Changing Lanes Manassas Park City Schools’ Transition to a Non-Traditional Pay Structure.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Compensation & Classification Study Brevard Public Schools Compensation & Classification Study Brevard Public Schools July 17, 2007 Employee Orientations.
Advertisements

Radford Surveys + Consulting Preparing for An IPO – A Total Compensation Approach N.A.C.D. September 27, 2005 Ed Speidel
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
Comprehensive Faculty Compensation Plan Joint Presentation By Faculty Senate Budget & Welfare Committees.
Current Issues in Human Resources & Benefits Judy Boyette Associate Vice President Academic Business Officers Conference April 4, 2005.
No 1 REVIEW OF ACADEMIC STRUCTURE PROPOSED GENERAL STAFF STRUCTURE 3 June 2008.
Management Forum Presentation November 3, 2008 Lynne Gervais, Associate Vice-Principal Human Resources 1.
Non-Academic Staff Compensation Structure & Administration
Salary Administration East Carolina University Department of Human Resources Classification and Compensation.
Total Rewards and Compensation
Competitive Market Compensation Review July 2009 Project Overview.
SECCP Salaried Employees Compensation and Classification Program June, 2005.
Non-Academic Staff Compensation Program Employee Presentation 2013.
1 ACC FY07 Classification and Compensation Study.
North Carolina Teacher Salaries State Board of Education March 2013 Alexis Schauss, Director of School Business.
Compensation Project Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Finance Committee Meeting Project Overview
-09/06/13, - Page 1 The Ohio State University - Classification and Compensation Talking Points - CONFIDENTIAL – for internal use only -  Compensation.
Proposed Financial Plan for Fiscal School Board Meeting February 12, 2015.
Agenda Review Major Changes from January 8 Presentation of Draft Preliminary Results Review Final Recommendations Other Progress to Date  
Recommendations Recommendation 1: Regrade the ten classifications found to be 20 percent or more below market midpoint to be in alignment with the market.
State Board of Education Dr. Gary L. Nixon, Executive Director Work of the 2013 BEP Committee.
Strategic Human resource Management compensation.
Compensation Plan May 11, Strategic Goal II: Northwest ISD will recruit, develop, retain, and recognize an exceptional, highly motivated.
Human Resources Department Bridget Paris, Compensation Specialist Work Session July 7, 2011.
Discussion on Compensation. Goal To assist in securing and retaining a staff of necessary quality to achieve the goals and objectives of the organization.
New Mexico Highlands University
COMPENSATION 101 CREATING & ADMINISTERING YOUR BASE PAY STRATEGY Consulting Inc.
1– 1 MGT-351 Human Resource Management Chapter-11 MGT-351 Human Resource Management Chapter-11 Establishing Strategic Pay Plans.
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook The University of West Alabama 1 Human Resource Management ELEVENTH EDITION G A R Y D E S S L E R © 2008 Prentice.
Approve a Market Adjustment to the City of Southlake Employee Compensation Program Item 9B.
Management Advisory Group, Inc. Executive Summary City of Fairfax Compensation and Classification Study July 1, 2016.
Classification and Compensation
Compensation Structure and Merit Process
Staff Compensation Structure
ESTABLISHING STRATEGIC PAY PLANS
About the Study 1 Summary 2 Market Study Results 3 Recommendations 4.
Establishing Strategic Pay Plans
Superintendent’s Budget Update Draft
UNC Tomorrow Update UNC Board of Governors
Today’s Agenda The importance of a conversation
Salary Survey based on Hay Method
Compensation: Creating an Equitable and Market-driven Pay System
Compensation Program Update
Grade and pay structures
Operations and Performance of the Virginia Community College System
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
Office of Human Resources
Florence County School District Three
Classification and Compensation Department of Human Resources
Designing pay levels, mix and pay structures
Staff Compensation Update
Job Evaluation Salary Administration Program
Claudio Collovà Evaluation Officer
Establishing Strategic Pay Plans
Compensation Plan May 26, 2015.
Compensation Philosophy, Objectives, and Implementation
Establishing Strategic Pay Plans
FINDING THE RIGHT BALANCE
Roanoke County Schools School Board Meeting March 22, 2018
Classification and Compensation Department of Human Resources
Pay Structure Chapter 9 HRM-300.
Agenda • Introductions • Project Objectives • Project Steps
Roanoke County Schools Budget Work Session February 22, 2018
Florence County School District Three
Finalizing the Compensation Study
Establishing Strategic Pay Plans
Chapter 10: Compensation
Compensation 101 A Primer for HR Professionals
Lake Havasu Unified School District #1
LUHR Compensation Program.
Presentation transcript:

Changing Lanes Manassas Park City Schools’ Transition to a Non-Traditional Pay Structure

Manassas Park City Schools Relative Wealth (LCI) ELL Percentage Geography Student Count (ADM) Disadvantaged Percentage

Staff Portrayals Fictionalized examples of MPCS Staff

Jan 2015 White Paper Sept 2015 Contract Consultant Change Timeline

Disadvantaged Percentage Comparison Group Organization Type Relative Wealth (LCI) ELL Percentage Geography Student Count (ADM) Disadvantaged Percentage

Change Timeline Jan 2015 Sept 2015 Aug 2016 Nov 2016 Jan-Jun 2017 White Paper Sept 2015 Contract Consultant Aug 2016 State Compensation Grant Nov 2016 Consultant Presentation Jan-Jun 2017 Teacher Committee Change Timeline

MPCS Compensation Philosophy The design and administration of all compensation packages will be sustainable to ensure good stewardship of division resources. Financial Sustainability The division will clearly communicate compensation policies and structures. Administration of the compensation plan will be consistent and impartial to ensure equity for employees working within similar jobs. Transparency and Internal Equity Compensation policies and procedures will be competitive with comparable K-12 school divisions and based on appropriate external markets. Policies will reflect the desire to recruit, retain, and develop high quality employees. External Competitiveness

Change Timeline Jan 2015 Sept 2015 Aug 2016 Nov 2016 Jan-Jun 2017 White Paper Sept 2015 Contract Consultant Aug 2016 State Compensation Grant Nov 2016 Consultant Presentation Jan-Jun 2017 Teacher Committee 2018 Budget Initiate Grades & Midpoint Change Timeline

Scale Structure – Step and Lane Easy administration When funds available Easy to understand? Steps do NOT equal years of service Sets artificial expectations Difficult to adjust Creates Step vs COLA debate

Scale Structure – Unified Pay Bands Uniform All positions Defined range Flexible Sustainable

Traditional Increase – COLA Min $15.36 Max $26.12 IA #1 = $15.37 IA #2 = $19.28 IA #3 = $23.78 IA #4 = $30.37 Mid $20.75 IA #4 = $30.07 Max $25.86 IA #3 = $23.54 +1% Mid $20.54 IA #2 = $19.09 Min $15.21 IA #1 = $15.22

Traditional Increase - COLA Employee Old Rate New Rate Change Extended* IA #4 $30.07 $30.37 30¢ $434.25 IA #3 $23.54 $23.78 24¢ $347.40 IA #2 $19.09 $19.28 19¢ $275.03 IA #1 $15.22 $15.37 15¢ $217.13 Double the increase * Extended assumes 7.5 hours for 193 days * Extended assumes 7.5 hours for 193 days

Salary Scale Width over Time

Increase on Midpoint IA #4 = $30.07 Min $15.21 Max $25.86 $20.54 Max $25.86 IA #3 = $23.54 +1% on Mid Mid $20.54 IA #2 = $19.09 Min $15.21 IA #1 = $15.22

Increase on Midpoint Employee Old Rate New Rate Change Extended* IA #4 $30.07 0¢ $0 IA #3 $23.54 $23.75 21¢ $303.98 0.89% IA #2 $19.09 $19.30 1.10% IA #1 $15.22 $15.43 1.38% Midpoint of $20.54 1% increase = 21¢ Standard increase * Extended assumes 7.5 hours for 193 days * Extended assumes 7.5 hours for 193 days

Board Meeting Public Comments

Change Timeline Jan 2015 Sept 2015 Aug 2016 Nov 2016 Jan-Jun 2017 White Paper Sept 2015 Contract Consultant Aug 2016 State Compensation Grant Nov 2016 Consultant Presentation Jan-Jun 2017 Teacher Committee 2018 Budget Initiate Grades & Midpoint 2019 Budget Implement Dual Teacher Grades Change Timeline

Teacher Scale Design Options 106% 96% 87% 60%

Impact of Raise Methods $21,750 Cumulative value of Loyalty Increase $65,025 Cumulative difference between 2% Midpoint and 2% Straight

A critical look at what the division values in new employees Scale Placement A critical look at what the division values in new employees

Rachel Kirkland School Board Chair rkirkland@mpark. net Dr Rachel Kirkland School Board Chair rkirkland@mpark.net Dr. Bruce McDade Superintendent bruce.mcdade@mpark.net Eric Neff Deputy Superintendent eric.neff@mpark.net Krista Kelly Executive Director of Finance krista.kelly@mpark.net Questions?