PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CMMI Course Introduction CMMI course Module 0.
Advertisements

Strategic Priorities Consultation Survey Overview Strategic Priorities Advisory Committee November 6, 2013.
Basic Overview of Project Management and Life Cycle ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik January 21, 2003.
1. P09203 – 1kg Robotic Motor Module Gen 2 Platform This project is Sponsored by the Kate Gleason Foundation.  Team Members:  Lauren Farnsworth → Team.
STARLight PDR 3 Oct ‘01I.1 Miller STARLight Control Module Design Ryan Miller STARLight Electrical Engineer (734)
RockSat-C 2011 SITR Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
STARLight PDR 3 Oct ‘01J.1 Miller STARLight Electrical Ground Support Equipment Ryan Miller STARLight Electrical Engineer (734)
STARLight PDR 3 Oct ‘01 G.1.1 Rashid STARLight STARLight Thermal Tahir Rashid STARLight Mechanical Engineer (734)
WBS & AO Controls Jason Chin, Don Gavel, Erik Johansson, Mark Reinig Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
STARLight PDR 3 Oct ‘01C.1 Hansen STARLight Peter Hansen PROJECT OVERVIEW.
P ROMETHEUS 5 System Overview.
LSU 10/09/2007System Design1 Project Management Unit #2.
Training for the 2013 Construction and Material Specifications Office of Construction Administration Gary Angles, Administrator.
Steps to the Preliminary Design Review (PDR) ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik January 28, 2003.
Technological Design STS-118 Lunar Plant Growth Chamber Challenge © 2013 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association STEM  Center for.
Common PDR Problems ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik March 6, 2003.
STARLight PDR 3 Oct ‘01 F.1.1 Rashid STARLight STARLight Mechanical Tahir Rashid STARLight Mechanical Engineer (734)
Careers in Science ESAT Science Night Student Presentations.
Hosted by: Institute for Software Integrated Systems (ISIS) Vanderbilt University Software Reliability for FCS May 18-19, 2004 ARO Workshop.
GEON PI Meeting University of Utah Salt Lake City, Utah October 15, 2005.
ACES Spring 2003 Overview Where are we going? How are we going to get there?
Our school day At Calverley Parkside, England.. Every morning we line up before we come into class.
Critical Design Review (CDR)
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes 12/25/20151 Flight Software Template for Instrument Critical Design Review Gary M. Heiligman.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
MAVEN CDR May 23-25, 2011 Particles and Fields Package Critical Design Review May , 2011 Introduction Dave Curtis PFP Package Manager Mars Atmosphere.
Forms of Energy Openers Mrs. V Science Match each definition to the correct key term A. B. C. D.
Tethered Aerostat Program Concept Design Review Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/College Team Members Date.
Data Science Interview Questions 1.What do you mean by word Data Science? Data Science is the extraction of knowledge from large.
ENGR-10_Why-n-Where_Self-Intro_Order.pptx 1 Bruce Mayer, PE Engineering-10: Intro to Engineering Bruce Mayer, PE Licensed Electrical.
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 System Design Dave Curtis UCB/SSL Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
RockSat-C 2013 SITR Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
Introduction to Engineering Camera Lab #4 – 2 Task #1 Agenda Overview of Camera Lab #4 Learn about operation of oscilloscope Review Task #1 Procedure Conduct.
English for Engineering Management ( 1 ) Detail 1-1 Fill out the missing words on the drawing (5 are missing) Where is the detail located on the building?
14ME404 INTRODUCTION TO MEMS DISCIPLINE ELECTIVE-II Thanking everyone for MEMS as an elective subject Dr.J.S.Senthilkumaar, Professor Mechanical Engineering.
Signal Transmission and Conversion, Test Review - Agenda
Introduction MARS II Design Review.
Ultrastable Thin Film TiC Resistors for Space Applications
2K Cold Box PDR Introduction
MIGHTY AUTO PARTS OF [Insert Location]
BASIC ELECTRONICS & ROBOTICS Instructor: Humayun Rashid Raahat
The National Curriculum
Microsoft Online Services Partner Deployment Training for Office 365
2K CB FDR Overview:  Agenda, Charge, Review Process
The George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering
Peer Review Agenda (Suggested).
Identify Key Factors that Impact Effective Change Efforts
Intro to Digital Control Test # 2 - Agenda
Michael Schilmoeller Thursday, December 2, 2010
تحليل الحساسية Sensitive Analysis.
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Course Schedule Day 1 Day 2 8:00 AM - 9:30 AM 9:30 AM - 9:45 AM
School/Team member names Date
EE-314 Signals and Linear Systems
Science Policy Exchange - Thursday pm Session -
Training for the 2013 Construction and Material Specifications
Chapter 8 – Energy balances
Control Loops: Primary Sensors, Transmitters, and Transducers - Agenda
High School Engineering Design Training
Atlanta Control-M User Group Meeting
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
PSS verification and validation
Kamran Marashi, P.E., S.E. Jim Schettler, P.E., S.E.
Project Management Unit #2
AFTER SCHOOL BOOSTER SESSIONS
Course Schedule Day 1 Day 2 8:00 AM - 9:30 AM 9:30 AM - 9:45 AM
3D Circuit Integration Technology for Multiproject Fabrication
NEW VISION OF ENGINEERING ECONOMY COURSE (VISION) MODULE 3
Course Schedule Day 1 Day 2 8:00 AM - 9:30 AM 9:30 AM - 9:45 AM
Table 2. Modal parameters estimated by Pulse Reflex®
Presentation transcript:

PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW Peter Hansen STARLight Project Manager (734) 763-6241 pehansen @ umich.edu

AGENDA 8:30 A- Introduction - P. Hansen, PM 8:35 B- Science - T. England, PI 8:45 C- Project Overview - P. Hansen, PM 9:00 D- System Engineering - R. DeRoo, Proj. Scientist 10:00 Break 10:15 D- System Engineering (continued) 10:45 E- Receiver Design - L.vanNieuwstadt, PE 11:30 F- Mechanical Design - T. Rashid, PE 12:00 Lunch 1:30 F- Mechanical Design (continued) 2:00 G- Thermal Design - T. Rashid, PE 3:00 Break 3:15 H- Sensor Signal Processing - R. Miller, PE 3:45 I- Control Module Design - R. Miller, PE 4:15 J- Electrical GSE - R. Miller, PE 4:30 RID Summary - P. Hansen, PM

PDR FOCUS Does the described design meet the science requirements in terms of estimated accuracy, sensitivity, size, weight, power, etc.? Will the described design work in the anticipated environment on the stated aircraft platform? Is the described design cost effective? Are we ready to invest additional resources to detail this design for fabrication? What is missing in this design? Reviewers please use the RID form to formalize criticisms