Conservative versus surgical treatment of venous leg ulcers: A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial  Wijnand B. van Gent, MD, Wim C. Hop, PhD, Marinus.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professionalism and the work-life balance Thomas S. Huber, MD, PhD Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014) DOI:
Advertisements

The influence of different sub-bandage pressure values on venous leg ulcers healing when treated with compression therapy  Dragan J. Milic, PhD, Sasa.
In search of optimal compression therapy for venous leg ulcers: A meta-analysis of studies comparing divers bandages with specifically designed stockings 
Conservative versus surgical treatment of venous leg ulcers: A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial  Wijnand B. van Gent, MD, Wim C. Hop, PhD, Marinus.
Efficacy of topical pale sulfonated shale oil in the treatment of venous leg ulcers: A randomized, controlled, multicenter study  Stefan Beckert, MD,
A prospective study of the fate of venous leg perforators after varicose vein surgery  Andre M. van Rij, MD, Gerry Hill, BSc (Hons), Chris Gray, BSc, Ross.
Thomas F. O’Donnell, MD, Joseph Lau, MD  Journal of Vascular Surgery 
State-of-the-art treatment of chronic leg ulcers: A randomized controlled trial comparing vacuum-assisted closure (V.A.C.) with modern wound dressings 
Foot volumetry can predict recurrent ulceration after subfascial ligation of perforators and saphenous ligation  A.W. Bradbury, BSc, MD, FRCSEd, C.V.
Alfred Obermayer, MD, Katharina Garzon, MSc 
Without prejudice Journal of Vascular Surgery
Multicenter randomized clinical trial of supervised exercise therapy with or without feedback versus walking advice for intermittent claudication  Saskia.
Home versus in-hospital treatment of outpatients with acute deep venous thrombosis of the lower limbs  Francisco Lozano, MD, PhD, Javier Trujillo-Santos,
Jordan Knepper, MD, Enrique Criado, MD  Journal of Vascular Surgery 
Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical interventions versus conservative therapy for venous ulcers  Karen F. Mauck, MD, MS, Noor Asi, MD, Chaitanya.
Incidence of and risk factors for iliocaval venous obstruction in patients with active or healed venous leg ulcers  William Marston, MD, Daniel Fish,
Systematic versus selective stent placement after superficial femoral artery balloon angioplasty: A multicenter prospective randomized study  Jean-Pierre.
Postthrombotic or non-postthrombotic severe venous insufficiency: Impact of removal of superficial venous reflux with or without subcutaneous fasciotomy 
Prospective multicenter study of quality of life before and after lower extremity vein bypass in 1404 patients with critical limb ischemia  Louis L. Nguyen,
Factors that influence perforator thrombosis and predict healing with perforator sclerotherapy for venous ulceration without axial reflux  Misaki M. Kiguchi,
In search of optimal compression therapy for venous leg ulcers: A meta-analysis of studies comparing divers bandages with specifically designed stockings 
State-of-the-art treatment of chronic leg ulcers: A randomized controlled trial comparing vacuum-assisted closure (V.A.C.) with modern wound dressings 
A randomized trial of the Tubulcus multilayer bandaging system in the treatment of extensive venous ulcers  Dragan J. Milic, PhD, Sasa S. Zivic, MD, Dragan.
Thrombolysis for deep venous thrombosis
Effectiveness of an extracellular matrix graft (OASIS Wound Matrix) in the treatment of chronic leg ulcers: A randomized clinical trial  Eliot N. Mostow,
Thomas F. O’Donnell, MD, Joseph Lau, MD  Journal of Vascular Surgery 
Ali F. AbuRahma, MD  Journal of Vascular Surgery 
Mohamed A. Zayed, MD, PhD, Ronald L. Dalman, MD, Jason T. Lee, MD 
Combined treatment with compression therapy and ablation of incompetent superficial and perforating veins reduces ulcer recurrence in patients with CEAP.
Long-term safety of cilostazol in patients with peripheral artery disease: The CASTLE study (Cilostazol: A Study in Long-term Effects)  William R. Hiatt,
Subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery combined with saphenous vein ablation: results and critical analysis  Christian Bianchi, MD, Jeffrey L.
Prevention of recurrence of venous ulceration: Randomized controlled trial of class 2 and class 3 elastic compression  E. Andrea Nelson, RN, PhD, Douglas.
Lowell S. Kabnick, MD  Journal of Vascular Surgery 
Alfred Obermayer, MD, Katharina Garzon, MSc 
Without prejudice Journal of Vascular Surgery
Endovenous 980-nm laser treatment of saphenous veins in a series of 500 patients  Jacques Desmyttère, MD, Christophe Grard, MD, Benjamin Wassmer, MSc,
Endovenous ablation of incompetent perforating veins is effective treatment for recalcitrant venous ulcers  Peter F. Lawrence, MD, Ali Alktaifi, MD, David.
Healing rates and cost efficacy of outpatient compression treatment for leg ulcers associated with venous insufficiency  William A. Marston, MD, Robert.
Home versus in-hospital treatment of outpatients with acute deep venous thrombosis of the lower limbs  Francisco Lozano, MD, PhD, Javier Trujillo-Santos,
A prospective, randomized trial of Unna's boot versus Duoderm CGF hydroactive dressing plus compression in the management of venous leg ulcers  Paul R.
Infected aneurysm of the thoracic aorta
Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: Late results of a prospective multicenter randomized trial  Piergiorgio Cao, MD, Giuseppe Giordano,
The effect of azithromycin and Chlamydophilia pneumonia infection on expansion of small abdominal aortic aneurysms - A prospective randomized double-blind.
The best of times, the worst of times…
Thrombolysis for lower extremity bypass graft occlusion
Aikaterini A. Angeli, MD, Dimitra A. Angeli, MD, Chryssanthi A
Peter Neglén, MD, PhD, Kathryn C. Hollis, BA, Seshadri Raju, MD 
A prospective randomized controlled study with intermittent mechanical compression of the calf in patients with claudication  Joaquin de Haro, MD, Francisco.
Reply Journal of Vascular Surgery
Sonja R. Blecken, MD, Juan Leonel Villavicencio, MD, Tzu C. Kao, PhD 
Jim H. Geselschap, MD, Wijnand B. van Gent, MD, Cees H. A
Endoscopic versus open subfascial division of incompetent perforating veins in the treatment of venous leg ulceration: Long-term follow-up  Johannes E.M.
Surgical anatomy for subfascial endoscopic perforating vein surgery of laterally located perforating veins  Piet A.R de Rijcke, MD, Tejo Schenk, MD, Wijnand.
Carotid endarterectomy with a polyurethane patch versus primary closure: A prospective randomized study  Dallit Mannheim, MD, Boaz Weller, MD, Eran Vahadim,
The influence of different sub-bandage pressure values on venous leg ulcers healing when treated with compression therapy  Dragan J. Milic, PhD, Sasa.
Glauco Milio, MD, Chiara Minà, MD, Valentina Cospite, MD, Piero L
Efficacy of topical pale sulfonated shale oil in the treatment of venous leg ulcers: A randomized, controlled, multicenter study  Stefan Beckert, MD,
Regarding “Venous ulcers and the superficial venous system”
Polytetrafluoroethylene versus human umbilical vein in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass: Six-year results of a randomized clinical trial  Gijs J. Aalders,
Molecular characterization of post-thrombotic syndrome
FT04. “The Vein Is Screwed” Proof of Concept of the VeinScrew: A New Percutaneous Venous Closure Device  Doeke Boersma, MD, Frans Moll, MD, PhD, Gert Jan.
Systematic review of outcomes after surgical management of venous disease incorporating subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery  John A TenBrook, MD,
Reduction in deep vein reflux after concomitant subfascial endoscopic perforating vein surgery and superficial vein ablation in advanced primary chronic.
One-year multicenter results of 100 abdominal aortic aneurysm patients treated with the Endurant stent graft  Jasper W. van Keulen, MD, Jean-Paul P.M.
Chronic venous leg ulcers benefit from surgery: Long-term results from 173 legs  Alfred Obermayer, MD, Katharina Göstl, MSc, Gerald Walli, MD, Thomas Benesch,
Taco M. A. L. Klem, MD, J. Marco Schnater, MD, PhD, P
Subfascial endoscopic perforating vein surgery as treatment for lateral perforating vein incompetence and venous ulceration  P.A.R de Rijcke, MD, W.C.J.
Patrick A. Stone, MD, Ali F. AbuRahma, MD, Sarah K. Flaherty, BS 
Results of a single center vascular screening and education program
Prospective randomized study evaluating an absorbable cyanoacrylate for use in vascular reconstructions  Alan B. Lumsden, MD, Eugene R. Heyman, PhD  Journal.
Presentation transcript:

Conservative versus surgical treatment of venous leg ulcers: A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial  Wijnand B. van Gent, MD, Wim C. Hop, PhD, Marinus C. van Praag, MD, Albert J. Mackaay, MD, Edith M. de Boer, MD, Cees H. Wittens, MD  Journal of Vascular Surgery  Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages 563-571 (September 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.04.053 Copyright © 2006 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig 1 Trial profile. SEPS, Subfascial endoscopic perforating vein surgery. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2006 44, 563-571DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2006.04.053) Copyright © 2006 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig 2 Ulcer-free period per patient per 3 months in patients with an ulcer present before randomization for shorter or longer than 4 months (P < .001; analysis of variance). Journal of Vascular Surgery 2006 44, 563-571DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2006.04.053) Copyright © 2006 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig 3 The ulcer-free period per patient per 3 months in the surgical and conservative groups (analysis of variance, P = .14) Numbers along the horizontal axis represent legs still in follow-up at the particular time points for the two groups. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2006 44, 563-571DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2006.04.053) Copyright © 2006 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig 4 Ulcer-free period per patient per 3 months in first-time and recurrent ulceration patients (P < .001; analysis of variance). Error bars represent standard errors of the mean. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2006 44, 563-571DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2006.04.053) Copyright © 2006 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig 5 Ulcer-free period per patient per 3 months in patients treated in one of the centers (SFG; P = .02; analysis of variance). Journal of Vascular Surgery 2006 44, 563-571DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2006.04.053) Copyright © 2006 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig 6 Ulcer-free period per patient per 3 months in patients with a first-time ulcer and/or a medial ulcer in the surgical and conservative groups (P = .045; analysis of variance). Journal of Vascular Surgery 2006 44, 563-571DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2006.04.053) Copyright © 2006 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig 7 Cumulative healing rates according to randomized treatment groups (P = .24). Tickmarks note the ends of follow-up of patients. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2006 44, 563-571DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2006.04.053) Copyright © 2006 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig 8 Cumulative recurrence rates according to randomized treatment groups (not significant). Tickmarks note the ends of follow-up of patients. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2006 44, 563-571DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2006.04.053) Copyright © 2006 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions