2-Channel Option for 11g (proposal)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /220r0 Submission March 2002 A. Batra et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Proposal for a 4 Channel Option to Increase Capacity in the.
Advertisements

1 IEEE MBWA Standard Project Contribution: C xx Date: May RF Performance Evaluation Criteria Dan Gal
Simulation and Evaluation of Various Block Assignments Evaluation of multiple carriers deployed in a channel block evaluation criteria section.
January 6, 2002doc.: IEEE /044r0 SubmissionRishi Mohindra, MAXIMSlide 1 Proposal for IEEE802.11g Receiver Adjacent Channel Rejection Requirement.
Doc.: IEEE /0229r0 Submission February 2012 Assaf Kasher, IntelSlide 1 Transmit Mask Correction Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE p Submission September 2008 Carl Kain, Noblis (USDOT) Response to Comments on Optional Enhanced ACR and AACR Values Date:
2.4-GHZ RF TRANSCEIVER FOR IEEE B WIRELESS LAN UF# UF#
Welcome to EQ2430/EQ2440 RF lecture
DMG-12/00 Page 1 April 23, 2002 Digital Communications Basics Dan M. Goebel 4/23/2002.
60 GHz Impairments Modeling
Preliminary Coexistence Tests The same wireless signal was used as the victim: – Power Level = 0 dBm – BW = 20 MHz – Center Frequency = GHz.
Doc.: IEEE /283 Submission Sept/00 M. Webster and K. HalfordSlide 1 Spectral Mask Considerations for HRb Mark Webster and Karen Halford.
Doc.: IEEE /0935r0 Submission July 2012 Vinko Erceg, Broadcom 6-10GHz UWB Link Budget and Discussion Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks(WPANs) Submission Title: Link Budget for m Date Submitted: 5 March 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /383 Submission November1998November 1998 Jamshid Khun-Jush, ETSI-BRANSlide 1 BRAN#11 PHY Decisions & Issues to Resolved with
July 2002doc.: IEEE /420r0 Submission Rishi Mohindra, MAXIMSlide 1 2-Channel Option for 11g (proposal) Rishi Mohindra MAXIM Integrated Products.
Doc.: IEEE /1062r0 Submission Zhendong Luo, CATR September 2010 RF Feasibility of 120 MHz Channelization for China Date: Authors: Slide.
1 1 Lab. 9 Signal Analyzer  Signal/spectrum analyzer (SA): an equipment analyzing spectrum properties of signals.
DO Rev B & SVDO Arnab Chakrabarti, Vikram Gupta, Tao Chen 1/12/2016QUALCOMM Confidential and Proprietary1.
Doc.:IEEE m Submission January n Spectrum Mask Alignment Date: Slide 1 Authors: Bijoy Bhukania, Broadcom.
Doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 1 Power Amp Effects for HRb OFDM Paul Chiuchiolo and.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission May 1, 2009 Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM Slide 1 Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Simulation Data for Letter Ballot Comments on Quasi-guard Subcarriers and Reverse Link Waveform Lai King (Anna) Tee January 15, 2007.
Simulation of Multiple Transmitter Communication System Using IT++
IEEE n Submission Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:LB93 Comment resolution.
Doc.: IEEE /0039r2 Submission Nov 2010 Raja Banerjea, Marvell SemiconductorSlide 1 Transmit Spectral Mask Changes Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE m Submission January n Spectrum Mask Alignment Date: Slide 1 Authors: Bijoy Bhukania, Broadcom.
Challenges in making WiFi Chips. Access Point – Connects to Internet and provides Wireless Access to Devices including Smart phones, Tabs, Laptops INTERNET.
Validation items and major Conditions
Submission Title: OFDM PHY proposal for SUN
Adjacent Channel results for Four Channels
Channelization for HRb OFDM
Spectrum Mask in IEEE802.11p Date: Authors: March 2008
Text proposal for using receiver information
3GPP TSG RAN Meeting #67 Shanghai, China, 9 – 12 March, 2015
TX Masks Date: Authors: January 2017
Submission Title: OFDM PHY proposal for SUN
DCM SQPSK for Channel Aggregation in 11ay
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Adjacent Channel results for Four Channels
Spectrum Mask in IEEE802.11p Date: Authors: March 2008
PPM Sensitivity of 10 MHz OFDM Channels
5G Micro Cell Deployment in Coexistence with Fixed Service
Rishi Mohindra MAXIM Integrated Products
DCM SQPSK for Channel Aggregation in 11ay
Submission Title: Link Budget for m
Submission Title: FPP-SUN Bad Urban GFSK vs OFDM
Submission Title: FPP-SUN Bad Urban GFSK vs OFDM
Open Rack Specification 2.1 Update
Investigation of PA Model Sample Rate for TGac
Text proposal for using receiver information
March, 2003 doc.: IEEE /127r0 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Alternate PHY.
Transmit Spectral Mask Changes
Spectral Control Issues for TGg
Transmit Spectral Mask Changes
PHY Mask Issues Date: Authors: November 2006 November 2006
Response to Comments on Optional Enhanced ACR and AACR Values
Text proposal for using receiver information
Response to Comments on Optional Enhanced ACR and AACR Values
April 24, Study Group 1 A Regulatory Framework for Use of TV Channels by Part 15 Devices John Notor, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
DCM SQPSK for Channel Aggregation in 11ay
Optimizing OOK Waveform for High Data Rate WUS
White Space Regulatory Issues
August 2008 doc: IEEE c Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Responses.
Text proposal for using receiver information
4 Channel Special Committee Report
Month Year doc.: IEEE y18/r0 March 2018
Transmit OOB emission Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
RF Feasibility of 120 MHz Channelization for China
Month Year doc.: IEEE y18/r0 March 2018
Presentation transcript:

2-Channel Option for 11g (proposal) Rishi Mohindra MAXIM Integrated Products Rishi_Mohindra@maximhq.com Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM

Motivation for 2-channel option Adjacent channel interference Reduce ACI to 11b level Not have to additionally backoff Transmit level by 1.5 dB relative to 11a FCC Forbidden Band Compliance. Not have to backoff transmit level by 3 to 6 dB over 66% of channel capacity, to be FCC compliant (see appendix) No range or network throughput penalty Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM

Existing 3-channels in 11g 22 MHz 25 MHz 25 MHz 21.5 MHz 3 to 6 dB FCC forbidden band FCC forbidden band 2412 MHz (#1) 2437 MHz (#6) 2462 MHz (#11) Drawbacks for 11g: Adjacent channel interference: above 11b levels for OFDM (25 MHz channel spacing) Transmit Power Reduction: up to 6 dB less OFDM transmit power at outer channels in order to be FCC compliant Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM

2-channel Scenario Improvements for 11g: 32 MHz 30 MHz 31.5 MHz FCC forbidden band FCC forbidden band 2422 MHz (#3) 2452 MHz (#9) Improvements for 11g: Adjacent channel interference at 11b levels (30 MHz channel spacing) No Transmit Power Reduction in order to be FCC compliant (11a spectral mask sufficient) Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM

Tighter Spectral Mask Issue Proposed in 11-02-3471r1-G-Spectral_Control_Issues_for_TGg 1.5 dB penalty in Transmit Power for middle channel (BPSK, QPSK, 16QAM) Not relevant over 66% of channel capacity (two “Outer Channels”) as they already require 3 to 6 dB additional Transmit power backoff to be FCC compliant. Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM

Tighter Spectral Mask ? Drawbacks for tighter spectral mask: 2412 MHz (#1) 2437 MHz (#6) 2462 MHz (#11) FCC forbidden band 22 MHz 25 MHz 21.5 MHz -3 to -6 dB -1.5 dB Drawbacks for tighter spectral mask: All channels with reduced power: 1.5 dB for center channel 3 to 6 dB for outer channels Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM

Channel Occupancy Issue Currently “Center” channel is occupied by the first installed network 2nd network (11g based) forced to “Outer” channel, and must operate at lower power (FCC compliant) with reduced network capacity Very Low probability of 3 channels operating in same area Why penalise the 2nd network? Adopt 2-channel as an option: both networks can operate at full power (dictated by 11a EVM and spectral mask) Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM

Proposal to instruct editor Add the following text (shown underlined): 19.4.3.8.2 Operating Channel Frequencies   Operating channel frequencies of 2422 MHz and 2452 MHz (channels 3 and 9) are preferred in order to a) maximize transmit power while being FCC compliant, and b) to reduce adjacent channel interference. Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM

APPENDIX Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM

Simulation Model Used Rapps model 2400 MHz 2400 MHz OFDM source Power Time domain Power measurement Rapps model 2400 MHz Power 2400 MHz OFDM source BW=20 MHz 2422 MHz No spectrum analyzer used avoids frequency leakage avoids errors due to Windowing Power Noise BW=1 MHz Elliptic (N=6, 0.5dB ripple BW of 1 MHz, 85 dB rejection) Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM

Results Rapps model for Transmitter: Reference Case for BPSK OFDM: P = 2.3, Psaturation = 24.2 dBm Reference Case for BPSK OFDM: Backoff = 4.29 dB Output power = 19 dBm Power at 22 MHz = -30.3 dBm/MHz (fails FCC) Reference Case for 64QAM OFDM: Backoff = 7 dB EVM = -25 dB Output power = 16.8 dBm Power at 22 MHz = -37 dBm/MHz (fails FCC) Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM

Effect of Increased Backoff From Psat (dB) Output Power (dBm) Power at 22MHz (dBm/MHz) Increase in backoff (dB) BPSK 4.29 19 -30.3 0 (reference) 8.3 15.7 -42.3 4 9.3 14.7 -46 5 64 QAM 7 16.8 -37 2.7 9 15 -43.4 4.7 10 14 -47.8 5.7 Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM

Real RF Power Amplifier Why is measured power at 22 MHz offset more than simulation results ? Rapps model is only AM/AM distortion It does not model AM/PM distortion It does not model MEMORY effects Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM

Real PA Modulated Gain In Cartesian Plane Shows: AM/AM AM/PM Memory Effects Area enclosed = memory effects Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM

2-channel impact on FCC forbidden band Distance from forbidden band increases from 22 to 32 MHz Emission level decreases by 14 dB (see spectrum next page) Effective reduction in backoff up to 7 dB (for 2:1 slope of ACPR:Backoff) Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM

Simulated Spectrum 22 MHz (fails FCC) 14 dB 31.5 MHz (passes FCC) Rishi Mohindra, MAXIM