Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Small-Molecule Iron Transport Inhibitor Ferristatin/NSC Promotes Degradation of the Transferrin Receptor  Lior Horonchik, Marianne Wessling-Resnick 
Advertisements

Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2003)
TANGO1 Facilitates Cargo Loading at Endoplasmic Reticulum Exit Sites
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 98, Issue 1, Pages (July 1999)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (November 2011)
The Hypercholesterolemia-Risk Gene SORT1 Facilitates PCSK9 Secretion
An Essential Role of Hrs/Vps27 in Endosomal Cholesterol Trafficking
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
by Thomas D. Nightingale, Krupa Pattni, Alistair N. Hume, Miguel C
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Etienne Morel, Robert G. Parton, Jean Gruenberg  Developmental Cell 
Richard C. Centore, Stephanie A. Yazinski, Alice Tse, Lee Zou 
Meghal Gandhi, Vérane Achard, Laurent Blanchoin, Bruce L. Goode 
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Eun-Joo Kim, Jeong-Hoon Kho, Moo-Rim Kang, Soo-Jong Um  Molecular Cell 
Nithya Raman, Elisabeth Weir, Stefan Müller  Molecular Cell 
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 15, Pages (August 2012)
Phospholipid Scramblase 1 Mediates Type I Interferon-Induced Protection against Staphylococcal α-Toxin  Miroslaw Lizak, Timur O. Yarovinsky  Cell Host.
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
Intracellular Trafficking of Interleukin-1 Receptor I Requires Tollip
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Yutian Peng, Lois S. Weisman  Developmental Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (November 2006)
Septins Regulate Actin Organization and Cell-Cycle Arrest through Nuclear Accumulation of NCK Mediated by SOCS7  Brandon E. Kremer, Laura A. Adang, Ian.
The Actin-Bundling Protein Palladin Is an Akt1-Specific Substrate that Regulates Breast Cancer Cell Migration  Y. Rebecca Chin, Alex Toker  Molecular.
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages e5 (April 2017)
Essential Role of TGF-β Signaling in Glucose-Induced Cell Hypertrophy
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (September 2014)
Matt Yasuo Pecot, Vivek Malhotra  Cell 
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages e4 (February 2017)
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Role of PINK1 Binding to the TOM Complex and Alternate Intracellular Membranes in Recruitment and Activation of the E3 Ligase Parkin  Michael Lazarou,
Virus-Induced Abl and Fyn Kinase Signals Permit Coxsackievirus Entry through Epithelial Tight Junctions  Carolyn B. Coyne, Jeffrey M. Bergelson  Cell 
STIM2 Is an Inhibitor of STIM1-Mediated Store-Operated Ca2+ Entry
The Membrane-Lytic Peptides K8L9 and Melittin Enter Cancer Cells via Receptor Endocytosis following Subcytotoxic Exposure  Masayuki Kohno, Tomohisa Horibe,
Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
RLE-1, an E3 Ubiquitin Ligase, Regulates C
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
The PAR-6 Polarity Protein Regulates Dendritic Spine Morphogenesis through p190 RhoGAP and the Rho GTPase  Huaye Zhang, Ian G. Macara  Developmental Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 129, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Coxsackievirus Entry across Epithelial Tight Junctions Requires Occludin and the Small GTPases Rab34 and Rab5  Carolyn B. Coyne, Le Shen, Jerrold R. Turner,
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (December 2015)
Takashi Hayashi, Gavin Rumbaugh, Richard L. Huganir  Neuron 
Regulation of LKB1/STRAD Localization and Function by E-Cadherin
Figure 4 DNM1 mutations affect protein levels and self-dimerization (A) HeLa cells were transfected with green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged mutant.
Growth Factor-Dependent Trafficking of Cerebellar NMDA Receptors via Protein Kinase B/Akt Phosphorylation of NR2C  Bo-Shiun Chen, Katherine W. Roche 
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
PHD3 Regulates p53 Protein Stability by Hydroxylating Proline 359
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 134, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Sean P. Cullen, Conor J. Kearney, Danielle M. Clancy, Seamus J. Martin 
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 652-662 (May 2011) ADF/Cofilin Regulates Secretory Cargo Sorting at the TGN via the Ca2+ ATPase SPCA1  Julia von Blume, Anne-Marie Alleaume, Gerard Cantero-Recasens, Amy Curwin, Amado Carreras-Sureda, Timo Zimmermann, Josse van Galen, Yuichi Wakana, Miguel Angel Valverde, Vivek Malhotra  Developmental Cell  Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 652-662 (May 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.03.014 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Developmental Cell 2011 20, 652-662DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.03.014) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 ADF/Cofilin Interacts with Actin and SPCA1 and Regulates the Sorting of Secretory Cargo at the TGN (A) HeLa cells were lysed and clarified by centrifugation. The supernatant was immunoprecipitated with an anti-cofilin1 antibody and the immunoprecipitate was analyzed by mass spectrometry. In addition to the peptides of cofilin1, actin- and SPCA1-specific peptides were contained in the immunoprecipitate. (B–E) Lysates of HeLa cells stably expressing ss-HRP transfected with control or ADF/cofilin1 siRNA were analyzed by western blotting using anti-cofilin1, ADF (B), Cathepsin D (D), and Cab45 (E) antibodies. The media from control and ADF/cofilin1 siRNA transfected cells were also used to monitor the levels of HRP activity (C). Compared datasets were termed as statistically significant with p values of < 0.01 (∗∗). Error bars indicate the mean SD of HRP activity in the medium normalized with respect to the HRP activity in the cell lysates. Developmental Cell 2011 20, 652-662DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.03.014) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Ca2+ Homeostasis of the TGN Is Controlled by SPCA1 (A) HeLa cells were visualized by fluorescence microscopy with SPCA1- and TGN46-specific antibodies (size bars represent 5 μm). (B) Lysates of HeLa cells transfected with control or SPCA1-specific siRNA were western blotted with anti-SPCA1 (top panel) and actin antibodies (bottom panel). (C) The effect of SPCA1 siRNAs (SPCA-1 and SPCA1-2) was quantified using the ImageJ software and was normalized to the expression of SPCA1 compared with cells transfected with control siRNA. Bar graphs represent the mean ± SD of triplicate experiments. Compared datasets were statistically significant (∗∗) when p < 0.01. (D) HeLa cells were transfected with the TGN-specific Ca2+ FRET sensor Go-D1cpv, fixed, and stained with an anti-TGN46 antibody. (E) Cells treated with control and SPCA1 siRNAs were cotransfected with Go-D1cpv. Ca2+ entry into the TGN was measured in Ca2+-depleted cells transfected with control siRNA (n = 38) or SPCA1 siRNA (n = 16). Fluorescent signals reflecting TGN [Ca2+] were presented as ΔR/R0, where R0 is the value obtained before addition of 2.2 mM Ca2+ to the cells bathing solution. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Mean maximum values measured after readdition of Ca2+ were statistically different between control and SPCA1 siRNA (24 ± 2% and 8 ± 2%, respectively; p < 0.01) (n = number of cells monitored). See also Figure S1. Developmental Cell 2011 20, 652-662DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.03.014) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 SPCA1 Knockdown Causes Missorting of Secretory Cargo (A and B) Cell lysates and medium of control and SPCA1 knockdown HeLa cells stably expressing ss-HRP were western blotted with anti–Cathepsin D (A) and Cab45 (B) antibodies. (C) The media from control and SPCA1 knockdown cells were also used to detect HRP by chemiluminescence. Error bars indicate mean ± SD of HRP activity in the medium normalized by HRP activity in cell lysates of triplicate measurements from representative experiments. Compared datasets were termed as statistically significant when p < 0.01 (∗∗). (D) HeLa cells stably expressing ss-HRP were transfected with control and SPCA1-specific siRNA and were incubated at 20°C for 2 hr. The cells were then shifted to 32°C, and the localization of HRP was monitored by fluorescence microscopy with an anti-HRP antibody (size bars represent 5 μm). (E) One hundred cells were counted to quantitate the location of HRP in control and SPCA1 knockdown ss-HRP expressing HeLa cells. Bar graphs represent data from at least three different experiments. (F and G) Cells were transfected with control and SPCA1 siRNA. After 24 hr, cells were transfected either with a mock plasmid or SPCA1 wild-type. Secretion of HRP (F) and Cab45 (G) was monitored as described above. See also Figure S2. Developmental Cell 2011 20, 652-662DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.03.014) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Knockdown of ADF and Cofilin1 Affects Ca2+ Homeostasis of the TGN (A) HeLa cells transfected with control (n = 38) or ADF/cofilin1-specific siRNA and a mock plasmid (n = 26) or an siRNA-resistant mutant of cofilin1 (n = 9) were cotransfected with the TGN-specific Ca2+ sensor Go-D1cpv. TGN measurements were performed as described in Figure 2E. Mean maximum values after readdition of Ca2+ were statistically different between control and ADF/cofilin1 siRNA (24 ± 2% and 16 ± 2%, respectively; p < 0.01) but not between control and ADF/cofilin siRNA+cofilin1 (23 ± 1; p > 0.05). (B) Cells were transfected with control (n = 12) or ADF/cofilin1 siRNAs and a mock plasmid (n = 7) or SPCA1 wild-type (n = 8) and Go-D1cpv. Ca2+ entry into the TGN was measured using the Go-D1cpv probe. Mean maximum values after readdition of Ca2+ were statistically different between control and ADF/cofilin1 siRNA (35 ± 1% and 21 ± 1%, respectively; p < 0.01) but not between control and ADF/cofilin1 siRNA+SPCA1-WT (31 ± 1%; p > 0.05) (n = number of cells monitored). (C) Cells treated with control or ADF/cofilin1 siRNAs and a mock plasmid or SPCA1 wild-type plasmid were analyzed by western blot with SPCA1-, cofilin1-, and ADF-specific antibodies. (D) The medium of these cells was used to detect HRP by chemiluminescence. Error bars indicate mean ± SD of HRP activity in the medium normalized by HRP activity in cell lysates of triplicate measurements from representative experiments. Compared datasets were termed as statistically significant when p values were < 0.01 (∗∗). (E) In addition, both cell lysates and media were western blotted with anti-Cab45 antibody. See also Figure S3. Developmental Cell 2011 20, 652-662DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.03.014) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Cofilin1 Localizes to the TGN (A) HeLa cells grown at 37°C were fixed with formaldehyde and permeabilized with Triton X-100 (Standard) or first permeabilized with digitonin, washed, and then fixed with formaldehyde (Digitonin), prior to incubation with cofilin1- and TGN46-specific antibodies. (B) HeLa cells were cultured at 20°C for 2 hr and then fixed and permeabilized by the standard or digitonin procedure prior to incubation with anti-cofilin1 and TGN46 antibodies. (C) One hundred cells were randomly counted to determine the colocalization of cofilin1 with TGN46 in cells grown at 37°C or 20°C. Bar graphs represent mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments. (D) Colocalization analysis of control sample with GM130 staining in both image channels (Alexa 488 and Alexa 555) (a–c). Colocalization analysis of cofilin1 (green) and SPCA1 (red) staining in untreated cells (d–f), cofilin1 (green) and SPCA1 (red) staining in Lat A–treated cells (g–i), and cofilin1 (green) and SPCA1 (red) staining in Jasp-treated cells (j–l). Maximum projections of deconvolved 3D confocal datasets (a, d, and j), maximum projection of 3D confocal dataset (g). Product of the differences from the mean values of the two image channels (covariance) is shown (b, e, h, and k). Scatterplots of the pixel intensities of the two channels are shown (c, f, i, and l). See also Figure S4. Developmental Cell 2011 20, 652-662DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.03.014) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Cofilin and SPCA1 Bind at the TGN (A) HeLa cells stably expressing ss-HRP were grown at 37°C and fixed with formaldehyde and permeabilized with Triton X-100 (Standard) or first were permeabilized with digitonin, washed, and then fixed with formaldehyde (Digitonin), prior to incubation with anti-cofilin1 or anti-cofilin-P-S3 (green) and anti-TGN46 (red) antibodies. (B) Cofilin1 and SPCA1 were immunoprecipitated from cells. Ten percent total input and the cofilin1 and SPCA1 immunoprecipitates were separated by SDS PAGE and detected by western blotting with SPCA1- and cofilin1-specific antibodies. (C) IPs shown in (B) were quantified by densitometry using the ImageJ software and were normalized to the total inputs of the proteins. Bar graphs represent the mean ± SD of triplicate experiments. Compared datasets were statistically significant (∗∗) when p < 0.01. (D) HeLa cells were treated with DMSO, Jasp (500 nM), or Lat A (500 nM) for 2 hr. SPCA1 was immunoprecipitated, and IPs were analyzed by SDS page and western blotting with anti-SPCA1 and cofilin1 antibodies. (F) Cofilin1 was precipitated from the same lysates used in (B), and IPs were analyzed by SDS PAGE and western blotting with anti-SPCA1 and cofilin1 antibodies. (E and G) IPs were quantified by densitometry using the ImageJ software and as described in (B). For SPCA1-IP (E) and for cofilin1-IP (G), bar graphs represent the mean ± SD of triplicate experiments. Compared datasets were statistically significant (∗∗) when p < 0.01. See also Figure S5. Developmental Cell 2011 20, 652-662DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.03.014) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 SPCA1 Localization to the TGN Is Necessary for the ADF/Cofilin-Mediated Ca2+ Homeostasis and Protein Sorting (A) HeLa cells were transfected with HA-SPCA1 wild-type and HA-SPCA1-V919A. Proteins were visualized by staining with an anti-HA antibody and anti-TGN46 (for HA-SPCA1 wild-type) or anti-Calreticulin (for HA-SPCA1-V919A) antibodies, and images were taken by confocal microscopy. Size bars indicate 5 μm. (B) Cells were incubated with control or SPCA1 siRNAs and subsequently transfected with a mock plasmid, SPCA1 wild-type, or SPCA1 V919A. Cofilin1 was immunoprecipitated from cells, and IPs were analyzed by SDS page and western blotting with SPCA1- and cofilin1-specific antibodies. (C) HeLa cells treated with control or SPCA1-specific siRNAs were transfected with a control plasmid (n = 36), SPCA1 siRNA–resistant wild-type (n = 11), or SPCA1 siRNA–resistant V919A (n = 3), and the TGN-specific Ca2+ FRET sensor GoD1cpv. TGN measurements were performed as described in previous figures. Mean maximum values after readdition of Ca2+ were statistically different between control and SPCA1 siRNA–resistant V919A siRNA (19 ± 1% and 2 ± 0.7%, respectively; p < 0.01) but not between control and SPCA1 siRNA–resistant wild-type (14 ± 1%; p > 0.05). (D) Ca2+ entry into the TGN was measured using the Go-D1cpv probe in cells treated with control (n = 12) or ADF and cofilin1 siRNAs and transfected with a mock plasmid (n = 7) or SPCA1 V919A plasmid (n = 7). Mean maximum values after readdition of Ca2+ were statistically different between control (35 ± 1%) and both ADF/ cofilin1 siRNA (21 ± 1%) or ADF/cofilin siRNA + SPCA1 V919A plasmid (19 ± 1%; p > 0.05). (E) Cells were treated as described in (C) and the medium was used to detect HRP by chemiluminescence. (F) Cells were treated as described in (D) and the medium was used to detect HRP by chemiluminescence. Error bars indicate mean ± SD of HRP activity in the medium normalized by HRP activity in cell lysates of triplicate measurements from representative experiments. Compared datasets were termed as statistically significant when p < 0.01 (∗∗). See also Figure S6. Developmental Cell 2011 20, 652-662DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2011.03.014) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions