Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (April 2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Carly I. Dix, Jordan W. Raff  Current Biology 
Advertisements

Volume 16, Issue 17, Pages (September 2006)
A Switch in Mitotic Histone H4 Lysine 20 Methylation Status Is Linked to M Phase Defects upon Loss of HCF-1  Eric Julien, Winship Herr  Molecular Cell 
Naoki Noda, Sidney L. Tamm  Current Biology 
DNA Damage during Mitosis in Human Cells Delays the Metaphase/Anaphase Transition via the Spindle-Assembly Checkpoint  Alexei Mikhailov, Richard W Cole,
Spindle Pole Regulation by a Discrete Eg5-Interacting Domain in TPX2
Volume 20, Issue 24, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Nuclear Movement Regulated by Cdc42, MRCK, Myosin, and Actin Flow Establishes MTOC Polarization in Migrating Cells  Edgar R. Gomes, Shantanu Jani, Gregg.
Asymmetric Microtubule Pushing Forces in Nuclear Centering
Human Cep192 Is Required for Mitotic Centrosome and Spindle Assembly
Nuclear Membrane: Nuclear Envelope PORosity in Fission Yeast Meiosis
Maki Murata-Hori, Yu-li Wang  Current Biology 
Renzhi Yang, Jessica L. Feldman  Current Biology 
Sequential Protein Recruitment in C. elegans Centriole Formation
Kif15 Cooperates with Eg5 to Promote Bipolar Spindle Assembly
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Overexpressing Centriole-Replication Proteins In Vivo Induces Centriole Overduplication and De Novo Formation  Nina Peel, Naomi R. Stevens, Renata Basto,
SAS-4 Is a C. elegans Centriolar Protein that Controls Centrosome Size
Volume 23, Issue 24, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 25, Issue 24, Pages (December 2015)
Phases of Mitosis.
Cdk1 Modulation Ensures the Coordination of Cell-Cycle Events during the Switch from Meiotic Prophase to Mitosis  Dai Tsuchiya, Soni Lacefield  Current.
Spindle Pole Regulation by a Discrete Eg5-Interacting Domain in TPX2
The Cep192-Organized Aurora A-Plk1 Cascade Is Essential for Centrosome Cycle and Bipolar Spindle Assembly  Vladimir Joukov, Johannes C. Walter, Arcangela.
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 19, Issue 17, Pages (September 2009)
Differential Activation of the DNA Replication Checkpoint Contributes to Asynchrony of Cell Division in C. elegans Embryos  Michael Brauchle, Karine Baumer,
EB1-Recruited Microtubule +TIP Complexes Coordinate Protrusion Dynamics during 3D Epithelial Remodeling  Sarah Gierke, Torsten Wittmann  Current Biology 
Volume 19, Issue 19, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Sebastian Leidel, Pierre Gönczy  Developmental Cell 
Centrosome-independent mitotic spindle formation in vertebrates
Yumi Uetake, Greenfield Sluder  Current Biology 
P granules Current Biology
Intrinsically Defective Microtubule Dynamics Contribute to Age-Related Chromosome Segregation Errors in Mouse Oocyte Meiosis-I  Shoma Nakagawa, Greg FitzHarris 
Geoffrey J. Guimaraes, Yimin Dong, Bruce F. McEwen, Jennifer G. DeLuca 
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
Justin Crest, Kirsten Concha-Moore, William Sullivan  Current Biology 
Joshua N. Bembenek, John G. White, Yixian Zheng  Current Biology 
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Kinetochore Dynein Is Required for Chromosome Motion and Congression Independent of the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhenye Yang, U. Serdar Tulu, Patricia Wadsworth,
Peripheral, Non-Centrosome-Associated Microtubules Contribute to Spindle Formation in Centrosome-Containing Cells  U.S. Tulu, N.M. Rusan, P. Wadsworth 
The Stages of Mitosis Ch. 8.
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (June 2009)
STIL Microcephaly Mutations Interfere with APC/C-Mediated Degradation and Cause Centriole Amplification  Christian Arquint, Erich A. Nigg  Current Biology 
Volume 16, Issue 17, Pages (September 2006)
Victoria Stevenson, Andrew Hudson, Lynn Cooley, William E Theurkauf 
Nicole M. Mahoney, Gohta Goshima, Adam D. Douglass, Ronald D. Vale 
Volume 8, Issue 9, Pages (April 1998)
Jessica L. Feldman, James R. Priess  Current Biology 
HURP Is Part of a Ran-Dependent Complex Involved in Spindle Formation
Fig. 1. γ-Tubulin localizes in close proximity to centriole walls in interphase but within an extended PCM meshwork in mitosis.U2OS cells were fixed and.
Cell-Cycle Progression without an Intact Microtubule Cytoskeleton
David Vanneste, Masatoshi Takagi, Naoko Imamoto, Isabelle Vernos 
Volume 17, Issue 17, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 22, Pages (November 2010)
Rsp1p, a J Domain Protein Required for Disassembly and Assembly of Microtubule Organizing Centers during the Fission Yeast Cell Cycle  Sabina Zimmerman,
The Origin of Centrosomes in Parthenogenetic Hymenopteran Insects
Cnn Dynamics Drive Centrosome Size Asymmetry to Ensure Daughter Centriole Retention in Drosophila Neuroblasts  Paul T. Conduit, Jordan W. Raff  Current.
Cell Division Part 1.
TAC-1, a Regulator of Microtubule Length in the C. elegans Embryo
Roles of the fission yeast formin for3p in cell polarity, actin cable formation and symmetric cell division  Becket Feierbach, Fred Chang  Current Biology 
Chromothripsis Current Biology
Closed Mitosis: A Timely Move before Separation
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 18, Issue 18, Pages (September 2008)
Swapna Kollu, Samuel F. Bakhoum, Duane A. Compton  Current Biology 
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Cdk1 Modulation Ensures the Coordination of Cell-Cycle Events during the Switch from Meiotic Prophase to Mitosis  Dai Tsuchiya, Soni Lacefield  Current.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages 598-605 (April 2011) Amphiastral Mitotic Spindle Assembly in Vertebrate Cells Lacking Centrosomes  Jessica E. Hornick, Christopher C. Mader, Emily K. Tribble, Cydney C. Bagne, Kevin T. Vaughan, Sidney L. Shaw, Edward H. Hinchcliffe  Current Biology  Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages 598-605 (April 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.02.049 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Microsurgical Removal of the Centrosome from BSC-1 Cells (Aa) The centrosome is identified by a mass of granules adjacent to the nucleus (arrow). (Ab–Ae) The needle is brought down between the nucleus and the centrosome. (Af) The nuclear-containing KP (or Karyo) is completely separated from the centrosome containing cytoplast (cyto or CP). (B) MT network reformation in the KP/CP pair. (Ba–Bc) Two cells following microsurgery. The first is a mock cut, where the centrosome is displaced from the nucleus by the needle, but the CP is not severed from the KP. The second cell is cut by the needle, resulting in a KP/CP pair. The KP is surrounded by a white outline. (Bc) Fluorescence imaging: the mock-cut cell and the KP both lack a perinuclear MT focus, whereas the CP has a radial MT array. (Bd–Bf) The radial MTs reforms in the mock-cut cell (arrow in Be) and KP (arrow in Bf). (C) aMTOC formation in the karyoplast. (Ca–Cd) The KP and CP flatten out over the first 1.5 hr. (Cd′–Cd″″) Same cell immunolabeling of (Cd). The MTs in the KP (Cd′) do not have a central focus; the control cell does (arrowhead). The centrin-2-positive centrioles (Cd″) and γ-tubulin-positive pericentriolar material (Cd″′) are in the CP. (Ce–Ch) The KP and CP pair ∼5 hr after microsurgery. (Ch′–Ch″″) Same cell immunofluorescence of (Ch). The aMTOC has reformed (arrow in Ch′). The KP lacks centrioles and PCM; these reside in the CP. The time is indicated as hr:min. The scale bars represent 10 μm. Current Biology 2011 21, 598-605DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.02.049) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Mitotic Spindle Assembly in KPs (A) Amphiastral bipolar spindle assembly. (Aa–Ad) Microsurgery generates a KP (arrow). The CP was removed. (Ae–Al) Fluorescence imaging: there is a single MT focus (Ae–Ah, insets) that undergoes splitting and amphiaster formation prior to NEB. At NEB (Ah) there are two distinct MT foci, which form a bipolar spindle (Ai–Al). (B) Monastral spindle assembly. (Ba–Bd) Microsurgery forms a KP (arrow); the CP was removed. (Be–Bk) Fluorescence imaging: the single MT focus has not split at NEB. Upon entry into mitosis, the MTs are drawn into the monastral array. (Be′–Bj′) High magnification view of monaster during spindle assembly. The nuclear region is outlined. (C) Mode of spindle assembly in karyoplasts. Control microsurgery represents the removal of equal volumes of cytoplasm without removal of the centrosome. (D) Centrioles do not reform in the interphase karyoplasts. (Da–Dd) Microsurgery used to remove the centrosome and the KP/CP pair followed by time-lapse microscopy. When the KP was judged to be entering mitosis, the coverslip was removed from the chamber and fixed. (Dd′–Dd″″) The KP fixed just as it entered prophase. There are two distinct MT asters, fixed in the process of separating (arrows). These asters lack centrioles (Dd″, arrows and insets) but have assembled a somewhat diminished PCM (Dd″′, arrows and insets). Note the chromosomes are condensed (Dd″″). (De′–De″″) Control cell in prophase showing separated asters (De′, arrows) containing divided pairs of centrioles (De″, arrows and insets) and robust arrays of PCM (De″′, arrows and insets). The time is indicated as hr:min. The scale bars represent 10 μm. Also see Figure S2. Current Biology 2011 21, 598-605DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.02.049) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Reformation of the aMTOC Following Microsurgery (A) Pericentrin. (Aa–Ac) Karyo/cyto pair 1.5 hr after microsurgery. The control cell entering mitosis in Af is lost following fixation. (Ac′–Ac″′) Same cell immunofluorescence of Ac. The MT network has not reformed, and there is a faint, diffuse cloud of pericentrin adjacent to the nuclear envelope in the KP (Ac″, arrow). The centrosomal focus of pericentrin is in the CP (∗ in Ac″). (Ad–Af″′) After 6 hr, the aMTOC has reformed with a single focus of pericentrin adjacent to the nuclear envelope (Af″, arrow and inset). (B) Cytoplasmic dynein and Golgi apparatus. (Ba–Bc″′) One and a half hours after microsurgery, the centrosome and bulk of the Golgi are found in the CP (arrowheads in Bc′–Bc″). There is little Golgi network in the KP (arrow, Bc′), and the KP lacks a focus of cytoplasmic dynein (arrow in Bc″ and inset). (Bd–Bf″′) After 6.5 hr, there is a radial, perinuclear Golgi array (Bf′, inset) surrounding a single perinuclear focus of cytoplasmic dynein (Bf″, arrow and lower inset). The centrosome is in the CP (Bf″, arrowhead and upper inset). (Ca–Cc″′) Dynactin. After 1.5 hr the centrosomal focus of dynactin is located in the CP (Cc″, arrowhead and upper inset) and is lost from the KP (Cc″, arrow and lower inset). (Cd–Cf″′) After ∼6 hr, the aMTOC reforms in the KP. The centrosome is in the CP (Cf″, arrowhead and upper inset). There is a perinuclear cloud of dynactin (Cf″, arrow and lower inset) coincident with the MT focus in the KP (Cf′, arrow). The time is indicated as hr:min. The scale bars represent 10 μm. Also see Figure S2. Current Biology 2011 21, 598-605DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.02.049) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 aMTOC Reformation in Karyoplasts (A) Karyoplasts divide and contain a postmitotic focus of pericentrin. (Aa–Af) Two KPs proceed through mitosis yielding four daughters. The CP in the top right lyses prior to fixation. (Af′–Af″′) Same-cell immunofluorescence. The four daughter karyoplasts all contain a focus of pericentrin (arrows and insets) comparable to the centrosome in the remaining CP (4Af″, arrow and inset, lower left). (B) KP that undergoes a monopolar division lacks a postmitotic focus of pericentrin. (Ba–Bc) KP and CP pair (outline); the KP enters mitosis and exits as a single daughter (Bb). (Bc′–Bc″′) Same-cell immunofluorescence. The postmitotic KP (outline) has disorganized MTs and lacks a focus of pericentrin (Bc″). The centrosomal pericentrin focus is visible in the CP (arrow) as are the centrosomes in the two adjacent control cells (Bc″, arrowheads). These images were captured with differential interference contrast (DIC) and fluorescence optics. The time is indicated as hr:min. The scale bar represents 10 μm. Also see Figure S3. Current Biology 2011 21, 598-605DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.02.049) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions