Percentage Key Message

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Drug Discovery Process
Advertisements

Regulatory Clinical Trials Clinical Trials. Clinical Trials Definition: research studies to find ways to improve health Definition: research studies to.
UNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION AUGUST, 2014 Biologics & Biosimilars: An Overview 1.
Biopharmaceutical Regulatory Requirements 1. Marketing Authorization for Chemical Entities MoH Federal Commission for the Protection against Health Risks.
What is a Generic Medication?. The World Health Organization Definition of a Generic Medication A generic drug is a pharmaceutical product, usually intended.
The ICH E5 Question and Answer Document Status and Content Robert T. O’Neill, Ph.D. Director, Office of Biostatistics, CDER, FDA Presented at the 4th Kitasato-Harvard.
What Do Toxicologists Do?
About OMICS Group OMICS Group International is an amalgamation of Open Access publications and worldwide international science conferences and events.
Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Development with a Focus on Paediatric Medicines / October |1 | Regulatory Requirement on Dossier of Medicinal.
Biopharmaceutical Regulatory Requirements 40. Marketing Authorization for New Chemical Entities Health Canada’s (HC) Therapeutic Products Directorate.
What is ICH? ICH is a joint initiative involving both regulators and research-based industry representatives of the EU, Japan and the US in scientific.
Data protection and extension of patent rights TRIPS requirements & TRIPS-plus provisions Carlos Correa.
Stefan Franzén Introduction to clinical trials.
INTRODUCTION TO RA.
Drug Submissions: Review Process Agnes V. Klein, MD Biologics and Genetic Therapies Directorate February, 2003 www/hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut.
Topics discussed in the presentation
WHO Workshop on Prequalification of Medicines Programme, Abu Dhabi, October, 2010 Regulatory principles reflected in practice of WHO PQP Milan Smid,
The pharmaceutical R&D process
Biotechnology Chemical Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership
Nanotechnology - USDA - 18 Nov 2002 REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS FOR NANOTECHNOLOGY IN PUBLIC HEALTH FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION Norris E. Alderson, Ph.D.
WHO Workshop on Assessment of Bioequivalence Data Addis Ababa, 31. August – 3. September 2010 Selection of comparators Compiled by Jan Welink WHO Workshop.
FDA Standards Development and Implementation Randy Levin, M.D. Director, Office of Information Management Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food.
CDISC – 17/12/2012 Carine Javierre Nathalie SABIN.
GMP- A Regulatory Perspective. Regulatory Perspective in entering Global Pharma Markets.
1 COMMON TECHNICAL DOCUMENT / ORIGIN OF CTD… ICH EWG CTD WAS OFFICIALLY SIGNED OFF IN NOVEMBER 2000, AT 5 TH ICH CONFERENCE; SAN DIEGO,CALIFORNIA.
The association between European Medicines Agency approval and Health Technology Assessment recommendations Iga Lipska 1,2, Anke Hövels 2, Neil McAuslane.
China EU Pharmaceutical Forum
E-Clinical
1 CHALLENGES IN REGULATION OF TRADITIONAL AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINES 24 th March, 2010 MOHSW Conference Room Registration of Herbal Drugs.
IDMP Overview December 2015.
Pharmacology Science that studies interactions of drugs with organism on different levels (subcellular, cellular, organ, systemic) Studies: - relationship.
Introduction to general pharmacology.
Difference to Generics What can they do for us in the future
Regulatory Updates Health Sciences Authority Singapore
Regulatory– Terms & Definitions רגולציה - מונחים והגדרות
DIA Clinical Safety and Pharmacovigilance Community
Biotechnology Chemical Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership
The percentage of NASs approved by CDER
NASs approval time by therapeutic area:
Median 25th and 75th percentile
Median approval time for new active substances approved by ICH agencies by approval year Methodology For each new active substance (NAS) approved between.
What is ICH? ICH is a joint initiative involving both regulators and research-based industry representatives of the EU, Japan and the US in scientific.
Comparing HTA recommendations
2002–2006 Mid and Other sized companies continued to launch the majority of NMEs APRIL 2007 SOURCE: CMR INTERNATIONAL PERFORMANCE METRICS PROGRAM © THOMSON.
Median submission gap, median approval time and percentage approved as expedited for new active substances (NASs) approved by six authorities:
Median time to internationalisation
Scientific competence Communication and transparency
Comparison of median time for submission to EM countries from 1st world-wide approval ( vs ) Median time from 1st WW approval to submission.
New active substance median approval time for six regulatory authorities in Key messages The last decade, , saw a continuation.
Comparison of median approval time of NASs by year of submission vs
New active substances approved by EMA and FDA over 10 years
EMA: The European Medicines Agency
From Regulatory Approval to Subsidized Patient Access in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Comparison of Systems Across Australia, China, Japan, Korea, New Zealand,
NME/NAS launches in 2005/6 APRIL 2007
Fundamentals of Electronic Submissions and eCTD
Rollout time breakdown: 24 common NASs in 7 jurisdictions
INTERNATIONALISATION – FOCUS ON EMA AND FDA
Suzanne M. Sensabaugh, MS, MBA
Phase 2 to phase 3 clinical trial transitions: Reasons for success and failure in immunologic diseases  Dhavalkumar D. Patel, MD, PhD, Christian Antoni,
Cycle times decreased in larger but not smaller, companies
Opening an IND: Investigator Perspective
Median, Box : 25th and 75th percentiles
Assessment routes and timelines in Australia (2011)
Dr Manisha Shridhar Regional Advisor WHO-SEARO
Comparison of median approval time of NASs by year of submission vs
Out of the 52 NASs approved by all six authorities during :
Median times to submission and licensing for 70 new active substances approved in five markets from 1997 to 2010 Note: EMA approval.
Process mapping of registration to reimbursement for new pharmaceuticals in UK Description: A systematic methodology was developed in order to create the.
Assessment routes and timelines
Comparison of median time for submission to EM countries from 1st world-wide approval ( vs ) Median time from 1st WW approval to submission.
Presentation transcript:

Proportion of 69 NASs approved by all ICH agencies from 2002-2011 by submission timing Percentage Key Message Regulatory approvals are often a measure of the pharmaceutical industries output and are, along with approval time, used as a marker of the regulatory environment. There were 69 new active substances (NASs) approved by the three International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) agencies European Medicines Agency (EMA), United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and Japan’s Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) within the time frame of this study. The submission date for each product varied across authorities. A high proportion of NASs (67%) were submitted to FDA first, compared with 29% to EMA and 7% to PMDA; 38% of the 69 approvals were submitted to FDA and EMA simultaneously (submitted within 1 month). The median time difference between submission to each ICH agency following the submission to the first ICH agency was 31 days to EMA, 0 days to FDA and 825 days to PMDA; 77% of the 69 approvals were submitted to PMDA more than 1 year after submission to EMA or FDA. Source: CIRS Regulatory Approval Times Database (RRTD), which tracks NAS approvals for EMA, FDA, PMDA, Australian TGA, Health Canada and Swissmedic. New Active Substances (NAS): This includes chemical, biological and radiopharmaceutical substances that have not been previously available for therapeutic use in humans to be used for the cure, alleviation, treatment, prevention or in vivo diagnosis of diseases in humans. This term also includes: an isomer, mixture of isomers, a complex or derivative or salt of a chemical substance previously available as a medicinal product but differing in properties with regard to safety and efficacy from that substance previously available; a biological substance previously available as a medicinal product, but differing in molecular structure, nature of source material or manufacturing process; a radiopharmaceutical substance that is a radionuclide or a ligand not previously available as a medicinal product. Alternatively, the coupling mechanism linking the molecule and the radionuclide has not been previously available. Applications that are excluded from the study Vaccine; any active substance that has previously been approved either by the EMA or by a member state; any other application, where new clinical data were submitted; generic applications; those applications where a completely new dossier was submitted from a new company for the same indications as already approved for another company; applications for a new or additional name, or a change of name, for an existing compound (ie, a “cloned” application) Total number of NASs approvals = 69