CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION Prof. JANICKE 2018.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 3: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY P. JANICKE 2012.
Advertisements

CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION P. JANICKE Chap Authentication2 AUTHENTICATION A SUBSET OF RELEVANCE AUTHENTICATION EVIDENCE IS –NEEDED BEFORE DOCUMENTS.
EVIDENCE Trial Procedures. What is the point of Evidence? Evidence is the way in which the Crown and the defence try to reconstruct the chain of events.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE P. JANICKE 2011.
Foundations for Documentary Evidence. Do Problem 52.
The Roles of Judge and Jury Court controls legal rulings in the trial Court controls legal rulings in the trial Jury decides factual issues Jury decides.
Mock Trial Modified by Dennis Gerl from Evidence PPT by John Ed-Bishop
Writings and Authentication. Writing defined: FRE 1001(1) Evid. Code § 250 See also FRE (2)-(4)(defines photos, original and duplicate) and Evid. Code.
Chapter is based on two parties battling to win the case, each acting as the adversary of the other. ROLE: to provide a procedure for the parties.
CHAP. 9 : OPINION EVIDENCE Prof. JANICKE OPINIONS ARE GENERALLY INADMISSIBLE RULE 602 REQUIRES ACTUAL “KNOWLEDGE” FOR MOST TYPES OF EVIDENCE KNOWLEDGE.
Trial advocacy workshop
Basic Evidence and Trial Procedure. Opening Statement  Preview the evidence “The evidence will show”  Introduce theme  Briefly describe the issues,
The Trial. I. Procedures A. Jury Selection 1. Impanel (select) a jury 2. Prosecutors and Defense lawyers pose questions to potential jurors (VOIR DIRE)
CHAPTER 4, PART 3 OF 3 RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2015.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE P. JANICKE 2008.
Courtroom Protocol and Technology
INTRODUCTION AND CHAP. 1 Prof. JANICKE Evid. Intro. + Chap. 1 2 THE SUBJECT IS: A BODY OF RULES, TELLING LAWYERS WHAT THEY CAN AND CAN’T (MOSTLY)
CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED Prof. JANICKE 2015.
1 PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE Learning Domain PURPOSE FOR THE RULES OF EVIDENCE Protect the jury from seeing or hearing evidence that is: (w/b p. 1-3)
CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION Prof. JANICKE Chap Authentication2 AUTHENTICATION A SUBSET OF RELEVANCE AUTHENTICATION EVIDENCE IS –NEEDED BEFORE.
INTRODUCTION AND CHAP. 1 P. JANICKE Evid. Intro. + Chap. 12 THE SUBJECT IS: A BODY OF (MOSTLY EXCLUSIONARY) RULES, TELLING LAWYERS WHAT THEY CAN.
ARKANSAS LEGAL AID OCTOBER 17, 2013 BY MICHAEL JOHNSON AND PAULA CASEY EXHIBITS.
CHAPTER 4, PART 3 OF 3 RULE 804: DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2014.
PROCEDURES IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, 8 th ed. Roberson, Wallace, and Stuckey PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ
Mock Trial Team Strategies and Formalities. Opening Statements 3 minutes Objective – Acquaint court with the case and outline what you are going to prove.
CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED P. JANICKE 2012.
INTRODUCTION AND CHAP. 1 P. JANICKE Evid. Intro. + Chap. 12 THE SUBJECT IS: A BODY OF (MOSTLY EXCLUSIONARY) RULES, TELLING LAWYERS WHAT THEY CAN.
INTRODUCTION AND CHAP. 1 Prof. JANICKE 2016.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
Chapter 1 Structure of the Trial & Presentation of Evidence
CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED
Unit B Customized by Professor Ludlum Nov. 30, 2016.
HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS THAT ARE LESS RELIABLE: RULE 804: DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2010.
CHAPTER 4, PART 3 OF 3 RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2016.
MBA Mock Trial Program Mock Trial Basics
HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS THAT ARE LESS RELIABLE: RULE 804: DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2012.
MBA Mock Trial Program Mock Trial Basics
CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAP. 9 : OPINION EVIDENCE
CHAP. 14: BEST EVIDENCE RULE
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 3: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY Prof. JANICKE 2018.
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 3: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY Prof. JANICKE 2016.
DEFENDING A DFPS CASE : TRIAL: PARENTS CASE
OBJECTIONS.
Principles of Evidence
CHAP. 9 : OPINION EVIDENCE
Crime Scene Investigation and Evidence Collection
Opinion Testimony, In General
How Witnesses are Examined
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION Prof. JANICKE 2016.
CHAP. 9 : OPINION EVIDENCE
INTRODUCTION AND CHAP. 1 P. JANICKE 2010.
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 2: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY P. JANICKE 2011.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAPTER 4, PART 3 OF 3 RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2015.
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 3: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY Prof. JANICKE 2015.
CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION P. JANICKE 2010.
MBA Mock Trial Program Mock Trial Basics
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAP. 7 : DIRECT AND CROSS REVISITED
CHAPTER 4, PARTS D-H RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW “UNAVAILABLE” Prof. Janicke 2019.
CHAP. 4, part A: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY
CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION Prof. JANICKE 2019.
CHAP. 9 : OPINION EVIDENCE
Presentation transcript:

CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION Prof. JANICKE 2018

Chap. 13 -- Authentication A SUBSET OF RELEVANCE AUTHENTICATION EVIDENCE IS NEEDED BEFORE DOCUMENTS AND TANGIBLE THINGS ARE RECEIVED IN EVIDENCE NOT NEEDED FOR TESTIMONY 2018 Chap. 13 -- Authentication

MEANING OF “AUTHENTICATION” PROOF: EVIDENCE THAT THE DOCUMENT (OR PHYSICAL THING) IS WHAT ITS PROPONENT CONTENDS IT IS EXAMPLE: THE STEERING WHEEL FROM THE DEFENDANT’S CAR EXAMPLE: A CHECK WRITTEN AND SIGNED BY D. 2018 Chap. 13 -- Authentication

Chap. 13 -- Authentication DOES NOT DEPEND ON DOCUMENT BEING TRUTHFUL, OR CORRECT EXAMPLE – A FORGED CHECK IS “AUTHENTIC” IF THE PROPONENT (LAWYER OFFERING) CONTENDS IT’S A FORGED CHECK EXAMPLE – A COUNTERFEIT BILL, OFFERED BY THE GOVERNMENT IN A COUNTERFEITING CASE, IS “AUTHENTIC” IF THE GOVERNMENT CONTENDS IT IS COUNTERFEIT 2018 Chap. 13 -- Authentication

PROPONENT CONTROLS HOW MUCH FOUNDATION EVIDENCE IS NEEDED SHE CAN DECIDE WHAT HER CONTENTION IS: A STEERING WHEEL FROM A ’99 FORD EXPLORER, vs. THE STEERING WHEEL FROM P’S ’99 FORD EXPLORER AN AXE OF THE ZZZ TYPE, vs. THE MURDER WEAPON IN THIS CASE 2018 Chap. 13 -- Authentication

Chap. 13 -- Authentication STILL NEED RELEVANCE MUST OF COURSE STAY WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF RELEVANCE IF “A STEERING WHEEL” HAS NO RELEVANCE, AUTHENTICATION ALONE WON’T ALLOW IT IN 2018 Chap. 13 -- Authentication

Chap. 13 -- Authentication CHAIN OF CUSTODY IS ONE METHOD OF AUTHENTICATING ITEMS THAT COULD HAVE BEEN ALTERED NO HARD-AND-FAST REQUIREMENTS CHAIN WITH BROKEN LINKS SOMETIMES RULED O.K. 2018 Chap. 13 -- Authentication

TAKING THE AUTHENTICATING WITNESS ON VOIR DIRE [TEXAS : PRONOUNCED “VORR DYER”] REST OF U.S.: “VWAHR DEER” COURT PERMISSION NEEDED FOR VOIR DIRE, PER RULE 611 BUT PERMISSION IS OFTEN ASSUMED 2018 Chap. 13 -- Authentication

Chap. 13 -- Authentication IT IS GENERALLY IMPROPER TO TAKE THE AUTHENTICATING WITNESS ON VOIR DIRE PRIOR TO TIME WHEN THE DOCUMENT OR OBJECT IS OFFERED IN EVIDENCE WOULD UNDULY INTERRUPT THE FOUNDATION EVIDENCE OF THE PROPONENT BUT UPON THE OFFER, VOIR DIRE IS NORMAL 2018 Chap. 13 -- Authentication

Chap. 13 -- Authentication 2 PURPOSES OF VOIR DIRE TO DEFEAT THE FOUNDATION AND KEEP THE ITEM OUT OF EVIDENCE IF THE ITEM COMES IN, TO WEAKEN ITS IMPACT 2018 Chap. 13 -- Authentication

Chap. 13 -- Authentication JUDGE IS GATEKEEPER, AS USUAL JUDGE’S RULING IS NOT BINDING ON THE JURY JUDGE IS NOT BOUND BY EVIDENCE RULES (EXCEPT PRIVILEGE) 2018 Chap. 13 -- Authentication

JURY IS THE ULTIMATE DECIDER OF ALL FACTS (INCLUDING AUTHENTICITY) THEREFORE, MOST LAWYERS CHOOSE AN AUTHENTICATION METHOD THAT FOLLOWS THE RULES OF EVIDENCE AND CAN BE INTRODUCED IN JURY’S PRESENCE 2018 Chap. 13 -- Authentication

WAYS TO AUTHENTICATE [RULE 901(b)] TEN ARE LISTED IN THE RULE LIST IS ILLUSTRATIVE, NOT EXCLUSIVE 2018 Chap. 13 -- Authentication

Chap. 13 -- Authentication #1: TESTIMONY FROM A LAY WITNESS WITH KNOWLEDGE THE MOST TRADITIONAL WAY PROBABLY THE MOST DRAMATIC DON’T LEAD! (IT RUINS THE DRAMA) 2018 Chap. 13 -- Authentication

Chap. 13 -- Authentication AFFIDAVIT TESTIMONY ON AUTHENTICITY IS OK OFTEN USED IN BENCH TRIALS IN JURY TRIALS, AFFIDAVITS ARE INADMISSIBLE HEARSAY ON THE MERITS, BUT ARE OK FOR THE JUDGE TO RULE ON FOUNDATION QUESTIONS RULES OF EVIDENCE DON’T APPLY 2018 Chap. 13 -- Authentication

PROS AND CONS OF AFFID. PRACTICE PRO: CAN’T BE CROSS-EXAMINED CON: JURY CAN’T NORMALLY SEE THE AFFIDAVIT R. 103(b), 104(c) 2018 Chap. 13 -- Authentication

Chap. 13 -- Authentication METHOD #3: COMPARISON BY EXPERT WITNESS OR BY JURY COMPARISON TO PREVIOUSLY ADMITTED SPECIMENS WITH JURY, THERE’S NO WAY FOR THEM TO PRE-ANNOUNCE THEIR RULING ON AUTHENTICITY (LEFT IN THE AIR) 2018 Chap. 13 -- Authentication

Chap. 13 -- Authentication METHOD #4: DISTINCTIVE CHARACTERISTICS PROBLEM: POINTING THEM OUT WITHOUT A WITNESS WORKABLE ONLY IN BENCH TRIALS 2018 Chap. 13 -- Authentication

VOICE AUTHENTICATION METHOD #5 REQUIRES FAMILIARITY BUT IT CAN BE ACQUIRED AFTER A PHONE CALL IN QUESTION E.G., BY HEARING A PARTY SPEAK IN COURTROOM OR IN A DEPOSITION 2018 Chap. 13 -- Authentication

ALTERNATE VOICE AUTHENTICATION METHOD #6 – FOR PHONE CALLS, TESTIMONY THAT X’S PHONE NUMBER WAS DIALED AND CIRCUMSTANCES SUGGEST X WAS ON THE LINE CAN INCLUDE SELF-IDENTIFICATION SIMILAR PROCEDURE FOR A BUSINESS 2018 Chap. 13 -- Authentication

Chap. 13 -- Authentication N.B.: AUTHENTICATING A DOCUMENT OR RECORDING DOES NOT OVERCOME THE HEARSAY RULE THAT MUST BE SEPARATELY ADDRESSED 2018 Chap. 13 -- Authentication

Chap. 13 -- Authentication PROBLEMS/CASES Johnson Bagarich 13B 13C 13E 2018 Chap. 13 -- Authentication

SELF-AUTHENTICATING DOCUMENTS [RULE 902] PUBLIC DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL PUBLIC DOCUMENTS NOT UNDER SEAL, BUT WITH SEALED ATTESTATION SHEET ATTACHED GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS NEWSPAPERS AND PERIODICALS 2018 Chap. 13 -- Authentication

Chap. 13 -- Authentication TRADEMARKS ON GOODS OR PREMISES INCLUDES CORPORATE LOGOS DOCUMENTS WITH PRIVATE SIGNATURES, BUT ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE A NOTARY BUSINESS RECORDS WITH DECLARATION 2018 Chap. 13 -- Authentication

Chap. 13 -- Authentication PROBLEMS/CASES 13J 2018 Chap. 13 -- Authentication