Evaluation Design Preliminary

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SWEDISH AGENCY FOR ECONOMIC AND REGIONAL GROWTH 1 LEARNING through ongoing EVALUATION -Ongoing evaluation of the eight ERDF programs and in major strategic.
Advertisements

The System Development Life Cycle
ECVET WORKSHOP 2 22/23/24 November The European Quality Assurance Reference Framework.
Evidence Based Cohesion Policy Focus on performance incentives Thomas Tandskov Dissing Senior Adviser Ministry of Economics and Business Affairs Danish.
Systems Development Life Cycle
ISO 9000 Quality Management Systems Program Evaluation and Audit Verl ‘Andy’ Anders 1, Merle Pochop 2, Chad M. Laux 3 1 Industrial Specialist, Center for.
Pestalozzi Children‘s Foundation emPower 2012 Monitoring & Evaluation Lecturers: Beatrice Schulter.
Instructional Design Dr. Lam TECM 5180.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Walking on two legs: LEARNING EVALUATION 1 Göran Brulin, Senior Analyst and professor, Swedish Agency for Economic and Regional Growth Sven Jansson, National.
Advanced Metropolitan GIS Plan Final Report Presentation December 14, 2000 Jerry Happel – PlanSight LLC Fargo-Moorhead Council of Governments.
Kanban/Pull System As Part of the Continuous Improvement Process at Whirlpool Corporation - Findlay.
Welcome to Session 3 – Project Management Process Overview
Unilob – Artur Nowicki Istitutional Support System for Business Support Organisations in Poland Example of National Services Network for SMEs Artur Nowicki.
SmartNets Results Overview SmartNets SmartNets Methods.
© The Scout Association Module 29 Page: 1 of 12 Cambridgeshire Module 29 Presenting Session 1.
Material produced under Phare 2006 financial support Phare TVET RO 2006/ Project financed under Phare EUROPEAN UNION MERI/ NCDTVET-PIU.
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
Network analysis as a method of evaluating support of enterprise networks in ERDF projects Tamás Lahdelma (Urban Research TA, Finland)
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
Capacity Building in: GEO Strategic Plan 2016 – 2025 and Work Programme 2016 Andiswa Mlisa GEO Secretariat Workshop on Capacity Building and Developing.
Moving away from the fish-eye view Integrating Surveys for the Ecosystem Approach 29 May 2013, Ingeborg de Boois (WGISUR)
UNGGIM – PRIVATE SECTOR NETWORK. AGENDA > OVERVIEW OF PRIVATE SECTOR >PURPOSE AND VISION OF PRIVATE SECTOR NETWORK > STRUCTURE AND TERMS OF REFERENCE.
Follow-up Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for National R&D at NEDO -Part 1- ~Results from follow-up monitoring~ American Evaluation Association Conference.
The System Development Life Cycle
Systems Development Life Cycle
Title of presentation Copyright IDS and MeTA 2010
Science Fair Information.
Rebecca McQuaid Evaluation 101 …a focus on Programs Rebecca McQuaid
Science Fair Information.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 9. Periodic data collection methods.
Managing for Results Capacity in Higher Education Institutions
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
TAA04 TRAINING AND ASSESSMENT PACKAGE
Project Integration Management
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
HERE Seminar “Universities and social engagement”
Information Technology Project Management – Fifth Edition
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 7. Managers’ and stakeholders’ information needs.
Suzanne Le Menestrel, Ph.D.
The Observatory for European SMEs
Funded by the Erasmus+ Programme EPP JO-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP Lina Tsakalou
Program Evaluation Essentials-- Part 2
The System Development Life Cycle
Key Steps in the Culture Change Process
Project Plan Template (Help text appears in cursive on slides and in the notes field)
Marketing Plan – Year 1 & 2 Lean Landing.
16 May 2018 Briefing to the Portfolio Committee of the Department of Sport and Recreation portfolio on the review of the draft APP.
Developing an Evaluation Plan
Peer eXchange & Learning
Evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of change plans
PORTFOLIOS Footer Text 11/27/2018.
ESF and Social Partners
7. EAFM process overview Version 1.
Understanding and Planning Business Reports and Proposals
Lean Landing Concept.
Developing an Evaluation Plan
Core Competencies of a World Class Customer Advisory Board
SuperBIO: Evaluation Els Van de Velde
Working Group on cultural statistics - Luxembourg 30 June/1 July 2008
Task Force 3, Cultural Industries Kutt Kommel
The Estonian experience with ex-ante evaluation – set-up and progress
Systems Development Life Cycle
7. EAFM cycle overview Essential EAFM Date • Place 1.
Technical and Advisory Meeting
UNIT No- III- Leverging Information System ( Investing strategy )
Gio.net First Proposal to discuss during Barcelona Meeting
ICES Strategy day
Member Survey of Process: Ratings of Satisfaction
2019 CIRS survey: Methodologies to improve decision-making documentation during medicines development and review – gap analysis Do you think your current.
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation Design Preliminary Lean Soft Landing for Micro SMEs 24 May 2016

Purpose of Today’s Session obtain a common understanding of how the project will be evaluated obtain a common understanding of the project’s logic model agree on indicators for measurement

The Logic Model In evaluation, the logic model illustrates the linkage between project activities and the expected short-term and long-term results. A common understanding of the logic model - and thereby the logic of the project – is important in order to determine the best indicators for measurement. A + B = C

The Logic Model for Lean Soft Landing for Micro SMEs Activities Short-term results Long-term results Development phase Joint development of a lean soft landing program and exchange network A functioning lean soft landing program and exchange network A long-term viable knowledge network for public business development entities in the North Sea Region Implementation phase Creation of profit-enhancing SME knowledge partnerships Marketable new products, services or processes resulting from the knowledge partnerships Increased turnover, export and/or employment of the participating SMEs

Why do Monitoring and Evaluation? The purpose of monitoring and evaluation is to: monitor the progress of project activities according to agreed deliverables and indicators for measurement make adaptations to the project implementation, if necessary evaluate whether the short-term and long-term results of the project has been achieved gather lessons learned and best practice (blueprint)

Overview of Evaluation Activities The approved project application outlines three main evaluation activities: 1. Ongoing Monitoring of Activities 2. Final Evaluation 3. Soft Landing Blue Print will be done by the national steering groups will be done by Center for Growth Analysis, Vaeksthus Sjaelland

1. Ongoing Monitoring of Activities What are the best indicators for ongoing monitoring of activity progress?

2. Final Evaluation I Final Evaluation The final evaluation documents the results of the project and provides data for the Soft Landing Blue Print. The results will be documented in a traditional evaluation report (digital and physical version) Final Evaluation Evaluation of the activities of the project, including SME satisfaction Evaluation of the participating SMEs’ short-term results from the project, i.e. knowledge partnerships and new products, services or processes Evaluation of the SMEs’ long-term results from the project, i.e. effect on turnover, export and employment (historical and future)

2. Final Evaluation II Data collection for the final evaluation consists of: Project documents Input from ongoing monitoring of activities Survey (SMEs) Interviews with SMEs Etc.

Examples: Survey questions regarding effect Do you expect that your participation in the project will result in an increase in your company’s annual turnover? Yes/no Do you expect that this increase in annual turnover will amount to be at least 20 %? When do you expect the increase in annual turnover to occur? Within 2 years Within 2-5 years After 5 years

3. Soft Landing Blue Print I Structural set-up Activities and processes Lessons learned ? SMEs Resources The Soft Landing Blue Print documents the design of the soft landing network using data from the final evaluation as well as new data, including: Project documents Interviews with national steering group members Etc. Structural set-up: How many incubators and other actors. Samarbejdsrelationer? Activities and processes: What has been offered to the SMEs. Samarbejdsrelationer? Resources: What type of organisations participated and what were their competencies. Money? SMEs: Who are the participating SMEs in terms of size, industry, etc. Learning points: What are the lessons learned from the network in terms of what worked well and what should be/has been changed? ? What else is relevant to describe the soft landing network?

3. Soft Landing Blue Print II Format: an illustrated and easy-to-read publication with more pictures, illustrations and graphs than words digital as well as physical version Can be presented at the North Sea Region SME Partnership Fair