28-Nov-18 Benchmarking e-learning in UK Universities: Reflections on University of Leicester’s participation in the HEA-led benchmarking of e-learning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supporting further and higher education Setting the scene Rhona Sharpe Learner Experience Support Project.
Advertisements

PRD Group Maturity Matrix 31/07/08. Maturity Matrix Guidance Notes Aims of the Matrix The Maturity Matrix is a tool aimed to support groups during their.
Year Two Year Three Year One Research methods teaching in the social sciences: An integrated approach to inquiry- based learning.
Specialist leaders of education Briefing session for potential applicants 2013.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
An e-Learning Strategy to promote technology enabled learning i n UCC Teaching & Learning workshop 30 October, 2012.
National ‘virtual’ e-learning advisory and support ‘centre’ Lawrence Hamburg Higher Education Academy HeLF: February 2006, London South Bank.
Higher Education Academy Update Lawrence Hamburg, Assistant Director and Head of e-learning HeLF: Wed 2 April 2008.
Benchmarking as a management tool for continuous improvement in public services u Presentation to Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation u Peter.
Empowering Staff Through Institute Planning (ESTIP) Executive Workshop Institute Name: XXXXXX Presenter: XXXXXX Date: XXXXXX.
The BLU and the HEA/JISC Benchmarking Pilot The Higher Education Academy (HEA)/JISC Benchmarking Exercise The HEA is working with the JISC on a major Benchmarking.
Institutional embedding of e- learning: findings from the Adelie Pathfinder project Alejandro Armellini and Sylvia Jones Beyond Distance Research Alliance.
What is HEA Fellowship? What’s the UK PSF?
1 Marking For Improvement Presented by: Mrs G Duffy, VP & Mrs B Bridges, Curriculum Leader Self Evaluation.
1 Marking for Improvement Presented by: Mrs G Duffy, Vice Principal Self Evaluation.
Continuing Professional Development Tegryn Jones Policy and Planning Officer.
Department of Information & Communications Centre for Excellence in Teaching & Learning Background - Centre for Excellence in Teaching & Learning (CETL)
Strategy Development Update July Council Catherine Dixon Chief Executive.
Specialist leaders of education Briefing session for potential applicants Autumn 2013 An executive agency of the Department for Education.
Diana Laurillard Head, e-Learning Strategy Unit Overview of e-learning: aims and priorities.
Welcome slide. Enhancing learning, teaching and assessment: an overview of national initiatives in the UK Presented by Richard Blackwell, HEFCE Regional.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency How do you know how far you have got? How much you still have to do? Are we nearly there yet? What – Who – When.
Work Package 4 Learning Process for Reflective Policy Making 3rd TECHNICAL AND SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE AND STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING 18 Sept – Thessaloniki.
The Art of the Designer: creating an effective learning experience HEA Conference University of Manchester 4 July 2012 Rebecca Galley and Vilinda Ross.
The Research Excellence Framework: principles and practicalities Stephen Pinfield Thanks to Paul Hubbard and Graeme Rosenberg of HEFCE for providing much.
Internal quality development and assurance in HEIs Seminar on quality assurance in higher education in Armenia Yerevan, 4 June 2007 Karin Riegler Senior.
Public Health Curriculum Review Developing the future public health workforce through high quality training Name: Position: Date:
Opportunities for CPD and Professional Recognition for Learning and Teaching Velda McCune.
Benchmarking Pilot: update HeLF London South Bank University 21 February 2006 Derek Morrison – Associate Head of e-Learning, The Higher Education Academy.
Benchmarking Pilot Workshop 1, 17 March 2006, Leicester1 Benchmarking e-learning: Putting the Pick & Mix approach into action Professor Paul Bacsich Consultant.
Benchmarking Pilot Launch Meeting, 20 January 2006, London1 Benchmarking e-learning: The Pick & Mix approach Professor Paul Bacsich Matic Media Ltd.
Cochrane Agenda and Priority Setting Methods Group (CAPSMG)
Personal Development from a Student Perspective: Introducing and using the NUS Personal Development Benchmarking Tool Kate Little Senior Project Officer.
Queen’s Teaching Awards QUB Teaching Awards Aims of the Briefing Session To raise awareness of the Queen’s Teaching Awards Scheme To encourage colleagues.
CATS Self Review and Planning Tool An Introduction and Overview Alison Poot and Melody West, CATS Project Team (University of Tasmania)
Directorate of Quality Promotion QP_DN Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion The HEQC Audit 23 January 2006.
Preparing to Apply for Taught Degree Awarding Powers: Quality Assurance and Enhancement Dr Nick Holland – Academic Registrar Conservatoire for Dance and.
MODULE 15 – ORGANISATIONAL COMMUNICATION
SCHOOL BASED SELF – EVALUATION
Information, Information, Information The Review of NSS and Unistats
What is HEA Fellowship? What’s the UK PSF?
Queen’s Teaching Awards 2017
Strategic Advisor for Social Work and Social Care Research
IT Governance is …… ‘an integral part of enterprise governance and consists of the leadership and organizational structures and processes that ensure that.
Quality Assurance and Enhancement at The University of Edinburgh
Lisa Dawson – Head of Student Systems Operations
LEARNING REPORT 2016 Disasters and Emergencies Preparedness Programme
Institution-wide Educational Transformation
Welcome slide.
Why apply? To formalise an opportunity to reflect on your L&T practice
School Self-Evaluation 
Loddon Campaspe Integrated Transport Strategy
European Network on teacher Education Policies
“CareerGuide for Schools”
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Loddon Campaspe Integrated Transport Strategy
Embedding equality and diversity in assessment and feedback policy and practice Helen Duncan, Equalities and Diversity Adviser Keith Smyth, Professor.
Style You need to demonstrate knowledge and understanding beyond undergraduate level and should also reach a level of scope and depth beyond that taught.
Promotions to Senior Lecturer Briefing Sessions January 2019
Periodic Review Departmental Review.
Developing a Research Impact Capture System
Prof John O’Halloran Deputy President & Registrar
HEA Fellowship Workshop
ETBI Annual Conference for Principals and Deputy Principals
Steph Kirkham, Development Consultant, sparqs
Indicators&Criteria in External Quality Assessment
NICE has many methods and processes
E-learning benchmarking at Leicester
Professor John O’Halloran Deputy President & Registrar
Presentation transcript:

28-Nov-18 Benchmarking e-learning in UK Universities: Reflections on University of Leicester’s participation in the HEA-led benchmarking of e-learning (2005-06) Jaideep Mukherjee Beyond Distance Research Alliance University of Leicester Presentation to the ALT-C 2006, Herriot Watt University, Edinburgh, 5 Sep 2006 28-Nov-18

The HEA’s rationale for the project: 28-Nov-18 The HEA’s rationale for the project: Through this exercise, the HEA are attempting to understand ‘more about institution’s own, and the sector's, progress in e-learning’; The  exercise had three stated aims: ‘to provide institutions with information to make informed plans for future development’, ‘to allow institutions providing HE to identify their current progress, on embedding e-learning, in relation to similar institutions’, ‘to provide a picture of the sector as a whole in order to identify areas of strategic importance to inform the work of the JISC, the HEA and the Funding Councils’. The exercise was expected to yield quantifiable and qualitative information on how far HEI-s were 'embedding' aspects of e-learning into institutional policy and practice. 28-Nov-18

Univ. of Leicester’s rationale for participation: 28-Nov-18 Univ. of Leicester’s rationale for participation: UoL is an established player in distance learning and e-learning projects; Had already made a strategic commitment to e-learning, which included: Substantial internal consultation and self-reflection; Scan of competitor activity; and Massive increase in VLE use. A senior member of staff at UoL had led the HEFCE benchmarking programme; Had developed and adopted (in 2004-2005) an ‘e-learning strategy’, fully embedded in UoL’s ‘Teaching and learning strategy’ and ‘Distance Learning strategy’ documents; and UoL was keen to assess its position in e-learning among comparable providers (i.e. comparators) 28-Nov-18

The HEA benchmarking e-learning project: 28-Nov-18 The HEA benchmarking e-learning project: Benchmarking project and Pathfinder Programme announced by HEA at ALT-C (5-8 Sept 2005) Expressions of Interest call (Oct – Nov 2005), HEA noted that 56 responses were received; Selection process for Consultants (Oct – Dec 2005), HEA selected 3 Consultants from 23 bids received; 12 pilot institutions selected and notified in Dec 2005; Launch meeting for pilot institutions (20 Jan 2006) University of Leicester (UoL) allocated to Prof. Paul Bachsich’s benchmarking ‘club’, along with the Universities of Chester, Manchester and Staffordshire; Reported back to HEA on (21 Jun 2006) with findings from the Benchmarking exercise, along with other institutions. 28-Nov-18

UoL: Expected outcomes 28-Nov-18 UoL: Expected outcomes Research into e-learning; Measures of equivalence of experience for distance learners and campus-based students; Rewarding and celebration of staff involved in teaching and learning innovation and transformation associated with ICT; Use of the VLE-s and post-VLE tools across all departments. Planning system that considers all relevant market, pedagogies and technology options for new programmes; 28-Nov-18

UoL: Expected outcomes (cont’d) 28-Nov-18 UoL: Expected outcomes (cont’d) Level of knowledge throughout the University of e-learning issues in line with the governance model of a research-led university; Regularly updating e-learning and distance learning costed business plans; Regularly updating market research and competitor analysis reports; Measuring the students’ satisfaction with e-learning; Rating ourselves against the HEFCE ‘Measures of Success’, and Other measures proposed by expert commentators on benchmarking e-learning 28-Nov-18

The actual exercise: Engaging the HEI 28-Nov-18 The actual exercise: Engaging the HEI High-level engagement – e.g. PVC (L&T), key admin directors, service directors; At the coalface – e.g. e-learning experts, DL departments in transition, departmental heads; Structured meetings – via steering groups, individual consultations and access; Scope and time for negotiating on criteria and scoring; Reporting to the HEA– blogs, not reports; Sharing information with ‘club’ members and other HEI-s; Interacting with the consultant Using internal and external (consultant) feedback 28-Nov-18

Methodology: The ‘Pick and Mix’ approach 28-Nov-18 Methodology: The ‘Pick and Mix’ approach According to Prof. Bacsich, this approach: Is focussed purely on e-learning, but could be extended more widely; Draws on several sources and methodologies; Is not linked to any particular style of e-learning (e.g. distance or on-campus or blended); Is oriented to institutions past “a few projects”; Is suitable for desk research as well as “in-depth”; Is suitable for single- and multi-institution studies; N.B. The initial version - developed in early 2005 – has since been strengthened – ‘by literature search, discussion, feedback, presentations’ (See: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/weblogs/benchmarking/?p=99 ) 28-Nov-18

Examples of (core) criteria and scoring: 28-Nov-18 Examples of (core) criteria and scoring: 28-Nov-18

Examples of (supplementary) criteria and scoring: 28-Nov-18 Examples of (supplementary) criteria and scoring: 28-Nov-18

Typical instruments for collecting data: 28-Nov-18 Typical instruments for collecting data: 28-Nov-18

Reporting instruments: 28-Nov-18 Reporting instruments: HEA blogs - http://elearning.heacademy.ac.uk/weblogs/benchmarking/ Gathering and analysing evidence: 28-Nov-18

Benchmarking institutional ‘slices’: 28-Nov-18 Benchmarking institutional ‘slices’: Why benchmark departmental ‘slices’? Early decisions on which departmental ‘slices’ complement the ‘institutional’ benchmarking; At UoL ‘slices’ include: School of Biological Sciences (including Genetics CETL) Management Centre Department of Media and Communication Research Leicester Medical School Key differences when benchmarking against same criteria 28-Nov-18

Recording, analysing and scoring responses: 28-Nov-18 Recording, analysing and scoring responses: Stages of the data collection and analysis process: Briefing at Steering Group meeting, including consultant Negotiating and agreeing criteria and matrices Background information collection and review Interview(s) with key institutional or departmental nominee(s) Further data / document collection Analysis of interview and document data Cross-referencing information and developing the narrative Tentative score allocation Rehearsal meeting Steering Group meeting with consultant to finalise scoring Reporting on scores and process to the HEA and other institutions involved 28-Nov-18

Operational and methodological issues: Some observations 28-Nov-18 Operational and methodological issues: Some observations High-level institutional buy-in essential; Clear institutional aims and objectives required early in the benchmarking process; Issues of institutional confidentiality; Issues of interpreting criteria and scoring; Avoiding ‘self-congratulatory’ responses; Means of intra-institutional feedback. 28-Nov-18

Operational and methodological issues: Some observations (cont’d) 28-Nov-18 Operational and methodological issues: Some observations (cont’d) Means of inter-institutional information sharing… or lack of it thereof … little opportunity yet of learning from excellence in this sector; Addressing student experiences through benchmarking e-learning ‘We don’t do central!’ – One methodology does not fit all UK HEI-s; Means of addressing aspects of e-learning where UoL ‘fell short’ on scores, and UoL’s Pathfinder proposal. 28-Nov-18

28-Nov-18 Postscript: HEA have now invited another 35 UK HEI-s to undertake the benchmarking exercise in their institutions; The same set of (5) approaches are available for these institutions to use; The 12 original benchmarking institutions have now embarked on the ‘pathfinder’ phase of this project. The University of Leicester’s ‘pathfinder’ project is titled ADELIE: Advanced Design for E-Learning - Institutional Embedding. The aim of this project is to build institutional capacity in the areas of designing for e-, m- and blended learning and teaching online with and through student activities 28-Nov-18

Thank you for listening. Questions and comments welcome. 28-Nov-18 Thank you for listening. Questions and comments welcome. For further queries/comments: Jaideep Mukherjee jm118@le.ac.uk Please visit us at: www.le.ac.uk/beyonddistance 28-Nov-18