Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching Tool

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
Advertisements

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 1: Analysis of a Science Research Simulation Task Science High School Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching and Learning.
Unit 2 – Making It Real Learning Objectives Reflect on your classroom instruction to identify the literacy components you are already using and how they.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 1: Analysis of a Research Simulation Task in CTE Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Carrie Roberts, Administrator Literacy, History, and Arts.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
Unit 2 – Making It Real Learning Objectives Reflect on your classroom instruction to identify the literacy components you are already using and how they.
Louisiana Reading Association Update April 21, 2012.
February 3-6, 2014 Christina Orsi Parent Information Night.
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, November 2013 NTI.
Instruction aligned to Iowa Core: What does it look like? #CCSS.
State Role in Supporting Educators C HRIS M INNICH M AY 2012 | SCEE M EETING.
Common Core State Standards: The Shifts and their Implications Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
February 10, 2012 Session 3: Effective Leadership in the Common Core February 10, 2012 Session 3: Effective Leadership for the Common Core NYSED Principal.
Understanding PARCC and Disciplinary Literacy November
Introducing the Common Core to Parents and Community Members Benson Elementary November 8, 2013.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Student Achievement Partners – Who We Are 1 Who we are: SAP is a nonprofit organization founded by three of the contributing authors.
Shelby County Schools Common Core Modules for Social Studies/History Grades 6-12.
Leading and Learning in a Time of Change #CCSS.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Common Core State Standards Back to School Night August 29, 2013.
The Instructional Practice Suite for ELA/Literacy Core Advocate Webinar November 17, :00 – 8:00 EST The webinar will begin shortly. You may wish.
Aligning Teacher Effectiveness to the Common Core Standards March 7, 2013 Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Presentation of Professional Development Modules for Common Core State Standards Student Achievement Partners, Inc. Sandra Alberti July 11, 2012.
Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching Tool Making the Shifts in Classroom Instruction Ignite 2015 San Diego, CA February 20, 2015 Sandra
The Instructional Practice Suite for Math Core Advocate Webinar January 19, :00 – 8:00 EST The webinar will begin shortly. You may wish to download.
State of the Standards #CCSS.
Curriculum that Brings the Common Core to Life Session 1 Elementary
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Welcome to 2nd Grade.
Instructional Practice Guides Reflecting on Practice
Illinois State Board of Education English Language Arts
Curriculum that Brings the Common Core to Life Session 1 Secondary
Shift Happens Or does it? Leadership Summit Thursday, November 10
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
Quarterly Meeting Focus
Springfield Schools CCSS Literacy Training
Smarter Balanced Assessment Results
Showcase of Resources: achievethecore.org
February 29, 2012 Albuquerque High School
Common Core State Standards and Disciplinary Literacy
What Digital Resources Are Available to Support STEM?
Introducing the Common Core to Parents and Community Members
College and Career Readiness Symposium Strategies for Closing the
Sequencing Writing Assignments
Sequencing Writing Assignments
CCRS Implementation Team Meeting September, 2013
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Texts Worth Reading Problems Worth Solving Tests Worth Taking
CCRS Implementation
Alabama Quality Teaching Standards
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
CCRS Quarterly Meeting English Language Arts
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Empowering Practitioners to Lead the Core
Teacher Leadership: Owning the Standards
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Common Core State Standards
Instructional Learning Cycle:
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Introducing the Common Core to Parents and Community Members
Building Academic Language
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Empowering Practitioners to Lead the Core
Illinois State Board of Education English Language Arts
Building Academic Language
Megan Poor Date: Grade level/course: 8th grade History
Presentation transcript:

Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching Tool Making the Shifts in Classroom Instruction Ignite 2015 San Diego, CA February 20, 2015 Sandra Alberti @salberti @achievethecore

Objectives for this Session Participate in a detailed walkthrough of the Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching Tool Practice with the Coaching Tool Plan how to use and share the Coaching Tool and this training with colleagues One of the questions we hear most frequently from coaches is, “What does the Common Core look like in the classroom?” Teachers ask a version of this question, “How do I know if I’m doing the Common Core?” During today’s session we’ll be talking about the Instructional Practice Guides and how they help to answer these questions. During the session you’ll get an overview of the guides – including how they are designed and used. You’ll have a chance to try them out, and, finally, we’ll talk about ways you can plan to use them to support your work in local settings. We recognize that the people in this room are from different places and have had different experiences with the Common Core and the Instructional Practice Guides. We imagine that this will be the same with groups you work with in your local settings. As we go through this session, we’ll be leading a few different activities but we’ll also stop at points to voice over and reflect on how this training and information might be used in different environments to facilitate different discussions. As we move through this, we encourage you to consider how what’s here might be used or customized to support your needs. Feel free to ask questions along the way!

Student Achievement Partners – Who We Are A nonprofit organization founded by three of the lead authors of the Common Core State Standards Our mission is to design and take actions based on evidence that substantially improve student achievement Funded by multiple foundations and committed to the following three key principles: We hold no intellectual property. Our goal is to disseminate high quality materials as widely as possible. All resources that we create are open source and available to teachers for free. We do not compete for state, district or federal contracts. Ensuring that states and districts have excellent materials for teachers and students is our top priority. We do not accept money from publishers. We have no financial interests with any publisher of education materials. Our independence is essential to our work.

Getting Started: Guiding Principles for the Instructional Practice Guides The Standards require a shift in what happens in the classroom – CCSS-aligned teaching requires aligned content This work starts with a shared understanding of the expectations of the Standards and then specific descriptions of what these expectations look like in practice Professional development, coaching, feedback and professional learning community conversations must be focused and coherent to support these expectations Before we begin, who has had PLC or coaching conversations aligned to the expectations of the Standards? In what ways? What tools or protocols have you used? By show of hands, has anyone here Been trained on the Instructional Practice Guides? Worked with the Instructional Practice Guides in a school or district? Great! During the session, we hope you’ll share some of your experiences and help offer your perspective on how these tools have been useful. In developing these, there were a few critical principles at the center of our conversations: CCSS requires a shift in what happens in the classroom; aligned content is fundamental to that change. Simply, CCSS aligned teaching requires aligned content. Teachers, coaches and leaders need to understand the expectations of the standards and what they mean for practice. Shared expectations are critical for effective dialog. Finally, PD, coaching, PLCs, etc – all of the structures that are in place to support the Shifts in practice need to be focused and coherent.

Purpose of the Coaching Tool Designed to guide effective integration of the Common Core Shifts into instructional practice Intended to help teachers in developing their practice through: Teacher self-reflection Teacher-to-teacher learning in PLCs, grade-level meetings or other collaborative structures Feedback from instructional coaches and leaders Not designed for evaluative purposes The Coaching Tool is designed specifically to support teachers in developing their practice, and to help coaches or other instructional leaders in supporting them to do so. The Coaching Tool is intended to be used to assess effective integration of the Common Core in instruction. This process of shifting instructional practice to meet the expectations of the Common Core must be developmental and recognize the hard work teachers are doing in implementing the strategies required by the Common Core. In support of this, we imagine multiple possible contexts for using the Coaching Tool, including in: - Teacher self-reflection - Teacher-to-teacher learning in PLCs, grade-level meetings or other collaborative structures - Coaching and feedback from instructional coaches or leaders The Coaching Tool was not designed for evaluation. It was designed to help facilitate and foster conversation about what’s happening in the classroom. The initial name for these tools was actually “evidence guides” because the focus is really meant to be on the process of gathering and discussing evidence of the Shifts. All guides are available at achievethecore.org/instructional-practice.

Coaching Tool: Versions The Coaching Tool exists for a single lesson and for over the course of the year Coaching Tools by subject and grade: ELA/literacy (grades K-2; grades 3-12; History/Social Studies, Science & Technical Subjects) Mathematics (K-8, HS) The Coaching Tool is available for daily lessons or to consider instruction over the course of the year. It is available across grades and subjects.

Coaching Tool: Actions and Indicators Each Coaching Tool for a single lesson has 3 Core Actions Each Core Action has 3-7 indicators (look-fors) Each indicator has an area to note the evidence that has been observed or gathered Indicators include a binary (yes/no) or 4-point scale that may be used to further focus the evidence collected The Coaching Tool was designed to be targeted and focused and to capture a few critical concepts specific to how aligned content and classroom practice work together. Each Coaching Tool has 3 Core Actions. The Core Actions are targeted and specific. There are a limited number of indicators under each Core Action. We think of these as the “look-fors”. The Coaching Tool leaves space to capture evidence – this is the most critical part of the process and will be the basis of the dialog between teachers and coaches or peers. Finally, there is an optional rating for each indicator. The ratings help to focus the evidence and ask the observer to consider different aspects of the evidence they capture.

The Shifts are the basis of the Coaching Tool Regular practice with complex text and its academic language Reading, writing and speaking grounded in evidence from text, both literary and informational Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction ELA/Literacy Focus: Focus strongly where the standards focus Coherence: Think across grades, and link to major topics within grades Rigor: In major topics, pursue conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application Mathematics The Shifts are at the center of the Coaching Tool. If you are working with an audience of people who are unfamiliar with the Shifts, you’ll need to spend more time here. There are a number of trainings and supports on achievethecore that can help you with developing this knowledge and understanding. (achievethecore.org/PD)

A Contest! Find the Language of the Shifts Each table will be assigned a Shift. You will have three minutes to find as many references as possible to the Shift in the Summary Page of the Coaching Tool. Share out! Introduce activity Time 3 minutes Share out (each table gets 2 minutes): How many references to the Shifts did you find? What interesting observations did you have? Take away: the Shifts are present throughout the tool, and there is lots of helpful language that can help you as you ground others who are familiar with the Shifts in this tool, if it is new to them.

Standards Aligned Instructional Practice in English Language Arts (Example Grades 3-12) Focus each lesson on a high-quality text (or multiple texts). Employ questions and tasks, both oral and written, that are text specific and reflect the standards. Provide all students with opportunities to engage in the work of the lesson. When the Shifts in ELA/Literacy are effectively integrated into instructional practice, evidence of the following can typically be observed: Evident in Each Lesson Evident Over the Course of the Year Students encounter an appropriate balance and sequence of texts. Students are asked to practice the range of reading and writing tasks the Standards demand. There is evidence of student mastery of grade level English Language Arts and Literacy Standards. We are about to move onto an activity in which we watch a part of a lesson. As in a real observation setting, you won’t see everything at once. Some things should be part of every lesson. Some will be evident over time. Guides are structured to focus capture of evidence to facilitate discussion about what you see.

Standards Aligned Instructional Practice in Mathematics (Example Grades K-8) Ensure the work of the lesson reflects the Shifts required by the CCSS for Mathematics. Employ instructional practices that allow all students to master the content of the lesson. Provide all students with opportunities to exhibit mathematical practices in connection with the content of the lesson. When the Shifts in Mathematics are effectively integrated into instructional practice, evidence of the following can typically be observed: Evident in Each Lesson Evident Over the Course of the Year The lessons and tasks students encounter reinforce focus and coherence across and within grades. There is evidence of student mastery of the grade level Standards for Mathematical Content and student progress on the Standards for Mathematical Practice. The teacher regularly and productively collaborates with other teachers to improve practice. - Quick review of slide (similar to previous slide, but math content).

Activity: Using the Coaching Tool to Observe Practice Task: Each person at a table selects one Core Action from the Coaching Tool to focus on while watching the video lesson (if there are more than three people, multiple people may choose the same Core Action). As you watch the video, use the Coaching Tool to gather specific evidence of the Indicators throughout the lesson. After you watch, discuss: What evidence did you gather using the Coaching Tool? How is the evidence that you gathered different from observations you’ve collected (or received) from other tools? What kind of next steps would we want for this teacher, based on the feedback you’ve collected? Video: Ms. Eckhardt (Grade 9, ELA) – Symbolism in "The Lottery“ http://commoncore.americaachieves.org/module/3 We’re going to watch a video for about 15 minutes. We want to give you a sense for an experience doing an observation (you want to leave at least 15 minutes), but we realize that sometimes in a setting like this it can feel a little long if we don’t tell you what to expect! This is an activity you can do with colleagues (other option for elem ELA video in the notes, and more great examples available on America Achieves website). Everyone at the table should choose a Core Action. (Each table should have at least one person doing each Core Action). Turn to your Core Action in the Coaching Tool in front of you and take notes during the video. When the video is over, please discuss these questions at your table. Someone should be assigned to be the recorder and should be able to share out for your table. You’ll have about 15 minutes to discuss and then we’ll share out. Other Potential Video Video: Analyzing Text, 5 mins, Teaching Channel - Ms. Brewer (Grade 5 ELA) https://www.teachingchannel.org/videos/analyzing-text-lesson?fd=1 Video: Nonfiction, ~17 mins – Ms. Sims (Grade 5 ELA) – Start at minute 4:20 (text selection) Graphic Nonfiction “Harriet Tubman”: http://commoncore.americaachieves.org/landing#module/2?&_suid=135310775131108994104866317836

Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching and Lesson Planning Tools The Instructional Practice Guide includes the Coaching Tool and the Lesson Planning Tool Lesson Planning Tool developed as a companion tool for teachers to use to prepare The Shifts are the basis of both tools The same Core Actions and Indicators facilitate meaningful discussion between teachers and coaches Many people using the Coaching Tool used it to facilitate planning discussions. The Coaching and Lesson Planning Tools work together. They are both based on the Shifts and use the Core Actions and Indicators.

Closing Activity: Planning to Use the Coaching Tool Task: Pair up with someone at your table and choose to discuss ways you might use the Coaching Tool at the school, district or state level. Consider specific activities you might do with relevant audiences. Discuss the following: What existing activities or initiatives relate to the use of the Coaching Tool? How would you adapt or replace these activities? What supports or trainings might you need to facilitate your use of the Coaching Tool? What other individuals or groups might be most relevant to your work with the Coaching Tool? After you discuss with your partner for 10 minutes, we’ll share out some of the ideas to the groups. Feel free to pose questions you encountered during your turn and talk to us or the group

Additional Resources www.achievethecore.org: Resources for teachers and instructional leaders Achievethecore.org/instructional-practice Achievethecore.org/PD Achievethecore.org/materials-alignment-toolkit commoncore.americaachieves.org: Lesson videos and teacher reflection on the Shifts. Teaching the Core: Lesson videos annotated using the Coaching Tool, includes the lesson materials and teacher interviews. Coming Soon! Student Achievement Partners Sandra Alberti: salberti@studentsachieve.net