Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure 1 Food, nutrition, obesity, physical activity, and the cellular processes linked to cancer Figure 1 | Food, nutrition, obesity, physical activity,
Advertisements

Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 2 Underreporting by physicians of specific treatment-associated symptoms by physicians in the TORCH trial Figure 2 | Underreporting by physicians.
Figure 2 Response after initial increase in total tumour burden
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 1 Concept of the therapeutic index
Figure 5 Schematic illustration of different clinical trial designs
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 3 Monitoring clonal evolution using liquid biopsies
Figure 1 Key time points in the discovery and development of imatinib for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) and gastrointestinal stromal.
Figure 2 Three-step approach to the assessment and management
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 2 Copy-number variations in multiple myeloma
Figure 5 Identification of mucinous carcinoma
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 6 Double opposed-field irradiation of an idealized geometry
Figure 1 Underreporting of treatment-related toxicities by physicians, relative to patients with either advanced-stage lung cancer, or early-stage breast.
Figure 2 Therapeutic targeting of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway
Figure 1 Proposed treatment algorithm for advanced gastroesophageal cancer based on publish recommendations Figure 1 | Proposed treatment algorithm for.
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 4 Example of a patients with CUP
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 1 CAR-T-cell design
Figure 2 Examples of histopathological validation
Figure 4 Effects of delaying cardioprotective medications after anthracycline administration Figure 4 | Effects of delaying cardioprotective medications.
Figure 1 Cost of one month of treatment with
Figure 2 The association between CD8+ T‑cell density of the tumour
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 3 Drug cycling with collateral sensitivity
Figure 4 Road to targeting mutant p53
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 2 Differences between MC and AC
Figure 3 Possible modalities for reconciliation of patient's and physician's report of symptomatic treatment-associated toxicities Figure 3 | Possible.
chemotherapy for patients with MC versus those with AC
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 2 Nonmalignant tissue can be spared from radiation
Figure 4 Treatment plans using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 3 Summary of overall survival by Kaplan–Meier
Figure 3 Clinical trial design in charged-particle therapy (CPT)
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 2 Median monthly launch price of a new anticancer drug,
Figure 1 Translocations involved in multiple myeloma
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 2 Host immune responses, not the radiosensitivity
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 5 Palliative-care-referral patterns
Figure 2 Frequency and overlap of alterations
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 2 Variations between planned and delivered doses of radiation
Figure 6 Proposed model of clonal evolution in multiple myeloma
Figure 3 Tumours secrete factors that cause systemic immunosuppression
Figure 5 Schematic overview of a clinical decision-support
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 7 Overview of the methodological processes for
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 4 Radiogenomics analysis can reveal relationships
Figure 2 Radiomics in cardiology
Figure 1 Overview of the imaging biomarker roadmap
Figure 3 Determination of the primary site
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Presentation transcript:

Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.219 Figure 1 Updated algorithm for personalized allocation of first-line treatments in patients with mCRC Figure 1 | Updated algorithm for personalized allocation of first-line treatments in patients with mCRC. We propose this updated version of the algorithm originally presented in our 2015 Perspectives article in this journal1, in order to reflect the importance of the primary tumour location — or 'sidedness' — to treatment decision-making. Cremolini, C. et al. (2017) First-line therapy for mCRC — the influence of primary tumour location on the therapeutic algorithm Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.219