Survey of Attitudes Toward Statistics American vs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Course experience questionnaire (P. Ramsden) Designed as a performance indicator 24 statements relating to 5 aspects 1 overall satisfaction statement.
Advertisements

1 Teaching Stat I: Putting it all together Kirk Steinhorst and Carolyn Keeler University of Idaho.
1 Know Your Students Teaching Effectively in Higher Education in Hong Kong.
Increasing computer science popularity and gender diversity through the use of games and contextualized learning By Mikha Zeffertt Supervised by Mici Halse.
Motivation to Lead Layla Qaabidh, RN, MSN, (PhD candidate)
Hands on Statistics: Active learning in College Guojing Wang, Maika Yanagishita, Andrew Hwang, James Florczak Introduction As learning assistants for Statistics.
Assessing College Wide SLOs using a Student Perception Survey: A Tale of Two SLOs Jeanne Edman and Brad Brazil Cosumnes River College.
THE IMPACT OF COMPUTER SELF-EFFICACY AND TECHNOLOGY DEPENDENCE ON COMPUTER-RELATED TECHNOSTRESS: A SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY PERSPECTIVE Qin Shu, Qiang Tu.
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Examining Attitude Toward Statistics Among Graduate Nursing Students MyoungJin Kim, PhD, Illinois State University INTRODUCTION While the integration of.
Diverse Use of Surveys Contribute to Understanding Students and Improving Courses Leo F. Denton and Dawn McKinney
Building on Transmaths: TeLePriSM Teaching and Learning Practices in Secondary Mathematics Maria Pampaka 2 nd March 2012 Formal ESRC Title: “Mathematics.
Competitive Swimmers’ Interpretation of Motivational Climate Rebecca C. Trenz, M.A. Fordham University Psychology of Motivation.
Measuring Students’ Readiness for L2 Group Work in a University in Japan Kumiko Fushino Temple University, Japan Campus, Graduate College of Education.
Online students’ perceived self-efficacy: Does it change? Presenter: Jenny Tseng Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: July 11, 2007 C. Y. Lee & E. L. Witta (2001).
The Influence of Social Issue- based Science Teaching Materials on Students’ Creativity Jack Holbrook Anne Laius Miia Rannikmäe Tartu,
Chinese Students Attitudes Toward Statistics Ping Wang, Ph.D. wangpx at jmu.edu Computer Information Systems/Business Analytics College of Business, James.
TEXT MESSAGING AS A FORM OF COMMUNICATION A presentation about the hypothesis, survey and results.
Individual differences in statistics anxiety Donncha Hanna School of Psychology QUB.
Gender Differences in Statistical Anxiety Dennis Pearl & Hyen Oh (Penn State University), Larry Lesser (University of Texas, El Paso) & John Weber (Perimeter.
Gender Differences in Predictors of Academic Success: Mental Toughness and Affect Rosey Stock and Amanda Hodder Stock, R., Hunt, F., Fern-Pollak, L., Lynam,
UE4A Jenny Su. Outline Abstract Introduction Literature Review Methodology Results & Discussion Limitation Conclusion.
Computer Attitude and Computer Self-Efficacy: A Case Study of Thai Undergraduate Students Jantawan Noiwan Thawatchai Piyawat Anthony F. Norcio HCI International.
Patient’s Knowledge and Attitudes of Medical Students and Residents Wyman Gilmore, MS; Melanie T. Tucker, PhD; Daniel Avery, MD; John C. Higginbotham,
“Excuse Me Sir, Here’s Your Change”
Investigating student outcomes in beginning algebra
Director of Institutional Accreditation and Assessment
Measuring Attitudes A person’s attitude towards an attitude object may be measured in two ways. Obseravtion of behavioural signals Highly positive or.
Measurement of Attitude
(Saima Eman, University of Sheffield, UK)
Training for Master Trainers: Learning Engagement & Motivation
DECLARATION OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Characterising the mathematical confidence
Math Anxiety Joshua Lehman
Believe in me, I’m your teacher… The Influence of Student’s Subjective Beliefs on Learning their Professions Dr. Michael Harnischmacher, U Passau | Trial.
Gender and Conceptual Learning
The Role of Expectancy & Self-Efficacy Beliefs
Improving Student Engagement Through Audience Response Systems
Dept of physiology Shalamar Medical and Dental college Lahore
Jagdish Vankar1, Anusha Prabhakaran1, Suman Singh2,
Introduction to questionnaire design
Introduction Results Hypotheses Discussion Method
Perceptions on the Relevance of Mathematics by Computer and Communication Engineering Students Wan Azizun Wan Adnan, Makhfudzah Mokhtar, Syarifah Mumtazah.
Learning About Sex: How does it Affect your Sexual Future
Findings from Cardinal Ambrozic Grade Nine Math Survey
Undergraduate Social Sciences Students’ Attitudes Toward Statistics
An Assessment of the Acceptability of UMED Online among Physicians
Teaching and Learning Practices in Secondary Mathematics
Student Interest In Science
Laura M. Sylke & David E. Szwedo James Madison University Introduction
Mercedes Smart Car 8 feet long (3.5 feet shorter than Mini), 60 MPG, recyclable …but is it electric?
Ahmed Sayed S. Abdelmoeti
Table 8. Unit Key Performance Indicators
5th International Conference on ELT in China, May 2007 Motivation and motivating Chinese students in the language classroom – Transition to UK Higher.
Maddison Miles & David E. Szwedo James Madison University
Daniel Showalter, PhD Assistant Professor of Mathematics,
English Language Writing Apprehension of University English Major Students – A survey carried out in Kunming University of Science and Technology. 昆明理工大学.
Kristin E. Gross & David E. Szwedo James Madison University
Introduction Results Discussion Hypotheses Method
Undergraduate Survey Data
Aashna A. Dhayagude & David E. Szwedo James Madison University
Survey Taker Name: Question Survey Taker Name:
Survey Design.
Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)
Main Predictors of Attitudes toward the Use of Moodle for Learning Business Administration Courses in an International University Setting Jhon Bueno, Stanislav.
Using the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure to understand the allied health undergraduate student journey Eric Chua, Benjamin Soon, May Lim.
Cierra Brown Discussion and Implications
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Conclusions and Future Implications
ASSESSING SOUTH AFRICAN UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES TOWARDS MATHEMATICS AS A FUNDAMENTAL DISCIPLINE Sam Ramaila University.
Presentation transcript:

Survey of Attitudes Toward Statistics American vs Survey of Attitudes Toward Statistics American vs. Chinese Business Students Ping Wang wangpx at jmu.edu Computer Information Systems/Business Analytics College of Business, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA SEDSI, February 22 – 24, Charleston, SC

Drivers for Learning Business Statistics Interest Career

Characteristics of Students Google generation Low attention span

Motivating Students to Learn Business Stats Keep students interested, engaged Affect Value Interest Learning to teach problem solving Cognitive competence Difficulty Effort Pedagogical issues

Survey of Attitudes Toward Statistics (SATS) by Schau et al., 1995 Statistics anxiety relates to: negative experience, less appreciative of values and usefulness, less of confidence or competent, with negative feeling Unfavorable attitudes often relate to poor achievements Attitudes Components: Affect: (6 items): positive and negative feelings about statistics. Such as, I enjoy taking statistics courses. Cognitive Competence (6 items): intellectual knowledge and skills applied to statistics. Such as I understand statistics equations. Value (9 items): usefulness, relevance, and worth of statistics in personal and professional life. Such as Statistics is irrelevant to my life. Difficulty (7 items): perception of difficulty of statistics as a subject. Such as, Statistics is a complicated subject. Interest (4 items): individual level of interest. Such as, I am interested in using statistics. Effort (4 items): amount of work to learn statistics. Such as, I plan to work hard in my statistics course. Atkinson 1957, Eccles and Wigfield 1995, Weiner 1979, Bandura 1977, Maehr 1984, Kamirez et al. 2012

Attitude toward Business Statistics --- USA vs. China   Attitude toward Business Statistics --- USA vs. China 41. Your sex: Total Male 1 Female 2 USA 129 99 228 China 56 125 181 185 224 409

American vs. Chinese Students Group Comparison Chinese students rated much higher on Affect, Cognitive Competence, and Value components American students rated higher on Difficulty, Interest, and Effort components Affect: American students rated just slightly over neutral while Chinese students rated moderately positive Cognitive Competence & Interest: Both groups rated moderately positive Value: Both groups rated very positive at around 5.5 to 6 out of 7 Difficulty: Both groups rated moderately negative Effort: Both groups rated extremely positive Remarks: Group means are statistically significantly different at p – value of *** 0.01, ** 0.05, and * 0.10 levels The number after * refers to the group difference, i.e., 0.64 of the 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (neutral) to 7 (strongly agree) of Likert scale

American vs. Chinese Male Business Students Group Comparison Chinese male students rated much higher on Affect, Cognitive Competence, and Value components American male students rated higher on Effort component Both groups male students rated same levels on Difficulty and Effort components Affect: Both groups male students rated moderately positive Cognitive Competence & Interest: Both groups male students rated moderately positive Value: American male students rated moderately positive while Chinese male students rated very positive Difficulty: Both groups rated moderately negative Effort: Both groups rated extremely positive Remarks: Group means are statistically significantly different at p – value of *** 0.01, ** 0.05, and * 0.10 levels The number after * refers to the group difference, i.e., 0.64 of the 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (neutral) to 7 (strongly agree) of Likert scale

American vs. Chinese Female Business Students Group Comparison Chinese female students rated much higher on Affect, Cognitive Competence, & Value components American female students rated higher on Interest & Effort component Both groups male students rated same level on Difficulty component Affect: American female students rated neutral while Chinese female students rated moderately positive Cognitive Competence & Interest: Both groups male students rated moderately positive Value: Both groups female students rated very positive Difficulty: Both groups rated moderately negative Effort: Both groups rated extremely positive Remarks: Group means are statistically significantly different at p – value of *** 0.01, ** 0.05, and * 0.10 levels The number after * refers to the group difference, i.e., 0.64 of the 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (neutral) to 7 (strongly agree) of Likert scale

American Business Students by Gender Group Comparison American male students rated much higher on Affect, Cognitive Competence, & Difficulty components Both male and female groups rated same levels on Value, Interest, and Effort components Affect: American male students rated moderately positive while American female students rated neutral Cognitive Competence & Interest: Both groups rated moderately positive Value: Both groups rated moderately to very positive Difficulty: Both groups rated moderately negative Effort: Both groups rated extremely positive Remarks: Group means are statistically significantly different at p – value of *** 0.01, ** 0.05, and * 0.10 levels The number after * refers to the group difference, i.e., 0.64 of the 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (neutral) to 7 (strongly agree) of Likert scale

Chinese Business Students by Gender Group Comparison Chinese male students rated much higher on Interest component while female students rated much higher on Effort component Both male and female groups rated same levels on Affect, Cognitive Competence, Value, and Difficulty components Affect, Cognitive Competence & Interest: Both male and female students rated moderately positive Value: Both groups rated very positive Difficulty: Both groups rated moderately negative Effort: Chinese male students rated moderately positive while female students rated extremely positive Remarks: Group means are statistically significantly different at p – value of *** 0.01, ** 0.05, and * 0.10 levels The number after * refers to the group difference, i.e., 0.64 of the 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (neutral) to 7 (strongly agree) of Likert scale