Jingfeng Zhang, Fang Liu, Kris Innanen and Arthur B. Weglein

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
55:148 Digital Image Processing Chapter 11 3D Vision, Geometry Topics: Basics of projective geometry Points and hyperplanes in projective space Homography.
Advertisements

Chapter 7 – Solving Systems of Linear Equations 7.3 – Solving Linear Systems by Linear Combinations.
AGENDA Tuesday, April 30, :00 PM Welcome Reception – El Fortin Lawn Wednesday May 1, 2013 – San Gabriel Room 7:00 AM Continental Breakfast - outside.
DIFFERENTIATING “COMBINED” FUNCTIONS ---PART I CONSTANT MULTIPLES, SUMS AND DIFFERENCES.
GG 450 Feb 27, 2008 Resistivity 2. Resistivity: Quantitative Interpretation - Flat interface Recall the angles that the current will take as it hits an.
Green’s theorem requires the wavefield P and its normal derivative P n on the measurement surface as the input. In marine exploration, an over/under cable.
PROCESSING FOR SUBSALT IMAGING: A NEW AND FIRST TWO WAY MIGRATION METHOD THAT AVOIDS ALL HIGH FREQUENCY ASYMPTOTIC ASSUMPTIONS AND IS EQUALLY EFFECTIVE.
Including headwaves in imaging and internal multiple attenuation theory Bogdan G. Nita Research Assistant Professor, Dept. of Physics University of Houston.
Development of source terms Resulting full Boltzmann Equation
Annual Meeting and Technical Review
Fang Liu and Arthur Weglein Houston, Texas May 12th, 2006
AGENDA Wednesday, May 28, :30 AM Welcome, program goals, objectives and overall strategy: Tutorial on the inverse scattering series and Green’s theorem.
examining the problem and its resolution
Inverse scattering terms for laterally-varying media
Definition of “outer” (energy) iteration
Imaging conditions in depth migration algorithms
Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using direct non-linear inversion method: an application to time-lapse seismic data Haiyan Zhang,
Arthur B. Weglein M-OSRP, University of Houston Oct 22nd, 2015
Xinglu Lin* and Arthur B. Weglein
A note: data requirements for inverse theory
Multi-dimensional depth imaging without an adequate velocity model
I. Tutorial: ISS imaging
The Multiple Attenuation TOOLBOX: PROGRESS, CHALLENGES and open issues
Kristopher Innanen†, †† and Arthur Weglein†† ††University of Houston,
Non-linear forward scattering series expressions for reflected-primary and transmitted-direct wavefield events Kristopher A. Innanen University of Houston.
Fang Liu, Arthur B. Weglein, Kristopher A. Innanen, Bogdan G. Nita
Deghosting of towed streamer and OBC data
Multiples Multiple attenuation reprint vol. A. Weglein & W. Dragoset
M-OSRP 2006 Annual Meeting, June 6, 2007
Free Surface Multiple Elimination
Accommodating the source (and receiver) array in the ISS free-surface multiple elimination algorithm: impact on interfering or proximal primaries and multiples.
Haiyan Zhang and Arthur B. Weglein
Issues in inverse scattering series primary processing: coupled tasks, lateral shifts, order, and band-limitation reconsidered Kristopher A. Innanen University.
Lasse Amundsen, Arne Reitan, and Børge Arntsen
Accuracy of the internal multiple prediction when the angle constraints method is applied to the ISS internal multiple attenuation algorithm. Hichem Ayadi.
Good afternoon everyone. My name is Jinlong Yang
Responding to pressing seismic E&P challenges
Review of the Green’s Theorem deghosting method
Kristopher Innanen** and Arthur Weglein* *University of Houston
M-OSRP Objectives To address and solve prioritized seismic E&P challenges (isolated task sub-series, intrinsic and circumstantial nonlinearity, and purposeful.
Kristopher Innanen and Arthur Weglein University of Houston
Source wavelet effects on the ISS internal multiple leading-order attenuation algorithm and its higher-order modification that accommodate issues that.
Calculating Investment Returns
Green’s theorem preprocessing and multiple attenuation;
Initial analysis and comparison of the wave equation and asymptotic prediction of a receiver experiment at depth for one-way propagating waves Chao Ma*,
Inverse scattering internal multiple elimination
M-OSRP 2006 Annual Meeting, June 5 ~ June 7, 2007
Maths Parent Workshop Thursday January 25th 2018
Chapter 8 Models and Decision Support
A first step towards the P wave only modeling plan
Haiyan Zhang and Arthur B. Weglein
Jing Wu* and Arthur B. Weglein
Direct horizontal image gathers without velocity or “ironing”
Some remarks on the leading order imaging series
Tutorial: ISS and ISS multiple removal
Adriana C. Ramírez and Arthur B. Weglein
Haiyan and Jingfeng Zhang proudly announce the birth of
Jingfeng Zhang and Arthur B. Weglein
Two comments about imaging closed forms
News Article Analysis Summary & Analysis.
Adriana Citlali Ramírez
Data modeling using Cagniard-de Hoop method
Remarks on Green’s Theorem for seismic interferometry
Haiyan Zhang and Arthur B. Weglein
The Method of Moments Lf = g where L is a linear operator
Prerequisites for all inverse seismic processing
The general output of the leading-order attenuator
Bogdan G. Nita *University of Houston M-OSRP Annual Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Towards understanding the intermediate activity within the inverse scattering series Jingfeng Zhang, Fang Liu, Kris Innanen and Arthur B. Weglein M-OSRP 2006 Annual Meeting, June 5 ~ June 7, 2007 M-OSRP report pages: 149-159

Key points LOIS is counter-intuitive, Some terms have been inadvertently included It’s just an intermediate step There are examples in inverse scattering subseries where intermediate steps seem to working at cross purposes to the overall goal. That apparent cross purposes is in fact entirely purposeful (e.g., FSMR). Careful consideration of the diagrams is necessary in order to seek further progress on imaging LOIS; HOIS two possibilities

Inverse Scattering Series Forward scattering (Born) Series: Definition of “data” Assume:

Inverse Scattering Series Linear Non-linear Imaging subseries

LOIS and HOIS Leading-Order Imaging Series: High-Order Imaging Series: 1. What are their the performance? 2. What difference it will make if the complicated argument moved to the other side of the equation? Count-intuitive

LOIS and HOIS Leading-Order Imaging Series: High-Order Imaging Series: 1. What are their the performance? 2. What difference it will make if the complicated argument moved to the other side of the equation? Count-intuitive

Performance of LOIS and HOIS LOIS: provides encouraging results for small contrast models HOIS: For 1D medium, HOIS can accurately locate the second interface Very good results even for big contrast models (e.g. salt model)

LOIS and HOIS Leading-Order Imaging Series: High-Order Imaging Series: 1. What are their the performance? 2. What difference it will make if the complicated argument moved to the other side of the equation? Count-intuitive

Leading Order Imaging Series distance to be shifted Z Z Count-intuitive Deeper medium contributes to the location of shallower interface Deeper events/primary has information that has nothing to do with the location of shallower interface

Leading Order Imaging Series distance to be shifted Z Z Deeper medium does not contributes to the location of shallower interface

High Order Imaging series Original “deduced” High-Order Imaging Series: This is Fang Liu’s intuitive leap: guarantee only shallower medium information will help the location of an interface Deeper events/primary has information that has nothing to do with the location of shallower interface

Why counter-intuitive LOIS results? Two possibilities: In the derivation of the original LOIS, we inadvertently collected terms that included contributions from deeper within the medium. There is no inadvertent collecting, this is just an intermediate step, after more imaging terms been added, comprehensible results will be obtained (i.e., deeper medium will not contribute). Example: ISS free surface multiple removal algorithm (Carvalho, 1992 and Weglein et.al., 1997)

FSMR results (point receiver data) 1st order FSM Using the 1st term in the ISS FSMR series

Free surface multiple removal

Concluding Remarks LOIS is counter-intuitive, Some terms have been inadvertently included It’s just an intermediate steps There are examples in inverse scattering subseries where intermediate steps seem to working at cross purposes to the overall goal. That apparent cross purposes is in fact entirely purposeful (e.g., FSMR). Careful consideration of the diagram is necessary in order to seek further progress on imaging LOIS; HOIS two possibilities

Acknowledgements M-OSRP sponsors and colleagues Simon Shaw (ConocoPhillips) are thanked for valuable discussions

ConocoPhillips, Geotrace, BP Thank you Prof. Weglein ConocoPhillips, Geotrace, BP