Little River Ditches Watershed Monitoring Project S

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Cypress Creek Basin Clean Rivers Program Nutrient Special Study Update Report – May 16, 2007 Roy Darville.

Advertisements

West Virginia Department of Agriculture Water Quality Monitoring Program 2009 Photo by Paul Morley.

Cass River Water Quality Monitoring Project Year Two Project Summary Prepared by: Environmental Science Solutions, LLC June 2014.

Transport of nitrogen and phosphorus from Rhode River watersheds during storm events David Correll, Thomas Jordan, and Donald Weller Water Resources Research,

Water Quality Assessment of Osage Creek & West Fork, White and Kings Rivers 2008 & ½ 2009 Marc Nelson PhD, PE Nelson Engineering.

Baraboo River Watershed RCPP

2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.

Red Lake River Farm to Stream Tile Drainage Study - Red Lake Watershed District –

UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.

Practice – CP-39 Farmable Wetland Program Constructed Wetland.

Division of Water Quality

How Management Effects Nutrient and Sediment Losses Dennis FrameFred Madison Directors UW Discovery Farms Program.

Nonpoint Source Pollutant Reduction in Tensas River Watershed Using a Vegetated Filter Strip - Retention Pond System Principal Investigator: Beatrix Haggard,

Agricultural BMPs An Educator’s Guide. What are Agricultural BMPs? Best Management Practices An approach to help farmers reduce or eliminate agricultural.

Improving Agricultural Runoff Management for Irrigated Lands in California A. Ristow, S. Prentice, W. Wallender, W. Horwath Department of Land, Air, and.

Water Quality Monitoring of Lake St. Joseph Watershed Principal Investigator: Beatrix Haggard, Ph.D. Co-Principal Investigators: James Hendrix Donnie Miller,

Presented at the 9 th Stakeholder Meeting Mike Herrmann, NCEEP Central Watershed Planner April 20th, 2010 Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) Intake Stessor.

West Virginia Non-tidal Monitoring Network: 2010 Update West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection West Virginia Department of Agriculture USGS.

Condition of the Water & Streambanks– Preliminary Results Marty St. Clair Coe College August 15, 2013.

Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.

Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed and L’Anguille River Watershed Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium.

Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed, L’Anguille River Watershed, and Bayou Bartholomew Presented.

Compliance Monitoring─Ensuring Effective Results Jim Younk Idaho Power Company.

Water Quality Monitoring : Galla Creek Bayou Bartholomew L’Anguille River Presented By: The Ecological Conservation Organization.

Ecosystems Climate and Land-Use Change Water Natural Hazards Core Science Systems Energy and Minerals, and Environmental Health U.S. Geological Survey.

Professor Art McGarity, Zach Eichenwald Assisted by Markia Collins, Sophia Richardson, Richard Scott, Pete Cosfol.

Red Lake Watershed District Water Quality Monitoring.

Dr. Matt Helmers Assistant Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Dept. of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Iowa State University How is.

The Non-tidal Water Quality Monitoring Network: past, present and future opportunities Katie Foreman Water Quality Analyst, UMCES-CBPO MASC Non-tidal Water.

Site Locations Shaded area = Counties that do not drain into the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Basin.

112.3 Jessica L. Feeser, M. Elise Lauterbur & Jennifer L. Soong Research Project for Systems Ecology (ENVS 316), Fall ’06 Oberlin College, Oberlin OH BackgroundFindings.

al-weather-gang/wp/2014/10/28/hawaii- lava-flow-advances-now-less-than-100- yards-from-nearest-home-in- pahoa/?hpid=z3http://

Cache River Monitoring Jennifer L. Bouldin, PhD Ecotoxicology Research Facility Arkansas State University.

Larkin Creek Phase II Project Jennifer L. Bouldin, PhD Ecotoxicology Research Facility Arkansas State University.

SWAT Modeling and Monitoring of Priority Watersheds- Phase III

Water Quality Monitoring in the Upper Illinois River Watershed and Upper White River Basin Project Brian E. Haggard University of Arkansas.

Non-tidal network monitoring update for calendar year 2011 Non-tidal Monitoring Workgroup 8 February 2011 Bill Romano MD Dept. of Natural Resources Photograph.

Sediment Delivery to the Watonwan River

Delaware’s Non-Tidal Monitoring Update for CY 2011 February 8,

Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in L’Anguille River Watershed and Deep Bayou Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium

Findings Is the City of Oberlin a source or a sink for pollutants? Water quality in Plum Creek as a function of urban land cover Jonathan Cummings, Tami.

Our Case Study. Rationale for study The TMDL model assumes that there is no decrease in seepage during low flow conditions, basing its calculations on.

Water Quality Monitoring on the Upper Strawberry River Project Dr. Jennifer Bouldin and Teresa Brueggen Arkansas State University Ecotoxicology.

Year Two Review of Water Quality Monitoring on the Upper Strawberry River Project T.R. Brueggen 1 and J.L. Bouldin 1,2 1 Environmental Sciences.

Year Three Review of Water Quality Monitoring on the Upper Strawberry River Project T.R. Brueggen 1 and J.L. Bouldin 1,2 1 Environmental Sciences.

What is the System-Wide Monitoring Program (SWMP) and What Can It Do For You?

Water quality sensors provide insight into the suspended solids dynamics during high flow events in the Lamprey River, NH Nicholas K. Shonka and William.

Water Quality Monitoring on Larkin Creek St. Francis County, AR JL Bouldin RA Warby Arkansas State University.

WATERSHEDS Concepts and Curriculum Review LAKE MONITORING AND ANALYSIS Tony Thorpe and Dan Obrecht Lakes of Missouri Volunteer Program – Univ. of Missouri.

Analysis of Mechanisms of Nutrient Cycling in Floodplain Lakes of the Lower Mississippi River By Alex Dominguez.

Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.

Annual Membership Meeting Water Quality Report 2010

Reducing sediment & nutrient losses from intensive agriculture Restoring eutrophic shallow lakes Pastoral agriculture is the dominant land use in New.

Integrating surface water, groundwater and landscape stressor data into a regional assessment to support management decision-making Karen R. Worcester.

Caddo Lake Nutrient Study Roy Darville - Caddo Lake Institute

Thief River Watershed Sediment Investigation

A. low levels of salt B. low levels of arsenic

Cache River Monitoring

Andrine Stanhope*, Cassel Gardner and Larry Robinson

Larkin Creek Phase II Project

2018 Louisiana Soil Health and Cover Crop Conference

URBANIZATION IMPACTS ON STREAM NUTRIENT

URBAN NON-POINT SOURCE NUTRIENT IMPACTS

Jim McClelland Rae Mooney University of Texas at Austin

A Public Friendly Approach to Sharing Water Quality Data

NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE

West Virginia CBP Non-tidal Network: 2006 Status Update

Middle Cache River Monitoring

Little River Ditches Watershed Monitoring

URBANIZATION IMPACTS ON STREAM NUTRIENT

Presentation transcript:

Little River Ditches Watershed Monitoring Project 11-2000S Jennifer L. Bouldin, PhD Ecotoxicology Research Facility Arkansas State University

arkansaswater.org

Little River Ditches Shared with MO and KY ~ 25% in AR Intensive row crop agriculture www.epa.gov

Land Use 81.4% cropland 11% forested arkansaswater.org

MRBI sampling ISCO sampler set for runoff events 24 ISCO containers analyzed individually Total solids (g/time)

Measured Parameters pH Dissolved Oxygen Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Turbidity Dissolved Nitrate, Nitrite, Orthophosphate Total Nitrogen, Total Phosphorus

Ditch Number 4-Buffalo Creek Ditch Number 56 HUC#080202040806 Ditch Number 56 HUC#080202040807

Site 1 2415 2164 1714 1242

Site 2 1078 2340 1626 2520 1420

Site 3 2451 1586 1248

Site 4 2457 1686 2052

Site 5 7.5 4430 3280 1796 1746

Site 7 6.7 5.2 1510 4590 1702 3640 2200

Preliminary results High flow vs. low/no flow conditions vary nutrient and TSS values Sediment and nutrients values much higher in primary ditches More TSS spikes in 2013 due to rainfall Comparison of edge-of-field data to instream data will determine direct input from field

Thanks to ANRC, Kyle Cassidy, students and technicians at Ecotox Questions? Thanks to ANRC, Kyle Cassidy, students and technicians at Ecotox