Starter- Debriefing List the Six parts to a debriefing process.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment I. Outline Select a paper of interest Not a thought piece or a review Empirical research Get paper approved Produce 2,000 word report.
Advertisements

Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
The Art of Publishing Aka “just the facts ma’am”.
Writing for Publication
Basic Scientific Writing in English Lecture 3 Professor Ralph Kirby Faculty of Life Sciences Extension 7323 Room B322.
Experimental Psychology PSY 433
Publishing a Journal Article: An Overview of the Process Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH Texas A&M University
How to Write a Scientific Paper Hann-Chorng Kuo Department of Urology Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital.
Dr. Alireza Isfandyari-Moghaddam Department of Library and Information Studies, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan Branch
EMPRICAL RESEARCH REPORTS
Refereeing “And diff’ring judgements serve but to declare, That truth lies somewhere, if we knew but where.” – William Cowper, Hope.
11 Reasons Why Manuscripts are Rejected
G544 – Practical project SELF REPORT. Revision  Socrative quiz  In pairs – answer each question.  We will then discuss each answer given.
Mainly the Neck of the Hourglass: Methods, Results, Tables and Graphs, and Abstracts Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH Veterinary Integrative Biosciences.
What does peer review involve? Here are some of the aspects of the research that are scrutinised: Originality of the research The appropriateness of the.
 Answer six of the following questions about the text you brought to class to challenge your teacher. Why did you choose this particular reading to bring.
IADSR International Conference 2012 Aiwan-e-Iqbal Lahore, Pakistan 27–29 April 2012.
Starter Objectivity task one- booklet. Task Write instructions for someone to recreate your given picture.
G544 – Practical project SELF REPORT. Revision  Socrative quiz  In pairs – answer each question.  We will then discuss each answer given.
Module Requirements and Components NCSLP Summer Institute 2002.
Manuscript Review Prepared by Noni MacDonald MD FRCPc Editor-in-Chief Paediatrics and Child Health Former Editor-in -Chief CMAJ
Dealing with Reviews. Rejection hurts, but is it fatal?
PSY 219 – Academic Writing in Psychology Fall Çağ University Faculty of Arts and Sciences Department of Psychology Inst. Nilay Avcı Week 9.
ANOMALISTIC PSYCHOLOGY LESSON 1. ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS 1 & 2 Question 1: Directional (one-tailed is acceptable) Question 2: 1 mark for correctly stating.
PSYA4- research methods Section C. Validating new knowledge The role of peer review the assessment of scientific work by others who are experts in the.
Research methods revision The next couple of lessons will be focused on recapping and practicing exam questions on the following parts of the specification:
Scientific Literature and Communication Unit 3- Investigative Biology b) Scientific literature and communication.
Publishing research in a peer review journal: Strategies for success
AQA Religious Philosophical & Ethical Studies
Dr.V.Jaiganesh Professor
Academic writing.
PhD Program Requirements
UNIT 5: NON EXAMINED ASSESSMENT
Aim: To understand how to tackle the Paper 3 British History exam
Answering exam questions GCSE Physical Education
Year 1: Post Exam SSA Group poster presentation.
The peer review process
Parts of an Academic Paper
Discussion Section of a Scientific Paper
Paper 3 Issues and Debates Revision
Writing for “Innovations in Family Medicine Education”
Ways of measuring the brain
Please take a seat near the front of the lecture theatre. Thank you!
Reaching a wider audience: From conference paper to journal article, avoiding rejection Liz Marr, Open University.
Research Methods.
Lesson 5. Lesson 5 Extraneous variables Extraneous variable (EV) is a general term for any variable, other than the IV, that might affect the results.
Second Edition Chapter 3 Critically reviewing the literature
Apply Question based on what we learnt last lesson.
RESEARCH METHODS Trial
Experimental Psychology PSY 433
..
How to read a scientific paper
Psychology (A) old spec 2017
Reading Research Papers
Writing up a report.
Question 6 Read the examiners comments
Assessment - KS4 Create detailed revision materials for the work we have done so far Ask your teacher for help if you are not sure what works for you The.
Barbara Gastel INASP Associate
The Rosabeth Moss Kanter Award Module 2, Class 2 A Teaching Module Developed by the Curriculum Task Force of the Sloan Work and Family Research Network.
REFERENCES AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Paper One: Answering Question 4
Guidelines Dear author(s),
Exam technique.
How to write an Introduction?
How to answer each question 1 hour 20 minutes
Analyzing and Organizing Information
How to write an Introduction?
Peer Review: How scientists get their homework marked
Preparing students for assessments Janet Strain Ann Jakeman
Presentation transcript:

Starter- Debriefing List the Six parts to a debriefing process

Debriefing process 1. Thank participants 2. State the aims of the study 3. Point out relevant ethical concerns 4. Invite them to withdraw their data 5. Ask if they have any questions 6. Give contact details if they wish to ask any further questions

Standardised instructions Use your packs Number 2 on sheet for your practical

Report writing Look at the report 1.Identify the different sections of the report in the correct order 2. In your group identify what is included in your section Abstract Introduction/Lit review Method Results Discussion Consider type of language and communication Create your own checklist for your report Write brief notes on what goes in each section

Peer review Write on your whiteboard in groups What is a peer review? 3 reasons why we need to do it

Peer review In the peer review process, a paper is submitted to a journal and evaluated by several reviewers.  (Reviewers are often individuals with an impressive history of work in the area of interest, that is, the specific area that the article addresses).  After critiquing the paper the reviewers submit their thoughts to the editor.  Then, based on the commentaries from the reviewers, the editor decides whether to publish the paper, make suggestions for additional changes that could lead to publication, or reject the paper. The primary purpose of peer review is to ensure that the papers published are valid and unbiased.

Why bother? Research proposals will be scrutinized to check it is robust To ensure it can contribute to already existing knowledge Encourages academic debate, openness and communication Ensure there is no bias Appropriateness of conclusions drawn Ensure it is worth dissemination- journals Consider wider implications Find any errors Ensure it can be repeated

Peer reviewing your essays I am going to ask an A2 student in the other group to mark your timed essays. What might be the problems with this?

Ok ….I am going to get another teacher to mark your essays

Bias Reviewer Publication Reputation

Exam questions Mark the question(s) and provide points detailing what the student has or has not done well What is meant by peer review? (2 marks) Explain why peer review is an important aspect of the scientific process. (4 marks)

Examiners report Read the examiners report Write 3 things to avoid doing when answering a peer review question Write 3 things you must include when answering a peer review question

Questions or queries about research? Subject extensions Thursday 10:15 or 11:45 Essay Plan for Tomorrow/Friday