Employee survey 2018 – RESULTS HUV.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Close Hold – Company Confidential – Not for Distribution Engagement Every Day: 2011 Engagement Survey – List of Q12 & SAIC-specific 2011 Engagement Survey.
Advertisements

2013 CollaboRATE Survey Results
Leadership MOT Version 1. The Leadership MOT survey is a tool which will help leaders to benchmark their leadership capabilities within Nuffield Health.
It’s About Us: Employee Experience Survey Gender umanitoba.ca.
1 Example Bank Customer Survey Results Net Promoter Score.
1 All responses Total of 1,446 Trust responses. Aggregate Index Score Aug 11 Trust overall 692 Surgical Division – Division Divisional Management.
Employee engagement Guide Global Human Resources June 2014.
12-14 Pindari Rd Peakhurst NSW 2210 p: e: Employee Survey Links2Success.
Introduction Motivating others in the workplace is being able to identify the reasons which make employees behave a particular way. In most cases this.
Force Results – August 2012 Sussex Police Employee Survey 2012.
Employee Survey 2005 Results from employee survey run during Feb/March 2005.
OneVoice W Group Results 16 June 2014 Human Resources Employee Engagement.
Employee NPS Leanne Taylor.
Employee Pulse Survey March 2010 Office of Human Resources.
School of Biological Sciences Staff Survey 2013 Department of Zoology Results Briefing, 21 May 2013.
Northwest ISD Board Presentation Staff Survey
KTH Employee survey 2016 Report SK - Inklusive undernoder.
Marketing Principles CHAPTER 11 SECTION 2.  Management decisions affect all employees.  Communicating and motivating people are two of the most important.
The Art of Managing & Supervising Volunteers Ilm Level 3.
0 Faculty Senate October 17, 2006 Working at IOWA.
Collaborative & Interpersonal Leadership
Postgraduate Taught Experience Survey (PTES) 2010 Interim Results
2016 Duck River EMC Employee Survey
Handout 2: Effective working relationships
Part 1 Being professional
PowerPoint to accompany:
The High Cost of Low Morale
Items in red require your input
Self Assessment   The assessment tool on the following pages is designed to help you evaluate your individual behaviors and characteristics related to.
Chapter 7.
13 Leadership.
Culture Survey This document provides examples of how we analyze and report our clients’ culture survey data. It includes data from several clients in.
Work choice. Government scheme to help those who are disabled get and keep a job. This is voluntary and is delivered by different providers across the.
Best Practices for Incorporating an Employee Engagement Survey
Employee Engagement Survey Education Session #3
Attitudes and Job Satisfaction
MGT 210 CHAPTER 13: MANAGING TEAMS
Age management for sustainable development of organisations
Social Services Union County
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
Items in red require your input
Employee Engagement Survey
Items in red require your input
Employee survey 2018 Report with all questions SCI - with child nodes.
Employee survey 2018 Manager’s report SCI - with child nodes.
Employee survey 2018 Report with all questions ITM - with child nodes.
Employee Engagement 2018 Example of analysis report
UA Workplace Experience Survey - Chime in!
Survey Results Overview
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
Employee satisfaction survey 2018
Empire Southwest 2017 Companywide EOS Results.
Work in the 21st Century: It’s a Whole New World
Employee survey 2018 Report with all questions ABE - with child nodes.
Employee survey 2018 Report with all questions KTH - with child nodes.
Employee survey 2018 Report with all questions UF - with child nodes.
Presentation report KTH - with child nodes
Workforce Engagement Survey
Employee survey 2018 Report with all questions CBH - with child nodes.
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
2018 Great Colleges Survey for Champlain College
Employee survey 2018 Report with all questions EECS - with child nodes.
Dave Scott – Middle School Principal – Kristin School
Handout 5: Feedback and support
Departure View Glossary
Employee Engagement Defined
Manage Your Staff.
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
Enter Your Work Unit Here Enter Date Here
Dave Scott – Middle School Principal – Kristin School
Presentation transcript:

Employee survey 2018 – RESULTS HUV

Employee Survey 2018 2 419 people made their voice heard this year throw the Employee survey and the result will be presented and worked within the whole organization. The result will be the base for further development and improvement in our organization. The survey is anonymous. This means that no results will be shown for a group or segment with fewer than five responses. With five responses, an index value can be shown. A further three responses are required to show the distribution of the possible answers. Period: 2018-01-22—2018-02-11  Total amount of surveys sent: 3107 Total amount of initiated surveys: 2540 Total amount of answers: 2419 Amount of reminders: 4 Response rate: 78% (2016: 74%) The survey is anonymous. This means that no results will be shown for a group or segment with fewer than five responses. HUV: 43

eNPS – What is it? Those who give high answers (9–10) are known as ambassadors. As well as speaking positively about their workplace on their own initiative, they also develop their work and motivate three other employees to participate. Those who answer with 7–8 on the scale are regarded as passively satisfied. These are people who are satisfied but do not actively tell people about it. Passively satisfied employees may be as satisfied as employees anywhere else. Those who give low answers (0–6) are known as critics, and are likely to speak negatively about their workplace. They may be more or less critical depending on where on the negative part of the scale they are. Those who are far down the scale focus on problems and may encourage others to seek to leave the workplace, while those who are higher up the scale (5 or 6) might say: “It’s good, BUT…” eNPS, the Employee Net Promoter Score©, is a key indicator showing willingness to recommend your workplace - internally or externally. The question asked is: “How likely is it that you would recommend your workplace to a friend or acquaintance?” and the answer scale ranges from “0. Not at all likely” to “10. Extremely likely”. The NPS is calculated by taking the proportion of ambassadors (9s and 10s) and subtracting the proportion of critics (0–6). The result is a percentage between -100 and 100. NPS®, Net Promoter® & Net Promoter Score® are registered trademarks of Satmetrix Systems, Inc., Bain & Company and Fred Reichheld

Employee Net Promoter Score RED = More detractors than promoters How likely is it that you would recommend SLU as a place of work to a friend or acquaintance? GREEN = More promoters than detractors The employee answers the question on a scale from 0 (Not likely at all) to 10 (Extremely likely). Based on the chosen answer alternative the employee is categorized either as Promoters (9-10), Passives (7-8) or Detractors (0-6). Promoters (9-10) are loyal and enthusiastic employees who openly recommend the company to others.   Passives (7-8) are satisfied but unenthusiastic employees. Detractors (0-6) are unsatisfied employees that can damage the company’s brand by speaking negatively about their place of work NPS®, Net Promoter® & Net Promoter Score® are registered trademarks of Satmetrix Systems, Inc., Bain & Company and Fred Reichheld

Product Net Promoter Score RED = More detractors than promoters GREEN = More promoters than detractors How likely are you to recommend studying at SLU? NPS®, Net Promoter® & Net Promoter Score® are registered trademarks of Satmetrix Systems, Inc., Bain & Company and Fred Reichheld

Result index areas - overview Over 70 % good result 60-69% potential for improvements Below 60% low result

Employee Index 2018 Your result Totalt SLU EI index is a merged value of the 19 Index questions in the areas: Working environment: 6 questions Management: 7 questions Organisation: 3 questions Visions & Goals: 3 questions Over 70 % good result 60-69% potential for improvements Below 60% low result

Working Environment Working environment Working environment area contains 27 questions, out of which 6 are index questions. The area measures conditions, relationships and commitment among the group. When the work environment is good, employees will not only try to find balance in being loyal to their employer and colleagues but also to themselves as an individual and to their relatives. Over 70 % good result 60-69% potential for improvements Below 60% low result

Management Management Management area contains 26 questions, out of which 6 are index questions. This area shows how the immediate leadership works and also gives input of requirement for development and improvement of the area. The result is monitored mainly by the manager with the help of his/her boss and if necessary by HR. Over 70 % good result 60-69% potential for improvements Below 60% low result

Organisation Organisation Discrimination – shall be 100 % The Organisation area contains 23 questions, out of which three are index questions. The area Organisation show together with the area Vision and goals the overall conditions an employer gives to create a supportive and promoting leadership with effective and healthy groups. In this area you find questions about management on all levels above immediate manager. It is mainly the management and individuals with operations-wide functions that work with this result. Discrimination – shall be 100 % Clear organisation I think it is clear who or which department/unit is responsible for what throughout SLU, and who to contact with various questions or assignments. Over 70 % good result 60-69% potential for improvements Below 60% low result

Visions and Goals Visions and Goals Vision and goals area contains 4 questions, out of which 3 are index questions. The area Vision and Goals together with Organisation shows the overall pre-subsidence an employer gives to create a supportive and promoting leadership with effective and healthy groups. It is mainly the management and individuals with business-wide functions that work with this result. Over 70 % good result 60-69% potential for improvements Below 60% low result

Working environment – Motivators The section is created by five indicators of motivation. Motivators are the driving forces that gives the desire to continue doing a good job. And that creates commitment and loyalty. Over 70 % good result 60-69% potential for improvements Below 60% low result

Working environment – Balance The section is created by seven indications for balance in work and life. Being able to relax from work, have a good sleep and a good balance between work and private life is preventive against negative stress and will help create a good health. The question Stress, recovery has only been answered by them who rated 1, 2 or 3 to the question After an intense period. Working environment – Balance Balance Over 70 % good result 60-69% potential for improvements Below 60% low result

Working environment – Good conditions The section is created by five indicators for the right conditions. To be able to influence the work situation employees needs to have good conditions concerning responsibilities, authorites and also requirement and control. Over 70 % good result 60-69% potential for improvements Below 60% low result

Working environment – Objectives The section is created by three indicators on performance management. To know if you're working on the right things and to measure what you do leads forward, clear and communicated goals are needed. The section goals has only been answered by them who have individual objectives (Yes I have agreed objectives related to my work). Over 70 % good result 60-69% potential for improvements Below 60% low result

Working environment – Team This section is created by eight indicators for effective and productive groups. The section measures conditions, relationships and commitments amongst the group. Efficient and well-functioning groups need to work together, show respect, allow different opinions and to support and encourage each other. Over 70 % good result 60-69% potential for improvements Below 60% low result

Next step? Continue our work regarding discrimination – on all levels Focus on balance and work load in the Staff development review Discussions in August (preliminary 27-28 August)

I believe my efforts contribute and are important Conditions Shortening Question text Workload contributes I believe my efforts contribute and are important Conditions I have clear assignments with reasonable conditions Interesting tasks I think my tasks are interesting and rewarding Feel job satisfaction I feel job satisfaction Learn new things I learn new things and develop in my daily work Involved in decision making In my working group we have the opportunity to influence and be involved in decision-making Meaningful I find my work meaningful Appreciation In my working group show each other appreciation when we do something well. Amount of work I am happy with my workload in general Professional and private life I feel that there is a good balance between my working life and my personal life After intense period An intensive period is usually followed by a calmer period that offers opportunity for recovery and reflection. More recovery time I feel that there is time for reflection in my work Relax I can unwind from my work in my free time Responsibility I have a clear view of my area of responsibility Stress, sleep During the last six months, I've had problems falling alsleep, or I've ben waking up during the night, due to my work.(After an intense day at work, I don't feel rested and refreshed when I return the next day) Manager anticipates My immediate manager leads by example Realistic targets feel that my objectives are realistic and achievable Confidence - staff My immediate manager has confidence in me as an employee. Power I have a clear view of my authority Manager leads My immediate manager leads and drives the organisation in a way that enables us to achieve our department/unit/team objectives. Manager supports I feel that my immediate manager supports, encourages and inspires me as an employee Requirements and skills I think that there is a good balance between the demands that my job places on me and my skills and ability Manager is attentive notices my good achievements (for example, through increased responsibility, increased trust, new opportunities for development, etc.). Control and planning I am able to manage and plan my own work (speed, scope, prioritisation, etc.) Confidence - manager I have confidence in my immediate manager's (#ovrigt10#) way of managing and developing my department/unit/team. Motivating targets I feel motivated by my work objectives Manager feedback gives me sufficient feedback on my performance and work results Prioritise targets I know how to prioritise my tasks in relation to my objectives Discrimination I consider SLU to be a workplace that supports equal rights (regardless of ethnicity, disability, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, religion or age). Working together In my working group we work well together Confidence univ. management team I have confidence in the way the vice-chancellor and the university management is managing and developing our operations.The vice-chancellor has appointed a management team that consists of the vice-chancellor, the deputy vice-chancellor, two pro vice-chancellors (responsible for environmental monitoring and assessment and external collaboration respectively) and the head of university administration. Stress, recovery time During the last six months, I've had problems recovering due to my work.(After an intense day at work, I don't feel rested and refreshed when I return the next day) Commitment In my working group we are motivated and want to evolve Information All in all, I feel sufficiently informed about what happens within SLU, and I know where to find information about it. Open-minded In my working group we are open minded and everyone has their say. Pride I am proud to work at SLU. Uses skills In my working group we have the ability to see and make use of the skills within the group Business concept permeates Our mission statement permeates the entire organisation. Respect In my working group we treat each other with respect even when we have different opinions Clear organisation I think it is clear who or which department/unit is responsible for what throughout SLU, and who to contact with various questions or assignments. Support In my working group we are responsive and help and support each other.