TRIMODE model & rail O/D data

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Towards sustainable transport: Focus on freight Nina Renshaw Transport and Environment Open Days, Brussels, 7 October 2008.
Advertisements

Experiences with EMS in combined road / waterway transport EMS Forum, September 18 th, 2012 André Pluimers Bolk Transport / Combi Terminal Twente.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Laboratory of the Helmholtz Association INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC POLICY RESEARCH (IWW),
Federal Statistical Office of Germany © Federal Statistical Office of Germany, Environmental-Economical Accounting, 2006 London Group Meeting – New York,
China’s Future Oil Demand for Road Transportation James Coan Research Associate Energy Forum Baker Institute for Public Policy Rice University October.
Freight Data - A Transportation Perspective September 2010 Michael Sprung – FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations.
Improved Modal Split Indicators for transport statistics based on an effective distance matrix Ekkehard PETRI, Boryana MILUSHEVA & Oliver HEIDEN, Eurostat.
World Transport. Concentration of Railroads in Select Countries One way in which goods are transported is by train. Some nations’ communities are much.
Seaports in the transport chain The Danish Perspective Jakob Svane, Danish Ports UNECE Transport Committee 2 June 2010 Geneva.
National trends in passenger transport regarding the choice of transport mode Grant Agreement number: Project Acronym: USEmobility Project title:
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula and Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,
Multimodal Study on Freight Transportation in Québec Transportation Border Working Group Spring 2014 Meeting Buffalo, NY April 8, 2014 Claude Sirois.
Florida Multimodal Statewide Freight Model
D/TTAS - Transport policy data needs Transport Statistics Liaison Group 19 th September 2013.
1 Noise and rail What about Belgium ? Martine Serbruyns Federal Public Service Mobility and Transport Brussels - 28 april 2014.
 Scotland’s National Transport Strategy A Consultation.
Bangkok September, Economic Integration 2 Bangkok September, 2012.
SUTRA [ Sustainable Urban TRAnsportation ] Fifth framework programme of the European Community Environment and sustainable development Final Meeting and.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Laboratory of the Helmholtz Association INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC POLICY RESEARCH (IWW),
OECD ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT OCDE ORGANISATION DE COOPERATION ET DE DEVELOPPEMENT ECONOMIQUES Annex I Expert Group 18/02/2000.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Talking Freight Seminar Freight Analysis Framework, version 3 Diane Davidson Center for Transportation.
Tom TapperTransport 1 TRANSPORT Energy Demand Projections Tom Tapper 24 th February 2005.
1 57th session of UNECE Working Party on Inland Transport Statistics Activities of the European Commission - Eurostat in inland transport statistics Yves.
Measuring rail accessibility using Open Data Elena Navajas-Cawood.
1 Domingo Jiménez-Beltrán, Executive Director TERM 2001 Indicators on transport and environment integration in the EU Joint Transport and Environment Informal.
1 UN-ECE Transport working Group meeting UN-ECE Transport working Group meeting June 7-9, 2006 Peter Smeets (CBS, The Netherlands) and Philippe Tardieu.
European Strategic Traffic Forecasts and possible contribution for the TEM Master Plan Bratislava 9 February 2004 Benno Bultink DG Public Works, the Netherlands.
Workshop on Passenger Mobility Conclusions. EU data requirements – DG MOVE  Environmental, economic and social considerations require close monitoring.
The Spatial Impact of Road Pricing on the Accessibility of Port Hinterlands Hilde Meersman, Christa Sys, Eddy Van de Voorde, Thierry Vanelslander.
Modal Split Indicators Item 6.5 COORDINATING GROUP FOR STATISTICS ON TRANSPORT (CGST) 4 – 5 December 2013.
English cars vs Dutch bikes: an international comparison of the energy costs of commuting RGS-IBG 28th August 2013 Robin Lovelace.
Transportation Today Policy, Freight, Intercity Travel
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA
Level Two Supply Chain Management
West of England Joint Transport Study
Assessing Strengths and Limitations of a Statewide Tour Based Freight Model Using Scenario Analysis in Maryland By Colin Smith, RSG Sabya Mishra, University.
Gerard de Jong, Reto Tanner
Modelling Sustainable Urban Transport
The future of the LMAs from the Commission's perspective
Meeting of the WG on Rail Transport Statistics 2-3 April 2009
Recent developments in the EU transport policy
 Users’ needs, odometer reading data & Member States’ reporting obligations Andreas Nägele European Commission - DG MOVE
Proximity to airports via the road network
Working Group on Rail Transport Statistics
Safety statistics - rail accident statistics
PRIMES and SCENES comparison
Eurostat Management Plan for Regional and Urban statistics
Intermodality and Inland Waterways
Working Group on Rail Transport Statistics
vkm in transport modelling
Working Party on Regional Statistics 1-2 October 2012
Energy Consumption in Transport
High-level Working Group on Statistical Confidentiality
Conclusions Working Group Rail Transport Statistics 9 – 10 November 2011 Ruxandra Roman Enescu.
Item 7 “Intermodal transport statistics” November 2013
Paolo Bolsi DG MOVE - Unit A3 Economic Analysis and Impact Assessment
IMPROVING THE REGIONAL DIMENSION OF EU-SILC
Recent developments in the EU transport policy
Intermodal project Agenda point 9.1
Paolo Bolsi DG MOVE - Unit A3 Economic Analysis and Impact Assessment
Item 6.1 Modal Split Indicators by distance class 6-7 November 2013
Rail transport developments Agenda point 7.2
Marco Polo – Towards a policy revision
Task Force on the measurement of road traffic volumes in VKm
How geospatial information adds value to existing sub-national data and territorial typologies Valeriya Angelova-Tosheva, Eurostat,
Regional accessibility indicators: developments and perspectives
UNECE Rail Statistics Alex Blackburn
UNECE’s Transport Statistics Activities
Comparison of key parameters of EU WLTP database and WLTC version 5
COORDINATING GROUP FOR STATISTICS ON TRANSPORT (CGST)
Presentation transcript:

TRIMODE model & rail O/D data Paolo BOLSI, DG MOVE A3, Economic Analysis & Better Regulation Eurostat Rail Transport Statistics Working Group Luxembourg, 15-16 June 2017

Summary 1. TRIMODE model overview 2. Freight data overview – all modes 3. Rail freight data – gaps, issues and actions 4. Rail passenger data - gaps, issues and actions 5. Why TRIMODE needs freight segmentation by NST?

TRIMODE Model Overview Model covering all modes of passenger and freight transport for all of Europe Includes integrated sub-models: transport demand; network assignment; fleet; energy; economy. NUTS3 level zoning, plus detailed modal networks Base year 2010, validation year 2015 - 5-year-steps projections up to 2050 Phase 1 (2017) development and testing of 6 countries: AT, DE, IT, NL, SI, UK Phase 2 (2019) will extend to cover remaining European (and neighbouring) countries Access to good data is crucial to success: - in the model development and testing currently underway - based on Eurostat data to the maximum extent feasible - to simplify updating of the model in future years by EC DGs

Overview: OD Data Availability & Completeness Requirement for 2010 is a complete OD tonnes matrix segmented by NUTS3 x NUTS3 x NST2007 (type of goods) x Mode Eurostat data availability in 2010 for Phase 1 countries is OD matrix – Origin Destination matrix of tonnes transported Road will use 2011 NUTS3xNUTS3 data to spatially disaggregate 2010 control totals IWW port locations will be used to disaggregate from NUTS2 to NUTS3xNUTS3 level. Air initially allocate all tonnes to NST class 15: mail and parcels. Later after further analysis, reallocate some from NST15 to other consumer goods NSTs. Maritime needs some processing but the basic ingredients needed are available. Due to the major gaps in Eurostat tables we will need to rely on national data sources for pipeline tonnages. However, pipeline network is of limited size and has just NST 2: crude oil & NST 7: refined petroleum products - so this task appears feasible. Rail freight data is the main issue to be discussed in later slides. We already have UK rail OD matrices for 2010 and 2015 from within the team (NUTS3xNUTS3xNST).

Overview: National Data Coverage & Consistency Requirement is that the tonnes transported are defined in a fully consistent fashion across all combinations of: Countries – Modes – Years Otherwise, if the model matched well to the 2010 pattern it would be guaranteed to be wrong for 2015 Eurostat consistency of tonnes for Phase 1 countries is: Mode Yearly total Country NST Yearly NST Road OK DE, NL, SI, UK have some issues IWW OK except IT: 2011 &15 IT, UK have issues – small flows Air OK – NST:15 - freight & mail Maritime Cargo type - OK Pipeline Gaps Rail Gaps except 2012 &14 Some years OK IT, NL, UK have issues Road - NST consistency issues are mainly in the earlier years and in general can be worked around IWW – Consistency seems good throughout for the major flows Air and Maritime - both appear consistent throughout Rail – has some major gaps and issues

Rail Freight Data Issues – OD matrices, 2010 Only 12 European countries match to the total tonne-km aggregate within 1% of difference No OD data at all for Austria, Belgium, Romania For other Phase 1 countries major missing OD tonnage data for Italy (-24%) and Netherlands (-14%) smaller missing tonnages for Slovenia (-5%) and UK (-7%) Germany matches fully Source: comparison of Eurostat tables for annual national totals <rail_ga_typeall> for 2010 OD based totals <tran_r_rago>

Comparison of Eurostat 2010 total rail tonnes (000s): national <rail_ga_typeall> OD based <tran_r_rago>

Rail Freight Data Issues - NST No NST segmentation at all in the rail OD dataset NST only available at country level - at best! not zonally even at NUTS1 level Half of all European countries have data gaps in their total national tonnes For Phase 1 countries: AT (83%), IT (64%) & NL (31%) of expected totals But DE (100%), UK (100%) and SI (96%) do match OK in 2010 Source: comparison of Eurostat tables for annual national totals <rail_go_typeall> for NST based totals <rail_go_grpgood> Major issues need to be resolved so to use rail OD data segmented by NST for base year 2010

Comparison of Eurostat 2010 total rail tonnes (000s): national <rail_ga_typeall> NST based <rail_go_grpgood>

NST national consistency over time, Phase 1 countries – Rail A constant 12.5% spread of colours over 8 years & 20 NSTs would suggest consistent data for country AT, DE and SI appear broadly OK IT is missing some or all NSTs in 2008, 2010 & 2013 NL is missing some or all national and transit traffic 2008-2011 UK shows inconsistencies between early and later years for various NSTs Source: Eurostat NUTS0 table ‘rail_go_grpgood’

Freight data - National sources Requirement is: complete 2010 (calibration) and 2015 (validation) OD rail tonnes matrices segmented by NUTS3 x NUTS3 x NST2007 (20 types of goods) otherwise a close approximation to these segments plus meta-data on the source of observations and processing Observed data is needed – not the output from a model

Freight OD matrix availability with NST - 1 Phase 1 countries DE (2010 only) and UK – matrices are already available AT – potentially available from Directorate Business Statistics – Transport NL – potentially available from inputs to BasGoed model SI - contact Slovenian Ministry of Infrastructure and the Slovenian statistical office IT – possibly available from: Italian Ministry of Transport – inputs to SIMPT model RFI - inputs to SAVEF model

Freight OD matrix availability with NST - 2 Phase 2 countries BE– potentially available from Belgian Federal Planning Bureau – inputs to PLANET model SE – potentially available from inputs to SAMGODS model NO – potentially available from inputs to national model Other countries Hopefully similar national sources can be made available

Passenger data - National sources Requirement is complete 2010 (calibration) and 2015 (validation) OD rail passenger matrices segmented by NUTS3 x NUTS3 otherwise a close approximation to these segments plus meta-data on the source of observations and processing Observed data is needed – not the output from a model

Comparison of Eurostat 2010 total rail passengers (000s): national <rail_pa_total> OD based <tran_r_rapa>

Passenger OD matrix availability Phase 1 countries UK – matrices are already available though require significant processing AT – possibly available from Statistik Austria DE - possibly available from DESTATIS NL – to fill major gaps and to obtain OViN mobility data, contact CBS - statistical agency and Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment SI - contact Slovenian Ministry of Infrastructure and the Slovenian statistical office IT – Unlikely to be further data available Phase 2 countries Hopefully similar national sources can be made available

Tonne kilometres (bn) by NST by reporting country, 2010: (note difference in scales and in pattern across NSTs) Rail Road Why is it important to have our freight matrices segmented by NST / type of goods in a consistent fashion for each mode across years? tkm across Europe differ in relative importance by NST class between road and rail: Road: NST4 – food products; NST1 - agricultural goods have highest tkms Rail: NST19 – containers; NST7 - refined petroleum products have highest tkms But note total tkm for NST7 is around 50 billion for both road and rail – difference in scale. The model needs to segment by NST in order to pick up these important differences in competitiveness between modes.

EU total by distance class & NST07 class, road, 2013 Tonnes (million) lifted Vehicle-kilometers (billions) Looking just at different units of measurement provide different insights for policy making: NST3 – ores and quarry products have the largest tonnes lifted But they are mainly loaded on large trucks (heavy bulk products) moving short trip lengths (blue<50kms) so generate lower impacts on traffic congestion (vkms) than might otherwise be expected. NST4 – food products are moved long distances with low tonnes per truck (light goods – individually packaged sometimes in smaller trucks used for local deliveries) often into urban areas and so have much larger impacts on road congestion than is indicated just by their tonnes lifted. NST18 – grouped goods is similar to NST4

Conclusions TRIMODE is an important modelling project for the European Commission, which will support the analytical work accompanying the policy initiatives in the transport field Network-based models are data-intense and require O/D detailed data for development and calibration. Using high quality detailed data is a precondition for reliable results! DG MOVE looks forward any detailed O/D data in rail transport, possibly at NUTS3 level, and by type of goods.

Thank you for your attention! paolo.bolsi@ec.europa.eu