Volume 84, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nonresonant Confocal Raman Imaging of DNA and Protein Distribution in Apoptotic Cells N. Uzunbajakava, A. Lenferink, Y. Kraan, E. Volokhina, G. Vrensen,
Advertisements

Date of download: 6/18/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Optical diagram for high-speed TPEF imaging based on a conventional scanning laser.
Date of download: 6/25/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Depiction of the confocal Raman system used to excite the embedded probes and collect.
Biology 227: Methods in Modern Microscopy Andres Collazo, Director Biological Imaging Facility Yonil Jung, Graduate Student, TA Week 10 Multispectral Imaging.
Optical Non-Invasive Approaches to Diagnosis of Skin Diseases
Picosecond Multiphoton Scanning Near-Field Optical Microscopy
Reliable and Global Measurement of Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Using Fluorescence Microscopes  Zongping Xia, Yuechueng Liu  Biophysical Journal 
P.J. Caspers, G.W. Lucassen, G.J. Puppels  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 91, Issue 8, Pages (October 2006)
Laurdan Fluorescence Lifetime Discriminates Cholesterol Content from Changes in Fluidity in Living Cell Membranes  Ottavia Golfetto, Elizabeth Hinde,
Quantitative Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering Imaging of Lipid Distribution in Coexisting Domains  Li Li, Haifeng Wang, Ji-Xin Cheng  Biophysical.
Tissa R. Hata, Theresa A. Scholz, Lynn K. Pershing 
Paul J. Campagnola, Mei-de Wei, Aaron Lewis, Leslie M. Loew 
Optical Non-Invasive Approaches to Diagnosis of Skin Diseases
György Vereb, Elizabeth Jares-Erijman, Paul R. Selvin, Thomas M. Jovin 
Characterization of a Range of Fura Dyes with Two-Photon Excitation
Probing Membrane Order and Topography in Supported Lipid Bilayers by Combined Polarized Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence-Atomic Force Microscopy 
Volume 111, Issue 5, Pages (September 2016)
Different Metabolic Responses in α-, β-, and δ-Cells of the Islet of Langerhans Monitored by Redox Confocal Microscopy  Ivan Quesada, Mariana G. Todorova,
Dual Mode Reflectance and Fluorescence Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy for In Vivo Imaging Melanoma Progression in Murine Skin  Yanyun Li, Salvador.
Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Molecular Dynamics in Living Cells Observed by Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy with One- and Two-Photon Excitation  Petra Schwille, Ulrich Haupts,
Volume 95, Issue 11, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 105, Issue 9, Pages (November 2013)
Peyman Obeidy, Philip L. Tong, Wolfgang Weninger 
Volume 74, Issue 6, Pages (June 1998)
Volume 107, Issue 10, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 100, Issue 11, Pages (June 2011)
The Mobility of Phytochrome within Protonemal Tip Cells of the Moss Ceratodon purpureus, Monitored by Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy  Guido Böse,
Surface-Sensitive Raman Spectroscopy of Collagen I Fibrils
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 83, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Behavior of Giant Vesicles with Anchored DNA Molecules
Volume 99, Issue 8, Pages (October 2010)
In Vivo Confocal Raman Microspectroscopy of the Skin: Noninvasive Determination of Molecular Concentration Profiles  Peter J. Caspers, Hajo A. Bruining,
Sapun H. Parekh, Young Jong Lee, Khaled A. Aamer, Marcus T. Cicerone 
Aleš Benda, Yuanqing Ma, Katharina Gaus  Biophysical Journal 
Cylindrical Illumination Confocal Spectroscopy: Rectifying the Limitations of Confocal Single Molecule Spectroscopy through One-Dimensional Beam Shaping 
Regulation of Airway Ciliary Activity by Ca2+: Simultaneous Measurement of Beat Frequency and Intracellular Ca2+  Alison B. Lansley, Michael J. Sanderson 
Multiphoton Excitation Provides Optical Sections from Deeper within Scattering Specimens than Confocal Imaging  Victoria E. Centonze, John G. White  Biophysical.
Jana Humpolíčková, Aleš Benda, Jörg Enderlein  Biophysical Journal 
Mechanical Distortion of Single Actin Filaments Induced by External Force: Detection by Fluorescence Imaging  Togo Shimozawa, Shin'ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical.
Volume 93, Issue 9, Pages (November 2007)
Francesca Pennacchietti, Travis J. Gould, Samuel T. Hess 
Volume 105, Issue 2, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 95, Issue 8, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 90, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Kinesin Moving through the Spotlight: Single-Motor Fluorescence Microscopy with Submillisecond Time Resolution  Sander Verbrugge, Lukas C. Kapitein, Erwin.
3D Protein Dynamics in the Cell Nucleus
Volume 107, Issue 10, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 107, Issue 10, Pages (November 2014)
Pulsed Interleaved Excitation
Shaohui Huang, Ahmed A. Heikal, Watt W. Webb  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Hongqiang Ma, Jianquan Xu, Jingyi Jin, Yi Huang, Yang Liu 
Real-Time Nanoscopy by Using Blinking Enhanced Quantum Dots
Volume 111, Issue 5, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 105, Issue 9, Pages (November 2013)
Single-Molecule Three-Color FRET
P.J. Caspers, G.W. Lucassen, G.J. Puppels  Biophysical Journal 
Polarized Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Microscopy
Volume 101, Issue 9, Pages (November 2011)
Imaging the Activity and Localization of Single Voltage-Gated Ca2+ Channels by Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy  Angelo Demuro, Ian Parker 
Shaohui Huang, Ahmed A. Heikal, Watt W. Webb  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 106, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 98, Issue 9, Pages (May 2010)
The Mobility of Phytochrome within Protonemal Tip Cells of the Moss Ceratodon purpureus, Monitored by Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy  Guido Böse,
Laurdan Fluorescence Lifetime Discriminates Cholesterol Content from Changes in Fluidity in Living Cell Membranes  Ottavia Golfetto, Elizabeth Hinde,
Presentation transcript:

Volume 84, Issue 6, Pages 3968-3981 (June 2003) Nonresonant Confocal Raman Imaging of DNA and Protein Distribution in Apoptotic Cells  N. Uzunbajakava, A. Lenferink, Y. Kraan, E. Volokhina, G. Vrensen, J. Greve, C. Otto  Biophysical Journal  Volume 84, Issue 6, Pages 3968-3981 (June 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75124-8 Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Confocal Raman/TPE fluorescent microscope. Both Raman and fluorescent signals were excited with 647.1nm line of a Kr-ion laser (Innova 90-K, Coherent). The excitation and the detection wavelengths were separated by use of a dichroic beamsplitter (BS1) (Chroma Technology). Images were acquired by scanning the sample with a scanning mirror (SM) (Leica Lasertechnique GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). The laser beam, focused by a water immersion objective (Zeiss Plan Neofluar, Carl Zeiss), formed a diffraction-limited spot on the sample. A mobile pellicle beamsplitter (BS2) (Melles Griot) was used to visualize the object in white light. White light was focused by a lens (L4) (f=100mm) on a video camera. A holographic notch filter (NF) (Kaiser Optical Systems, Ann Arbor, MI) was used to suppress both reflected and elastically scattered light. A polychromator (Jobin-Yvon, Paris, France) with a blazed holographic grating (600 gr/mm) was used for dispersion. The Raman scattered light was focused on the confocal pinhole (ph1) (diameter, 25μm) at the entrance of the monochromator by a lens (L2) (f=35mm). Raman signal was detected by a CCD camera (LN/CCD 1100 PB/VISAR, Roper Scientific). The output power of the laser source was monitored by a photodiode (PD). A movable mirror (M1) (Newport) was used to switch between Raman and fluorescent signal acquisition modes. A colored glass filter (F) (Melles Griot) was used to suppress the laser light and to transmit the two-photon excited fluorescence signal. Fluorescent signal was focused on a confocal pinhole (ph2) (diameter, 25μm) by a lens (L3) (f=30mm) and was detected on an APD (EG&G, Canada, Ltd., Optoelectronics Division). Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 3968-3981DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75124-8) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Semilogarithmic plots of the singular values of 10 consecutive spectra obtained at a single location in the cell nucleus. The measurement time for each spectrum was 10s. Results are shown for four different powers: (A) 10mW; (B) 30mW; (C) 70; and (D) 100mW. It is observed that the spectra are dominated by a single spectral component. Starting from 70mW, a very small additional component can be observed that is further increased at higher laser powers. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 3968-3981DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75124-8) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Raman spectra of the nuclei of single fixed PBLs. (A) The fingerprint region of the spectrum. (B) The high frequency region of the spectrum. The cells were adhered to CaF2 disk, which was immersed in PBS buffer. The laser power was 30mW, and the accumulation time was 60s. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 3968-3981DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75124-8) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Raman images of the protein distribution in a single fixed PBL cell. (A) Image made in the 1449cm−1 (spectral region from 1433cm−1 to 1481cm−1) band. (B) In the high frequency band ∼2880cm−1 (spectral region from 2800cm−1 to 3030cm−1). Raman images A and B were acquired simultaneously. The pixels on the CCD camera along the spectral dimension were hardware-binned in groups having a size of 5 pixels. The spectral resolution of the superpixel was 8.5cm−1. The camera offset was subtracted. The scanning area was 8μm×8μm. Laser power was 120mW, and the acquisition time was 1s per step. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 3968-3981DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75124-8) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Raman images of a single fixed PBL cell on a CaF2 substrate, immersed in PBS buffer. (A) The DNA/RNA image, reconstructed in the 788cm−1 band (spectral region from 774cm−1 to 805cm−1). (B) The protein image, reconstructed in 1451cm−1 band (spectral region from 1431cm−1 to 1481cm−1). (C and D) The line profiles with the SDs through the DNA- and protein image, respectively. The SD intervals are shown as 2σ interval and were calculated using Eq. 2. The background intensity due to water and the camera offset was subtracted. The scanning area was 8.4μm×8.4μm. The laser power was 100mW, and the acquisition time was 2s per step. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 3968-3981DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75124-8) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 (A) A white light image of a control HeLa cell. (B) The DNA distribution as obtained by two-photon excitation of the DNA dye, Hoechst 33342. The signal is detected on the APD. The color scale is given in counts, detected on the APD. The scanning area was 15μm×15μm in 128×128 steps. The cw-laser power was 100mW, and the accumulation time was 1 ms/pixel. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 3968-3981DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75124-8) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 The DNA distribution in an apoptotic HeLa cell. (A) White light image of an apoptotic HeLa cell. (From B–E) The DNA distribution as obtained by two-photon excitation of the DNA marker, Hoechst 33342. Optical sections are made at the different z-positions (Δz=2μm) inside the cell. The scanning x-y range was 15μm×15μm in 128×128 steps. The cw-laser power was 100mW, and the accumulation time was 1 ms/pixel. Each image was scaled from ‘0’ to the 30% of the maximum intensity. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 3968-3981DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75124-8) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 The Raman spectra obtained at the different locations inside a single fixed control HeLa cell. (A) The nucleus spectrum, average of seven spectra. (B) The cytosol spectrum, obtained at a single location. (C) The spectrum of the phospholipid-containing vesicles, average of five spectra. The cell was adhered to a CaF2 disk, immersed in PBS buffer. The laser power was 100mW, and the accumulation time was 60s. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 3968-3981DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75124-8) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 Raman imaging of a single fixed control HeLa cell. The cell was adhered to a CaF2 disk, immersed in PBS buffer. (A) The bright light view of the cell. The dotted rectangle indicates the scanning area. (B) The image, reconstructed in 788cm−1 band (spectral region from 776cm−1 to 805cm−1). (C) Image, reconstructed in 1451cm−1 band (spectral region from 1431cm−1 to 1473cm−1). (D) The line profile through image B with the SD. (E) The line profile through image C with the SD. The SD intervals are shown as 2σ interval and were calculated using Eq. 2. The scanning area was 15μm×15μm. The laser power was 100mW, and the acquisition time was 2s per step. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 3968-3981DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75124-8) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 10 Average and difference Raman spectra obtained in a nucleus of the HeLa cell. (A) Average spectrum obtained from the bright intensity regions, visible in the image made in 788cm−1 band. (B) Average spectrum obtained from the regions between the bright intensity regions. (C) Difference spectrum of A and B. Spectrum A was obtained by averaging of 41 individual spectra, and spectrum B by averaging of 103 individual spectra. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 3968-3981DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75124-8) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 11 Raman imaging of a single fixed apoptotic HeLa cell. The cell was adhered to a CaF2 disk, immersed in PBS buffer. (A) A bright light view of the cell. The dotted rectangle indicates the scanning area. (B) DNA image, reconstructed in 788cm−1 band (spectral region from 774cm−1 to 805cm−1). (C) Protein image, reconstructed in 1451cm−1 band (spectral region from 1434cm−1 to 1474cm−1). (D) Line profile with the SD through the DNA image. (E) Line profile with the SD through the protein image. The SD intervals are shown as 2σ interval, and were calculated using Eq. 2. The background intensity due to the Raman scattering of water and the camera offset was subtracted. The scanning area was 10μm×10μm. The laser power was 100mW, and the acquisition time was 1s per step. Biophysical Journal 2003 84, 3968-3981DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75124-8) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions