Magnetic gap calculation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Existing Arcs and 4m Dipole Preliminary Design and Safety Review Beam Transport Interface Mike Bevins February 22, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport.
Advertisements

Recap of heat loads and peak doses from HL-LHC Q1 to Q7 L.S. Esposito, F. Cerutti HL-LHC WP3 meeting, 22 May 2014.
DRAGAN TOPREK Manchester University Accelerator Physics Group supervisor: Dr. Rob Appleby.
Method of beam extraction from a synchrotron by the instrumentality of multilayer Cu-Fe shield Bondarenko Alexey.
August 11, 2004SPEAR3 Chicane Lattice Review Lifetime and injection efficiency vs. Dynamic and physical aperture; Measurement & simulation.
Effects of wake fields in ATF2 low aperture kicker and IP nano-BPMs Karl Bane April 19, 2005.
Concept for the New Detector Chamber at the ESR Ion beam Internal Target Region  Lab *)  Flange axis Covered  range Flange size in mm A90° – 80°83°95°
The Compendium of formulae of kick factor. PLACET - ESA collimation simulation. Adina Toader School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester.
1 On MICE Coordinate System Yury Ivanyushenkov RAL MICE Collaboration CERN, 29 March - 2 April 2004.
Preliminary result on Quarter wave transformer simulation a short lens with a high magnetic field and a long solenoidal magnetic field. Field profile of.
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
G.N. Kulipanov, N.A.Mezentsev, A.V. Philipchenko, K.V. Zolotarev
LINAC 4 Project L4T/L4Z Design Status J.Humbert / B.Riffaud on behalf of EN-MME design team 1 st September 2011 LINAC4 – BEAM COORDINATION COMMITTEE B.Riffaud.
FAIR MT/Cryogenics, Seong Yeub Shim Beam-Tube Eddy Loss S. Y. Shim.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
SPECIALISED CYCLOTRON FOR BEAM THERAPY APPLICATION Yu. G. Alenitsky, A
20to2T5m100cm Images Van Graves February 13, 2014.
Vacuum Issues from the Beam Dynamics Point of View Marc Muñoz.
Status of PSB Impedance calculations: Inconel undulated chambers C. Zannini, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant Thanks to: E. Benedetto, J. Borburgh.
Target Magnets & Shielding Bob Weggel Particle Beam Lasers, Inc. Magnet Optimization Research Engineering, LLC. March 5,
BL1U at TRIUMF UCN Beamline Septum & Dipole Magnets (April 12, 2010)
Design of DC septum magnets based on measurements and 3D calculation of an R&D septum magnet for Rapid Cycle Synchrotron of J-PARC Masao Watanabe, Accelerator.
Optimized CESR-c Wiggler Design Mark Palmer, Jeremy Urban, Gerry Dugan Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
Material and thickness for pi0 Y.Sudo Univ. of Tsukuba 2008/07/18.
EAR2 Beam Line Report on the Status C. Weiss EAR2 Beam Line - Report on the Status1.
Undulator Insulation materials Simon Canfer Advanced Materials Group Applied Science Division Technology
DR to RTML ILC DR Technical Baseline Review Frascati, July 7, 2011 Mark Palmer Cornell University.
ESS | A Preliminary Feasibility Assessment of Power Converters and Magnets for Beam Raster System| | Carlos A. Martins, ESS Preliminary Feasibility.
Trapped Modes in LHC Collimator (II) Liling Xiao Advanced Computations Department SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
Resistive Effects in XFEL Kicker Andranik Tsakanian XFEL Beam Dynamic Meeting 17 Dec 2007.
X LCLS SCU NbTi Prototype Schedule Version: February 12, 2015 Update 23JUN2015 X X System complete and ready for test X System complete & tested w/Hall.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Beam Wire Scanner for PS/SPS/PSB Current status and Schedule Dmitry Gudkov BE-BI-ML.
Vacuum conditions in PANDA pbar-line Alexander Gruber, SMI, Vienna, Austria.
The reading is 7.38 mm. The reading is 7.72 mm.
SAMURAI magnet Hiromi SATO SAMURAI Team, RIKEN Requirements Geometry Magnetic field Superconducting coil and cooling system Present status of construction.
Part 2: NbTi Magnet Performance Yury Ivanyushenkov for the APS SCU Team: S. Bettenhausen, C. Doose, M. Kasa, Q. Hasse, I. Kesgin, D. Jensen, S. Kim, G.
HTS and LTS Magnet Design and Prototyping for RAON
ENERGY DEPOSITION AND TAS DIAMETER
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
High Gradient Magnet Design for SPring-8 Upgrade Plan
L. Gentini, A. Bertarelli, F. Carra
Summary of Session: Magnets and undulators for light sources 2
Status of the CLIC DR wiggler design and production at BINP
The Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics
Energy deposition studies on magnets. Aim. First applications
General remarks about the HESR and PANDA vacuum system
ILCDR08 10 July 2008 Plan of measuring cloud density in the solenoid field and in the quadrupole field K. Kanazawa (KEK)
N-TOF EAR2 - Vertical beam design & construction - Irradiation facility proposal S. Girod EN-EA.
Beam Injection and Extraction Scheme
SCU Next Phase Meeting July 8, 2014.
LHC INJECTION SEPTUM MSI (1/3)
Vincent Roger, Siarhei Yurevich, Cecilia G. Maiano, Mario Sapinski
E = 4.0 GeV (nominal) PMU g = 5 mm NbTi Nb3Sn g = 4 mm g = 4 mm 145 m
Beam Finder Wire Assembly Undulator System
B1 long answer questions
Dee1 View from back of back plate
An Overview of Collective Effects in 3rd Generation Light Sources
Revised estimates of heat loads and radiation damage in the IT and D1
CLIC damping rings working plan towards the CDR
CMS vacuum chamber. Geometry for wakefield calculations
Gas cell apertures with dimensions (original)
Potato Demo 2017.
Muon Collider Magnet Technologies/Challenges
Unit 3 Review (Calculator)
MAGiC Shielding Simulations
Beam Halo Considerations for Back Angle Running
GROUP 12 CAS – Erice - March 2017 Andrea DE FRANCO
Calculate 9 x 81 = x 3 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x =
Y. Nosochkov and M. Woodley (SLAC)
Presentation transcript:

Magnetic gap calculation Magnet core Wall thickness Vertical aperture HTS tape thickness Vacuum gap Beam chamber HTS tape Magnetic gap Vacuum gap Vacuum gap Parameter Value Vertical aperture, mm 5.7 Wall thickness, mm 0.75 HTS tape thickness, mm 0.15* Vacuum gap, mm 0.5 Magnetic gap, mm 8.5 Note: not to scale

Magnetic gap for NbTi magnet Magnet core Wall thickness Vertical aperture HTS tape thickness Vacuum gap Beam chamber HTS tape Magnetic gap Vacuum gap Vacuum gap Parameter Value Target value Vertical aperture, mm 5.7 5.5 Wall thickness, mm 0.75 0.5 HTS tape thickness, mm Vacuum gap, mm Magnetic gap, mm 8.2 7.5 Note: not to scale

Magnetic gap for Nb3Sn magnet Magnet core Wall thickness Vertical aperture HTS tape thickness Vacuum gap Beam chamber HTS tape Magnetic gap Vacuum gap Vacuum gap Parameter Value Target value Vertical aperture, mm 5.7 5.5 Wall thickness, mm 0.75 0.5 HTS tape thickness, mm 0.15* Vacuum gap, mm Magnetic gap, mm 8.5 7.8 Note: not to scale