N.S. Khaerdinov & A. S. Lidvansky

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Solar System Science Flares and Solar Energetic Particles Terrestrial Gamma-Ray Flashes Cosmic-ray interactions with Earth, Sun, Moon, etc. Plans: Optimization.
Advertisements

Cosmic Ray Using for Monitoring and Forecasting Dangerous Solar Flare Events Lev I. Dorman (1, 2) 1. Israel Cosmic Ray & Space Weather Center and Emilio.
Possible anomalous magnetic moment and spin- flavor neutrino precession Lev I. Dorman a,b (a) Israel Cosmic Ray and Space Weather Center and Emilio Segre’
Further development of modeling of spatial distribution of energetic electron fluxes near Europa M. V. Podzolko 1, I. V. Getselev 1, Yu. I. Gubar 1, I.
A.U. Kudzhaev, D.D. Dzhappuev, V.V. Alekseenko, A.B. Chernyev, N.F. Klimenko, A.S. Lidvansky, A.B. Chernyev, N.F. Klimenko, A.S. Lidvansky, V.B. Petkov.
From Geo- to Heliophysical Year: Results of CORONAS-F Space Mission International Conference «50 Years of International Geophysical Year and Electronic.
Detection of MeV electrons, neutrons and gammas from the Relativistic Feedback Breakdown Process by particle detectors at Aragats A.Chilingarian.
Radio emissions produced by cosmic- ray extensive air showers traversing thunderclouds Joseph R. Dwyer Department of Physics and Space Sciences Florida.
1 Seasonal variations of the muon flux seen by the muon detector BUST 1 Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radiowave Propagation RAN of.
Variations of the high energy muon flux and space-time structure of the temperature profile in the atmosphere M.G. Kostyuk 1, V.B. Petkov 1, R.V. Novoseltseva.
Interplay of the Turbulence and Strong Coulomb’s Coupling in the Formation of the Anomalous Plasma Resistance Yurii V. Dumin Institute of Ionosphere and.
Analysis of Parameters of Bright Events in Variations of Secondary Particles of Cosmic Rays during Thunderstorms N.S. Khaerdinov & A. S. Lidvansky Institute.
Ultimate Spectrum of Solar/Stellar Cosmic Rays Alexei Struminsky Space Research Institute, Moscow, Russia.
Neutron bursts associated with lightning cloud-to-ground discharges V.I. Kozlov, V.A. Mullayarov, S.A. Starodubtsev, A.A. Toropov Yu.G. Shafer Institute.
Size and Energy Spectra of incident cosmic radiation obtained by the MAKET - ANI surface array on mountain Aragats. (Final results from MAKET-ANI detector)‏
Solar Atmosphere A review based on paper: E. Avrett, et al. “Modeling the Chromosphere of a Sunspot and the Quiet Sun” and some others [Alexey V. Byalko]
S.V.Goncharov, V.V.Surkov, Pilipenko V.A.
Events 1. Figure 4 shows: Left panel – Negative values ​​ of the electric field and data of high energy neutrons (upper panel), thermal neutrons (lower.
1 Atmospheric variations as observed by the BUST Barometric effect M.Berkova, V.Yanke, L.Dorman, V.Petkov, M.Kostyuk, R.Novoseltseva, Yu.Novoseltsev, P.
The short particle bursts during thunderstorms: EAS or lightning seeds? G. Hovsepyan, A. Chilingarian, A. Alikhanian National Laboratory, Armenia.
Simulations of radio emission from cosmic ray air showers Tim Huege & Heino Falcke ARENA-Workshop Zeuthen,
Spectra of the Thunderstorm Correlated Electron and Gamma-Ray Measured at Aragats Bagrat Mailyan and Ashot Chilingarian.
Operation of the Space Environmental viewing and Analysis Network (Sevan) in 24-th Solar Activity Cycle A. Chilingarian A. Chilingarian Yerevan Physics.
On the Role of Electric Field Changes when Calculating Thunderstorm Currents Yu.V. Shlugaev, V.V. Klimenko, E.A. Mareev Institute of Applied Physics RAS,
SN 1987A as a Possible Source of Cosmic Rays with E 0 < eV by Yakutsk EAS Array Data A.V. Glushkov, L.T. Ksenofontov, M.I. Pravdin Yu.G. Shafer Institute.
Cosmic rays at sea level. There is in nearby interstellar space a flux of particles—mostly protons and atomic nuclei— travelling at almost the speed of.
Cosmic Rays Cosmic Rays at Sea-Level - Extensive Air Showers and the detection of cosmic rays.
Variations of Cosmic Rays during Thunderstorms N.S. Khaerdinov & A. S. Lidvansky Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
On the origin of the huge natural electron accelerators operated in the thunderclouds Ashot Chilingarian Artem Alikhanyan National Laboratory (Yerevan.
Athens University – Faculty of Physics Section of Nuclear and Particle Physics Athens Neutron Monitor Station Study of the ground level enhancement of.
Spectrum of Gamma Rays, Produced by the Runaway Electrons G.G. Karapetyan Alikhanian National Laboratory, Armenia.
X-ray Emission from Thunderstorms and Lightning Joseph R. Dwyer Department of Physics and Space Sciences Florida Institute of Technology.
The identification of the fluctuation effects related to the turbulence and “permanent” layers in the atmosphere of Venus from radio occultation data V.N.Gubenko.
Simulation of Terrestrial Gamma Ray and Neutron Flashes (Small variations of thundercloud dipole moment) L.P. Babich, Е.N. Donskoĭ, A.Y. Kudryavtsev, M.L.
Neutron emission in TGE’s L.Vanyan*, A.Chilingaryan, N.Bostanjyan, T.Karapetyan Yerevan Physics Institute.
Measurement of the CR light component primary spectrum B. Panico on behalf of ARGO-YBJ collaboration University Rome Tor Vergata INFN, Rome Tor Vergata.
Our Star, the Sun Chapter Eighteen. Guiding Questions 1.What is the source of the Sun’s energy? 2.What is the internal structure of the Sun? 3.How can.
Modeling of secondary cosmic ray spectra for Solar Cycles 23
for Lomonosov-GRB collaboration
Ralph Markson (2007) February 23, 2017 Karly Reimel ATS 780
The “Carpet-2” multipurpose air shower array of the Baksan Neutrino Observatory INR of RAS A.U. Kudzhaev Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy.
On behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration
Cosmic-ray acceleration by compressive plasma fluctuations in supernova shells Ming Zhang Department of Physics and Space Sciences, Florida Institute.
Solar gamma-ray and neutron registration capabilities of the GRIS instrument onboard the International Space Station Yu. A. Trofimov, Yu. D. Kotov, V.
Primary authors : Dr. PAVLOV, Anatoly (Ioffe Institute)
AE33A-0435 Lightning leader and relativistic feedback discharge models of terrestrial gamma-ray flashes Joseph R. Dwyer1, Ningyu Liu1, J. Eric Grove2,
Search for Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station G. LA VACCA University of Milano-Bicocca.
STUDY of RADIATION RELATED with ATMOSPHERIC PRECIPITATIONS
A.S. Lidvansky, M.N. Khaerdinov, N.S. Khaerdinov
Generation of Toroidal Rotation by Gas Puffing
B. Hariharan Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, India
R. Bucˇık , K. Kudela and S. N. Kuznetsov
Are cosmic rays galactic or extragalactic?
Gamma-ray Albedo of the Moon Igor V. Moskalenko (Stanford) & Troy A
Comparison Of High Energy Hadronic Interaction Models
Comparison Of High Energy Hadronic Interaction Models
Meeting on Solar Wind Turbulence, Kennebunkport, June 4-7, 2013
Particle Acceleration in the Universe
Ulysses COSPIN High Energy Telescope observations of cosmic ray and solar energetic particles intensities since its distant Jupiter flyby in 2004 R.B.
Earth’s Ionosphere Lecture 13
Cosmic-ray acceleration by forward and reverse shocks in young SNR
Nuclear Transformations
Simulation of 14C production rates for the troposphere and stratosphere in weak geomagnetic intensity at 26,000 yr BP 1 Graduate School of Science and.
Estimation of Sensitivity to Gamma Ray point Sources above 30TeV
Bagrat Mailyan, Alikhanian National Laboratory (Former YerPhI)
Chemistry 25.2.
Intae Yu Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Korea KNO 2nd KNU, Nov
HASMIK ANDREASYAN Tigran Magakian Tigran Movsessian Mkrtich Gevorgyan
Conditions for Production of Terrestrial Gamma Ray Flashes (TGF)
Conditions for Production of Terrestrial Gamma Ray Flashes (TGF)
Presentation transcript:

N.S. Khaerdinov & A. S. Lidvansky Dynamics of Cosmic Rays in Thunderstorm Atmosphere and Generation of Elementary Particles by Thunderclouds N.S. Khaerdinov & A. S. Lidvansky  Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

Plan Experimental data obtained at Baksan on variation of the CR soft component (10-30 MeV) and muons during thunderstorms Calculated transformation of energy spectra of the soft component in weak near-earth electric field. Can describe regular behavior of CR intensity at moderate fields Calculated transformation of energy spectra in strong (critical) field of clouds. Cannot describe the bright enhancements of intensity with sections of exponential growth The model of particle production in thunderclouds is suggested based on a feedback cycling process

Experimental data: soft component Regular variations ‘intensity versus field’ averaged over many thunderstorm events. Strong enhancements of intensity (often before lightning) that sometimes demonstrate exponential increase Published in N.S. Khaerdinov, A.S. Lidvansky, and V.B. Petkov, Electric Field of Thunderclouds and Cosmic Rays: Evidence for Acceleration of Particles (Runaway Electrons), Atmospheric Research, vol. 76, issues 1-4, July-August 2005, pp. 346-354.

Relative deviation of the soft component intensity from the mean value versus local field (52 thunderstorm events)

Thunderstorm on Sept 26, 2001, Baksan Valley (North Caucasus) Electric field Soft component (10-30 MeV) Hard component (> 90 MeV) Intensity of muons (> 1 GeV)

Experimental data: muons Regular variations ‘intensity versus field’ averaged over many thunderstorm events. Negative linear and negative quadratic effect Strong dependence on the muon threshold energy (both linear and quadratic coefficients increase with decreasing threshold) N.S. Khaerdinov, A.S. Lidvansky, and V.B. Petkov, Variations of the Intensity of Cosmic Ray Muons due to Thunderstorm Electric Fields, 29th Intern. Conf. on Cosmic Rays, Pune, August 3-10, 2005, vol. 2, pp. 389-392.

Electric field strength Soft component Muons >1 GeV Hard component Thunderstorm on August 6, 2003, averaging over 15 s, one of the longest and most profound muon effect Electric field strength Soft component Muons >1 GeV Hard component (muons > 90 MeV) Stopping muons (20-80 MeV)

Muons with E > 90 MeV Stopping muons (20 < E < 80 MeV) Muons with E > 1 GeV

Weighted mean coefficients of approximations by second-degree polynomials of the intensity – field regression curves for different components Component Energy Linear coefficient, % per kV/m Quadratic coefficient, % per (kV/m)2 Muons > 1 GeV  0.00277  0.00034  0.00045  0.00005 Hard component (muons) > 90 MeV  0.00794  0.0013  0.00235  0.00002 Stopping muons 20 – 80 MeV  0.04124  0.01260  0.00845  0.00201

A great increase of the soft component The event of September 7, 2000 A view on a large time scale Averaging over 4-s intervals

Electric field Soft component (10-30 МэВ) Hard component (> 70 МэВ) Thunderstorm on Sept 7, 2000, fine structure of the largest increase in the soft component Electric field Soft component (10-30 МэВ) Hard component (> 70 МэВ) Precipitation electric current

Sept 7, 2000 event The largest increase is exponential with high precision and has an abrupt stop at the instant of lightning

Outstanding event during thunderstorm on Oct 11, 2003 The largest enhancement ever detected Lightning strokes interrupt the fast exponential rise in one case and slow exponential decay in the other

Accelerated near the ground Accelerated in the clouds Correlation of the intensity of soft CR component with near-earth electric field as measured and calculated (on the left panel). The difference (effect not explained by the spectrum transformation in the weak field near the ground surface is shown on the right panel. Accelerated near the ground Accelerated in the clouds Electrons Positrons Positrons Electrons

Examples of vertical profiles of thunderstorm electric field measured in a balloon experiment (Marshall et al., 1996)

Due to this structure, there is always a field with an opposite sign The layered structure of electric field in the atmosphere during thunderstorms (measured and used in calculations). S.S. Davydenko et al., 12 Int. Conf. on Atmospheric Electricity, Versailles, 2003) Due to this structure, there is always a field with an opposite sign overhead

Admissible regions for runaway and feedback particles

Under stable conditions and at sufficient strength (D) and extension (from x0 to x1) of the field the intensity of particles increases exponentially (K is the probability of one cycle, and  is its duration):

Different effect of lightning in the Oct 11, 2003 event The estimates of minimum distances are 4.4 and 3.1 km for the two lightning having strong effect. No effect is produced by the third nearby lightning.

Field strength versus field extension for particle generation process with different rise time. Red line is the boundary of stability, thick blue line corresponds to 10 s, as e-folding time in our 11 Oct 2003 event. Fundamental limit on electrostatic field in air calculated by J.R. Dwyer. Monte Carlo simulation (Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 2055 (2003)) at a pressure of 1 atm.

The upper limits to which intensity can be increased due to transformation of equilibrium background electron-positron spectrum of cosmic rays by strong (critical) electric field versus the lower boundary of this field (analysis of Oct 11, 2003 event) Analytical estimates (solid lines) made under extreme assumptions and the results of Monte Carlo simulations (points) for gamma-rays starting from three altitudes (1, 2, and 3 km) with an ultimately steep energy spectrum. Vertical line corresponds to the altitude of near mountains (~ 4000 m a.s.l.).

Arguments in favor of the suggested mechanism Intervals with exponential growth of intensity are explained in a natural way Distances to lightning discharges having an effect on the development of the process agree with sufficiently distant location of acceleration region (intensity argument) The spectrum of the observed effect is far steeper than extreme estimation for spectrum transformation effect (spectral argument) But more direct proof is needed!

Conclusions At moderate field strengths the transformation of the spectrum of cosmic rays is measured. There are enhancements of the soft component of cosmic rays that do not correlate with measured near-earth field. We interpret them as Wilson’s runaway electrons (or -rays from them). Events with fast exponential increase of intensity are interpreted as a feedback effect for runaway particles. It is shown that the critical field and particle energy for this process are 300 kV/m and 10 MeV, respectively.

The view on the feedback process applications (more conclusions): From the point of view of… Generation of particles by thunderclouds is: Environment science New type of natural radioactivity Climatology Amplification factor for CR effects Physics of atmosphere Mechanism of regulation of electric field strength and ion production Physics of gas discharge New type of discharge stimulated by relativistic particles Physics of particle acceleration Effect of bulk acceleration of diffused particle flux in dense medium Astrophysics Ready model of gamma-ray sources (including cosmic gamma-ray bursts)