Planning, Conducting, and Implementing Research Peer Exchanges David M. Jared, P.E. Asst. State Research Eng. Georgia DOT July 25, 2016

Overview Peer exchange concept General mechanics Varieties of exchanges Example best practices Program review and next steps High-level introduction

Peer Exchange Concept Allows each state DOT research program to evaluate itself through a team of peers where exchange of ideas and best practices could provide mutual programmatic benefit Each state DOT required to host at least every five (5) years Written report to FHWA required

General Mechanics SP&R Funds may be used Programming Standalone project Pooled-fund option: TPF-5(031), “Support Services for Peer Exchanges”

Varieties of Exchanges Traditional Host state, a few other states, FHWA division staff, academia Multi-state Participating states share results Virtual multi-state Remote attendance Third-party facilitation

Example Best Practices Ad hoc participation FHWA division office staff Key academic partners TRB staff Discussion facilitator Third-party assistance with travel Report template Off-site, complementary activities Management attendance and/or briefings

Program Review & Next Steps Peer exchange programmatic review NCHRP 20-111, “Support for AASHTO-RAC Activities” Comprehensive, third-party review of best practices since 2001 Survey of RAC members a key element Next steps Results to be presented to RAC and SCOR (2017) Recommendations for programmatic improvements