GETTING ‘EVEN’ BETTER: FIVE LEVELS FOR PD EVALUATION

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Post 16 Citizenship Liz Craft Valuing progress Celebrating achievement.
Advertisements

Performance management guidance
Performance management guidance. Performance management Part C: Appraisers An introduction to the revised Performance Management Regulations January 2011.
A Roadmap for Professional Development Planning
Training Evaluation Presentation by Ranjith Menon.
The Blueprint Your SIP (School Improvement Plan) A living, breathing, document.
Opening Session Tutor Conference March 11, :00 am – 10:15 am.
Carol Hawman Primary PE and Sport Premium: are you making a difference?
Evaluation is a professional and ethical responsibility and is a core part of PHN professional practice Commitment to evaluation helps build the PHN intelligence.
Empowering Staff Through Institute Planning (ESTIP) Executive Workshop Institute Name: XXXXXX Presenter: XXXXXX Date: XXXXXX.
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT HOW TO GET THE MOST OUT OF THE PROCESS Tuesday 2nd September pm.
- Objective of the Program Evaluation - The process of the Program Evaluation.
Measuring Learning Outcomes Evaluation
Partnership between the NYCI, the Health Service Executive and the Department of Children and Youth Affairs National Youth Health Programme Kevin O’ Hagan.
SAISD Office for Professional Learning Advisory Board March 2, 2005 Navarro Academy March 2, 2005 Navarro Academy 623 S. Pecos.
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
Building Teacher Effectiveness A Lab School Protocol.
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Kazakhstan Centres of Excellence Teacher Education Programme Assessment of teachers at Level Two.
Performance and Development Culture Preparing for P&D Culture accreditation April 2008.
Annamari Ylonen (Evaluation Officer) Evaluation of the project.
TCN – General Points Not a method for monitoring teaching methods but a means to look at the impact changes in our teaching can have on pupils. Not a method.
UNPACKING THE VALIDATION PROCESS
Identifying and Assessing Learning Outcomes for Professional Development Programming Diane E. Waryas, Ph.D. Kim E. VanDerLinden, Ph.D.
Educational Solutions for Workforce Development Unit 8 – How to Evaluate Aim To provide an overview of how to effectively evaluate learning programmes.
Planning for Continuing Professional Development – A Whole School Approach A step by step guide to planning CPD including a framework for Teacher Induction.
Understanding Meaning and Importance of Competency Based Assessment
November 20, :00am – 11:00am As you enter, if you can hear.
This project is financed by the European Union 1 The project is implemented by a European Profiles S.A. led consortium Evaluation of Training By Senior.
Curriculum and Instruction iSupport Platform Presentation August 15, 2014.
BUILDING EVIDENCE FOR EFFECTIVE CONTINUOUS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS FOR SUSTAINABLE LEARNING BUILDING EVIDENCE FOR EFFECTIVE.
Strategic Planning for Training Evaluation
Important Idea, Skill or Attitude I learned from this course which I can use in my job: The advance facilitation processes (only stage 2: Clarify desired.
Evaluation: what is it? Anita Morrison. What is evaluation? Evaluation… –…is the process of determining the merit, worth, or value of something, or the.
Evaluating gifted and talented students January 2007.
Evaluation: Methods & Concerns Otojit Kshetrimayum V.V. Giri National Labour Institute, Noida
Program Evaluation DR. MAJED WADI. Objectives  Design necessary parameters used for program evaluation  Accept different views of program evaluation.
Building Effective Staff Development to Support Employer Engagement Jane Timlin & Renata Eyres The University of Salford.
Final Plenary Session Professional Development Consortium in MFL.
Welcome to PD Forum FY 11. Professional Development Support Structure SchoolsDistrict Support Department PD Team (Administrator, PD Contact, & PD Team.
M & E System for MI’s Training Program & Guidelines for MI’s Completion Report Presented by Monitoring and Evaluation Officer Mekong Institute January.
Are we there yet? Evaluating your graduation SiMR.
Evaluating Training The Kirkpatrick Model.
December 18, :00am – 11:00am
Monitor and Revise Teaching. ObjectivesObjectives Describe how to monitor teaching List ways to contribute to broader evaluations Explain how to review.
4 th Biennial SAMEA Conference Meaningful Evaluation: Improving Use and Results Evaluation of Teacher-Directed ICT Initiatives Presenter Mokete Mokone.
Using the STEM learning impact evaluation process Also known as The Impact Toolkit (ITK)
Claverham Community College Professional Development Programme.
Analysis of Research and Impact on Practice, Action Planning Monday December 13th.
Allison Nichols, Ed.D. Extension Specialist in Evaluation.
How to evaluate the impact of CPD? 28 th April 2016.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center 1 Introduction.
 Transition Resources for Youth TR4Y Improvement Planning and Implementation 1.
Culturally appropriate training for remote Australian Aboriginal Health Workers: Evaluation of an early child development training intervention Dr Anita.
SNRPDP Self Evaluation
Sports Premium Funding
Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning
Evaluation Emma King.
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
TRAINING NEED ANALYSIS
Hazelwood School District Program Evaluation
BEST PRACTICES IN LIBRARY INSTRUCTION FORUM November 7, 2007
New Zealand Dietitians Board
Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate
Support for English, maths and ESOL Level 3 Award in English for literacy and language teaching Summative workshop.
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
FRAMEWORK OF EVALUATION QUESTIONS
Using Data to Assess High Quality Professional Development Findings From Interviews With Massachusetts Educators May 2015 Massachusetts Department.
School priorities September 2018.
Evaluating Staff Development Initiatives
Presentation transcript:

GETTING ‘EVEN’ BETTER: FIVE LEVELS FOR PD EVALUATION (adapted from Guskey 2000) EVALUATION LEVEL WHAT QUESTIONS ARE ADDRESSED? HOW WILL INFORMATION BE GATHERED? WHAT IS MEASURED OR ASSESSED? HOW WILL INFORMATION BE USED? 1. PARTICIPANTS’ REACTIONS (Evaluates how staff feel about the quality of their professional learning) Did they enjoy it? Was the time well spent? Was the content relevant? Quality of delivery? Questionnaires/surveys “happy sheets” – evaluate the extent to which session’s objectives have been met? Teacher satisfaction with the experience To improve programme and delivery 2. LEARNING EVALUATION (Measures knowledge, skills and attitudes acquired through training) Have teachers acquired the desired knowledge and understanding? Staff baseline audits and follow up surveys O&F PL log/5 dials Surveys New knowledge and skill of participants To improve programme content, format, and organisation 3. ORGANISATIONAL SUPPORT (Assesses the support and ethos of the organisation) Was implementation advocated, facilitated, and supported? Were successes recognised and shared? What was the impact on the organisation? Whole school PD Audit e.g. NTEN Minutes from follow-up meetings Questionnaires The organisation's advocacy, support, facilitation, and recognition Whether PD impacted at a whole school level To inform future change efforts 4. BEHAVIOUR EVALUATION (Focuses on changes in behaviours as a result of training received) Are teachers using the new knowledge they have learnt? Feedback from staff through surveys or conversations. Low-stake learning walks, Line-management meetings Peer observations through Lesson Study Student evaluation Quality of implementation To document and improve the implementation of programme content 5. RESULTS EVALUATION (Assesses the impact of professional development on student outcomes) Has there been an impact on students? This could be any outcome – attainment, behavioural or attitudinal – depending on what need the PD was planned to address. Results of Action Research/ RCTs Assessment data Students’ learning outcomes To demonstrate the overall impact of PD