.gov website. All districts should be mindful that it is a federal requirement that all parents need to receive information in a language they understand.

Background Resources Fact sheet on the responsibilities of school districts Fact sheet answering common questions about the rights of limited English proficient parents and guardians Original OCR/DOJ guidance in “Dear Colleague” letter Translations into multiple languages All available at https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/ellresources.html Companion toolkit from the Dept. of Education Office of English Language Acquisition: https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oela/english-learner- toolkit/index.html Background resources are accessible to district and building leaders and staff. Parent resources are available in multiple languages. The listed resources can be downloaded at https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/ellresources.html. District and school leaders may wish to review and share the resources with staff to support development and implementation of EL initiatives and programs in their buildings. The companion toolkit which can be downloaded at https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oela/english-learner-toolkit/index.html can provide further support for implementation.

Further Reading American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.). Collaborating with interpreters: http://www.asha.org/PRPSpecificTopic.aspx?folderid=8589935334&section=Over view Breiseth, L. (2011, August). Engaging ELL families: 20 strategies for school leaders with questions for reflection and checklists: http://www.colorincolorado.org/pdfs/articles/Engaging-ELL-Families_A-Checklist- for-School-Leaders.pdf Erekson, J., Kim, Y., & Lycke, K. (2015, March). Five principles with twenty examples for engaging ELL families. ASCD Express: http://www.ascd.org/ascd- express/vol10/1013-erekson.aspx Harry, B., & Waterman, R. (2008). Building collaboration between schools and parents of English language learners: Transcending barriers, creating opportunities. National Center for Culturally Responsive Educational Systems: http://www.niusileadscape.org/docs/FINAL_PRODUCTS/LearningCarousel/Buildin g_Collaboration_Between_Schools_and_Parents_of_ELLs.pdf Further reading resources are provided to help district and school leaders and staff in supporting EL students and their families. A complete list of further reading is available at https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oela/english-learner-toolkit/chap10.pdf.