Child Care Research Roundtable

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Invest in Children Child Care Quality Fund: Accreditation and Literacy
Advertisements

Quality Rating & Improvement Systems Powerful Policy for Improving and Unifying Early Care and Education Anne Mitchell Early Childhood Policy Research.
Broward’s Infrastructure Design to Guide and Sustain Permanency for Young Foster Children (BRIDGES)
What Is An ABA Placement? Seattle University School of Law Administrative Law Judge Training October 19, 2011 Kathryn Dobel, JD Berkeley, California.
1 Child Care Quality Funds. Funding Proposals EEC is proposing to utilize funding from the Child Care Quality Fund in two ways for FY2014: 1. Amend Educator.
Embedding the Early Brain & Child Development Framework into Quality Rating and Improvement Systems Meeting Name Presenter Name Date 1.
Project Aim To provide training for Early Childhood Care Providers (ECCPs) on Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) principles within the EIBI autism classroom,
Supporting PreK Teachers During Act 3 Implementation.
10 Early Childhood Program Standards. Relationships  Promote positive relationships with all parents and children.  Children’s learning is encouraged.
4380 SW Macadam Ave., Ste. 530 Portland, OR (503) Informing policy, improving programs An Evaluation of the Lane County.
Minnesota’s Outcome Measurement System For Infants, Toddlers and Preschool Children with Disabilities and their Families, including young children with.
EQUIP is a public & private initiative to improve the quality of early care and education in Oregon. August, 2010 EQUIP is a public & private initiative.
Michelina Manzi, Ph.D. Developing the Child’s Early Literacy (Based on Implications from Recent Research on Certification Requirements in Reading of Childcare.
New Jersey Department of Education Division of Early Childhood Education March 3, 2009.
United Way of Greater Toledo - Framework for Education Priority community issue: Education – Prepare children to enter and graduate from school.
A Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) for Early Care and Education Settings.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators Evaluation Plan.
Performance and Progress 2005/2006. Introduction  Data collected during 2005/2006 fiscal year.  Who did our programs serve?  Did programs reach the.
Early Childhood Mental Health Consultation Early interventions with very young children (birth to 6 years of age) at risk of experiencing serious emotional.
Asset Building Strategies Mayors and Working Families: City Human Service Officials May 2, 2005.
The Case for Early Childhood. BHAG To be a leading social change agent that transformed greater Detroit into one of the top 5 places to live and work.
“Invest in Children” Child Care Quality Fund ’FY 14 1.
FLORIDABROWARD ECHOSFAIRECHOSFAIR Not Yet Demonstrating 9%4%12%3% Emerging/Progressi ng 38%26%53%23% Demonstrating53%70%35%74% 2012 Third GradeFLORIDABROWARD.
Minnesota Quality Rating and Improvement System Scaling Options: Presentation to Early Childhood Committee Anne Mitchell Louise Stoney MN Work Group February.
 This kind of thinking based on a lack of knowledge about the process of working with adults and about the needs of young children  Supervisors in early.
Great Start Collaborative-Wayne Collaborative Meeting November 16, 2015.
OKLAHOMA EARLY READING FIRST What We Are Learning Priscilla Griffith University of Oklahoma Go Sooners!
Navy EFMP Respite Care Bonnie Storm Director, Programs, Policy & Training © 2009 National Association of Child Care Resource & Referral AgenciesPresented.
Building Foundations for Early Learning. Family Place Libraries™ provides a developmental framework and comprehensive model for family centered library.
Child Care and Early Education. What will we learn today? Standard: – ET-ECE-11 Determine components of a well organized, developmentally appropriate.
Background Objectives Methods Study Design A program evaluation of WIHD AfterCare families utilizing data collected from self-report measures and demographic.
Bennington County Head Start Child Outcomes Midpoint Data Report.
Psychological Service Using a Relational Approach (Video Interaction Guidance: ViG and Video Enhanced Reflective Practice: VERP) to Improve Attunement,
Observing and Assessing Young Children
Susan Main Executive Director Early Learning Coalition of Duval EARLY LEARNING COALITION OF DUVAL Helping parents choose, preparing children to learn Presentation.
Module 3 Early ACCESS Process Section 3 Evaluation and Assessment Iowa Department of Education.
Class will start at the top of the hour! Please turn the volume up on your computer speakers to access the audio feature of this seminar. Also, check your.
Individual Family Service Plans vs
Infants & Toddlers with HL Chapter 14
Indiana Paths to QUALITY™ Child Care Quality Rating and Improvement System: Outcomes for Children and Child Care Providers James Elicker, Zachary Gold,
How Centerstone can help Improve Outcomes For Mothers and Babies
No Place Like HOME Texas Kick Off Meeting
Chapter 14 Early Childhood Special Education
WJCS Parent Child Home Program bridging the academic achievement gap
Maryland Healthy Transition Initiative
Policy & Advocacy Platform April 24, 2017
The Early Childhood Family Engagement Framework: Maryland’s Vision for Engaging Families with Young Children Jeffrey Capizzano President Maryland State.
FPG Child Development Institute
Dr. Amber Reed, School of Educational Leadership
Dana Keener, Ph.D. ICF Macro 2009 AEA Annual Meeting November 12, 2009
Georgia’s Pre-K Summer Transition Program
CHAPTER 7: Developmental Assessment
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
What IS a Collaborative?
Early Childhood.
Using Family Survey Data for Program Improvement
The Day My Parents Came to School
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
Established in Minneapolis in 1982
Texas Inclusion Activities Overview
Early Childhood Updates October 4, 2016
National Schools and additional needs support allocation. (Summary)
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Supporting Families Together Association
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Supporting Kinship Placements
The Day My Parents Came to School
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Basic Needs for Healthy Growth
Presentation transcript:

Child Care Research Roundtable An Evaluation of the Lane County Child Care Enhancement Project: Quality Improvement Outcomes Presented by Beth Green Sonia Worcel Child Care Research Roundtable October 1, 2008

What is the Child Care Enhancement Project? Funded through the Child Care Contribution Tax Credit Program administered by Family Connections at Lane Community College Interrelated Goals: Decrease the cost of quality child care Increase provider stability and wages Increase child care quality October 1, 2008

Program Components Parent Subsidies 2. Provider wage enhancements & financial supports 3. Individualized mentoring, networking & technical assistance October 1, 2008

What Was the CCEP Evaluation? 3-year process and outcome evaluation Data collected on CCEP & control providers (randomly assigned) and families Observations of child care facilities Surveys of providers Surveys & interviews with facility directors Surveys and interviews with parents October 1, 2008

Participating Facilities 2 CCEP child care centers (& 5 control centers) 12 CCEP family child care facilities (& 23 control) October 1, 2008

Quality Improvement Outcomes Quality measured by the QUEST Observations by trained data collectors Appropriate for family and center-based providers Quality of provider-child interactions Quality of environment and materials Quality improvement outcomes found ONLY for family child care providers October 1, 2008

Physical Environment CCEP family providers improved more in the quality of developmentally appropriate equipment October 1, 2008

Physical Environment CCEP family providers improved more in safety of furnishings & materials October 1, 2008

Physical Environment CCEP family providers improved more in quality of materials for language & literacy October 1, 2008

Curricula & Provider-Child Interactions CCEP family providers increased the amount of support for social emotional development October 1, 2008

Curricula & Provider-Child Interactions CCEP family providers provided more support than controls for cognitive development October 1, 2008

Curricula & Provider-Child Interactions CCEP family providers provided more support than controls for language & early literacy development October 1, 2008

Why did CCEP Result in Quality Improvement for Family Providers? CCEP providers (center and family) involved in more professional development activities October 1, 2008

Why Didn’t CCEP Result in Quality Changes for Center Providers? Shorter length of intervention & less intense intervention for center providers Length of time in CCEP Family Providers Center Providers <1 year 2 (14%) 3 (15%) 1- 2 years 1 (7%) 7 (35%) 2 - 3 years 3+ years 10 (71%) October 1, 2008

Summary: Quality Outcomes Strong quality improvement for family providers Not successful for center-based providers Center-based providers received less intervention, and may have been less engaged in networking and mentoring October 1, 2008

Summary: Other Outcomes CCEP Family providers were less likely to close (compared to controls) CCEP providers received significant wage enhancements (ranging from 1,00-$15,000) CCEP providers reported greater revenue stability Parents receiving subsidies purchased more hours of care, and reported fewer changes in childcare placements CCEP parents were more satisfied with childcare quality October 1, 2008