Shuhei Yoshida, Masako Kaido, Tomoya S. Kitajima  Developmental Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Advertisements

Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
María Dolores Vázquez-Novelle, Mark Petronczki  Current Biology 
Two Phases of Astral Microtubule Activity during Cytokinesis in C
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
Genome Transfer Prevents Fragmentation and Restores Developmental Potential of Developmentally Compromised Postovulatory Aged Mouse Oocytes  Mitsutoshi.
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (November 2016)
Mechanism of Ska Recruitment by Ndc80 Complexes to Kinetochores
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages e6 (October 2017)
Aurora B Defines Its Own Chromosomal Targeting by Opposing the Recruitment of the Phosphatase Scaffold Repo-Man  Junbin Qian, Monique Beullens, Bart Lesage,
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Protein Interaction Analysis Provides a Map of the Spatial and Temporal Organization of the Ciliary Gating Zone  Daisuke Takao, Liang Wang, Allison Boss,
Repositioning of Aurora B Promoted by Chiasmata Ensures Sister Chromatid Mono- Orientation in Meiosis I  Takeshi Sakuno, Koichi Tanaka, Silke Hauf, Yoshinori.
Naomi R. Stevens, Hélio Roque, Jordan W. Raff  Developmental Cell 
And the Dead Shall Rise: Actin and Myosin Return to the Spindle
Volume 18, Issue 19, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (February 2007)
Control of Local Rho GTPase Crosstalk by Abr
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
Guillaume Halet, John Carroll  Developmental Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Large Cytoplasm Is Linked to the Error-Prone Nature of Oocytes
Volume 137, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Daniela Cimini, Xiaohu Wan, Christophe B. Hirel, E.D. Salmon 
Volume 19, Issue 17, Pages (September 2009)
The Timing of Midzone Stabilization during Cytokinesis Depends on Myosin II Activity and an Interaction between INCENP and Actin  Jennifer Landino, Ryoma.
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Kinetochore Attachments Require an Interaction between Unstructured Tails on Microtubules and Ndc80Hec1  Stephanie A. Miller, Michael L. Johnson, P. Todd.
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Self-Organization of MTOCs Replaces Centrosome Function during Acentrosomal Spindle Assembly in Live Mouse Oocytes  Melina Schuh, Jan Ellenberg  Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Intrinsically Defective Microtubule Dynamics Contribute to Age-Related Chromosome Segregation Errors in Mouse Oocyte Meiosis-I  Shoma Nakagawa, Greg FitzHarris 
Geoffrey J. Guimaraes, Yimin Dong, Bruce F. McEwen, Jennifer G. DeLuca 
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (November 2016)
Roshan L. Shrestha, Viji M. Draviam  Current Biology 
Sara Cuylen, Jutta Metz, Andrea Hruby, Christian H. Haering 
Distinct Roles of the Chromosomal Passenger Complex in the Detection of and Response to Errors in Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachment  Julian Haase, Mary.
Volume 20, Issue 17, Pages (September 2010)
Chk1 Is Required for Spindle Checkpoint Function
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Intra-spindle Microtubule Assembly Regulates Clustering of Microtubule-Organizing Centers during Early Mouse Development  Sadanori Watanabe, Go Shioi,
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (February 2006)
A New Model for Asymmetric Spindle Positioning in Mouse Oocytes
Vincent Vanoosthuyse, Kevin G. Hardwick  Current Biology 
Kinetochore Dynein Is Required for Chromosome Motion and Congression Independent of the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhenye Yang, U. Serdar Tulu, Patricia Wadsworth,
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (April 2009)
Polo-like Kinase 1 Triggers the Initiation of Cytokinesis in Human Cells by Promoting Recruitment of the RhoGEF Ect2 to the Central Spindle  Mark Petronczki,
Moving Right Along: How PP1 Helps Clear the Checkpoint
Mariola R. Chacón, Petrina Delivani, Iva M. Tolić  Cell Reports 
Anaphase B Precedes Anaphase A in the Mouse Egg
Timing and Checkpoints in the Regulation of Mitotic Progression
Premature Sister Chromatid Separation Is Poorly Detected by the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint as a Result of System-Level Feedback  Mihailo Mirkovic, Lukas H.
Mi Hye Song, L. Aravind, Thomas Müller-Reichert, Kevin F. O'Connell 
RECQL4 is a MAP with a spindle function.
Dual Detection of Chromosomes and Microtubules by the Chromosomal Passenger Complex Drives Spindle Assembly  Boo Shan Tseng, Lei Tan, Tarun M. Kapoor,
Spatial Regulation of Kinetochore Microtubule Attachments by Destabilization at Spindle Poles in Meiosis I  Lukáš Chmátal, Karren Yang, Richard M. Schultz,
Repositioning of Aurora B Promoted by Chiasmata Ensures Sister Chromatid Mono- Orientation in Meiosis I  Takeshi Sakuno, Koichi Tanaka, Silke Hauf, Yoshinori.
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages (September 2016)
Yuki Hara, Christoph A. Merten  Developmental Cell 
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages (May 2015)
Presentation transcript:

Inherent Instability of Correct Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachments during Meiosis I in Oocytes  Shuhei Yoshida, Masako Kaido, Tomoya S. Kitajima  Developmental Cell  Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages 589-602 (June 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.04.020 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Developmental Cell 2015 33, 589-602DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2015.04.020) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Stabilization of KT-MT Attachments Is Not Temporally Coupled with Bivalent Stretching (A) Chromosome dynamics during MI in mouse oocytes. Chromosomes are shown in blue and KTs are shown in red. (B) Bivalents fully biorient during the stretching phase. Bivalents in a fully bioriented state (normalized inter-KT distance exceeding 70% that was maintained until anaphase I onset) were scored using the KT tracking datasets of oocytes expressing mEGFP-CENP-C and H2B-mCherry (n = 5 oocytes, all 20 bivalents were scored in each oocyte). (C) Stable end-on KT-MT attachments. Cold-treated oocytes were stained for MTs (green), KTs (ACA, red), and chromosomes (Hoechst 33342, blue). Magnified images of representative KT-MT attachments are shown. Unattached (black frame), lateral (blue frame), end-on merotelic (red frame), and end-on monopolar (green frame) attachment of sister KTs. Scale bar represents 10 μm. See also Movie S1. (D) Correct KT-MT attachment is delayed compared to bivalent stretching. The end-on attachments were plotted (n = 3 oocytes at each time point, all 40 KTs were scored in each oocyte). The stretching phase is shown in the pink box and the stabilization phase is shown in the blue box. Error bars show SD. See also Figure S1. Developmental Cell 2015 33, 589-602DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2015.04.020) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Aurora B/C Is Located in Close Proximity to KT-MT Attachment Sites after Bivalent Stretching (A) INCENP is located in close proximity to KTs. Oocytes expressing mEGFP-INCENP were stained for mEGFP (INCENP, green), CENP-C (red), and chromosomes (Hoechst 33342, blue). Green arrows indicate the defined INCENP peak at the inner centromere. Normalized intensities were plotted against the distance from the CENP-C peak (top right, n = 30 KTs from three oocytes at each time point). The distance between the position of the CENP-C peak and the position of the 80% INCENP peak intensity is shown (bottom right). (B) Hec1 is located in close proximity to CENP-C. Oocytes expressing Hec1-mEGFP and Nuf2 were stained for mEGFP (Hec1, green), CENP-C (red), and chromosomes (Hoechst 33342, blue). The distance between the peaks of Hec1 and CENP-C is shown (right, n = 15 chromosomes from three oocytes at each time point). (C and D) The close proximity is due to an intrinsic property of the MI chromosomes. MI and MII chromosomes were placed in the same spindle through oocyte fusion. (C) Fused oocytes were stained and analyzed as in (A) (n = 30, 30 KTs from three fused oocytes). (D) Fused oocytes were stained and analyzed as in (B) (n = 15, 15 chromosomes from three fused oocytes). Error bars show SD (not significant [n.s.], ∗∗p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗p < 0.001). Scale bars represent 2 μm, and time after NEBD. See also Figure S2. Developmental Cell 2015 33, 589-602DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2015.04.020) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Aurora B/C Activity Maintains the High Phosphorylation Levels of KTs upon Bivalent Stretching (A–C) Aurora B/C substrates remain phosphorylated upon bivalent stretching. Oocytes were stained for KTs (ACA, red), chromosomes (Hoechst 33342, blue), and pS55-Hec1 (A, green), pS24-Knl1 (B, green), or Hec1 (C, green). The signals indicated (using arrowheads) were magnified with fire color coding. The intensity relative to ACA was measured (n = 5 oocytes at each time point). The stretching phase is shown in the pink box and the stabilization phase is shown in the blue box (time after NEBD). (D) The high phosphorylation levels at the KTs are due to an intrinsic property of the MI chromosomes. MI and MII chromosomes were placed within the same spindle through oocyte fusion. The fused oocytes were stained and analyzed as in (A) (n = 5 oocytes). Representative MI (red arrowhead) and MII (orange arrowhead) chromosomes are magnified. The boxes show the 25th to 75th percentiles, and the whiskers show the minimum to maximum (not significant [n.s.], ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001). Scale bars represent 10 μm. Developmental Cell 2015 33, 589-602DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2015.04.020) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 PP2A-B56 Is Progressively Recruited to KTs Independently of Bivalent Stretching (A) 3mEGFP-PP2A-B56ε gradually localizes to KTs. Time-lapse imaging of oocytes expressing 3mEGFP-PP2A-B56ε (green) and H2B-mCherry (red). The KT signal intensity relative to the cytoplasmic signal is shown (n = 3 oocytes at each time point). See also Movie S2. (B) Endogenous PP2A-B56ε is gradually recruited to KTs. The oocytes were stained for PP2A-B56ε (green), ACA (KTs, red), and chromosomes (Hoechst 33342, blue). The PP2A-B56ε intensity relative to ACA was measured (n = 5 oocytes at each time point). (C) The amount of pS659-BubR1 is progressively increased at KTs. The oocytes were stained for pS659-BubR1 (green), KTs (ACA, red), and chromosomes (Hoechst 33342, blue). The pS659-BubR1 intensity relative to ACA was measured (n = 5 oocytes at each time point). The error bars show SD. (D and E) The expression of BubR1 mutants increase and decrease PP2A-B56ε localization. Oocytes expressing mEGFP-BubR1-WT, -3D, or -3A at 4 hr (D) or at 6 hr (E) after NEBD were stained and analyzed as in (B) (n = 6 oocytes for each group). The signals indicated (using arrowheads) were magnified with fire color coding. The stretching phase is shown in the pink box and the stabilization phase is shown in the blue box. The boxes show the 25th to 75th percentiles, and the whiskers show the minimum to maximum (∗∗p < 0.01). Scale bars represent 10 μm. See also Figures S3 and S4. Developmental Cell 2015 33, 589-602DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2015.04.020) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 The KARD Domain of BubR1 Is Important in Determining the Stability of KT-MT Attachments (A and B) The expression of BubR1 mutants decrease and increase the level of pS24-Knl1. Oocytes expressing mEGFP-BubR1-WT, -3D, or -3A at 4 hr (A) or 6 hr (B) after NEBD were stained for pS24-Knl1 (green), KTs (ACA, red), and chromosomes (Hoechst 33342, blue). The pS24-Knl1 intensity relative to ACA was measured (n = 5 oocytes for each group). The signals indicated (using arrowheads) were magnified with fire color coding. The boxes show the 25th to 75th percentiles, and the whiskers show the minimum to maximum. (C and D) The expression of BubR1 mutants increase and decrease stable KT-MT attachments. Oocytes expressing mEGFP-BubR1-WT, -3D, or -3A at 4 hr (C) or 6 hr (D) after NEBD were stained for MTs (green), KTs (ACA, red), and chromosomes (Hoechst 33342, blue) after cold treatment. Magnified images of representative KT-MT attachments are shown. Unattached (black frame), end-on merotelic (red frame), and end-on monopolar (green frame) attachment of sister KTs are shown. The end-on KT-MT attachments were categorized (n = 5 oocytes for each group, all 40 KTs in each oocytes were scored). (E) Artificial targeting of PP2A-B56 to KTs stabilizes MT attachments in BubR1-3A-expressing oocytes. Oocytes co-expressing mNeonGreen-Nsl1, PP2A-B56ε-mNeonGreen, or PP2A-B56ε-mNeonGreen-Nsl1 with mEGFP-BubR1-3A at 4 hr after NEBD were stained and analyzed as in (C). Error bars show SD (not significant [n.s.], ∗∗p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗p < 0.001). Scale bars represent 10 μm. See also Figure S5. Developmental Cell 2015 33, 589-602DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2015.04.020) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 The Timing of Bivalent Stretching Is Determined Independently of KT-MT Attachment Stability (A) Time-lapse imaging of oocytes expressing mEGFP-BubR1-WT or -3A (green) and H2B-mCherry (red). The images were processed for peak enhancement and background subtraction. In the 3D plot of the KT positions (spheres), homologous KTs are connected by lines. Stretched bivalents (>70% of maximum inter-KT distance) were scored using KT tracking and were colored in green and red. The unit of the grid is 5 μm. Scale bar represents 10 μm. See also Movie S3. (B) The expression of BubR1-3A does not delay bivalent stretching. The fraction of stretched bivalents is shown (top, n = 3, three oocytes, and all 20 bivalents in each oocyte were scored). The time at which half-maximal values occurred was calculated by fitting sigmoidal curves (bottom) (not significant [n.s.]). (C) Bivalents stably align in BubR1-3A-expressing oocytes. The frequency of misaligned bivalents (>5 μm away from the estimated spindle equator) is shown (n = 3, three oocytes, and all 20 bivalents in each oocyte were scored). Error bars show SD. Developmental Cell 2015 33, 589-602DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2015.04.020) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Timely Aurora B/C Inhibition Promotes Selective Stabilization of Correct KT-MT Attachments (A) Selective stabilization of correct KT-MT attachments by Aurora B/C inhibition at the stretching phase. Oocytes were treated with 500 nM AZD1152 or 200 nM Hesperadin at 3 hr after NEBD. At 4 hr after NEBD, oocytes were stained for MTs (green), KTs (ACA, red), and chromosomes (Hoechst 33342, blue) after cold treatment. Magnified images of representative KT-MT attachments are shown. Unattached (black frame), end-on merotelic (red frame), and end-on monopolar (green frame) attachment of sister KTs are shown. The end-on KT-MT attachments were categorized (n = 6 oocytes for each group, all 40 KTs in each oocyte were scored). (B) Time-lapse imaging of oocytes expressing mEGFP-CENP-C (green) and H2B-mCherry (red) after AZD1152 treatment before NEBD or 3 hr after NEBD. The mEGFP-CENP-C signals are processed for peak enhancement and background subtraction (time after NEBD). See also Movie S4. (C) Bivalents align after timely Aurora B/C inhibition. Misaligned chromosomes (>5 μm away from the spindle equator) were counted (n = 4, 4, 4 oocytes). Error bars show SD (∗∗p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗p < 0.001). Scale bars represent 10 μm. (D) KT phosphoregulation and bivalent stretching are not coordinated in oocytes. Prior to the stretching phase, Aurora B/C prevents premature stabilization of incorrect KT attachments to multiple MTOCs in random directions. During the stretching phase, MTs extending from MTOCs at two spindle poles can correctly attach to KTs, but the correct attachments fail to be stabilized and a significant amount of incorrect attachments form due to persistent Aurora B/C activity at the KTs. During the stabilization phase, Aurora B/C substrates are dephosphorylated via the CDK1-BubR1-PP2A pathway, stabilizing the KT-MT attachments. See also Figures S6 and S7. Developmental Cell 2015 33, 589-602DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2015.04.020) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions