Tractor Speed and Boom Height Effects on Spray Coverage

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
“Spray Application Accuracy” Nozzle Selection. Why are you here???? Are you concerned with accuracy? n $$ go bye, bye n Changing rates (< an ounce/acre)
Advertisements

Drift-Reducing Nozzles Rich Affeldt Extension Crop Scientist Jefferson County Acknowledgment: Dr. Tom Wolf, Agri-Food Canada Dr. Bob Wolf, Kansas State.
Sprayer calibration Maury Craig, IR-4 Program Coordinator Extension Plant Sciences Dept. New Mexico State University.
To Mix or Not to Mix: That is the Question? (Tank-mixing Herbicides and Fungicides) Eric P. Prostko Extension Weed Specialist Department of Crop & Soil.
Peanut Weed Management Update Eric P. Prostko Extension Weed Specialist Department of Crop & Soil Sciences The University of Georgia Tifton Extension Agent.
Peanut Weed Control Update (County Extension Agents) Eric P. Prostko Professor and Extension Weed Specialist Department of Crop & Soil Sciences.
Spray Tip Update. Nozzle Technology Nozzles designed to reduce drift Improved drop size control Emphasis on ‘Spray Quality’
Using Pulse Width Modulation to Control Spray Droplet Size Robert E. Wolf Extension Specialist Application Technology Biological and Agricultural Engineering.
1/128 Method Of Calibration Calibrating Hand Sprayers And High Pressure Hand Guns Because a gallon = 128 ounces and the area to be sprayed is 1/128 of.
New Application Technologies u Bobby Grisso 4 Biological Systems Engineering.
Calibration Principles. Calibrating a Sprayer zUnderstand variables zSet variables zTrial application with water zDetermine output zAdjust zFigure tank.
Equipment II Nozzles Nozzles Selection Low Drift Nozzles.
Dr. Eric P. Prostko Extension Weed Specialist Dept. Crop & Soil Sciences University of Georgia December Weed Control Update (Peanut, Field Corn,
Field Test Comparisons of Drift Reducing Products for Fixed Wing Aerial Applications Robert E. Wolf, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas Scott Bretthauer,
Pesticide Drift Management
Pesticide Drift Management
Comparison of Drift for Four Drift-Reducing Flat-fan Nozzle Types Measured in a Wind Tunnel and Evaluated using DropletScan  Software Robert E. Wolf &
Spray Spectrum of Spray Droplets Concerning Fungicide Control in Dense Canopy.
U NDERSTANDING S PRAY D EPOSITION AND M INIMIZING D RIFT Dan Heider University of Wisconsin - IPM.
Peanut Tolerance to KIH-485 in Georgia E. P. Prostko and T.L Grey Department of Crop & Soil Sciences The University of Georgia APRES-2008.
Practical Field Demonstrations for Drift Mitigation Presented at ASAE/NAAA Technical Session 36 th Annual NAAA Convention Silver Legacy Hotel and Casino.
Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Influence of Spray Droplet Size on Paraquat and Glyphosate Efficacy Robert Wolf.
Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Spray Droplet Analysis of Air Induction/Venturi Nozzles Using WRK’s DropletScan.
Pesticide Drift Management Dr. Eric P. Prostko Extension Weed Specialist University of Georgia.
Comparison of Spray Droplet Characteristics for Nozzles Used for Agronomic Weed Control Robert Wolf Cory Friedli and Brian Lauer Biological and Agricultural.
Peanut Weed Management Where are we headed? Eric P. Prostko Extension Weed Specialist University of Georgia Tifton December 2002.
Herbicide Resistant Corn Hybrid Research in Georgia Eric P. Prostko William K. Vencill R. Dewey Lee Dept. Crop & Soil Sciences University of Georgia.
Influence of Cadre on Georgia Green Yield and Seed Germination Eric P. Prostko and Tim L. Grey Department of Crop & Soil Sciences University of Georgia.
Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Comparison of Off-Target Deposits for Conventional Spray Nozzles and Venturi.
Robert E. Wolf Associate Professor - Extension Specialist Application Technology, Bio & Ag Engineering, Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural.
Application Equipment for ASR Bobby Grisso Biological Systems Engineering.
Peanut Weed Management Issues Eric P. Prostko Extension Weed Specialist Department of Crop & Soil Sciences The University of Georgia Tifton GA Peanut.
“Spray Application Accuracy” Nozzle Selection. Why are you here???? Points??? Are you concerned with accuracy?
The Affect of Application Volume and Deposition Aids on Droplet Spectrum and Deposition for Aerial Applications Presented at ASAE/NAAA Technical Session.
Sprayers, Calibration, Nozzle Selection, Efficacy, & Drift Considerations for the No-Till Farmer Robert E. Wolf Extension Specialist Application Technology.
The Affect of Flat-fan Nozzle Angle on Aerial Spray Droplet Spectra Presented at ASAE/NAAA Technical Session 39 th Annual NAAA Convention Silver Legacy.
Tropical Spiderwort Management in Peanut, Corn, and Soybean
2007 Peanut Weed Management Update for County Agents Eric P. Prostko Extension Weed Specialist Department of Crop & Soil Sciences The University of Georgia.
Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Influence of Nozzle Type and Spray Pressure on Droplet Size Robert Wolf Biological.
Kansas State University Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department Comparison of Drift Potential for Venturi, Extended Range, and Turbo Flat-fan.
Peanut Response to Foliar Applied Pyroxasulfone Tank-Mixtures P.M. Eure*, E.P. Prostko, and R.M. Merchant Department of Crop & Soil Sciences.
Peanut Weed Control for New Agents Eric P. Prostko, Ph.D. Professor and Extension Weed Specialist Department of Crop & Soil Sciences.
Why Are Some Herbicides Not Recommended By UGA? Eric P. Prostko and A. Stanley Culpepper Professors/Extension Weed Specialists Dept. Crop & Soil Sciences.
Field Test Comparisons of Drift Reducing Products for Fixed Wing Aerial Applications Robert E. Wolf, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas Dennis.
Purple Moonflower Control with Postemergence Herbicides Eric P. Prostko and Daniel S. Price Associate Professor/Extension Weed Specialist and Crisp County.
E.P. Prostko and O.W. Carter Dept. Crop & Soil Sciences Herbicide Effects on Field Corn Yield in A High Input Environment.
Extension Response to Contaminated 2,4-DB/Peanut Problems in 2007 Eric P. Prostko*, J. Tim Flanders, and Scott N. Brown The University of Georgia SWSS/WSSA.
Water Volume, Tractor Speed, and Nozzle Type Effects on Spray Coverage Eric P. Prostko, Extension Weed Specialist Paul E. Sumner, Extension Ag-Engineer.
Influence of Tractor Speed and Boom Height on Spray Coverage Eric P. Prostko 1, Glen C. Rains 2, and O. Wen Carter 1 1 Dept. Crop & Soil Sciences 2 Dept.
Peanut Weed Control Update 2010 (County Extension Agents) Eric P. Prostko Extension Weed Specialist Department of Crop & Soil Sciences The University of.
Considerations for Selecting Turf Spray Tips Maximizing control while minimizing spray drift!
Control of Tropical Spiderwort in Peanut with Selected Herbicides J. Tim Flanders Grady County Extension Coordinator Eric P. Prostko Dept. of Crop & Soil.
Field Corn Weed Management Update
New Peanut Cultivar Response to Paraquat Applications
WELCOME! 2016 Southeastern Hay Convention Brian Mathis
Renée Allen Area Blueberry Agent Extension, Alma, GA
Selecting the Right Nozzle SIC KNOWLEDGE--
Managing ALS-Resistant Palmer Amaranth in Peanuts
Influence of Nozzle Type on Peanut Weed Control Systems
Peanut Weed Control Update
Peanut Weed Control: Are We Out of Silver Bullets?
Water Quality and Herbicides
Untreated Weed-Free Check
Strongarm Applied Postemergence in Georgia Peanut
Eric P. Prostko Extension Weed Specialist
Application Strategies Calibration….Calibration….
Application Strategies to Improve Crop Health
Influence of Adjuvants on Leafspot Disease Management
PEANUT RESPONSE TO MULTIPLE SIMULATED OFF-TARGET
Continued Investigations on the Control of Tropical Spiderwort
Presentation transcript:

Tractor Speed and Boom Height Effects on Spray Coverage Eric P. Prostko1, Glen C. Rains2, Justin Lanier3, Maryssa Davis2 1Dept. Crop & Soil Sciences, 2Dept. of Entomology 3Former Crisp County Extension Agent

On-Farm vs. UGA Research? Concerns Tractor Speed Boom Height Coverage Quality vs. Quantity?

2016 Peanut Weed Control Research PE-08B-16 June 22, 2016 56 DAP

2016 Peanut Weed Control Research PE-08B-16 August 9, 2016 104 DAP

A Growers Peanut Field in 2016 Who Spent $138/A on Herbicides + 0.3 oz/A Strongarm + 24 oz/A 2,4-DB $55/A for hand-weeding (2X) 5250 lb/A August 24, 2016

Is this a bad combination???? 6 ft

Herbicide Efficacy Coverage Nozzle Type GPA Pressure Boom Height Tractor Speed Time of Day

2015 Speed/Boom Height Test – UGA Ponder Farm 8’ 10’ 30”

Figure 1. Tractor Speed Effects on Spray Coverage (%) – 30” Boom Height – 15 GPA (2015) 8003DG (40 PSI) 8004DG (53 PSI) N = 30

Objective Evaluate the effects of tractor speed and boom height on spray quality commercial sprayer Coverage VMD50

Materials and Methods March 16, 2016 Crisp County Steve and Stewart Whelchel JD 4630 80’ boom 20” nozzle spacing Tractor Speeds 8.5 and 13.0 MPH Boom Heights 40 and 60 in 15 GPA (water + dye) AI11004VS + AI11006VS spray tips 45 PSI 30 Kromekote cards (2” X 3”) 7” X 10’ apart Dropletscan (WRK of Arkansas, LLC)

2016 Nozzle Test JD 4630 80’ Spray Boom 20” nozzle spacing

2016 Speed/Boom Height/Nozzle Test

2016 Nozzle Test

Figure 2. The Influence of Tractor Speed and Boom Height on Spray Coverage (%) (15 GPA, 45 PSI, AI11004 and AI11006 nozzles) P = 0.4566 P = 0.9208 *averaged over 2 boom heights (40” and 60”) ** averaged over 2 tractor speeds (8.5 and 13.0 MPH)

Figure 3. The Influence of Tractor Speed and Boom Height on Droplet Size (VMD50) (15 GPA, 45 PSI, AI11004 and AI11006 nozzles) LSD 0.10 = 3 P = 0.3107 *averaged over 2 boom heights (40” and 60“) ** averaged over 2 tractor speeds (8.5 and 13.0 MPH)

TurboDrop® Asymmetrical Dual Fan (Greenleaf Technologies)

Table 1. The Influence of Nozzle System on Spray Coverage and VMD50 – 2016. Nozzle Type Pressure (PSI) Speed (MPH) Boom Height (in) GPA Coverage (%) VMD50 (microns) AI11004VS 45 8.5 40 15 9.85 418 AI11006VS 13.0 10.20 446 TADF05-D 38 10.0 9.76 450 LSD (0.10) NS (P = 0.4142) 6 CV 3.84 0.79

Summary - 2016 No interaction between speed and boom height No effect of speed or boom height on coverage (P > 0.45) VMD50 increased with speed but was not affected by boom height 2015 results different than 2016 results sprayer, nozzles, methodology

Questions? eprostko@uga.edu www.gaweed.com