Path Forward Discussion

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 ICES/NAFO Symposium Santander May Seasonal to interannual variability of temperature and salinity in the Nordic Seas: heat and freshwater budgets.
Advertisements

The ocean and the global hydrologic cycle Jim Carton (University of Maryland) Paulo Nobre (INPE) São Paulo Summer School on Global Climate Modeling October,
An analysis of transport and water masses in the Straits of Florida and the Bahamas Moulin Aurélie Moulin Department of Marine and Environmental Systems.
Temperature and salinity variability of the Atlantic Water in the Eastern Eurasian Basin between 1991 and 2011 Meri Korhonen R/V Akademik Fedorov, August.
Slide 1 Predicting the Climate of Europe: the THOR project Laurent Mortier – University of Paris for Detlef Quadfasel (co-ordinator), University of Hamburg.
Preliminary results on Formation and variability of North Atlantic sea surface salinity maximum in a global GCM Tangdong Qu International Pacific Research.
THE NORTH ATLANTIC OSCILLATION (NAO) JENNY KAFKA.
Mojib Latif, Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research and Kiel University
The Faroe Current: T-S properties and volume, heat and salt transports Karin Margretha H. Larsen Bogi Hansen, Hjálmar Hátún, Svein Østerhus Extended Ellett.
Thermohaline Circulation (THC) By Ross Alter. What is it? “…that part of the ocean circulation which is driven by fluxes of heat and freshwater across.
RECENT OBSERVATIONS FROM THE 26ºN RAPID MOORING ARRAY: DROPS, DECLINES AND IMPACTS Gerard McCarthy National Oceanography Centre UK Molly Baringer, Adam.
Thermohaline Overtuning – at Risk? Detlef Quadfasel, THOR Project Office KlimaCampus, University of Hamburg, Germany
THOR-CT3 Summary 26 September 2012
The North Atlantic Ocean and Climate Observing System Stuart A. Cunningham Scottish Association for Marine Science Barbara.
Model LSW formation rate (2 yr averages) estimated from: (red) CFC-12 inventories, (black) mixed layer depth and (green) volume transport residual. Also.
The AMOC in the Kiel Climate Model WP 3.1 Suitability of the ocean observation system components for initialization PI: Mojib Latif With contribution from:
Steffen M. Olsen, DMI, Copenhagen DK Center for Ocean and Ice Interpretation of simulated exchange across the Iceland Faroe Ridge in a global.
Deep circulation and meridional overturning Steve Rintoul and many others ….
Transport in the Subpolar and Subtropical North Atlantic
The RAPID ocean observation array at 26.5°N in the HadCM3 model Leon Hermanson, Rowan Sutton, Keith Haines, Doug Smith, Joël Hirschi.
NACLIM CT 2 Monitoring of North Atlantic parameters New Lead: Johannes Karstensen (GEOMAR) and Karin M. H. Larsen (HAV) WP 2.1 Exchanges across the Greenland-Scotland.
North Atlantic Observing System
Progress of US CLIVAR during Reasons for recapping progress: - Present advances in scientific understanding of the climate system - Demonstrate.
Monitoring Heat Transport Changes using Expendable Bathythermographs Molly Baringer and Silvia Garzoli NOAA, AOML What are time/space scales of climate.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 The Influences of Changes.
Factors contributing to variability in pCO 2 and omega in the coastal Gulf of Maine. J. Salisbury, D. Vandemark, C. Hunt, C. Sabine, S. Musielewicz and.
AGU, 2003 image:AGU 2003 How will the Northeast Atlantic and its living resources respond to global climate change? Nordic Seas Greenland Iceland Norway.
Regional Oceanography I
Paris, EU-THOR, Nov25-26, 2009 Response of the North Atlantic Circulation to the realistic and anomalous wind stress Yongqi Gao, Helge Drange, Mats Bentsen.
Image:AGU 2003 Steingrímur Jónsson, University of Akureyri & Marine Research Institute Héðinn Valdimarsson, Marine Research Institute, Reykjavik Bogi Hansen,
Nutrient fluxes in the eastern North Atlantic Clare Johnson (1), Stuart Cunningham (1), Penny Holliday (2) and Stefan Gary.
Salinity and Density Differences VERTICAL STRUCTURE, THERMOHALINE CIRCULATION & WATER MASSES.
Interagency Ocean Observation Committee The Integrated Coastal & Ocean Observing System Act of 2009  Interagency Ocean Observing Committee  Lead Federal.
THOR meeting Paris November 25-26, 2009 North Atlantic Subpolar Gyre forcing on the fresh water exchange with the Arctic Ocean Christophe HERBAUT and Marie-Noëlle.
Current Research: Seasonality of Arctic Mediterranean Exchanges Christoph Rieper, PhD Student, University of Hamburg, WP 2.3 Arctic Mediterranean communicates.
Observations of on-going Arctic change Nancy N. Soreide, NOAA PMEL, J. E. Overland, J. A. Richter-Menge, H. Eicken, H. Wiggins, J. Calder.
Bogi Hansen & Hjálmar Hátún Faroe Marine Research Institute Iceland Scot- land Nordic Seas Faroes 0.8 Sv 3.8 Sv Greenland Østerhus et al., GRL 2005 The.
Bogi Hansen, Hjálmar Hátún, Regin Kristiansen, Steffen M. Olsen and Svein Østerhus Iceland Scot- land Nordic Seas Faroes 0.8 Sv 3.8 Sv Greenland Østerhus.
10/24/03search_osm_10_032 Abrupt Change in Deep Water Formation in the Greenland Sea: Results from Hydrographic and Tracer Time Series SEARCH Open Science.
Seasonal Variations of MOC in the South Atlantic from Observations and Numerical Models Shenfu Dong CIMAS, University of Miami, and NOAA/AOML Coauthors:
I. Objectives and Methodology DETERMINATION OF CIRCULATION IN NORTH ATLANTIC BY INVERSION OF ARGO FLOAT DATA Carole GRIT, Herlé Mercier The methodology.
Increased oceanic heat transport in the main Atlantic inflow branch to the Nordic Seas Bogi Hansen, Karin Margretha H. Larsen Hjálmar Hátún,
RTOFS Monitoring and Evaluation Metrics Avichal Mehra MMAB/EMC/NCEP/NWS.
Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research NIOZ is part of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific.
ASOF II Objectives What are the fluxes of mass, heat, liquid freshwater and ice from the Arctic Ocean into the subpolar North Atlantic? How will anticipated.
Our water planet and our water hemisphere
Developing a climate prediction model for the Arctic: NorCPM
Lesson 8: Currents Physical Oceanography
The Ocean’s role in the climate system
Blue-Action – WP2 Lower latitude drivers of Arctic changes
Two stable equilibria of the Atlantic subpolar gyre
from space Heat by winds by ocean currents
WHOTS ALOHA Roger Lukas*, Fernando Santiago-Mandujano*, Robert Weller#, Albert Plueddemann# * SOEST/University of Hawaii # Woods Hole Oceanographic.
A Comparison of Profiling Float and XBT Representations of Upper Layer Temperature Structure of the Northwestern Subtropical North Atlantic Robert L.
NOAA Contributions to OceanSITES
Shelf-basin exchange in the Western Arctic Ocean
Mark A. Bourassa and Qi Shi
Deliverable 2.8 Optimization of the GSR inflow arrays
EarthsClimate_Web_Chapter.pdf, p
Global Ocean Conveyor Belt
Mark A. Bourassa1 Ernesto Rodriguez2 and Sarah Gille3
Workshop 1: GFDL (Princeton), June 1-2, 2006
Processes and flow over the Iceland-Faroe Ridge
Transport Mooring Arrays in NACLIM
The coupling between Atlantic inflow and overflow in the Iceland-Scotland region Bogi Hansen, Karin M. H. Larsen, Hjálmar Hátún, Svein Østerhus, Steffen.
Lesson 8: Currents Physical Oceanography
by M. A. Srokosz, and H. L. Bryden
in situ or Altimetry ? Arctic – Subarctic Ocean Fluxes focus topics:
Tony Lee, NASA JPL/CalTech
Presentation transcript:

Path Forward Discussion urls of exemplary web sites (with reasoning about what you appreciate about the website) to be used as examples for the OceanSITES website; and a one-page slide with a concise and compelling summary showing and describing the importance of your OceanSITE.

Observations of the Meridional Overturning Circulation in the North Atlantic Impacts temperature, salinity, sea-level, and ecosystems A strong MOC is associated with warm SST in the North Atlantic Goals: NOAA partners with the National Science Foundation and the National Environmental Research Council to measure the MOC at 26°N. The 26N array is the first of its kind trans basin array that directly measures the insitu ocean components of the circulation that make up the MOC. It is built upon the long standing NOAA program to measure the Florida Current with a submarine telephone cable in the straits of Florida since 1982. The Florida Current transport has been a standard benchmark used by numerical and inverse modelers to improve ocean circulation estimates, and as well as fisherman and fishery research efforts. Shown here is a diagram of the mooring array components that form a picket fence across the North Atlantic Ocean (left). On the right is the resulting MOC time series at 26N (red). On this slide the MOC transport is compared to two other time series of the MOC in the North Atlantic that are incomplete: the 41N data derived from Argo data (down to 2000m) and the 16N time series derived for the flow below 1000m – representing the lower limb of the MOC. This time series has been widely successful, generating a lot of new interest in the MOC, its variability and predictability – as well as looking at its meridional coherence (as shown here). So far we’ve learned that the MOC is much more variable than previously thought, there is a strong seasonal cycle with all components of the circulation influencing its phasing (you can see the seasonal cycle in this time series). The seasonal cycle appears to be driven predominantly by the wind stress curl in the far eastern Atlantic. We’ve also looked at long term trends for the MOC time series. This leverages a long term NOAA observing system program and a key NOAA strength. Measuring the MOC supports NOAA’s mission to assess the state of the climate system and improve scientific understanding of a changing climate and its impacts.

Iceland-Faroe AW inflow (OceanSITES FAROECURR-T1 and FAROECURR-T2) The exchanges across the Greenland-Scotland Ridge form the northern limb of the AMOC The Iceland-Faroe Inflow of Atlantic Water is the larges of three inflowing branches with an average transport of 3.8 Sv Over two decades (1993-2013) the volume and heat- transport in the IF-inflow increased by 9% and 18% respectively and this potentially has a large impact on Arctic sea-ice Heat transport relative to 0°C EU-FP7 NACLIM (http://naclim.zmaw.de/Iceland-Faroes.2468.0.html) http://www.oceansites.org Hansen et al, 2015. Transport of volume, heat, and salt towards the Arctic in the Faroe Current 1993–2013. Ocean Sci., 11, 743–757, 2015. www.ocean-sci.net/11/743/2015/doi:10.5194/os-11-743-2015

Faroe Bank Channel Overflow (OceanSITES FAROEBCO-T1 and FAROEBCO-T2) The exchanges across the Greenland-Scotland Ridge form the northern limb of the AMOC Two main overflow branches cross the ridge: the Denmark Strait overflow and the Faroe Bank Channel overflow The overflow through the Faroe Bank Channel thus is an important contribution to the global thermo-haline circulation EU-FP7 NACLIM (http://naclim.zmaw.de/Faroe-Bank-Channel.2461.0.html) http://www.oceansites.org https://www.atlantos-h2020.eu/structure/wp3/ Hansen and Østerhus, 2007. Faroe Bank Channel overflow 1995–2005. Progress in Oceanography 75 (2007) 817–856 Volume transport 1995 – 2015 Mean transport 2.1 Sv No significant trend

LOCO Irminger Sea time series 12-year long high resolution data in center of the Subpolar Gyre. Comes with: Near annual AR7E hydrogr. 1990-present. Bottle data back to 1950. OOI data till…?

Congratulations DFO Line P Program! 60-year time series in the subarctic NE Pacific 1956 – 2016 and beyond ! Line P Before going any further, I want to give a Shout Out to the DFO Line P Program, which has built a 60 year time series at Station P! This is the primary reason the NOAA surface mooring is there. Station P

Surface mooring (Stratus ORS) provides independent benchmark observation of wind and heat flux at sea surface – and a means to assess realism of models ERA: -2.7 W m-2 yr-1 NCEP2: -0.8 W m-2 yr-1 Buoy: -1.5 W m-2 yr-1 ERA: 0.0014 N m-2 yr-1 NCEP2: 0.0009 N m-2 yr-1 Buoy: 0.0013 N m-2 yr-1

So what? Was a model improved due to this assessment? What does it impact that ERA was too low (HF) yet fast (wind stress)? Is there a physical process that mattered to someone that was too high/low in ERA because of this bias? Can we extend the results one step further to include the societal impact?

Why does the Argo program succeed? Cool Technology OceanSITEs has this too – just perhaps too many! Measures something completely – can synthesize a story that completely covers a topic E.g. ”Where’s the missing heat?” – the miss-match between upper ocean heat content estimates and Overarching science question addressed by the whole array is not site or platform dependent Has an external customer (beyond scientific understanding) Model initialization – data is critical to remove model bias

Web Page Best Practices: * Serves "Best available data" for any time period requested with all deployment files stitched together.  (OceanSITES should give choice to user of accessing original deployment by deployment files with all redundant data, or the stitched together best available data.) * Data Display & Delivery page. Displays are publication quality. * Publication list is sortable * Links to partner pages and partner data

Why OceanSITES? Promote the time series sites Collect data Collect short web features of the “so what” results from publications, cruises, meetings, etc. Collect examples of model improvements, societal benefit concrete links Powerpoint slide summaries Collect data Single out a user community to help – provide what they need and what we can deliver Provide best time series, higher level products

Short Focused Timely Linked to papers, web sites, etc

Provide a home for existing derived products/time series Project summaries of OceanSITEs stations