Thurs., Oct. 25.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pre-Answer Motions. 12(b)(1) Subject Matter Jurisdiction Should have been in state rather than federal court 12(b)(2) Personal Jurisdiction This court.
Advertisements

The Process of Litigation. What is the first stage in a civil lawsuit ?  Service of Process (the summons)
PA 106 – Unit 2. 2 State and Federal Courts 3 Trial Courts “Courts of record”-court reporters. “Courts of record”-court reporters. Opening and closing.
© 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 3 Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 3 Litigation and.
Prof. Washington Civ. Pro. Spr. 06 PLEADINGS. PLEADINGS The pleading stage of litigation involves the complaint, the answer and pre-answer motions The.
Pretrial Matters: Pleadings & Motions © Professor Mathis-Rutledge.
Motion to Compel A party is entitled to secure discovery from another party without court intervention.
American Tort Law Carolyn McAllaster Clinical Professor of Law Duke University School of Law.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 15 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 29, 2003.
 Is the most common response to a Complaint  Must be served within 30 days in California  Filed with the Court with a filing fee  Mailed to Plaintiff.
Introduction to Civil Procedure in the United States Wake Forest LLM Introduction to American Law Alan R. Palmiter – Sep
Motion for Summary Judgment The Keys to Success. How does this work?  Summary judgments are governed by Rule 166(a) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
Part I Sources of Corrections Law. Chapter 4 - Going to Court Introduction – Chapter provides information on appearing in court, either as a witness or.
Wed., Sept. 3. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly (U.S. 2007)
Tues. Sept. 4. drafting a complaint Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly (U.S. 2007)
Court Procedures Chapter 3.
CIVIL PROCEDURE 2002 Class 8 September 13, 2002 Professor Fischer.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 10 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 25, 2001.
Mon. Nov. 26. Work Product “Privilege” A witness, X, who is friendly to the D was interviewed by P’s attorney and a statement was drawn up Is there any.
Tues. Oct. 29. venue in federal court Sec Venue generally (b) Venue in general.--A civil action may be brought in-- (1) a judicial district.
Wed., Oct. 15. venue in federal court Sec Venue generally (b) Venue in general.--A civil action may be brought in-- (1) a judicial district.
Chapter Twelve Civil Procedure Before Trial. Introduction to Law, 4 th Edition Hames and Ekern © 2010 Pearson Higher Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
1 Agenda for 6th Class Misc. –Name plates out Rule 11 examples (continued) Answer Intro to Amendment.
1 Agenda for 6th Class Misc. –Name plates out –Lunch Friday Rule 11 (continued) Answer Intro to Amendment.
Wed, Aug ) Brief description of subject matter of course a) why does Civ Pro seem to hard? b) three main themes in course c) quick overview of a.
Tues. Nov. 19. discovery scope of discovery attorney-client privilege.
Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication LA 310.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 15 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 26, 2005.
Fri., Oct. 17. amendment 15(a) Amendments Before Trial. (1) Amending as a Matter of Course. A party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course.
Thurs. Nov. 1. waiver of defenses FRCP 12(g) Joining Motions. (1) Right to Join. A motion under this rule may be joined with any other motion allowed.
Mon. Sept. 10. service Rule 55. Default; Default Judgment (a) Entering a Default. When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought.
Tues., Oct. 29. consolidation separate trials counterclaims.
Brown: Legal Terminology, 5 th ed. © 2008 Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All Rights Reserved. Legal Terminology Fifth Edition by Gordon.
March 4, 2011 Civil Procedure.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 22 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 16, 2002.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 10 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America Sept. 18, 2002.
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2003 SECTION F CLASS 22/23 DISCOVERY IV.
Chapter Twelve Civil Procedure Before Trial
What State Court Practitioners Need to Know About Federal Civil Procedures.
Fri., Sept. 5.
PRE-SUIT CONSIDERATIONS
No-answer and Post-answer
Thurs., Aug. 29.
Pretrial Conference After discovery, a pretrial hearing is held to clarify the issues, consider a settlement, and set rules for trial Once the trial court.
Tues., Oct. 22.
Wed., Oct. 11.
Wed., Oct. 18.
Tues., Sept. 9.
Mon., Oct. 9.
Thurs., Oct. 12.
Thurs., Oct. 5.
Fri., Oct. 24.
Tues. Nov. 12.
Thurs., Sept. 5.
Wed., Oct. 4.
Mon., Aug. 29.
Mon., Oct. 29.
Tues., Sept. 3.
Thurs. Sept. 6.
Thurs., Sept. 1.
CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION INTRODUCTION TO PLEADINGS
Mon., Sept. 5.
Wed., Oct. 24.
Attorneys’ fees: When will you or your client be on the hook?
Introduction to GAP Associate Program
Mon., Sept. 9.
Thurs., Oct. 18.
Chapter 3 Judicial, Alternative, and E-Dispute Resolution
Civil Pretrial Practice
Agenda for 5th Class Misc. Name plates out Slide handout
Presentation transcript:

Thurs., Oct. 25

responding to a complaint…

default

pleadings

FRCP 7. Pleadings Allowed; Form of Motions and Other Papers (a) Pleadings. Only these pleadings are allowed:     (1) a complaint;     (2) an answer to a complaint;     (3) an answer to a counterclaim designated as a counterclaim;     (4) an answer to a crossclaim;     (5) a third-party complaint;     (6) an answer to a third-party complaint; and     (7) if the court orders one, a reply to an answer.

answers

preanswer motions

FRCP 12(b) How to Present Defenses FRCP 12(b) How to Present Defenses.  Every defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading if one is required. But a party may assert the following defenses by motion:     (1) lack of subject-matter jurisdiction;     (2) lack of personal jurisdiction;     (3) improper venue;     (4) insufficient process;     (5) insufficient service of process;     (6) failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and     (7) failure to join a party under Rule 19.

timing

FRCP 12(a) Time to Serve a Responsive Pleading. (1) In General FRCP 12(a) Time to Serve a Responsive Pleading.     (1) In General. Unless another time is specified by this rule or a federal statute, the time for serving a responsive pleading is as follows:         (A) A defendant must serve an answer:             (i) within 21 days after being served with the summons and complaint; or             (ii) if it has timely waived service under Rule 4(d), within 60 days after the request for a waiver was sent . . .         (B) A party must serve an answer to a counterclaim or crossclaim within 21 days after being served with the pleading that states the counterclaim or crossclaim.         (C) A party must serve a reply to an answer within 21 days after being served with an order to reply, unless the order specifies a different time.

12(a)(4) Effect of a Motion    12(a)(4) Effect of a Motion.  Unless the court sets a different time, serving a motion under this rule alters these periods as follows:         (A) if the court denies the motion or postpones its disposition until trial, the responsive pleading must be served within 14 days after notice of the court’s action; or         (B) if the court grants a motion for a more definite statement, the responsive pleading must be served within 14 days after the more definite statement is served.

waiver of defenses

SMJ – can bring up at any time

failure to state claim, failure to join necessary party: if you bring up in a pre-answer motion under R 12, you can’t bring it up in a second pre-answer motion (unless it was not available to you at the time) but you can bring it up in your answer or later

pj, venue, process, service If you submit a pre-answer motion under R 12, it must be in it – it cannot be brought up in a second pre-answer motion (unless it was not available to you at the time) If your first response is instead an answer it must be in it (unless you can add it through an amendment “as a matter of course”)

answers

defenses in an answer 1) PJ, SMJ, venue, service, process 2) failure to state a claim 3) negative defenses 4) affirmative defenses

FRCP 8(b) Defenses; Admissions and Denials. (1) In General FRCP 8(b) Defenses; Admissions and Denials.     (1) In General. In responding to a pleading, a party must:         (A) state in short and plain terms its defenses to each claim asserted against it; and         (B) admit or deny the allegations asserted against it by an opposing party.

FRCP 8(c) Affirmative Defenses. (1) In General FRCP 8(c) Affirmative Defenses.     (1) In General. In responding to a pleading, a party must affirmatively state any avoidance or affirmative defense, including:         • accord and satisfaction;         • arbitration and award;         • assumption of risk;         • contributory negligence;         • discharge in bankruptcy;         • duress;         • estoppel;         • failure of consideration;         • fraud;         • illegality;         • injury by fellow servant;         • laches;         • license;         • payment;         • release;         • res judicata;         • statute of frauds;         • statute of limitations; and         • waiver.

8(c)(2) Mistaken Designation    8(c)(2) Mistaken Designation. If a party mistakenly designates a defense as a counterclaim, or a counterclaim as a defense, the court must, if justice requires, treat the pleading as though it were correctly designated, and may impose terms for doing so.

Rule 11. Signing Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to the Court; Sanctions

what is a frivolous action?

an action that loses?

are frivolous cases a problem?

why bring a frivolous action?

(a) Signature. Every pleading, written motion, and other paper must be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney’s name — or by a party personally if the party is unrepresented. The paper must state the signer’s address, e-mail address, and telephone number. Unless a rule or statute specifically states otherwise, a pleading need not be verified or accompanied by an affidavit. The court must strike an unsigned paper unless the omission is promptly corrected after being called to the attorney’s or party’s attention.

(b) Representations to the Court (b) Representations to the Court. By presenting to the court a pleading, written motion, or other paper — whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating it — an attorney or unrepresented party certifies that to the best of the person’s knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances:

Attorney has a good faith belief that the factual allegation has evidentiary support. Is R 11 satisfied?

objective standard

When Attorney signed the complaint it was true that, to the best of her knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances the standards in R 11 (b) were satisfied. Is she safe?

continuing duty

(1) it is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation;

Attorney has a non-frivolous motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. She and her client are happy litigating in the court but believes that a successful motion to dismiss would help wear down her opponent.

(2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions are warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law or for establishing new law;

If legal contentions must be warranted by existing law, should the attorneys who argued for the plaintiffs in Brown v. Board of Education have been be sanctioned under R. 11?

Can you always satisfy R Can you always satisfy R. 11(b)(2) simply by saying: “We would like the law to be extended to allow our action”?

Attorney has a non-frivolous arguments for legal contention X, but she has never mentioned it. Can she be sanctioned under R 11(b)(2)?

(3) the factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and (4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on belief or a lack of information.

Can you always satisfy R Can you always satisfy R. 11(b)(3) by saying - “The following allegation is likely to have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery”?  

Does the evidentiary support have to be admissible at trial?

can a plaintiff lose at summary judgment and nevertheless have satisfied R11(b)(3) at the pleading stage?

can a plaintiff defeat a motion for summary judgment and nevertheless have violated R11(b)(3) at the pleading stage?

did the complaint in Twombly/Iqbal satisfy R 11(b)(3)?

(d) Inapplicability to Discovery (d) Inapplicability to Discovery. This rule does not apply to disclosures and discovery requests, responses, objections, and motions under Rules 26 through 37.

11(c)(2) Motion for Sanctions 11(c)(2) Motion for Sanctions. A motion for sanctions must be made separately from any other motion and must describe the specific conduct that allegedly violates Rule 11(b). The motion must be served under Rule 5, but it must not be filed or be presented to the court if the challenged paper, claim, defense, contention, or denial is withdrawn or appropriately corrected within 21 days after service or within another time the court sets.

11(c)(1) In General. If, after notice and a reasonable opportunity to respond, the court determines that Rule 11(b) has been violated, the court may impose an appropriate sanction on any attorney, law firm, or party that violated the rule or is responsible for the violation. Absent exceptional circumstances, a law firm must be held jointly responsible for a violation committed by its partner, associate, or employee.

Attorney relies in making a factual allegation upon a document fabricated by Client, but taken by Attorney to be genuine. Can Attorney be sanctioned under R. 11(b)(3)? Can Client be?

11(c)(5) Limitations on Monetary Sanctions 11(c)(5) Limitations on Monetary Sanctions. The court must not impose a monetary sanction: (A) against a represented party for violating Rule 11(b)(2)…

Can a court apply R 11 sanctions sua sponte?

11(c)(3) - On the Court’s Initiative 11(c)(3) - On the Court’s Initiative. On its own, the court may order an attorney, law firm, or party to show cause why conduct specifically described in the order has not violated Rule 11(b).

R 11(c)(5) Limitations on Monetary Sanctions R 11(c)(5) Limitations on Monetary Sanctions. The court must not impose a monetary sanction… (B) on its own, unless it issued the show-cause order under Rule 11(c)(3) before voluntary dismissal or settlement of the claims made by or against the party that is, or whose attorneys are, to be sanctioned.

11(c)(4) - A sanction imposed under this rule must be limited to what suffices to deter repetition of the conduct or comparable conduct by others similarly situated. The sanction may include nonmonetary directives; an order to pay a penalty into court; or, if imposed on motion and warranted for effective deterrence, an order directing payment to the movant of part or all of the reasonable attorney’s fees and other expenses directly resulting from the violation.

Can a motion for Rule 11 sanctions be grounds for Rule 11 sanctions?

alternative pleading

R 8(d)(2) Alternative Statements of a Claim or Defense R 8(d)(2) Alternative Statements of a Claim or Defense. A party may set out two or more statements of a claim or defense alternatively or hypothetically, either in a single count or defense or in separate ones. If a party makes alternative statements, the pleading is sufficient if any one of them is sufficient.

P sues D alleging that D borrowed P’s vase and returned it cracked P sues D alleging that D borrowed P’s vase and returned it cracked. D answers alleging that D never borrowed vase, that vase was cracked when D borrowed it, and that D returned vase uncracked. OK?

(3) Inconsistent Claims or Defenses (3) Inconsistent Claims or Defenses. A party may state as many separate claims or defenses as it has, regardless of consistency.