Selection of the Triggered Action Response Plan as a Leading Practice to combat Uncontrolled Falls of Ground Andre van Zyl CoM MOSH Learning Hub
Selection of TARP as a Leading Practice MOSH Process Requirement Industry Driven Glenburn Workshop 16 March 2011 Over 40 Participants Rock Related Safety Causal Chain Verified Major Policies and Trends Impacts Discussed
Summary of Leading Practices Visualisation of Rock Related Hazards (Virtual Reality Programme) TARP System as at Kroondal Chrome FOGM System (AngloGold Ashanti and AngloPlatinum) Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)
Selection Criteria OHS Impacts Costs Time to Implement Readiness for Adoption Accessibility Operational Constraints
Leading Practice(s) Selected TARP + Virtual Reality (E-Learning)
Work Place Application (Line Management, Supervisor and Team Process) Triggered Action Response Plan Work Place Application (Line Management, Supervisor and Team Process)
Why Joel Mine Different environment to Source Mine Operationally Successful Joel Risk Profile set to Change Willingness of Harmony to Adopt and Assist
Value Case Impact Evaluation Health and Safety Improvements Positive Cost of Implementation Negative Production Impacts Initial Impact on Production Long-term Impact on Production Indirect Impact on Operations Legal Implications Overall Assessment on Adoption of TARP