Weekly Meeting October 5 2017.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Peter Schleper, Hamburg University SUSY07 Non-SUSY Searches at HERA 1 Non-SUSY Searches at HERA Peter Schleper Hamburg University SUSY07 July 27, 2007.
Advertisements

Qualitative, quantitative analysis and “standardless” analysis NON DESTRUCTIVE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS Notes by: Dr Ivan Gržetić, professor University of Belgrade.
Compton Scattering Reporter: Hui He. Outline Theory Experimental setup Experimental results (1) Calibration (2) Angular Distribution of the 137 Cs Source.
Chapter VIII: Elements of Inferential Statistics
Copyright (C) 2002 Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 1 Procedure for Hypothesis Testing 1. Establish the null hypothesis, H 0. 2.Establish.
In this experiment, C 60 was photoionized with single photons with specified energies between the energy range of 37 to 160eV. The photons used came from.
Simulation of the energy response of  rays in CsI crystal arrays Thomas ZERGUERRAS EXL-R3B Collaboration Meeting, Orsay (France), 02/02/ /03/2006.
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Counting Statistics and Error Prediction Poisson Distribution ( p.
How to extract Neutrino Factory flux from IMD and neutrino elastic scattering? Near Detector Workshop, CERN, 30 July 2011 Paul Soler.
PRESORT OF THE DATA OF THE COLOGNE TEST EXPERIMENT ● Quality and integrity of data ● Detector numbering and positions ● Calibrations and gain stability.
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, 1st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Radioactive decay is a random process. Fluctuations. Characterization.
Chunhui Chen, University of Pennsylvania 1 Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the Tevatron Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the.
Outline of Today’s Discussion 1.The Chi-Square Test of Independence 2.The Chi-Square Test of Goodness of Fit.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
Simultaneous photo-production measurement of the  and  mesons on the nucleons at the range 680 – 1500 MeV N.Rudnev, V.Nedorezov, A.Turinge for the GRAAL.
Pairwise comparisons: Confidence intervals Multiple comparisons Marina Bogomolov and Gili Baumer.
Polycrystalline, CVD and Single Crystal Tungsten Heated samples on Z Tina Tanaka, Greg Rochau, Robert Peterson, and Craig Olson June 2-3, 2004 HAPL Meeting.
Introduction to Science: The Scientific Method
Introduction to Science: The Scientific Method
Status of ULE-HPGe Experiment for WIMP Search in YangYang
Scientific Measurement
Data measurement, probability and Spearman’s Rho
IBD Detection Efficiencies and Uncertainties
Introduction to Science: The Scientific Method
Introduction to Science: The Scientific Method
Fourth TEMPO Science Team Meeting
Thomas Müller and Alfred Wiedensohler
AP Statistics FINAL EXAM ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE.
M.I. Abbas - Alexandria University - EGYPT.
Dark Matter Search With an Ultra-low Threshold Germanium Detector proposed by Tsinghua University Seoul National University Academia Sinica Qian Yue.
Image quality and Performance Characteristics
Origin of Quantum Theory
Radiation Damage Studies for Solid State Sensors Subject to Mrad Doses
Analyzing Redistribution Matrix with Wavelet
Lab Practical (Paper 3) Skills
Introduction to Science: The Scientific Method
Slope.
Direct Detection of Dark Matter
HPLC detectors Pharmawiki 11/18/2018.
Weekly Meeting September
Outline Announcements Fault Tolerance.
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Weekly Meeting September
Atomic Physics & Quantum Effects
In search of K+K- molecule
Russian Research Center “ Kurchatov Institute”
Monte Carlo Simulation of Neutrino Mass Measurements
Lab Practical (Paper 3) Skills
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages (May 2002)
Recent check of calibration across detectors
Search for coincidences and study of cosmic rays spectrum
The Scientific Method.
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages (May 2002)
Introduction to Science and the Scientific Method
Introduction to Experimental Design
Section 11.1: Significance Tests: Basics
Lesson – Teacher Notes Standard:
GEp/GMp Group Meeting Chris Crawford May 12, 2005
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Introduction to the Scientific Method
Presentation transcript:

Weekly Meeting October 5 2017

DMC – MidasIO Not much of an update here Amy said she asked Belina about completing a midas writer in the midasio files, I’m not sure what (if any) conclusion came from that There is still debate about whether A&M will use CDMSBats or midasio to read in midas files

DQM Meeting today with Amy, Joel, Noah Discuss various deciders based on noise traces: Non-freq dependent, total noise power: 𝑣(𝑡) 2 = 𝑑𝑓 𝐽(𝑓) → 𝑣 𝑡 2 𝑚𝑜𝑑 = 𝑑𝑓 𝐽 𝑓 ×𝑁 𝑠 (𝑓) 2 𝑣 𝑡 2 𝑚𝑜𝑑 = 𝑑𝑓 𝐽 𝑓 × 𝑤 (𝑓) Freq dependent decider: Could this take the place of selected peak checks?

DQM Other possible decider: Other questions/comments: Some type of quantitative comparison between noise PSD and idealized noise PSD – this may be a redundant check Other questions/comments: Can we assume Gaussian noise distributions, the mean = 0? Detector and channel(?) specific thresholds Multi-level thresholds Sampling at beginning of runs – is just one sample take, or multiple samples? Sampling periodically, having some history record? Coincidence – maybe not

Photoelectric Absorption

Photoelectric Absorption Can we obtain uncertainties from the Henke data? The Henke data isn’t strictly measured data. It takes experimental data from wherever it can find it. Interpolates between the data using theoretical calculations from Doolean and Liverman. Where experimental does not exist, it interpolates across Z The experimental data for Si goes down to about 40eV, and 20eV for Ge. The Henke paper also assumes atoms scatter light independently – no condensed matter effects. Generally it has been found experimentally that photoabsoprtion within condensed matter is indeed atomic-like above about 50eV except in energy regions near absorption thresholds. The effects of the condensed state are significant only at the lower energies of interest here.

Photoelectric Absorption I can look for uncertainties from individual data series from the Henke paper. I think there are factors that ought to be considered regarding the cross section values: Temperature dependence State of material (solid, crystal, gaseous) Isotope composition