Supervised Classification

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
With support from: NSF DUE in partnership with: George McLeod Prepared by: Geospatial Technician Education Through Virginia’s Community Colleges.
Advertisements

VEGETATION MAPPING FOR LANDFIRE National Implementation.
Major Operations of Digital Image Processing (DIP) Image Quality Assessment Radiometric Correction Geometric Correction Image Classification Introduction.
Lacy Smith Geog /13/2010. Project Sites & Background.
PRESENTATION ON “ Processing Of Satellite Image Using Dip ” by B a n d a s r e e n i v a s Assistant Professor Department of Electronics & Communication.
Radiometric and Geometric Errors
Desheng Liu, Maggi Kelly and Peng Gong Dept. of Environmental Science, Policy & Management University of California, Berkeley May 18, 2005 Classifying.
Multiple Criteria for Evaluating Land Cover Classification Algorithms Summary of a paper by R.S. DeFries and Jonathan Cheung-Wai Chan April, 2000 Remote.
Change analysis of Northborough, Massachusetts, Kristopher Kuzera and Silvia Petrova 1987 LANDSAT TM – 30m resolution False Color Composite Bands.
An Overview of RS Image Clustering and Classification by Miles Logsdon with thanks to Robin Weeks Frank Westerlund.
Image Classification.
Use of Remote Sensing in Forestry Applications Murat Tunç Murat Tunç
Lecture 14: Classification Thursday 18 February 2010 Reading: Ch – 7.19 Last lecture: Spectral Mixture Analysis.
Image Classification To automatically categorize all pixels in an image into land cover classes or themes.
Classification of Remotely Sensed Data General Classification Concepts Unsupervised Classifications.
Lecture 14: Classification Thursday 19 February Reading: “Estimating Sub-pixel Surface Roughness Using Remotely Sensed Stereoscopic Data” pdf preprint.
INTRODUCTION TO REMOTE SENSING & DIGITAL IMAGE PROCESSING Course: Introduction to RS & DIP Mirza Muhammad Waqar Contact:
Image Classification: Supervised Methods
Image Classification
A Statistically Valid Method for Using FIA Plots to Guide Spectral Class Rejection in Producing Stratification Maps Mike Hoppus & Andrew Lister USDA-Forest.
Image Classification and its Applications
Rsensing6_khairul 1 Image Classification Image Classification uses the spectral information represented by the digital numbers in one or more spectral.
Image Classification: Introduction Lecture Notes 6 prepared by R. Lathrop 11/99 updated 3/04 Readings: ERDAS Field Guide 6th Ed. CH. 6.
Exercise #5: Supervised Classification. Step 1. Delineating Training Sites and Generating Signatures An individual training site is delineated as an “area.
1 Urban Growth Simulation A Case Study of Indianapolis Sharaf Alkheder & Jie Shan School of Civil Engineering Purdue University March 10, 2005.
Land Cover Classification Defining the pieces that make up the puzzle.
Image Classification Digital Image Processing Techniques Image Restoration Image Enhancement Image Classification Image Classification.
INDICES FOR INFORMATION EXTRACTION FROM SATELLITE IMAGERY Course: Introduction to RS & DIP Mirza Muhammad Waqar Contact:
Summer Session 09 August Tips for the Final Exam Make sure your answers clear, without convoluted language. Read questions carefully – are you answering.
Image Classification 영상분류
Remote Sensing Supervised Image Classification. Supervised Image Classification ► An image classification procedure that requires interaction with the.
Course: Introduction to RS & DIP
CHAPTER 12 The Classification Problem CLASSIFICATION A. Dermanis.
 Up to what level of classification can we perform on LISSIII/LISSIV data?  Is any advantage of high spectral resolution of LISSIII over LISSIV. If.
Chapter 8 Remote Sensing & GIS Integration. Basics EM spectrum: fig p. 268 reflected emitted detection film sensor atmospheric attenuation.
Map of the Great Divide Basin, Wyoming, created using a neural network and used to find likely fossil beds See:
Digital Image Processing
Application of spatial autocorrelation analysis in determining optimal classification method and detecting land cover change from remotely sensed data.
Hyperspectral remote sensing
Supervised Classification in Imagine D. Meyer E. Wood
Remote Sensing Unsupervised Image Classification.
SPATIAL FILTERS Course: Introduction to RS & DIP Mirza Muhammad Waqar Contact: EXT:2257 RG610.
Sub pixelclassification
Unsupervised Classification
ADAPTIVE HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFICATION WITH LIMITED TRAINING DATA Dissertation Defense of Joseph Troy Morgan Committee: Dr Melba Crawford Dr J. Wesley Barnes.
TARGET FINDING WITH SAM AND BANDMAX Course: Special Topics in Remote Sensing & GIS Mirza Muhammad Waqar Contact:
High resolution product by SVM. L’Aquila experience and prospects for the validation site R. Anniballe DIET- Sapienza University of Rome.
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
Quantifying Analyst Bias in Mapping Flooded Areas from Landsat Images
Supervised Training and Classification
Factsheet # 12 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution.
HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DIFFERENT CROPS USING
Classification of Remotely Sensed Data
Map of the Great Divide Basin, Wyoming, created using a neural network and used to find likely fossil beds See:
Incorporating Ancillary Data for Classification
University College London (UCL), UK
الدكتور: أحمد رأفت غضية صفاء عبد الجليل كامل حمادة
REMOTE SENSING Multispectral Image Classification
REMOTE SENSING Multispectral Image Classification
Expert/rule based classification
Assessment of data quality
Unsupervised Classification
Image Information Extraction
Supervised vs. unsupervised Learning
University College London (UCL), UK
ALI assignment – see amended instructions
Mirza Muhammad Waqar PhD Scholar Website:
EM Algorithm and its Applications
Remote Sensing Landscape Changes Before and After King Fire 2014
Calculating land use change in west linn from
Presentation transcript:

Supervised Classification Mirza Muhammad Waqar Contact: mirza.waqar@ist.edu.pk +92-21-34650765-79 EXT:2257 RG610 Course: Introduction to RS & DIP

Contents Hard vs Soft Classification Supervised Classification Training Stage Field Truthing Inter class vs Intra Class Variability Classification Stage Minimum Distance to Mean Classifier Parallelepiped Classifier Maximum Likelihood Classifier Output Stage Supervised vs Unsupervised Classification These are the contents of my presentation.

Hard vs Soft Classification Hard Classification In hard classification, we can assign mixed pixels are pure pixels. It means we create an additive error in our pure class. Soft Classification In soft classification, for mix pixels, we identify the dominance and co-dominance factors in pixel. Through this analysis we can identify at the most three classes in one pixel. Though this analysis we can’t identify a class that is contributing less than 20% in the pixel.

Supervised Classification Such Classification, in which human interruption involve. Totally human decision dependent. Analyst define training sites, and on the base of these training sites, clusters formed.

Supervised Classification There are three phase in supervised classification. Training stage Classification stage Output stage

Training Stage Clear objective of classification Experiment on the image for understanding different land covers exit in the image. Identify the major variations in the image (hot spots). Any spectral variation that is new for analyst. Create multiple false color composites of ground truthing area. Ground truthing for hot spots identification.

Field Truthing Alternate for not accessible hot spots Historical data Local person’s knowledge High resolution imagery

Inter-Class Variability vs Intra-Class Variability It means variability among different classes in satellite image. Separating different land cover classes in satellite image. Accuracy of classification is dependent on inter- class variability/separability.

Inter Class Variability

Intra-Class Variability Within class variability. Used to map sub types of land covers, e.g. forest, bare soil, rocks etc. Feature space is a useful tool for within-class variability but the prediction through feature space is totally dependent on spectral signature. An appropriate feature space should be choose for intra-class variability.

Classification Stage There are three classifier. Minimum Distance to Mean Classifier Parallelepiped Classifier Maximum Likelihood Classifier

Minimum Distance to Mean Classifier

Parallelepiped Classifier

Maximum Likelihood Classifier

Output Stage In output stage, we define the level of classification. Create final classes. Accuracy Assessment Area estimation.

Supervised vs. Unsupervised Select Training fields Run clustering algorithm Edit/evaluate signatures Identify classes Classify image Edit/evaluate signatures Evaluate classification Evaluate classification

Questions & Discussion