Collector and the SPL Super-Beam Project

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WP2: Targets Proposed Outline Work Programme Chris Densham.
Advertisements

EuroNu CERN February 5, 2008 Marco Zito Super-Beam work package Marco Zito Dapnia-Saclay On behalf of the SB w2 team EuroNu 5/2/2008 Thanks to M. Dracos.
ISS meeting, (1) R. Garoby (for the SPL study group) SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities at CERN:
2nd EuroNu Plenary Meeting Review of CERN Proton Driver bunch compression studies 02/06/2010M.M. - EUROnu1.
Participants WP3total Imperial College CERN STFC University Warwick CRNS University Oxford6 6 Total Euro  - WP3.
MARS15 Simulations of the MERIT Mercury Target Experiment Fermilab March 18, Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration meeting Sergei.
25/10/2007M. Dracos1 EURO The European Design Study for a high intensity neutrino oscillation facility (Rob Edgecock, Mats Lindroos, Marcos Dracos)
Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura On behalf of PRISM Target Group Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy A Pion Production and Capture System for a 4 MW Target Station X. Ding, D.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Baseline IDS-NF Plenary CERN March 23-24, 2009.
30 June 2008M. Dracos, NuFact081 Challenges and Progress on the SuperBeam Horn Design Marcos DRACOS IN2P3/CNRS Strasbourg NuFact 08 Valencia-Spain, June.
17 Dec. 2008M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP21 Collector and the SPL Super-Beam Project Marcos Dracos IPHC-IN2P3/CNRS Strasbourg.
The MERIT experiment at the CERN PS Leo Jenner MOPC087 WEPP169 WEPP170.
Neutrino Study Group Dec 21, 2001 Brookhaven Neutrino Super-BeamStephen Kahn Page 1 Horn and Solenoid Capture Systems for a BNL Neutrino Superbeam Steve.
Solid Target Options NuFACT’00 S. Childress Solid Target Options The choice of a primary beam target for the neutrino factory, with beam power of
RAL/BENE meeting, April Marcos Dracos Collection system for future neutrino beams horn and target integration 2 LoI's sent –CERN –Strasbourg.
LINAC4 STATUS Alessandra M. Lombardi for the LINAC4 team 1.Motivation and goals 2.Status of Linac4 2 years after official start of the project ( )
MOMENT Synergies with Other Projects Jingyu Tang Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS NuFact2015, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Aug , 2015.
EUROnu Target and Horn Studies Nikolaos Vassilopoulos/IPHC-CNRS on behalf of WP2 1ECFA Review PanelDarensbury, 02/05/2011.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy AGS Upgrade and Super Neutrino Beam DOE Annual HEP Program Review April 27-28, 2005 Derek I. Lowenstein.
Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK)
ESS based neutrino Super Beam for CP Violation discovery Marcos DRACOS IPHC-IN2P3/CNRS Strasbourg 1 20 August 2013M. Dracos.
1 Linac4 Overview M. Vretenar, SLHC Meeting, Motivations 2.Layout 3.Main parameters 4.Schedule 5.Status.
GDR NEUTRINO - SESSION April, LPNHE Neutrinos options at CERN R. Garoby – 27/04/2009.
Secondary Particle Production and Capture for Muon Accelerator Applications S.J. Brooks, RAL, Oxfordshire, UK Abstract Intense pulsed.
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
KT McDonald MAP Tech Board Meeting Oct 20, The MAP Targetry Program in FY11 and FY12 K. McDonald Princeton U. (Oct 20, 2011) MAP Technical Board.
June 23, 2005R. Garoby Introduction SPL+PDAC example Elements of comparison Linacs / Synchrotrons LINAC-BASED PROTON DRIVER.
R.G. 7/09/20101 Options for neutrinos. R.G. 7/09/20102 Conventional beam from the SPS (1/3) Neutrinos using the SPS Nominal CNGS 732 km baseline from.
CERN/BENE meeting, July Marcos Dracos Collection system for future neutrino beams horn and target integration 2 LoI's sent –CERN –Strasbourg Who.
RAL/ISS meeting, April Marcos Dracos Collection system, horn (work mainly done by Francis Osswald) goals and perspectives suppliers and collaborations.
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
The High Intensity Frontier Franco Cervelli INFN-Pisa 7 Nov, 2005.
1 PS Days - Evian / MV The SPL : a High-Power Superconducting H – Linac at CERN  Motivations  Applications  Design features  Improvements.
ESS based neutrino Super Beam for CP Violation discovery Marcos DRACOS IPHC-IN2P3/CNRS Strasbourg 1 10 September 2013M. Dracos.
IDS-NF Accelerator Baseline The Neutrino Factory [1, 2] based on the muon storage ring will be a precision tool to study the neutrino oscillations.It may.
THE DESIGN OF THE AGS-BASED PROTON DRIVER FOR NEUTRINO FACTORY W.T. WENG, BNL FFAG WORKSHOP JULY 7-11, 2003 KEK, JAPAN.
H. Haseroth Friday, August 31, 2001 MUG Meeting 1 Overview of the CERN Neutrino Factory Machine Studies H. Haseroth for the Neutrino Factory Working Group.
From the SPL to the 4-target-horn system: Preliminary design of a beam switching yard WP2: Super Beam 4 th EUROν Annual Meeting, Paris, June 13, 2012 E.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
Neutrino Factory by Zunbeltz, Davide, Margarita, Wolfgang IDS proposal.
Horn and Solenoid options in Neutrino Factory M. Yoshida, Osaka Univ. NuFact08, Valencia June 30th, A brief review of pion capture scheme in NuFact,
Marcos DRACOS IPHC-IN2P3/CNRS Université de Strasbourg
UK Neutrino Factory Conceptual Design
Proton Driver Scenarios at RAL and CERN
Challenges and Progress on the SB Horn Design
IPHC-IN2P3/CNRS Strasbourg
Horn and Solenoid Options in Neutrino Factory
The Accelerator Complex from the International Design Study
Plans for a Superconducting Proton Linac at CERN
EURO Super Beam studies
Status of the beta-beam study
Target and Horn status report
A medium baseline superbeam facility in China
Accelerator R&D for Future Neutrino Projects
1- Short pulse neutron source
Muon Acceleration using 8 GeV Proton Driver Linac
Superbeams with SPL at CERN
Plans for new LHC injectors R. Garoby
W. T. Weng Brookhaven National Laboratory
Progress towards Pulsed Multi-MW CERN Proton Drivers
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Superbeam Horn-Target Integration
EURO Conclusions from Cracow meeting
A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility in Europe
SLHC-PP kick-off meeting, CERN 9 April 2008
Joint session – Beta-beams
Antoine Cazes Université Claude Bernard Lyon-I December 16th, 2008
The SPL-based Proton Driver at CERN
Presentation transcript:

Collector and the SPL Super-Beam Project Marcos Dracos IPHC-IN2P3/CNRS Strasbourg 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

Why this SB? Staging neutrino facilities towards the NF Cover "high" q13 range Cost effective facility Low intensity SPL already approved, Detector could already be approved to cover other physics subjects (proton life-time, cosmological neutrinos…) 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

Present and future injectors Proton flux / Beam power Linac2 Linac4 50 MeV Stage 1 (2013) 160 MeV PSB (LP)SPL Stage 2 (2017) 1.4 GeV 4 GeV (LP)SPL: (Low Power) Superconducting Proton Linac (4-5 GeV) PS2: High Energy PS (~ 5 to 50 GeV – 0.3 Hz) SPS+: Superconducting SPS (50 to1000 GeV) SLHC: “Superluminosity” LHC (up to 1035 cm-2s-1) DLHC: “Double energy” LHC (1 to ~14 TeV) PS 26 GeV PS2 50 GeV Output energy SPS 450 GeV SPS+ 1 TeV LHC / SLHC DLHC 7 TeV Stage 3 (>2017): HP-SPL ~ 14 TeV June 23-27, 2008 3 R.G. 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

Stage 3: HP-SPL Linac4 (160 MeV) SC-linac (5 GeV) HP-SPL H- source RFQ chopper DTL CCDTL PIMS 3 MeV 50 MeV 102 MeV 352.2 MHz β=0.65 β=1.0 643 MeV 5 GeV 704.4 MHz 180 MeV Length: 540 m HP-SPL beam characteristics Option 1 Option 2 Energy (GeV) 2.5 or 5 2.5 and 5 Beam power (MW) 3 MW (2.5 GeV) or 6 MW (5 GeV) 4 MW (2.5 GeV) and 4 MW (5 GeV) Rep. frequency (Hz) 50 Protons/pulse (x 1014) 1.5 2 (2.5 GeV) + 1 (5 GeV) Av. Pulse current (mA) 20 40 Pulse duration (ms) 1.2 0.8 (2.5 GeV) + 0.4 (5 GeV) June 23-27, 2008 4 R.G. 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

SPL Super-Beam Project H- linac 2.2, 3.5 or 5 GeV, 4 MW Accumulator ring + bunch compressor p proton driver to be studied in EURO WP2 Magnetic horn capture (collector) p Target hadrons n, m decay tunnel ~300 MeV nm beam to far detector to be studied by LAGUNA 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

SPL (CDR2) main characteristics Ion species H- Kinetic energy 3.5 GeV Mean current during the pulse 40 mA Mean beam power 4 MW Pulse repetition rate 50 Hz Pulse duration 0.57 ms Bunch frequency 352.2 MHz Duty cycle during the pulse 62 (5/8) % rms transverse emittances 0.4 p mm mrad Longitudinal rms emittance 0.3 p deg MeV Length 430 m butch compressor to go down to 3.2 s (important parameter for hadron collector pulsing system) (possible energy upgrade to 5 GeV could be the subject of a 3rd CDR) 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

Proton Target 300-1000 J cm-3/pulse Severe problems from : sudden heating, stress, activation Safety issues ! Baseline for Super-Beam is solid target, mercury is optional (baseline for NF) Extremely difficult problem : need to pursue two approaches : Liquid metal target (Merit experiment) Solid target (extensive R/D program at STFC and BNL) Envisage alternative solutions very challenging task 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

Proton Target some ideas cooling is a main issue… CC target Horn He IN He OUT Proposed rotating tantalum target ring (realistic?) Horn Helium cooling of target fluidised jet of particles Liquid Mercury (MERIT) Work at BNL and RAL Experience on T2K target (750 kW) very useful cooling is a main issue… 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

Proposed collection system proton beam horn 3.7 cm 8.5° 300 kA 4 cm target 16.6 cm 40 cm 80 cm taking into account the proton energy and collection efficiency, the target must be inside the horn 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

Hadron production Particles coming out of the target 2.2 GeV protons pT distribution not the same for all targets  the choice of the target could influence the hadron collection system (horn shape) pT From now on Hg will be considered 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

Hadron production uncertainties 2.2 GeV protons disagreement between models (Monte Carlo production, interaction and transport codes) p+ momentum more development is needed (simulation, measurements) 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

Proton Energy and Pion Spectra pions per proton on target. Kinetic energy spectrum 2.2 GeV: <Ek>=300MeV 3.5 GeV: <Ek>=378MeV interesting region for SPL SB Ekine (GeV) 1GeV 2GeV cos q hadrons boosted forward -1 1 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

Proposed design for SPL for pions coming out of the target 500 < pp < 700 MeV/c p+ angle p+ momentum horn region (0.26-1.22 rad) for a Hg target, 30 cm length, 15 mm (Nparticlesx1016/sec, FLUKA) relatively better collection when pproton the target must be inside the horn 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

Horn geometry 2.2 GeV proton beam : I = 300 kAmp I = 300 kAmp r(m) <pp> = 492 MeV/c <qp> = 55° 2.2 GeV proton beam : <pp> = 405 MeV/c <qp> = 60° I = 300 kAmp I = 300 kAmp r(m) r(m) B~1/r B~1/r B must be 0 B must be 0 4 cm 4 cm target target 30 cm z(m) 30 cm z(m) 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

Proposed design for SPL reflector Hg target proton beam horn 8.5° 40 cm 16.6 cm 4 cm 3.7 cm 20.3 cm 12.9° 80 cm 70 cm 600 kA 300 kA horn+reflector very high current and frequency inducing severe problems 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

Energy deposition in the conductors MARS 48.2 kW 67kW 14.9kW 78.7kW +8kW from Joule effect 4MW, 2.2 GeV proton beam (1MeV = 1.82 kW) 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

Main Technical Challenges Horn : as thin as possible (3 mm) to minimize energy deposition, Longevity in a high power beam (currently estimated to be 6 weeks!), 50 Hz (vs a few Hz up to now), Large electromagnetic wave, thermo-mechanical stress, vibrations, fatigue, radiation damage, Currents: 300 kA (horn) and 600 kA (reflector) design of a high current pulsed power supply (300 kA/100 μs/50 Hz), cooling system in order to maintain the integrity of the horn despite of the heat amount generated by the energy deposition of the secondary particles provided by the impact of the primary proton beam onto the target, definition of the radiation tolerance, integration of the target. 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

Power Supply for horn pulsing (major issue) values considered by CERN 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

3 Solutions proposed by ABB schematic versions at the capacitors ends option 1 at the capacitors ends option 2 in the charge option 3 s 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

q13 Sensitivity simulation inputs Detector: Run: Water Cerenkov 440 kt at Fréjus (130 km from CERN) Run: 2 years with positive focusing. 8 years with negative focusing. Computed with dCP=0 (standard benchmark) and q13 = 0 parameter… Dm23 = 2.5 10-3eV2 Dm12 = 7.1 10-5eV2 sin2(2q23) =1 sin2(2q12) =0.8 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

Sensitivity 3.5GeV Dm223 90%CL 95%CL 99%CL Minimum: q13= 1.2° (90%CL) A.Cazes thesis Dm223 90%CL 95%CL 99%CL 10-2 Minimum: q13= 1.2° (90%CL) 10-3 10-4 sin22q13 10-3 10-2 10-1 no strong dependence on proton energy for 2.2<p<5 GeV 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

Present Collectors In operation In operation completed (120 GeV) In operation (8 GeV) completed (12 GeV) CERN horn prototype for SPL Super-Beam (3.5 GeV) In operation (400 GeV) MiniBooNE NUMI CNGS K2K 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

Horn prototype …but Al not compatible with Mercury! For the horn skin AA 6082-T6 / (AlMgSi1) is an acceptable compromise between the 4 main characteristics: Mechanical properties Welding abilities Electrical properties Resistance to corrosion Same for CNGS …but Al not compatible with Mercury! tests done with: 30 kA and 1 Hz, pulse 100 ms long new tests to be done with 50 Hz Electrical and water connections 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

New ideas minimize power dissipation and radiation problems (pulser problems remain as before) use the advantage of the small horn size 2.5 m protons protons 2.5 m same decay tunnel Ø 3 m protons protons to be studied in EURO 2 options (only one pulser): send at the same time 1 MW per target/horn system send 4 MW/system every 50/4 Hz possibility to use solid target? 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

New (crazy) ideas to be studied in EURO superconducting wire (1 mm Ø) in superfluid He, DC power supply use a cryogenic horn (toroidal coil) blow gas He to avoid quenching problems No problem with power supply (pulser no more needed) Proton compressor no more needed to be studied in EURO 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

Conclusions LP-SPL already approved, HP-SPL possible before 2020. Many studies needed on targets. Collector studies are necessary to increase the system lifetime. Target/horn integration to be considered since the beginning. New studies have started in the framework of EURO FP7 project. New ideas are welcome… 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

End 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

Comparisons CNGS combined CHOOZ excluded Beta Beam Disappearance T2K BNL SPL 5y SPL 1y+4y Beta Beam (5y+5y) -150 -100 -50 -0 50 100 150 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 dCP (deg.) Sin22q13 Double CHOOZ SPL 2y+8y 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

CERN horn prototype cooling system Current of 300 kA p Protons To decay channel B = 0 Hg Target B1/R initial design satisfying both, neutrino factory and super-beam 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2

Decay Tunnel Flux vs decay tunnel length (2.2 GeV option) short decay tunnel 17 Dec. 2008 M. Dracos, EUROnu-WP2