Extension Plant Pathologist University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Corn Growth and Development
Advertisements

Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
2012 Trial Results Brett Galambos – Waldheim Colleen Murphy - Delmas.
Response of Early and Late Maturing Peanut Cultivars to Sowing Densities and Fungicide Application in Ghana Jesse B. Naab 1, P.V. Vara Prasad 2*, Kenneth.
Assessing the Reaction of American Wildrice to Inoculated Pathogens. Raymond Porter*, Robert Nyvall, and Laura Carey University of Minnesota, NCROC, 1861.
New development of Hybrid-Maize model Haishun Yang Associate Professor / Crop Simulation Modeler, Dept. Agronomy & Horticulture University of Nebraska.
Determine seeding rate and hybrid effects on: Phenotypical and physiological plant measurements Canopy and leaf sensor measurements A goal in precision.
R.W. Heiniger Vernon G. James Center North Carolina State University.
Fundamentals of Corn Pathology Paul Vincelli University of Kentucky.
Unit 1: Corn Diseases.
Foliar Fungicide Management for Corn Production Brian Jones Agronomy Extension Agent.
Evaluation of Various Insecticide Regimes in Sweetpotato Production for Sugarcane Beetle Control in the Mid-South Larry Adams 1, Randall Luttrell 1 and.
2014 High Yield and High Quality Wheat Program Step 1: Spray between feekes stage Huskie 12.8 oz./acre + Stratego YLD 2.5 oz./acre + Foliar Fertilizer.
Producing “New” Small Grain Crops in the Mid-Atlantic Wade Thomason.
Syngenta Cereals: Fungicides. 2 Disease Management – Importance of Flag Leaf.
IMPACT OF BAHIAGRASS, COTTON, AND CORN CROPPING FREQUENCY ON THE SEVERITY OF DISEASES OF PEANUT A. K. Hagan, L. H. Campbell, J. R. Weeks, M. E. Rivas-Davila.
Corn Growth and Development
Corn Growth and Development
Soybean Agronomics Eric P. Prostko Department of Soil & Crop Science The University of Georgia.
Wheat Management Mike Roegge University of Illinois Extension Adams/Brown Unit With special thanks to Dr. Carl Bradley, Dr. Steve Ebelhar, Dr. Eric Adee.
Fungicide Resistance in Field Crops
Validation, Optimization, and Deployment of Fungicide Advisories for Soybean Virginia Soybean Board 2014 Project Report & 2015 Project Proposal Dr. Hillary.
2009 Fungicide Application Research In 2009, we experimented with one of our inbreeds. We applied two applications of Headline Fungicide at the 6 ounce.
Conducting Sound On-Farm Research
Disease Management Jason Brock UGA Department of Plant Pathology.
2014 Technical Meeting Brad Engel. TSM Corn Starter Trial  Location: Catlin, IL  Corn Hybrid: Pioneer P-1142  Previous Crop: Soybeans  Planting Date:
SCC-33 National Variety Testing Meeting New Orleans – February 8-10, 2012 Rick Mascagni LSU AgCenter St. Joseph, LA.
1 Soybean Rust: What Happened in 2005? What’s Ahead? Gregory Shaner Purdue University.
Soybean Aphids in Iowa – Past and Present Marlin E. Rice Extension Entomologist Iowa State University.
2009 National Sunflower Association Survey Project Leader: Dr. Duane Berglund, Retired NDSU Extension Agronomist and Professor Emeritus- Crop Science.
BELT 4 SC (FLUBENDIAMIDE): A NEW INSECTICIDE FOR CONTROL OF HELIOTHINES IN CONVENTIONAL COTTON – 2006 Jarrod T. Hardke 1, Gus M. Lorenz 1, B.R. Leonard.
Corn Growth Stages Chad Lee, Ph.D. Grain Crops Extension Specialist
Optimizing Nitrogen and Irrigation Timing for Corn Fertigation Applications Using Remote Sensing Ray Asebedo, David Mengel, and Randall Nelson Kansas State.
TEN STEPS TO HIGH YIELD AND PROFITABLE SOYBEAN PRODUCTION The University of Georgia Extension Soybean Team.
Impact of 2012 Drought & Corn Production Research Update Agronomy In-service January 4, 2013 Peter Thomison Horticulture and Crop Science Ohio State University.
Yield Loss Prediction Tool for Field-Specific Risk Management of Asian Soybean Rust S. Kumudini, J. Omielan, C. Lee, J. Board, D. Hershman and C. Godoy.
15 July 2009 INFLUENCE OF PHC SEED AND FOLIAR TREATMENTS ON IRISH POTATO GROWTH AND YIELD Summary of Rhizoctonia Data, Holland Ag Services, Washington.
Level II Agricultural Business Operations.  Understand and identify the key crop production targets  Be able to state performance targets for individual.
1 Texas Liquid Fertilizer Corn TLF Commitment to you Increase yields Lower Costs Help solve those production problems that limit profitability.
LATE SEASON N APPLICATIONS FOR IRRIGATED HARD RED WHEAT PROTEIN ENHANCEMENT. S.E. Petrie*, Oregon State Univ, B.D. Brown, Univ. of Idaho. Introduction.
Plant Growth Regulator Programs in Arizona Cotton Erin L. Taylor and Patrick A. Clay University of Arizona Cooperative Extension.
Early and late fungicide applications in corn: What have we learned?
Insecticide Efficacy of Foliar Applications for Tarnished Plant Bug and Other Key Insect Pests of Cotton in the Mississippi Delta Dr. James Robbins Delta.
New Peanut Cultivar Response to Paraquat Applications
Irrigation Method Impacts on Peanut Pod Yield. S. Leininger 1, L. J
Influences of Planting Population on Sugarcane Aphid (Melanaphis sacchari) in Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) Brittany Lipsey Mississippi State University.
Effects of foliar fungicide application on the growing corn plant
Soybean Rust Tyler Stucker.
Crop Disease Update – August 23, 2016
Models for estimate yield losses due to wheat rusts and powdery mildew By Dr.Gamalat Abd-Elazize& Dr. Mohamed Abdelkader Wheat Diseases Research Department.
Brenda V. Ortiz1, Mariana Del Corso1, Gregory Pate2
Brown Stink Bug Insecticide Trials
The Solar Corridor Model: To Maximize Organic Crop Production
Wheat: Harvest and Review of Steps for Good Wheat Management
My Summer with Bunge Katie Schlake.
A. Adhikari1, R. Dill-Macky 2, J. J. Wiersma2, S. Haguen2 and M. J
2017 NUE Conference Baton Rouge, LA – August 7 - 9, 2017
Research & Development and Product Development Update
Advances in Valley Vegetable Production and Irrigation
Extension Plant Pathologist University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Lodging immediately after July 4, 2007 storm.
Gyles Randall and Jeff Vetsch University of Minnesota
Improving Silage Yield and Seasonal Distribution
Untreated Weed-Free Check
Evaluating “Ultra-Early” Corn Hybrids
PEANUT RESPONSE TO MULTIPLE SIMULATED OFF-TARGET
Jake Dyer Maine Potato Board
Purdue-Indiana Seed Industry Forum: Crop Production Shawn P. Conley
The Effects of Defoliation Timing and Ethephon Rate on Harvest Date, Lint Yield, and Fiber Quality of Cotton Guy Collins, Keith Edmisten, James Lanier,
National Agricultural Statistics Service
Presentation transcript:

Extension Plant Pathologist University of Nebraska - Lincoln 2013 Foliar Fungicide Product Comparison on Corn South Central Agriculture Laboratory Clay Center, NE Tamra Jackson-Ziems Extension Plant Pathologist University of Nebraska - Lincoln

2013 Diseases Although at very low severity, gray leaf spot was the predominant foliar disease during the growing season at this location. Gray leaf spot severity level was < 1% in the non-treated control.

2013 Diseases Common rust was the foliar disease first observed in this trial & was initially seen in late July. Disease severity was very low at this location and did not exceed trace amounts (≤ 0.1%) for any treatment.

2013 Diseases Southern rust was present and was first identified in this trial on September 4th. This disease was observed in trace amounts (≤0.2%) in the non-treated control.

2013 Diseases Eyespot, common smut, and Physoderma brown spot were observed sparsely in this trial, thus not justifying ratings for these diseases at this location in 2013.

2013 Hail Damage On August 1st, a storm event with strong wind and hail occurred when the corn was at the end of the R1 growth stage which caused an estimated 30% defoliation. Foliar fungicide treatments were applied on July 26th, six days prior to the event.

2013 Foliar Fungicide Trials 2005-2006 Last year’s crop was corn Planting date: 5/15/13 Target plant population of 31,763 plants/A Corn hybrid: NK N68B (GLS rating 7/9, ”fair”, not rated for CR, & SR rating 2/9, “excellent”) Eight foliar fungicide treatments and a non-treated control replicated six times NIS added at 0.25% v/v High clearance sprayer used at 20 gpa at 40 psi Alley width & row spacing = 30 inches Overhead sprinkler irrigated South Central Agriculture Laboratory Clay Center, NE

Treatment & application rate Rating Date & Growth Stage 2013 Fungicide Product Comparison Trial in NE Gray leaf spot disease severity (%) Treatment & application rate Rating Date & Growth Stage Foliar fungicide application was made July 26th at silking (R1). NIS added to each fungicide treatment at 0.25% v/v. 8

Treatment & application rate 2013 Fungicide Product Comparison Trial in NE Area Under the Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC) for gray leaf spot a ab b b b b b b b Aproach 5.6 fl oz/A + Alto 5.6 fl oz/A Fortix 6 fl oz/A Evito 2 fl oz/A Non-treated control Headline AMP 10 fl oz/A Quilt Xcel 10.5 fl oz/A Stratego YLD 4 fl oz/A Priaxor 4 fl oz/A Aproach 6 fl oz/A Treatment & application rate * Foliar fungicide applications made at silking (R1). NIS added at 0.25% v/v. * Treatments with different letters are statistically different. Coefficient of variation is 42.8%. 9

Treatment & application rate Rating Date & Growth Stage 2013 Fungicide Product Comparison Trial in NE Common rust disease severity (%) Treatment & application rate Rating Date & Growth Stage Foliar fungicide application was made July 26th at silking (R1). NIS added to each fungicide treatment at 0.25% v/v. 10

Treatment & application rate 2013 Fungicide Product Comparison Trial in NE Area Under the Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC) for common rust Stratego YLD 4 fl oz/A Aproach 5.6 fl oz/A + Alto 5.6 fl oz/A Fortix 6 fl oz/A Evito 2 fl oz/A Non-treated control Headline AMP 10 fl oz/A Quilt Xcel 10.5 fl oz/A Priaxor 4 fl oz/A Aproach 6 fl oz/A Treatment & application rate * Foliar fungicide applications made at silking (R1). NIS added at 0.25% v/v. * No statistical differences among treatments. Coefficient of variation is 0%. 11

Treatment & application rate Rating Date & Growth Stage 2013 Fungicide Product Comparison Trial in NE Southern rust disease severity (%) Treatment & application rate Rating Date & Growth Stage Foliar fungicide application was made July 26th at silking (R1). NIS added to each fungicide treatment at 0.25% v/v. 12

Treatment & application rate 2013 Fungicide Product Comparison Trial in NE Area Under the Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC) for southern rust a b b b b b b b b Aproach 5.6 fl oz/A + Alto 5.6 fl oz/A Fortix 6 fl oz/A Evito 2 fl oz/A Non-treated control Headline AMP 10 fl oz/A Quilt Xcel 10.5 fl oz/A Stratego YLD 4 fl oz/A Priaxor 4 fl oz/A Aproach 6 fl oz/A Treatment & application rate * Foliar fungicide applications made at silking (R1). NIS added at 0.25% v/v. * Treatments with different letters are statistically different. Coefficient of variation is 27.6%. 13

Treatment & application rate 2013 Fungicide Product Comparison Trial in NE Stay green % assessed on September 30th, 2013 Kernel dent stage (R6) Stratego YLD 4 fl oz/A Aproach 5.6 fl oz/A + Alto 5.6 fl oz/A Fortix 6 fl oz/A Evito 2 fl oz/A Non-treated control Headline AMP 10 fl oz/A Quilt Xcel 10.5 fl oz/A Priaxor 4 fl oz/A Aproach 6 fl oz/A Treatment & application rate * Foliar fungicide applications made at silking (R1). NIS added at 0.25% v/v. * No statistical differences among treatments. Coefficient of variation is 12.9%. 14

Treatment & application rate 2013 Fungicide Product Comparison Trial in NE Push lodging % assessed on October 16th, 2013 Physiological maturity stage (R6) Stratego YLD 4 fl oz/A Aproach 5.6 fl oz/A + Alto 5.6 fl oz/A Fortix 6 fl oz/A Evito 2 fl oz/A Non-treated control Headline AMP 10 fl oz/A Quilt Xcel 10.5 fl oz/A Priaxor 4 fl oz/A Aproach 6 fl oz/A Treatment & application rate * Foliar fungicide applications made at silking (R1). NIS added at 0.25% v/v. * No statistical differences among treatments. Coefficient of variation is 159.7%. 15

Treatment & application rate 2013 Fungicide Product Comparison Trial in NE 500 count kernel weight (g) Stratego YLD 4 fl oz/A Aproach 5.6 fl oz/A + Alto 5.6 fl oz/A Fortix 6 fl oz/A Evito 2 fl oz/A Non-treated control Headline AMP 10 fl oz/A Quilt Xcel 10.5 fl oz/A Priaxor 4 fl oz/A Aproach 6 fl oz/A Treatment & application rate * Foliar fungicide applications made at silking (R1). NIS added at 0.25% v/v. * No statistical differences among treatments. Coefficient of variation is 2.4%. 16

Treatment & application rate 2013 Fungicide Product Comparison Trial in NE Yield (bu/A) on October 23rd, 2013 a a ab cd ab ab abc bcd d Aproach 5.6 fl oz/A + Alto 5.6 fl oz/A Fortix 6 fl oz/A Evito 2 fl oz/A Non-treated control Headline AMP 10 fl oz/A Quilt Xcel 10.5 fl oz/A Stratego YLD 4 fl oz/A Priaxor 4 fl oz/A Aproach 6 fl oz/A Treatment & application rate * Foliar fungicide applications made at silking (R1). NIS added at 0.25% v/v. * Treatments with different letters are statistically different. Coefficient of variation is 2.5%. 17

Treatment & application rate 2013 Fungicide Product Comparison Trial in NE Grain moisture % at harvest on October 23rd, 2013 Stratego YLD 4 fl oz/A Aproach 5.6 fl oz/A + Alto 5.6 fl oz/A Fortix 6 fl oz/A Evito 2 fl oz/A Non-treated control Headline AMP 10 fl oz/A Quilt Xcel 10.5 fl oz/A Priaxor 4 fl oz/A Aproach 6 fl oz/A Treatment & application rate * Foliar fungicide applications made at silking (R1). NIS added at 0.25% v/v. * No statistical differences among treatments. Coefficient of variation is 2.0%. 18

Acknowledgments Casey Schleicher, Technologist UNL South Central Ag Lab (SCAL) Staff UNL Student Workers 19

Department of Plant Pathology University of Nebraska-Lincoln Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources 20