Created analysis model

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2.2 STRUCTURAL ELEMENT BEAM
Advertisements

Statically Determinate and Indeterminate System of Bars.
Deflection of Indeterminate Structure Session Matakuliah: S0725 – Analisa Struktur Tahun: 2009.
Structural Mechanics 4 Shear Force, Bending Moment and Deflection of Beams 20 kN RA RB 3.00m 2.00m.
MICE Collaboration Meeting at Frascati, Jun 26~29, 2005 Iron Shield Mounting Design Stephanie Yang.
Introduction – Concept of Stress
Chapter 3: ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE
ME221Lecture #301 ME 221 Statics Lecture #30 Sections 6.6 – 6.7 & Exam 3 Review.
ME221Lecture #291 ME 221 Statics Lecture #29 Sections 6.6 – 6.7.
Structure Analysis I. Lecture 8 Internal Loading Developed in Structural Members Shear & Moment diagram Ch.4 in text book.
Analysis of Basic Load Cases Axial Stress
ENGR 220 Section 13.1~13.2.
PROBLEM-1 State of stress at a point is represented by the element shown. Determine the state of stress at the point on another element orientated 30
LRFD-Steel Design 1.
DESIGN OF TRUSS ROOF Chapter 7
Bending Shear and Moment Diagram, Graphical method to construct shear
Shear Forces & Bending Moments Shear & Moment Diagrams
Trusses WORKSHEET10 to answer just click on the button or image related to the answer.
CHAPTER OBJECTIVES Discuss the behavior of columns.
ERT 348 Controlled Environment Design 1
ME 475 Computer Aided Design of Structures Finite Element Analysis of Trusses – Part 1 Ron Averill Michigan State University.
What is good for small mechanisms is very good for very big ones. Above is the major reciprocating parts of a rally engine. At top right is the force applied.
ERT352 FARM STRUCTURES TRUSS DESIGN
Design of Combined Bending and Compression Members in Steel.
7. APPROXIMATE ANALYSIS OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES
ENT 153 TUTORIAL 1.
1 NEESR Project Meeting 22/02/2008 Modeling of Bridge Piers with Shear-Flexural Interaction and Bridge System Response Prof. Jian Zhang Shi-Yu Xu Prof.
Eng. Tamer Eshtawi First Semester
WORKSHEET 6 TRUSSES. Q1 When would we use a truss? (a) long spans, loads not too heavy (b) when want to save weight (d) when want light appearance (c)
Forging new generations of engineers
A simply supported beam of span 8 m carries two concentrated loads of 32 kN and 48 kN at 3m and 6 m from left support. Calculate the deflection at the.
1 Wardenier “Tubular Structures Course” Examples Hollow Section Trusses Design Procedure.
Preliminary Design & Steel Deck Alternative Presentation
☻ 2.0 Bending of Beams sx 2.1 Revision – Bending Moments
Strength of Materials Malayer University Department of Civil Engineering Taught by: Dr. Ali Reza Bagherieh In The Name of God.
Unit-5. Torsion in Shafts and Buckling of Axially Loaded Columns Lecture Number-3 Mr. M.A.Mohite Mechanical Engineering S.I.T., Lonavala.
BFC (Mechanics of Materials) Chapter 7: Statically Determinate Plane Trusses Shahrul Niza Mokhatar
Beam Design Beams are designed to safely support the design loads.
EC3 VERIFICATION SCIAENG® EC3 VERIFICATION SCIAENG® SPECIAL THANKS TO ALL INVOLVED D. ALVAREZ FEITO J.C. BATISTA LOPES C. BAULT O. BELTRAMELLO A.CATINACCIO.
Results Verification Has the model been correctly implemented?
STIFFNESS MATRIX METHOD
BME 315 – Biomechanics Chapter 4. Mechanical Properties of the Body Professor: Darryl Thelen University of Wisconsin-Madison Fall 2009.
Troop 8 Truss Presentation. What are Trusses? A truss is a type of framework, usually comprising straight struts and ties, which is designed to be stiff.
Tension and Compression in Trusses
Molasses explosion 1919 Boston
Structural Considerations for Trusses
Structural Considerations for Bridges
ERT352 FARM STRUCTURES TRUSS DESIGN
Design of Beams for Flexure
Outline: Introduction: a ) General description of project b) Materials
Structural aspects related to the vacuum vessel of the SHIP Project
shear force and bending moment diagram
Week 2 Experimentation TS Term 2.
Dr. Ali I. Tayeh First Semester
Chapter 1 Stress and Strain.
Deflection: Virtual Work Method; Trusses
Statically Determine of Beams and Frames
Design of Reinforced Concrete
Beams.
TUTORIAL 3.
Structure I Course Code: ARCH 208
Revision.
Statics Course Code: CIVL211 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg
LOAD ANALYSIS OF RIGID FRAMES
Forging new generations of engineers
Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, All Rights Reserved
Reinforced concrete column
Revision.
Transverse Shear Objective:
Presentation transcript:

Created analysis model Validated analysis model Verified analysis model But do you really understand how your structure is behaving???

Sensitivity Analysis

Sensitivity Analysis Investigate the effects of different values for features/parameters. Why? Better understanding of the behaviour of system being modelled. How much is necessary? Depends on how certain you are of the model behaviour.

Reference model results Change 1 feature/ parameter New revised model New results Change a different feature/ parameter New revised model New results Change a different feature/ parameter New revised model New results Change variables one at a time, go back to the reference model after each change.

Consider the parameters most indicative of the model behaviour: Maximum deflection? Maximum bending moment/shear force/axial force? Lowest natural frequency? Compare and report results without dimensions. Use percentage difference +/- % %diff = (value – reference value)/reference value  100 Or ratios For more detail see: http://www.imacleod.com/UsingStructM/Sensitivity-Analysis.pdf

Example The Model Geometry: The model is created in 2D, in the x-y plane. 1.5m 1.3m 1.4m 1.4m 1.4m 1.4m 1.3m 100x100x3.6 SHS – for all top and bottom chord members and vertical members. 100x100x8 EA – for tension diagonals.

Model 1 – pin joints Axial load Displacement

Model 2 – fixed/rigid joints Axial load Bending moment

Model 3 – no bracing Axial load Bending moment

Structural system comparison Comparison of results Max Displacement at node 4 (mm) % difference ratio Max Bending (kNm) % difference Max Axial (kN) compression Reference - Model 1 Pinned truss -0.5920 -   -13.67 Model 2 Fixed truss -0.5840 -1.4% 1.0 -0.1163 -13.52 -1.1% Model 3 Vierendeel, no bracing -6.1200 933.8% 10.5 -2.294 1872.5% -10.62 -22.3% Structural system comparison

Consider truss chord depth v diagonal depth Reference model - Model 1 Pinned truss 100x100x3.6 SHS – for all top and bottom chord members and vertical members. 100x100x8 EA – for tension diagonals.

Model 4 – Equal sections Axial load Displacement 100x100x3.6 SHS – for all top and bottom chord members and vertical members. 100x100x3.6 SHS – for tension diagonals. Axial load Displacement

Model 5 – section d, Chords–Ties 2:1 100x100x3.6 SHS – for all top and bottom chord members and vertical members. 50x50x3.6 SHS – for tension diagonals. Axial load Displacement

Model 6 – section d, Chords–Ties 1:2 100x100x3.6 SHS – for all top and bottom chord members and vertical members. 200x200x5 SHS – for tension diagonals. Axial load Displacement

Truss chord depth v Diagonal depth Comparison of results Max Displacement at node 4 (mm) % difference ratio x Max Axial (kN) compression Reference Model 1 Pinned SHS & EA -0.5920 -   -13.67 Model 4 Equal sections -0.6072 +2.6% 1.02 0% Model 5 d, Chords–Ties 2:1 -0.7572 +27.9% 1.28 Model 6 d, Chords–Ties 1:2 -0.5193 -12.3% 0.88 Truss chord depth v Diagonal depth