Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D., FCPP

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COMPAS is the Pathfinder ! NYS Probation Officers Association Annual Conference August 9, 2012 Presenters: Sharon Lansing, DCJS Nancy Andino, DCJS Gary.
Advertisements

Integrating Risk/Needs Assessment Into Drug Court
Treatment of Substance Involved Offenders in Criminal Justice Settings – Challenges & Outcomes Igor Koutsenok, MD, MS Assistant Professor of Psychiatry,
Pretrial Release and Diversion
Best Practices Standards Vol. I: An Overview. OBJECTIVES  Define Best Practices Standards  Identify the need for Best Practices Standards  Briefly.
Residential Community Supervision Programs
Yamhill County: Evidence-Based Decision Making (EBDM)
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Effective Strategies for Drug-Abusing.
California Static Risk Assessment (CSRA)
Hamilton County Veterans’ Treatment Court Structure, Process, and Purpose.
Targeting Dispositions by Risk, Need, Responsivity Modeling If / Then Decisions Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. National Association of Drug Court Professionals.
Drug Court ♦The alternative to incarceration  History žHow and why the experiment evolved  Main Features of Drug Court žCooperation within the adversarial.
Risk and Needs Assessments
Assessment of Risk and Need
County College Parole & Probation Services
Evidence-Based Sentencing. Learning Objectives Describe the three principles of evidence- based practice and the key elements of evidence-based sentencing;
Offender Supervision Control and Public Safety Issues.
Probation Supervision and Information Gathering Presentence Reports.
Offender Rehabilitation
NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES.
Presented by: Cary Heck, Ph.D. University of Wyoming
Risk/Needs Assessment Within the Criminal Justice System.
Integrating Offender Screening Process into Specialty Court Eligibility Determination Presenter: Steven Fritz, LPC, LADC Clinical Director, Human Skills.
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
RISK AND NEED TRACKS SAMHSA 2013 Orleans Parish Drug Court Expansion Grant.
Chapter 2 Pretrial Release and Diversion. Pretrial Services Pretrial Services is a department with two overlapping functions: Assisting the court with.
And They All Come Home. Shawshank Redemption watch?v=KtwXlIwozog.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
Assessment of Alcohol-Involved Offenders Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. National Association of Drug Court Professionals Treatment Research Institute.
2 3 Texas has one of the largest Probation Populations in the United States (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2007) 4 Selected StatesProbation Population.
Targeting Participants for Adult Drug Courts Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. National Association of Drug Court Professionals.
Targeting Participants for Drug Courts Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. National Association of Drug Court Professionals.
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Effective Programs for Drug Offenders.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania Evidence-Based Dispositions for Drug Offenders.
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Targeting Dispositions by Risks &
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Targeting Dispositions by Risks &
Offender Risk Management Model Community Forum Teal Maedel Psychologist Vancouver Parole RCMP Behavioural Sciences Group.
Judge Neil Edward Axel District Court of Maryland (retired) Maryland Highway Safety Judicial Conference December 2, 2015 Best Practices & Sentencing Alternatives.
CLASSIFICATION Risk Institutional violence/misconduct Institutional violence/misconduct Suicide Suicide Recidivism Recidivism A standardized assessment.
Targeting Participants for Drug Courts Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. National Association of Drug Court Professionals.
 As of July 1, 2014, 61 operational courts: › 28 Adult Drug Courts  5 Hybrid Drug/OWI Courts › 14 OWI Courts › 9 Veterans Treatment Courts › 4 Mental.
Offender Assessment Utilizing the Risk-Need- Responsivity Model A web presentation for RSAT - T&TA by Roberta C. Churchill -ACJS.
Court Services A Continuum of Behavioral, Therapeutic and Supervision Programs.
Performance Evaluation of Drug Courts Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction.
The Criminal Justice System Chapter 12. Elements of the Criminal Justice System  Criminal Justice Law  Texas criminal justice system: The system of.
Jail Diversion Programs
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Henu’ Community Wellness Court
Promising Practices in Criminal Justice Reform
Evidence Based Practices in Napa County Probation
Summit County Probation Services
ICT, Research and Teaching for Criminal Justice Practitioners
What works and What Doesn’t in Reducing Recidivism: Some Lessons Learned from Evaluating Correctional Programs By: Edward Latessa School of Criminal Justice.
7. Develop a plan to strengthen employer relationships
Chapter 4 Probation: How Most Offenders Are Punished
ICT, Research and Teaching for Criminal Justice Practitioners
Community Corrections Alternative Program
Drug Treatment Court.
Criminal Justice System Components: Locating Probation and Parole
Evidence-Based Criminal Justice Reform
24-hours a day 7-days a week 365 days per year
Problem Solving Courts in the Federal System
Marie Crosson, Executive Director
Tools of the Trade: Risk Prediction Instruments
Annals of Research and Knowledge (ARK)
Key Moments in NADCP History
Federal Pretrial Services
Presentation transcript:

Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D., FCPP Targeting & Best Practices for Treatment Courts Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D., FCPP

Annals of Research and Knowledge (ARK) 4/1/2014 Dispositional Continuum Treatment / Public Health Emphasis Functioning of the individual Punishment / Public Safety Emphasis Risk of recidivism Cost to taxpayers l--- Treatment Courts ---l Pre-plea diversion Post-plea diversion Sentence to incarceration Sentence to restrictive intermediate punishment (IP / RIP) Sentence to probation or community supervision Decriminalization/ medicalization De-felonization

Risk Principle Not a risk for violence or dangerousness Difficult or complicated prognosis The higher the risk level, the more intensive the supervision and accountability should be, and vice versa Mixing risk levels is contraindicated

Prognostic Risk Factors Current age < 25 years Delinquency onset < 16 years Substance abuse onset < 14 years Prior rehabilitation failures Prior convictions or incarcerations Antisocial Personality Disorder Family history of crime or addiction Criminal or delinquent peer affiliations

Prognostic Risk Tools Level of Service Inventory—Revised (LSI-R) Level of Service Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI) Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions (COMPAS) Ohio Risk Assessment System (ORAS) Risk and Needs Triage (RANT) Risk Prediction Index (RPI) Static Risk Tool Wisconsin Risk & Need Assessment (WRN) Federal Post Conviction Risk Assessment (PCRA)

Violence Risk Tools Historical, Clinical, Risk Assessment-20 (HCR-20) Psychopathy Checklist- Revised (PCL-R) Static-99 Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (SARA) Sexual Violence Risk-20 (SVR-20)

Need Principle Clinical disorders or functional impairments (diagnosis) The higher the need level, the more intensive the treatment and rehabilitation services should be, and vice versa Focus on criminogenic and responsivity needs first (especially addiction & mental illness) Mixing need levels is contraindicated

Addiction and Mental Illness Neurological or neurochemical brain disorders Chronic, relapsing and progressive (worsen without treatment) Worsen if punished for “distal” infractions, such as substance use Worsen if not punished for “proximal” infractions, such as lying, treatment absences, or tainted urine specimens

Risk & Need Quadrants High Risk Low Risk High Need Low Need Treatment Court Treatment Deferral High Need Intensive Probation Banked Probation Low Need

Treatment Court Case Likely to be in the community Likely to recidivate or fail in treatment Severe mental illness or substance dependence NOT Empirically Relevant: Drug dealing or violence charge / history Motivated for treatment; good attitude Failed treatment or probation previously Unproven nexus between drug use and crime

Program Planning 15 times greater cost benefits }

Annual Staff Training Five times greater cost benefits }

Evaluation Four times greater cost benefits }

Judicial Assignments Three times greater cost benefits }

} Team Functioning Twice the cost benefit Judicial Officer, Prosecutor, Defense Attorney, Treatment Provider, Probation Officer, Coordinator

Sentencing Reform Require risk & need assessment before disposition (especially for felonies, serious misdemeanors, & probation/parole revocations) Use immunity Valid, reliable, & culturally unbiased instruments Non-specialized risk tools may not be used to inform in/out decisions (expedited review) Require professionals to consider risk and need in certain cases (expedited review)

Sentencing Reform (cont.) Require professionals to consider effectiveness and cost-effectiveness (return rehabilitation to forefront of sentencing) Require SAC to publish recidivism rates and costs of alternative dispositions Include dispositional rationale on the record Restrictive basis for appeal (abuse of discretion; clearly erroneous) Publish data on dispositional decisions (blinded?)

Treatment Court Standards As a condition of funding and accreditation, require treatment court teams (and other programs) to: Attend pre-implementation and annual trainings Report data annually on adherence to best practices Develop and evaluate remedial plans for deficiencies Target high risk and high need cases Develop alternative tracks/programs for other cases Apply graduated sanctions for distal infractions (right of interlocutory review) Prioritize criminogenic and responsivity needs