Sushrut S. Waikar, Venkata S. Sabbisetti, Joseph V. Bonventre 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 59, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Advertisements

Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)
Propofol-related green urine
Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease
Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Blaithin A. McMahon, Patrick Thomas Murray  Kidney International 
Volume 82, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Dietary acid reduction with fruits and vegetables or bicarbonate attenuates kidney injury in patients with a moderately reduced glomerular filtration.
Calcium balance in normal individuals and in patients with chronic kidney disease on low- and high-calcium diets  David M. Spiegel, Kate Brady  Kidney.
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral tolvaptan in patients with varying degrees of renal function  Susan E. Shoaf, Patricia Bricmont, Suresh.
Volume 80, Issue 10, Pages (November 2011)
Corrections to "Estimating the glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine is better than from cystatin C for evaluating risk factors associated.
John P. Middleton, Patrick H. Pun  Kidney International 
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 80, Issue 6, Pages (September 2011)
Better nephrology for mice—and man
Volume 77, Issue 8, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 78, Issue 12, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 91, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Pasquale Esposito, Teresa Rampino, Giuseppe Sileno, Antonio Dal Canton 
Volume 77, Issue 1, Pages 5-6 (January 2010)
How to interpret the eGFR in patients with small body surface area
Proinflammatory effects of iron sucrose in chronic kidney disease
Volume 83, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Proteinuria and Other Urinary Biomarkers in Kidney Transplantation: Why Are We Still Waiting for Godot?  Bertram L. Kasiske, MD  American Journal of Kidney.
Volume 76, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Long-term study of mycophenolate mofetil treatment in IgA nephropathy
Volume 84, Issue 3, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 85, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Timothy A. Sutton, Pierre C. Dagher  Kidney International 
U-shaped effect of eGFR and mortality
Volume 82, Issue 7, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 69, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 77, Issue 8, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 73, Issue 5, Pages (March 2008)
Urinary biomarkers: the future looks promising
Volume 74, Issue 8, Pages (October 2008)
Lesley A. Stevens, MD, MS, Nicholas Stoycheff, MD 
Volume 87, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 78, Issue 5, Pages (September 2010)
Nephrology Crossword: Glomerulonephritis
Volume 79, Issue 10, Pages (May 2011)
Michael W. Steffes, Derek Schmidt, Rebecca Mccrery, John M. Basgen 
Volume 80, Issue 3, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
A man with a hole in his penis
Douglas G Matsell, Colin T White  Kidney International 
Urinary biomarkers in the early diagnosis of acute kidney injury
Yasunori Kitamoto, Katsuhiko Matsuo, Kimio Tomita  Kidney International 
Volume 82, Issue 9, Pages (November 2012)
Phosphate binders on iron basis: A new perspective?
Volume 80, Issue 10, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 80, Issue 10, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 80, Issue 10, Pages (November 2011)
The hypothesis that abnormal BH4 metabolism impairs kidney function
Volume 76, Issue 1, Pages 8-10 (July 2009)
Volume 64, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Pediatric acute kidney injury: The use of the RIFLE criteria
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Adiponectin: good, bad, or just plain ugly?
Volume 84, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 77, Issue 12, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 78, Issue 5, Pages (September 2010)
Plasma concentration and urinary excretion of N-terminal proatrial natriuretic peptides in patients with kidney diseases  Martina Franz, Wolfgang Woloszczuk,
The Ebf1 knockout mouse and glomerular maturation
Volume 79, Issue 10, Pages (May 2011)
Acute phosphate nephropathy
Presentation transcript:

Normalization of urinary biomarkers to creatinine during changes in glomerular filtration rate  Sushrut S. Waikar, Venkata S. Sabbisetti, Joseph V. Bonventre  Kidney International  Volume 78, Issue 5, Pages 486-494 (September 2010) DOI: 10.1038/ki.2010.165 Copyright © 2010 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Change in serum creatinine concentration (gray) and urine creatinine-normalized biomarker concentration (black) after severe acute kidney injury (acute decrease in creatinine clearance at time 0 from 100 to 10ml/min). The urinary biomarker production and excretion rates are assumed not to change; the effect on the normalized biomarker level is due to changes in urinary creatinine excretion rate. Kidney International 2010 78, 486-494DOI: (10.1038/ki.2010.165) Copyright © 2010 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Change in serum creatinine concentration (gray) and urine creatinine-normalized biomarker concentration (black) after mild acute kidney injury (acute decrease in creatinine clearance at time 0 from 100 to 40ml/min). The urinary biomarker production and excretion rates are assumed not to change; the effect on the normalized biomarker level is due to changes in urinary creatinine excretion rate. Kidney International 2010 78, 486-494DOI: (10.1038/ki.2010.165) Copyright © 2010 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Change in serum creatinine concentration (gray) and urine creatinine-normalized biomarker concentration (black) after severe acute kidney injury (acute decrease in creatinine clearance at time 0 from 100 to 10ml/min, followed 5 days later by a linear increase to 100ml/min over 24h (diagonal arrow)). The urinary biomarker production and excretion rates are assumed not to change; the effect on the normalized biomarker level is due to changes in urinary creatinine excretion rate. Kidney International 2010 78, 486-494DOI: (10.1038/ki.2010.165) Copyright © 2010 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Changes in the urine creatinine-normalized biomarker concentration after prompt graft function and delayed graft function. The urinary biomarker production and excretion rates are assumed not to change; the effect on the normalized biomarker level is due to changes in urinary creatinine excretion rate. Kidney International 2010 78, 486-494DOI: (10.1038/ki.2010.165) Copyright © 2010 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Graphical comparison of extrapolated 24h urinary KIM-1 excretion rate (y axis) versus normalized urinary KIM-1/creatinine ratio. The solid diagonal line represents the line of identity. Three outlier measurements from subject #31 are excluded (see Table 3). KIM-1, kidney injury molecule-1. Kidney International 2010 78, 486-494DOI: (10.1038/ki.2010.165) Copyright © 2010 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions