End of Fieldwork Debriefing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
Advertisements

<<Date>><<SDLC Phase>>
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Preparation for Developmental Reviews.
NIAID Designation – Project Title PI: Name (Institution) Co-PI (if any): Name (Institution) Subcontract (if any): Name (Institution)
THE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY CENTER (ATEEC) Summative External Evaluation July 1, 2013 – June 30, 2014 PRELIMINARY OUTLINE.
HOW TO WRITE A GOOD TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR FOR EVALUATION Programme Management Interest Group 19 October 2010 Pinky Mashigo.
Literature Review and Parts of Proposal
Note to evaluator… The overall purpose of this presentation is to guide evaluators through the completion of step 7 of the UFE checklist and to “level.
Title of Training Module Design Plan
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
Insert: Title of Improvement Read Out Date:. 2 Objectives for Today’s Session Share results of improvement effort Demonstrate fact-base, analytical approach.
Context of the Project Close-Out Document Project is coming to an end, but hasn’t ended yet.
SITUATION ASSESSMENT FOR HIV PROGRAMMING DR. S.K CHATURVEDI DR. KANUPRIYA CHATURVEDI.
1 1 CEQA Scoping Naomi Feger Planning TMDL Section Leader Region 2.
Title of Your Project Team Member 1 Team Member 2.
1 GEO Task US-09-01a XX SBA SBA: XX Analyst: Name, Organization Current Status of Report: (e.g., Final, awaiting AG or L. Friedl Input, Preparing Draft,
JSGS Professional Workshop Series Copyright ©Heather McWhinney, 2016 WRITING A CABINET DECISION ITEM.
ALNAP Biannual Meeting 9-10 June 2005
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Project Management PTM721S
Southampton City Council School School Improvement Service
Presenter Name | Company Name
From the NDPHS Evaluation Team April 22, 2008 Brussels
Look and Feel of the Fund Management System (FMS)
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Presenter Name | Company Name
Project Name Progress Report 1
EPICS Design Review Template Notes:
Presenter Name | Company Name
Governor Visits to School
Outline What is Literature Review? Purpose of Literature Review
How does a Requirements Package Vary from Project to Project?
By: Project Manager Date: dd mmm yyyy
TECHjOSH.COM TechJosh.com.
BSA 376 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
BSA 376 AID Lessons in Excellence-- bsa376aid.com.
BSA 376 Education for Service/snaptutorial.com
BSA 376 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
CCSF Caltrain Obligations
Authors/Collaborators
Presenter Name | Company Name
Opening sentence: Frame your topic in terms of importance to NIH/foundation mission Briefly summarize current knowledge on this topic; 2-3 sentences to.
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO]
Effective Introductions
Presenter Name | Company Name
Look and Feel of the Fund Management System (FMS)
Resource 1. Evaluation Planning Template
Presenter Name | Company Name
Dillon Gee, Glenn Pittman, Ronnie Nguyen, Sarah Tracy
Assignment 2 The final assignment requires you to develop a hypothetical health promotion intervention in the format of a grant proposal. This will involve:
Authors/Collaborators
Grant writing Session II.
How did we do it? Case examples from AIC
Mr. Noniel John Vasquez Erno
Presenter Name | Company Name
Project Title Subtitle: make sure you specify it is a research project
‘BOAT CHART’ PROJECT WORKPLAN
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Note to evaluator… The overall purpose of this presentation is to guide evaluators through the completion of steps 4 to 6 of the UFE checklist. The main.
NEED: What need does your project address?
Presenter Name | Company Name
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System
Women’s Faculty Council Research Awards & Scholarship
Network Informational Interviewing
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Project Management Essentials
Presentation transcript:

End of Fieldwork Debriefing [Evaluation type] of [subject of evaluation] in [country/area] End of Fieldwork Debriefing [Month/Year] [Nam] Evaluation team leader [Name] Evaluation team member 1 [Name] Evaluation team member 2 Fighting Hunger Worldwide

Purpose Evaluation purpose and objectives Main expected users Measuring results /sharing lessons – Office of Evaluation Evaluation purpose and objectives Main expected users Subject and scope of the evaluation

Methodology Methodology [Outline overall approach] Measuring results /sharing lessons – Office of Evaluation Methodology [Outline overall approach] [brief on data collection methods] [Limitations, mitigation measures and impacts] [brief on field mission activities - List sites visited and stakeholders interviewed on separate slides]

Sites visited [List sites visited] Measuring results /sharing lessons – Office of Evaluation [List sites visited] [Briefly describe rationale for selection]

Stakeholders interviewed Measuring results /sharing lessons – Office of Evaluation [Summary of stakeholders interviewed] [Briefly describe rationale for selection]

Context Context Operational context [Outline country/area context] Measuring results /sharing lessons – Office of Evaluation [Keep this section brief, especially if the audience is internal stakeholders who may already know the context quite well] Context [Outline country/area context] Operational context [List key features of operation/thematic area/modality, including changes over time]

Preliminary findings Measuring results /sharing lessons – Office of Evaluation [Evaluation question 1] or use other sub-headings if too early to address questions (e.g. by activity/area/stakeholder type) Present key themes emerging Outline any gaps in data /what the team knows so far in addressing this question

Preliminary findings Measuring results /sharing lessons – Office of Evaluation [Evaluation question 2] or use other sub-headings if too early to address questions (e.g. by activity/area/stakeholder type) Present key themes emerging Outline any gaps in data /what the team knows so far in addressing this question

Preliminary findings Measuring results /sharing lessons – Office of Evaluation [Evaluation question 3] or use other sub-headings if too early to address questions (e.g. by activity/area/stakeholder type) Present key themes emerging Outline any gaps in data /what the team knows so far in addressing this question

Emerging themes for analysis Measuring results /sharing lessons – Office of Evaluation Keep these very brief and broad Emphasize ongoing analysis Outline implications i.e. likely conclusions/recommendations (if able to predicted at this stage)

Next steps Measuring results /sharing lessons – Office of Evaluation [Briefly outline next steps in process, including the key dates for the deliverables i.e. draft report, comments by stakeholders and final draft] [Point out any specific requests for additional data/information the team has at this point]

Thank you! Any comments or questions? Measuring results /sharing lessons – Office of Evaluation Thank you! Any comments or questions?